The United States MSA Boundaries data set contains the boundaries for metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. The data set contains information on location, identification, and size. The database includes metropolitan boundaries within all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The general concept of a metropolitan area (MA) is one of a large population nucleus, together with adjacent communities that have a high degree of economic and social integration with that nucleus. Some MAs are defined around two or more nuclei. Each MA must contain either a place with a minimum population of 50,000 or a U.S. Census Bureau-defined urbanized area and a total MA population of at least 100,000 (75,000 in New England). An MA contains one or more central counties. An MA also may include one or more outlying counties that have close economic and social relationships with the central county. An outlying county must have a specified level of commuting to the central counties and also must meet certain standards regarding metropolitan character, such as population density, urban population, and population growth. In New England, MAs consist of groupings of cities and towns rather than whole counties. The territory, population, and housing units in MAs are referred to as "metropolitan." The metropolitan category is subdivided into "inside central city" and "outside central city." The territory, population, and housing units located outside territory designated "metropolitan" are referred to as "non-metropolitan." The metropolitan and non-metropolitan classification cuts across the other hierarchies; for example, generally there are both urban and rural territory within both metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
County Boundary for Pitt County North Carolina - This dataset only contains one polygon representing the Pitt County boundary. This dataset is maintained in collaboration between Pitt County Tax Administration and Pitt County Management Information Systems. For specific questions regarding the data you may contact the Pitt County MIS department at 252-902-3800 OR contact Pitt County Tax Administration at 252-902-3400.Pitt County is a county located in the U.S. state of North Carolina. As of the 2010 census, the population was 168,148, making it the seventeenth-most populous county in North Carolina. The county seat is Greenville. Pitt County comprises the Greenville, NC Metropolitan Statistical Area. As one of the fastest growing centers in the state, the county has seen a population boom since 1990.
This dataset shows the count of substructures per county in the United States. the count is divided into safety ratings for each county, with values from 0-9. '0' Failed '1' Imminent '2' Critical '3' Serious '4' Poor '5' Fair '6' Satisfactory '7' Good '8' Very good '9' Excellent 'Unk' Unknown 'N' Not applicable Also Dangerous is summation of 0,1,2 and 3. Risky is summation of 4, 5 and 6. Safe is summation of 7, 8 and 9. Data Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.htm
This study explores the variation in ignition probability from different development patterns. This study sought to answer how development influences the spatial IP patterns. Development changes were mapped for eleven years (between 2001 and 2012) and the relationship between development and fire risk was assessed. The study area covered Bastrop and Travis County located in Texas. Bastrop county is home to the most destructive fire in Texas history, while the neighboring Travis County is one of the fastest growing areas in the state. Lateral development was categorized into five categories: infill, radial, isolated, clustered, and linear. Ignition probability maps show a fair sensitivity (0.77-0.78). Using Maximum Entropy, I predict the spatial distribution of ignition probabilities based on several physical and land use characteristics couples with historic ignition locations. Variation in ignition probability was assessed for each category of development using one-way ANOVA’s and post hoc analysis for each time period. Analyses found that outlying development patterns: isolated, clustered, linear, were at higher wildfire risk than infill and radial development. The results suggest that both spatial composition and location influence wildfire ignition. Probability results suggest that fire probabilities fall along a development gradient. Those areas nearest previous urban development have lower probabilities while outlying development patterns in the wildlands have higher probabilities.
