27 datasets found
  1. T

    POPULATION by Country in AFRICA/1000

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Oct 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). POPULATION by Country in AFRICA/1000 [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/population?continent=africa/1000
    Explore at:
    json, csv, excel, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Africa
    Description

    This dataset provides values for POPULATION reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

  2. w

    Afrobarometer Survey 1999-2000, Merged Round 1 Data (12 Countries) -...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Apr 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) (2021). Afrobarometer Survey 1999-2000, Merged Round 1 Data (12 Countries) - Botswana, Ghana, Lesotho, Mali, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/885
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA)
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana)
    Time period covered
    1999 - 2001
    Area covered
    Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Nigeria, Malawi, Namibia, Lesotho, Mali, Ghana
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics.

    The 12 country datasetis a combined dataset for the 12 African countries surveyed during round 1 of the survey, conducted between 1999-2000 (Botswana, Ghana, Lesotho, Mali, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe), plus data from the old Southern African Democracy Barometer, and similar surveys done in West and East Africa.

    Geographic coverage

    The Round 1 Afrobarometer surveys have national coverage for the following countries: Botswana, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    What to do about areas experiencing political unrest? On the one hand we want to include them because they are politically important. On the other hand, we want to avoid stretching out the fieldwork over many months while we wait for the situation to settle down. It was agreed at the 2002 Cape Town Planning Workshop that it is difficult to come up with a general rule that will fit all imaginable circumstances. We will therefore make judgments on a case-by-case basis on whether or not to proceed with fieldwork or to exclude or substitute areas of conflict. National Partners are requested to consult Core Partners on any major delays, exclusions or substitutions of this sort.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found at https://afrobarometer.org/surveys-and-methods/sampling-principles

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Because Afrobarometer Round 1 emerged out of several different survey research efforts, survey instruments were not standardized across all countries, there are a number of features of the questionnaires that should be noted, as follows: • In most cases, the data set only includes those questions/variables that were asked in nine or more countries. Complete Round 1 data sets for each individual country have already been released, and are available from ICPSR or from the Afrobarometer website at www.afrobarometer.org. • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires. • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed. • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  3. Countries in Africa with National Flag Dataset

    • zenodo.org
    Updated Nov 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dr. David Render PhD; Dr. David Render PhD (2023). Countries in Africa with National Flag Dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10138425
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Dr. David Render PhD; Dr. David Render PhD
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Africa
    Description

    In recent years, the African continent has emerged as a hub of growth, progress, and cultural diversity. With 54 recognized sovereign nations, Africa boasts a tapestry of vibrant cultures, breathtaking landscapes, and promising economies. From the vast deserts of the Sahara to the lush rainforests of the Congo Basin, each African nation has a unique story to tell. In this article, we will delve into the diverse and dynamic African nations, shedding light on their rich history, cultural heritage, and economic advancements. Africa, often referred to as the cradle of civilization, is home to some of the oldest human civilizations on Earth. Egypt, with its iconic pyramids and ancient pharaohs, stands as a testament to the continent's remarkable heritage. The Nile River, the lifeblood of ancient Egyptian civilization, continues to be a source of sustenance and culture today. Moving southwards, we encounter nations like Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, and South Africa, known for its vibrant multicultural society. Nigeria, with its rich cultural tapestry, has produced renowned artists, musicians, and authors who have made significant contributions to the global cultural landscape. South Africa, on the other hand, is celebrated for its remarkable post-apartheid transition, vibrant democracy, and impressive economic growth. Venturing into East Africa, we encounter Ethiopia, often referred to as the "cradle of humanity" due to the discovery of the oldest known human remains in the region. Ethiopia showcases a unique blend of ancient traditions and modern development, with its stunning landscapes, diverse wildlife, and rich historical sites attracting visitors from around the world. In West Africa, Ghana stands as a shining example of political stability and economic progress. Known as the "Gateway to Africa," Ghana has made significant strides in areas such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, positioning itself as an attractive investment destination. The continent's southern region features nations like Botswana, known for its commitment to wildlife conservation and sustainable tourism. With its vast national parks and awe-inspiring wildlife, Botswana offers visitors a chance to experience Africa's natural wonders firsthand. As we travel across the continent, it becomes evident that Africa's potential for growth and development is immense. From the technological advancements in countries like Rwanda to the agricultural innovations in Kenya, African nations are harnessing their resources and investing in their future. Furthermore, regional collaborations such as the African Union and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) are fostering deeper economic integration and creating new opportunities for trade and investment across the continent. These initiatives aim to unlock Africa's vast potential and promote sustainable development for the benefit of all African nations and their people. In conclusion, the African continent is a mosaic of nations that captivate with their diverse cultures, breathtaking landscapes, and a shared commitment to progress. From the ancient wonders of Egypt to the vibrant democracies of South Africa and Ghana, African nations are forging their paths towards a prosperous future. As the world focuses its attention on Africa's growth story, it is crucial to recognize and celebrate the achievements and potential of each African nation on the continent.

  4. World Population Live Dataset 2022

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 10, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aman Chauhan (2022). World Population Live Dataset 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/whenamancodes/world-population-live-dataset/code
    Explore at:
    zip(10169 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 10, 2022
    Authors
    Aman Chauhan
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    World
    Description

    The current US Census Bureau world population estimate in June 2019 shows that the current global population is 7,577,130,400 people on earth, which far exceeds the world population of 7.2 billion from 2015. Our own estimate based on UN data shows the world's population surpassing 7.7 billion.

    China is the most populous country in the world with a population exceeding 1.4 billion. It is one of just two countries with a population of more than 1 billion, with India being the second. As of 2018, India has a population of over 1.355 billion people, and its population growth is expected to continue through at least 2050. By the year 2030, the country of India is expected to become the most populous country in the world. This is because India’s population will grow, while China is projected to see a loss in population.

    The next 11 countries that are the most populous in the world each have populations exceeding 100 million. These include the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Russia, Mexico, Japan, Ethiopia, and the Philippines. Of these nations, all are expected to continue to grow except Russia and Japan, which will see their populations drop by 2030 before falling again significantly by 2050.

    Many other nations have populations of at least one million, while there are also countries that have just thousands. The smallest population in the world can be found in Vatican City, where only 801 people reside.

    In 2018, the world’s population growth rate was 1.12%. Every five years since the 1970s, the population growth rate has continued to fall. The world’s population is expected to continue to grow larger but at a much slower pace. By 2030, the population will exceed 8 billion. In 2040, this number will grow to more than 9 billion. In 2055, the number will rise to over 10 billion, and another billion people won’t be added until near the end of the century. The current annual population growth estimates from the United Nations are in the millions - estimating that over 80 million new lives are added each year.

    This population growth will be significantly impacted by nine specific countries which are situated to contribute to the population growth more quickly than other nations. These nations include the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania, and the United States of America. Particularly of interest, India is on track to overtake China's position as the most populous country by the year 2030. Additionally, multiple nations within Africa are expected to double their populations before fertility rates begin to slow entirely.

    Global life expectancy has also improved in recent years, increasing the overall population life expectancy at birth to just over 70 years of age. The projected global life expectancy is only expected to continue to improve - reaching nearly 77 years of age by the year 2050. Significant factors impacting the data on life expectancy include the projections of the ability to reduce AIDS/HIV impact, as well as reducing the rates of infectious and non-communicable diseases.

    Population aging has a massive impact on the ability of the population to maintain what is called a support ratio. One key finding from 2017 is that the majority of the world is going to face considerable growth in the 60 plus age bracket. This will put enormous strain on the younger age groups as the elderly population is becoming so vast without the number of births to maintain a healthy support ratio.

    Although the number given above seems very precise, it is important to remember that it is just an estimate. It simply isn't possible to be sure exactly how many people there are on the earth at any one time, and there are conflicting estimates of the global population in 2016.

    Some, including the UN, believe that a population of 7 billion was reached in October 2011. Others, including the US Census Bureau and World Bank, believe that the total population of the world reached 7 billion in 2012, around March or April.

    ColumnsDescription
    CCA33 Digit Country/Territories Code
    NameName of the Country/Territories
    2022Population of the Country/Territories in the year 2022.
    2020Population of the Country/Territories in the year 2020.
    2015Population of the Country/Territories in the year 2015.
    2010Population of the Country/Territories in the year 2010.
    2000Population of the Country/Territories in the year 2000.
    1990Population of the Country/Territories in the year 1990.
    1980Population of the Country/Territories in the year 1980.
    1970Population of the Country/Territories in the year 1970.
    Area (km²)Area size of the Country/Territories in square kilometer.
    Density (per km²)Population Density per square kilometer.
    Grow...
  5. w

    Afrobarometer Survey 2002-2004, Merged Round 2 Data (16 Countries) -...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 27, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) (2021). Afrobarometer Survey 2002-2004, Merged Round 2 Data (16 Countries) - Botswana, Cabo Verde, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Mali, Mozambique, Malawi, Namibia, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/886
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana)
    Time period covered
    2002 - 2004
    Area covered
    Senegal, Malawi, Namibia, Mali, Mozambique, Botswana, Nigeria, Lesotho, Cabo Verde, Ghana
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer project assesses attitudes and public opinion on democracy, markets, and civil society in several sub-Saharan African.This dataset was compiled from the studies in Round 2 of the Afrobarometer, conducted from 2002-2004 in 16 countries, including Botswana, Cape Verde, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe

    Geographic coverage

    The Round 2 Afrobarometer surveys have national coverage for the following countries: Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Republic of Cabo Verde, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    What to do about areas experiencing political unrest? On the one hand we want to include them because they are politically important. On the other hand, we want to avoid stretching out the fieldwork over many months while we wait for the situation to settle down. It was agreed at the 2002 Cape Town Planning Workshop that it is difficult to come up with a general rule that will fit all imaginable circumstances. We will therefore make judgments on a case-by-case basis on whether or not to proceed with fieldwork or to exclude or substitute areas of conflict. National Partners are requested to consult Core Partners on any major delays, exclusions or substitutions of this sort.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found at https://afrobarometer.org/surveys-and-methods/sampling-principles

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Certain questions in the questionnaires for the Afrobarometer 2 survey addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. Citizens of the 16 countries were asked questions about their economic and social situations, and their opinions were elicited on recent political and economic changes within their country.

  6. Afrobarometer Survey 2021-2023 - Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso...and 36 more

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    Updated May 6, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2025). Afrobarometer Survey 2021-2023 - Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso...and 36 more [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6664
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    University of Cape Town (UCT)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2023
    Area covered
    Benin, Burkina Faso, Angola
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countires and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, and Round 4 (2008) 20 countries.The survey covered 34 countries in Round 5 (2011-2013), 36 countries in Round 6 (2014-2015), 34 countries in Round 7 (2016-2018), and 34 countries in Round 8 (2019-2021). Round 9 covered 39 African countries. The 39 countries covered in Round 9 (2021-2023) are: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Congo-Brazaville, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey has national coverage in the following 39 African countries: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Congo-Brazaville, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Sao Tome & Principe, Seychelles, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Households and individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    Kind of data

    Survey data

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalised settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewers alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found in Section 5 of the Afrobarometer Round 5 Survey Manual

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire for Round 3 addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. The survey instruments were not standardized across all countries and the following features should be noted:

    • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires.

    • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed.

    • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  7. w

    Harmonized Database of Forcibly Displaced Populations and Their Hosts...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Poverty and Equity Global Practice (2023). Harmonized Database of Forcibly Displaced Populations and Their Hosts 2015-2020 - Ecuador, Peru, Niger...and 7 more [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6104
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 15, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Poverty and Equity Global Practice
    Time period covered
    2015 - 2020
    Area covered
    Niger
    Description

    Abstract

    This multi-country harmonized dataset concerning forcibly displaced populations (FDPs) and their host communities was produced by the World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Global Practice. It incorporates representative surveys conducted in 10 countries across five regions that hosted FDPs in the period 2015 to 2020. The goal of this harmonization exercise is to provide researchers and policymakers with a valuable input for comparative analyses of forced displacement across key developing country settings.

    Geographic coverage

    The datasets included in the harmonization effort cover key recent displacement contexts: the Venezuelan influx in Latin America’s Andean states; the Syrian crisis in the Mashreq; the Rohingya displacement in Bangladesh; and forcible displacement in Sub-Saharan Africa (Sahel and East Africa). The harmonization exercise encompasses 10 different surveys. These include nationally representative surveys with a separate representative stratum for displaced populations; sub-national representative surveys covering displaced populations and their host communities; and surveys designed specifically to provide insights on displacement contexts. Most of the surveys were collected between 2015 and 2020.

    Analysis unit

    Household

    Universe

    Forcibly displaced populations and their hosts communities.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Mode of data collection

    Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

  8. Afrobarometer Survey 2022 - South Africa

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Jun 11, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2025). Afrobarometer Survey 2022 - South Africa [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/6751
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    South Africa
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countries and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, Round 4 (2008) 20 countries, Round 5 (2011-2013) 34 countries, Round 6 (2014-2015) 36 countries, Round 7 (2016-2018) 34 countries, and Round 8 (2019-2021). The survey covered 39 countries in Round 9 (2021-2023).

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    Individual

    Universe

    Citizens of South Africa who are 18 years and older

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    South Africa - Sample size: 1,582 - Sample design: Nationally representative, random, clustered, stratified, multi-stage area probability sample - Stratification: Region and urban-rural location - Stages: PSUs (from strata), start points, households, respondents - PSU selection: Probability Proportionate to Population Size (PPPS) - Cluster size: 8 households per PSU - Household selection: Randomly selected start points, followed by walk pattern using 5/10 interval - Respondent selection: Gender quota filled by alternating interviews between men and women; respondents of appropriate gender listed, after which computer randomly selects individual - Weighting: Weighted to account for individual selection probabilities

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The Round 9 questionnaire has been developed by the Questionnaire Committee after reviewing the findings and feedback obtained in previous Rounds, and securing input on preferred new topics from a host of donors, analysts, and users of the data.

    The questionnaire consists of three parts: 1. Part 1 captures the steps for selecting households and respondents, and includes the introduction to the respondent and (pp.1-4). This section should be filled in by the Fieldworker. 2. Part 2 covers the core attitudinal and demographic questions that are asked by the Fieldworker and answered by the Respondent (Q1 – Q100). 3. Part 3 includes contextual questions about the setting and atmosphere of the interview, and collects information on the Fieldworker. This section is completed by the Fieldworker (Q101 – Q123).

    Response rate

    Response rate was 85%.

    Sampling error estimates

    The sample size yields country-level results with a margin of error of +/-2.5 percentage points at a 95% confidence level.

  9. Subjective Well-Being of Africa 2020

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Diondra Stubbs (2021). Subjective Well-Being of Africa 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/diondrakimberly/subjective-wellbeing-of-africa-2020
    Explore at:
    zip(25999 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2021
    Authors
    Diondra Stubbs
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Africa
    Description

    Context

    This project analyzes the 2020 World Happiness Report to draw conclusions about the general well being of Africa. It uses several CSV files consisting of survey responses formed from a Google Form survey, data from the 2020 World Happiness Report and data on countries only in Africa from the 2020 World Happiness Report. The main data set used includes over 150 countries and their happiness scores, freedom to make life choices, social support, healthy life expectancy, regional indicator, perceptions of corruption and generosity. This analysis was done to answer the following data-driven questions: 'Which African country ranked the happiest in 2020?' and 'Which variable predicts or explains Africa's happiness score?'

    This project includes several programs created in R and Python.

    Background

    The Gallup World Poll (GWP) is conducted annually to measure and track public attitudes concerning political, social and economic issues, including controversial and sensitive subjects. Annually, this poll tracks attitudes toward law and order, institutions and infrastructure, jobs, well-being and other topics for approximately 150 countries worldwide. The data gathered from the GWP is used to create an annual World Happiness Report (WHR). The World Happiness Report is conducted to review the science of understanding and measuring the subjective well-being and to use survey measures of life satisfaction to track the quality of lives in over 150 countries.

    At first glance, it seems that world happiness isn't important or maybe it's just an emotional thing. However, several governments have started to look at happiness as a metric to measure success. Happiness Scores or Subjective Well-being (SWB) are national average responses to questions of life evaluation. They are important because they remind policy makers and people in power that happiness is based on social capital, not just financial. Happiness is often considered an essential and useful way to guide public policies and measure their effectiveness. It is also important to note that happiness scores point out the importance of qualitative rather than quantitative. At times, quality is better than quantity.

    Africa is the world's second largest and second most populous continent in the world. It consists of 54 countries meaning that Africa has the most countries. Africa has approximately 30% of the earth's mineral resources and has the largest reserves of precious metals. Africa reserves over 40% of the gold reserves, 60% on cobalt and 90% of platinum. However, Africa unfortunately has the most developmental challenges. It is the world's poorest and most underdeveloped continent. Africa is also almost 100% colonized with the exceptions of Ethiopia and Liberia. Given this information, one can wonder what the SWB or state of happiness is in Africa?

    This site analyzes the 2020 World Happiness Report to draw conclusions to data-drive questions listed later on this page. The focus is specifically on countries in Africa. Even though there are 54 countries in Africa, only 43 participated in the 2020 WHR.

    Content

    The dataset used is generated from the 'World Happiness Report 2020'. This dataset contains the Happiness Score for over 150 countries for the year of 2020. The data gathered from the Gallup World Poll gives a national average of Happiness scores for countries all over the world. It is a annual landmark survey of the state of global happiness.

    This dataset is from the data repository "Kaggle". On Kaggle's dataset page, I searched for Africa Happiness after filtering the search to CSV file type. I wasn't able to find any datasets that could answer my questions that didn't include other countries from different continents. I decided to use a Global Happiness Report to answer the questions I have. The dataset I am using was publish by Micheal Londeen and it was created on March 24, 2020. His main source is the World Happiness Report for 2020.

    Variables

    Happiness score or subjective well-being (variable name ladder ): The survey measure of SWB is from the Feb 28, 2020 release of the Gallup World Poll (GWP) covering years from 2005 to 2019. Unless stated otherwise, it is the national average response to the question of life evaluations. The English wording of the question is “Please imagine a ladder, with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. The top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?” This measure is also referred to as Cantril life ladder, or just life ladder in our analysis.

    Healthy Life Expectancy (HLE). Healthy life expectancies at birth are based on the data extracted from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Health Observatory dat...

  10. A

    Horn of Africa Refugee Database

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • +1more
    csv, tsv, txt, xls
    Updated Dec 8, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UN Humanitarian Data Exchange (2020). Horn of Africa Refugee Database [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/ca/dataset/hoa-refugee-database
    Explore at:
    xls(171520), csv(183103), txt(5023), tsv(183106)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    UN Humanitarian Data Exchange
    Area covered
    Horn of Africa, Africa
    Description

    The HoA Refugee Database, produced by the Humanitarian Information Unit of the U.S. Department of State, is a compilation of the UN High Commission of Refugees (UNHCR) population and demographic data reports for refugee camp populations in the Horn of Africa Region. Dadaab Camp in Kenya and Dollo Ado camp of Ethiopia are the focus; there are seven sites within Dadaab: Dagahaley Camp, Hagadera Camp, Ifo Camp, Ifo 2 East Camp, Ifo 2 West Camp, and Camp Kambioos, and five sites within Dollo Ado: Bokolmanyo Camp, Melkadida Camp, Kobe Camp, Hilaweyn Camp, and Buramino Camp.

    The HoA Refugee Database originated in July of 2011 and the current release is through December 2011. The HoA Refugee Database includes several demographic variables of populations within the refugee camps, including: individual population, household counts, gender, age and nationality. Geographic location, in the form of latitude and longitude coordinates, are provided for each of the camps.

  11. Afrobarometer Survey 2016-2018, Merged Round 7 Data (34 Countries) - Benin,...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Apr 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2021). Afrobarometer Survey 2016-2018, Merged Round 7 Data (34 Countries) - Benin, Burkina Faso, Botswana, Côte d'Ivoire, Cameroon, Cabo Verde, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Gambia, The, Kenya, Liberia, Lesotho, Morocco, Madagas... [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3805
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
    Time period covered
    2016 - 2018
    Area covered
    Cameroon, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Liberia, Lesotho, Morocco, Cabo Verde, Guinea, Ghana
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countries and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, Round 4 (2008) 20 countries, Round 5 (2011-2013) 34 countries, and Round 6 (2014-2015) 36 countries. The survey covered 34 countries in Round 7 (2016-2018).

    Geographic coverage

    The survey has national coverage in the following 34 African countries: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found at https://afrobarometer.org/surveys-and-methods/sampling-principles

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire for Round 7 addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. The survey instruments were not standardized across all countries and the following features should be noted:

    • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires.

    • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed.

    • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  12. Afrobarometer Survey 2019-2021, Merged 34 Country - Africa

    • datafirst.uct.ac.za
    Updated Oct 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2024). Afrobarometer Survey 2019-2021, Merged 34 Country - Africa [Dataset]. http://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/Dataportal/index.php/catalog/991
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    University of Cape Town (UCT)
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    Time period covered
    2019 - 2021
    Area covered
    Africa
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countires and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, and Round 4 (2008) 20 countries.The survey covered 34 countries in Round 5 (2011-2013), 36 countries in Round 6 (2014-2015), and 34 countries in Round 7 (2016-2018). Round 8 covered 34 African countries. The 34 countries covered in Round 8 (2019-2021) are:

    Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey has national coverage in the following 34 African countries: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Households and individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalised settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewers alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found in Section 5 of the Afrobarometer Round 5 Survey Manual

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire for Round 3 addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. The survey instruments were not standardized across all countries and the following features should be noted:

    • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires.

    • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed.

    • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  13. Afrobarometer Survey 2019-2021 - Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso...and 31 more

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michigan State University (MSU) (2025). Afrobarometer Survey 2019-2021 - Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso...and 31 more [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/13060
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 28, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    University of Cape Town (UCT)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    Time period covered
    2019 - 2021
    Area covered
    Benin, Burkina Faso, Angola
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countires and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, and Round 4 (2008) 20 countries.The survey covered 34 countries in Round 5 (2011-2013), 36 countries in Round 6 (2014-2015), and 34 countries in Round 7 (2016-2018). Round 8 covered 34 African countries. The 34 countries covered in Round 8 (2019-2021) are:

    Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey has national coverage in the following 34 African countries: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Households and individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalised settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewers alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found in Section 5 of the Afrobarometer Round 5 Survey Manual

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire for Round 3 addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. The survey instruments were not standardized across all countries and the following features should be noted:

    • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires.

    • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed.

    • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  14. Afrobarometer Survey 2016-2018 - Africa

    • datafirst.uct.ac.za
    Updated Jul 28, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2020). Afrobarometer Survey 2016-2018 - Africa [Dataset]. http://www.datafirst.uct.ac.za/Dataportal/index.php/catalog/808
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 28, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
    Time period covered
    2016 - 2018
    Area covered
    Africa
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countires and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, and Round 4 (2008) 20 countries.The survey covered 34 countries in Round 5 (2011-2013) and 36 countries in Round 6 (2014-2015). The 34 African countries covered in Round 6 (2014-2015) are:

    Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Geographic coverage

    The survey has national coverage in the following 34 African countries: Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, eSwatini, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

    Analysis unit

    Households and individuals

    Universe

    The sample universe for Afrobarometer surveys includes all citizens of voting age within the country. In other words, we exclude anyone who is not a citizen and anyone who has not attained this age (usually 18 years) on the day of the survey. Also excluded are areas determined to be either inaccessible or not relevant to the study, such as those experiencing armed conflict or natural disasters, as well as national parks and game reserves. As a matter of practice, we have also excluded people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories and persons in prisons or nursing homes.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalised settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewers alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Data weights For some national surveys, data are weighted to correct for over or under-sampling or for household size. "Withinwt" should be turned on for all national -level descriptive statistics in countries that contain this weighting variable. It is included as the last variable in the data set, with details described in the codebook. For merged data sets, "Combinwt" should be turned on for cross-national comparisons of descriptive statistics. Note: this weighting variable standardizes each national sample as if it were equal in size.

    Further information on sampling protocols, including full details of the methodologies used for each stage of sample selection, can be found in Section 5 of the Afrobarometer Round 5 Survey Manual

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire for Round 3 addressed country-specific issues, but many of the same questions were asked across surveys. The survey instruments were not standardized across all countries and the following features should be noted:

    • In the seven countries that originally formed the Southern Africa Barometer (SAB) - Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe - a standardized questionnaire was used, so question wording and response categories are the generally the same for all of these countries. The questionnaires in Mali and Tanzania were also essentially identical (in the original English version). Ghana, Uganda and Nigeria each had distinct questionnaires.

    • This merged dataset combines, into a single variable, responses from across these different countries where either identical or very similar questions were used, or where conceptually equivalent questions can be found in at least nine of the different countries. For each variable, the exact question text from each of the countries or groups of countries ("SAB" refers to the Southern Africa Barometer countries) is listed.

    • Response options also varied on some questions, and where applicable, these differences are also noted.

  15. H

    Sub-Saharan Public Hospitals Geo-coded database

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Dec 5, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Snow, Robert William; Okiro, Emelda A.; Ouma, P (2017). Sub-Saharan Public Hospitals Geo-coded database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JTL9VY
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2017
    Authors
    Snow, Robert William; Okiro, Emelda A.; Ouma, P
    Area covered
    Sub-Saharan Africa
    Description

    Timely access to emergency care can significantly reduce mortality. International benchmarks for access to emergency hospital care have been established to guide ambitions for universal health care by 2030. However, there is no complete geo-coded inventory of hospital services in Africa in relation to how populations might access these services. We assembled a geocoded inventory of public hospitals across 48 countries and islands of sub-Saharan Africa from 100 different sources. A cost distance algorithm based on the location of 4908 public hospitals, population distributions and road networks were used to compute the proportion of populations living within a combined walking and motorised travel time of 2 hours to emergency hospital services. We estimate that 286 million (29%) people and 64 million (28%) women of child bearing age are located more than 2 hours from the nearest hospital. Marked differences were observed within and between countries. Only 17 countries reached the international benchmark of more than 80% of their populations living within a 2-hour travel time of the nearest hospital.

  16. Afrobarometer Survey 2020 - Gabon

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Nov 2, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP) (2022). Afrobarometer Survey 2020 - Gabon [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/4746
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 2, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Institute for Justice and Reconciliationhttp://www.ijr.org.za/
    Michigan State University (MSU)
    Institute for Empirical Research in Political Economy (IREEP)
    Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD)
    Institute for Development Studies (IDS)
    University of Cape Town (UCT, South Africa)
    Time period covered
    2020
    Area covered
    Gabon
    Description

    Abstract

    The Afrobarometer is a comparative series of public attitude surveys that assess African citizen's attitudes to democracy and governance, markets, and civil society, among other topics. The surveys have been undertaken at periodic intervals since 1999. The Afrobarometer's coverage has increased over time. Round 1 (1999-2001) initially covered 7 countries and was later extended to 12 countries. Round 2 (2002-2004) surveyed citizens in 16 countries. Round 3 (2005-2006) 18 countries, Round 4 (2008) 20 countries, Round 5 (2011-2013) 34 countries, Round 6 (2014-2015) 36 countries, and Round 7 (2016-2018) 34 countries. The survey covered 34 countries in Round 8 (2019-2021).

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    Individual

    Universe

    Citizens aged 18 years and above excluding those living in institutionalized buildings.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    Afrobarometer uses national probability samples designed to meet the following criteria. Samples are designed to generate a sample that is a representative cross-section of all citizens of voting age in a given country. The goal is to give every adult citizen an equal and known chance of being selected for an interview. They achieve this by:

    • using random selection methods at every stage of sampling; • sampling at all stages with probability proportionate to population size wherever possible to ensure that larger (i.e., more populated) geographic units have a proportionally greater probability of being chosen into the sample.

    The sampling universe normally includes all citizens age 18 and older. As a standard practice, we exclude people living in institutionalized settings, such as students in dormitories, patients in hospitals, and persons in prisons or nursing homes. Occasionally, we must also exclude people living in areas determined to be inaccessible due to conflict or insecurity. Any such exclusion is noted in the technical information report (TIR) that accompanies each data set.

    Sample size and design Samples usually include either 1,200 or 2,400 cases. A randomly selected sample of n=1200 cases allows inferences to national adult populations with a margin of sampling error of no more than +/-2.8% with a confidence level of 95 percent. With a sample size of n=2400, the margin of error decreases to +/-2.0% at 95 percent confidence level.

    The sample design is a clustered, stratified, multi-stage, area probability sample. Specifically, we first stratify the sample according to the main sub-national unit of government (state, province, region, etc.) and by urban or rural location.

    Area stratification reduces the likelihood that distinctive ethnic or language groups are left out of the sample. Afrobarometer occasionally purposely oversamples certain populations that are politically significant within a country to ensure that the size of the sub-sample is large enough to be analysed. Any oversamples is noted in the TIR.

    Sample stages Samples are drawn in either four or five stages:

    Stage 1: In rural areas only, the first stage is to draw secondary sampling units (SSUs). SSUs are not used in urban areas, and in some countries they are not used in rural areas. See the TIR that accompanies each data set for specific details on the sample in any given country. Stage 2: We randomly select primary sampling units (PSU). Stage 3: We then randomly select sampling start points. Stage 4: Interviewers then randomly select households. Stage 5: Within the household, the interviewer randomly selects an individual respondent. Each interviewer alternates in each household between interviewing a man and interviewing a woman to ensure gender balance in the sample.

    To keep the costs and logistics of fieldwork within manageable limits, eight interviews are clustered within each selected PSU.

    Gabon - Sample size: 1,200 - Sampling Frame: Recensement Général de la Population et des Logements (RGPL) de 2013 réalisée par la Direction Générale de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques - Sample design: Representative, random, clustered, stratified, multi-stage area probability sample - Stratification: Province, Department, and urban-rural location - Stages: Primary sampling unit (PSU), start points, households, respondents - PSU selection: Probability Proportionate to Population Size (PPPS) - Cluster size: 8 households per PSU - Household selection: Randomly selected start points, followed by walk pattern using 5/10 interval - Respondent selection: Gender quota to be achieved by alternating interviews between men and women; potential respondents (i.e. household members) of the appropriate gender are listed, then the computer chooses the individual random

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The Round 8 questionnaire has been developed by the Questionnaire Committee after reviewing the findings and feedback obtained in previous Rounds, and securing input on preferred new topics from a host of donors, analysts, and users of the data.

    The questionnaire consists of three parts: 1. Part 1 captures the steps for selecting households and respondents, and includes the introduction to the respondent and (pp.1-4). This section should be filled in by the Fieldworker. 2. Part 2 covers the core attitudinal and demographic questions that are asked by the Fieldworker and answered by the Respondent (Q1 – Q100). 3. Part 3 includes contextual questions about the setting and atmosphere of the interview, and collects information on the Fieldworker. This section is completed by the Fieldworker (Q101 – Q123).

    Response rate

    Outcome rates: - Contact rate: 99% - Cooperation rate: 92% - Refusal rate: 3% - Response rate: 91%

    Sampling error estimates

    +/- 3% at 95% confidence level

  17. Data from: Epidemiology of harmful use of alcohol in Nigeria: a systematic...

    • tandf.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    doc
    Updated Oct 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Davies Adeloye; Adebanke Olawole-Isaac; Asa Auta; Mary T. Dewan; Chiamaka Omoyele; Nnenna Ezeigwe; Wura Jacobs; Rex G. Mpazanje; Michael O. Harhay; Wondimagegnehu Alemu; Isaac F. Adewole (2023). Epidemiology of harmful use of alcohol in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8337407.v2
    Explore at:
    docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Taylor & Francishttps://taylorandfrancis.com/
    Authors
    Davies Adeloye; Adebanke Olawole-Isaac; Asa Auta; Mary T. Dewan; Chiamaka Omoyele; Nnenna Ezeigwe; Wura Jacobs; Rex G. Mpazanje; Michael O. Harhay; Wondimagegnehu Alemu; Isaac F. Adewole
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Nigeria
    Description

    Background: Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, has reported relatively high levels of alcohol misuse, yet limited resources to guide effective population-wide response. There is a need to integrate existing empirical information in order to increase the power and precision of estimating epidemiological evidence necessary for informing policies and developing prevention programs. Objectives: We aimed to estimate nationwide and zonal prevalence of harmful use of alcohol in Nigeria to inform public health policy and planning. Methods: Epidemiologic reports on alcohol use in Nigeria from 1990 through 2018 were systematically searched and abstracted. We employed random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression model to determine the number of harmful alcohol users. Results: 35 studies (n = 37,576 Nigerians) were identified. Pooled crude prevalence of harmful use of alcohol was 34.3% (95% CI: 28.6–40.1); twice as high among men (43.9%, 31.1–56.8) compared to women (23.9%, 16.4–31.4). Harmful alcohol use was higher in rural settings (40.1%, 24.2–56.1) compared to urban settings (31.2%, 22.9–39.6). The number of harmful alcohol users aged ≥15 years increased from 24 to 34 million from 1995 to 2015. However, actual age-adjusted prevalence of harmful use of alcohol in Nigeria decreased from 38.5% to 32.6% over the twenty-year period. Conclusions: While the prevalence of the total population that drinks harmfully appears to be dropping, absolute number of individuals that would be classified as harmful drinkers is increasing. This finding highlights the complexity of identifying and advocating for substance abuse policies in rapidly changing demographic settings common in Africa, Asia, and other developing countries.

  18. i

    Household Demographic Surveillance System, Cause-Specific Mortality...

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Mar 29, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bassirou Bonfoh (2019). Household Demographic Surveillance System, Cause-Specific Mortality 1992-2012 - World [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/study/WLD_1992-2012_INDEPTH_v01_M
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Sanjay Juvekar
    Abba Bhuiya
    Shashi Kant
    Peter Byass
    Nguyen T.K. Chuc
    Alex Ezeh
    Abraham Oduro
    Marcel Tanner
    Bassirou Bonfoh
    Valérie Delaunay
    Nurul Alam
    Abdramane Soura
    Amelia Crampin
    Abraham J. Herbst
    Thomas N. Williams
    P. Kim Streatfield
    Ali Sie
    Wasif A. Khan
    Frank O. Odhiambo
    Berhe Weldearegawi
    Stephen M. Tollman
    Momodou Jasseh
    Margaret Gyapong
    Siswanto Wilopo
    Osman A. Sankoh
    Time period covered
    1992 - 2012
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Abstract

    Cause of death data based on VA interviews were contributed by fourteen INDEPTH HDSS sites in sub-Saharan Africa and eight sites in Asia. The principles of the Network and its constituent population surveillance sites have been described elsewhere [1]. Each HDSS site is committed to long-