This dataset illustrates the largest difference between high and low temperatures and the smallest difference between high and low temperatures in cities with 50,000 people or more. A value of -1 means that the data was not applicable. Also included are the rankings, the inverse ranking to be used for mapping purposes, the popualtion, the name of city and state, and the temperature degree difference. Source City-Data URL http//www.city-data.com/top2/c489.html http//www.city-data.com/top2/c490.html Date Accessed November 13,2007
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) contracted with the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) and Aerial Information Systems (AIS) to produce an alliance-level, vegetation classification and map of Western Riverside County, California. The resulting classification and map products will be used to help establish a monitoring basis for the vegetation and habitats of the Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The plan aims to conserve over 500,000 acres of land out of the 1.26 million acre total. This area is the largest MSHCP ever attempted and is an integral piece of the network of Southern California Habitat Conservation Plans and Natural Community Conservation Planning (Dudek 2001, Dudek 2003). Riverside County is one of the fastest growing counties in California, as well as one of the most biodiverse counties in the United States. A wide array of habitats are found within the non-developed lands in Western Riverside County, including coastal sage scrub, vernal pools, montane coniferous forest, chaparral, foothill woodland, annual grassland, and desert. In the CNPS contract, vegetation resources were assessed quantitatively through field surveys, data analysis, and final vegetation classification. Field survey data were analyzed statistically to come up with a floristically-based classification. Each vegetation type sampled was classified according to the National Vegetation Classification System to the alliance level (and association level if possible). The vegetation alliances were described floristically and environmentally in standard descriptions, and a final key was produced to differentiate among 101 alliances, 169 associations, and 3 unique stands (for final report, see https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18245). In a parallel but separate effort by AIS (as reported in this dataset), vegetation mapping was undertaken through interpretation of ortho-rectified, aerial photographs for vegetation signatures in color infrared (CIR) and in natural color (imagery flown in winter or summer). A detailed map has been produced through the following process: 1) hand-delineation of polygons on base CIR imagery, 2) digitization of polygons, and 3) attribution of the vegetation types and overstory cover values. The map was created in a Geographic Information System (GIS) digital format, as was the database of field surveys. The dataset was produced through an on-screen photo interpretation procedure using three sets of geo-referenced imagery. The data is classified to a floristic classification derived through clustering analysis procedures based on species dominance and significance. The classification is based on the MCV (Manual of California Vegetation) in which 103 alliances and 169 floristic associations have been defined for the study area. Over 3300 full plot and reconnaissance points have been used in helping classify the mapped polygons. Mapped polygons are classified to either an association, alliance or mapping unit which may be an aggregation of associations or alliances. The dataset encompasses the western portions of Riverside County from the county boundary on the west eastward to the summit of the San Jacinto Mountains and Anza valley.
This dataset has been migrated from our Geocommons platform, and lacks a description from the original posting user. This is not a Fortiusone provided dataset. Please keep this in mind, and make of the dataset what you will. Thank you for visiting Finder!
This dataset illustrates the cities with the largest wind speed differences. Also included are the city and state, the population, the speed differnce, the ranking, and the inverse ranking (to be used only for mapping purposes). Source: City-Data URL: http://www.city-data.com/top2/c466.html Date Accessed: November 9, 2007
The NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis developed the GIS data set, County Boundaries with Shoreline, as mapped by the US Geological Survey-Digital Line Graph Program to facilitate planning, siting and impact analysis in the 100 individual counties of North Carolina. This file enables the user to make various county-level determinations when used in conjunction with other data layers. Another coverage contains straight-lined boundaries of the coastal counties without the shoreline. This data was created to assist governmental agencies and others in making resource management decisions through use of a Geographic Information System (GIS). For more information about the data please go to cgia.state.nc.us
This data set illustrates where the youth of the nation reside. Included in the data set are the rankings of city by age and the median age of the city. Source: Census data, Onboard 2006 projection URL: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2007/top25s/youngest.html Date Accessed: October 16, 2007
This dataset reports annual building permits per capita (in 1,000's of persons) by metro area in the U.S. for the years 2000-2006. It was created based on the U.S. Census quartlerly building permit data and Census population estimates by county
This dataset includes unemployment rates for all counties in the lower 48 for the year 2004. I calculated Rates of Change from 2003 and they are also included. The data was extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistic Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)program. (pre-update)
This dataset displays all the hazardous waste sites in the United States and it's Territories as of 5.08. The data comes from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry(ATSDR). The dataset contains information about the site: Site ID Site Name CERCLIS # Address City State County Latitude Longitude Population Region # Congressional Districts Federal Facility National Priorities List Status Ownership Status Classification For more information go to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry(ATSDR)website at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov
This dataset shows the count of Deck structures per county in the United States. the count is divided into safety ratings for each county, with values from 0-9. '0' Failed '1' Imminent '2' Critical '3' Serious '4' Poor '5' Fair '6' Satisfactory '7' Good '8' Very good '9' Excellent 'Unk' Unknown 'N' Not applicable Also Dangerous is summation of 0,1,2 and 3. Risky is summation of 4, 5 and 6. Safe is summation of 7, 8 and 9. Data Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.htm
This is the monthly data for U.S. employment and unemployment by state including some numbers for Puerto Rico. This dataset was accessed on April 7th 2008. The data for February 2008 are preliminary. The data presented are seasonally adjusted although the unadjusted numbers are also available. Unavailable data are represented as -1. The dataset is taken from Tables 3 and 5 from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. It includes the civilian labor force, the unemployed in numbers and percentages, and employment by industry. Data from table 3 "refer to place of residence. Data for Puerto Rico are derived from a monthly household survey similar to the Current Population Survey. Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 08-01, dated November 20, 2007, and are available at http://www.bls.gov/lau/lausmsa.htm. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month". Data from table 5 "are counts of jobs by place of work. Estimates are currently projected from 2007 benchmark levels. Estimates subsequent to the current benchmarks are provisional and will be revised when new information becomes available. Data reflect the conversion to the 2007 version of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) as the basis for the assignment and tabulation of economic data by industry, replacing NAICS 2002. For more details, see http://www.bls.gov/sae/saenaics07.htm.
This dataset displays the Real GDP by metropolitan area for the years 2001-2005. For each of the posted metropolitan areas Millions of chained dollars and the percentage change from the previous year is posted. This data was geocoded according to city and state locations. During the geocoding process 233/363 records from the original dataset were successfully geocoded. The reason for this is that during the process is that the dataset often groups cities together into one metropolitan area, which were unable to be properly coded. This data was collected from the Bureau of Economic analysis at their web page at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_metro/gdp_metro_newsrelease.htm Access Date: October 29, 2007
This dataset displays the annual US import of pork. This is measured in carcass weight by 1000 pound scale. The data is available from 2003 - January of 2008.
This dataset explores the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service Program - Food Stamp Program by recording the average monthly benefit by household for the years 2003-2007 by state. * The following outlying areas receive Nutrition Assistance Grants which provide benefits analogous to the Food Stamp Program: Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas. Annual averages are total benefits divided by total annual household participation. All data are subject to revision.
This dataset explores the USDA summer food service program participation by state for fiscal years 2003-2007. *Average daily attendance is reported for July only, the peak month of national program activity. Unlike participation data in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, average daily attendance is not adjusted for absenteeism. Data are subject to revision.
This dataset was found online at the Association of Religious Data Archives (ARDA) website. http://www.thearda.com/ . This data set shows information on religous groups throughout the United States. All data was uploaded as a polypoint centroids per county in the United States, in shapefile format. This Data set shows the Total congregations, Total Adherents, and Rate of Adherence per 1000 population for All religions in the United States and for the Mainline Religions.
The United States MSA Boundaries data set contains the boundaries for metropolitan statistical areas in the United States. The data set contains information on location, identification, and size. The database includes metropolitan boundaries within all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The general concept of a metropolitan area (MA) is one of a large population nucleus, together with adjacent communities that have a high degree of economic and social integration with that nucleus. Some MAs are defined around two or more nuclei. Each MA must contain either a place with a minimum population of 50,000 or a U.S. Census Bureau-defined urbanized area and a total MA population of at least 100,000 (75,000 in New England). An MA contains one or more central counties. An MA also may include one or more outlying counties that have close economic and social relationships with the central county. An outlying county must have a specified level of commuting to the central counties and also must meet certain standards regarding metropolitan character, such as population density, urban population, and population growth. In New England, MAs consist of groupings of cities and towns rather than whole counties. The territory, population, and housing units in MAs are referred to as "metropolitan." The metropolitan category is subdivided into "inside central city" and "outside central city." The territory, population, and housing units located outside territory designated "metropolitan" are referred to as "non-metropolitan." The metropolitan and non-metropolitan classification cuts across the other hierarchies; for example, generally there are both urban and rural territory within both metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas.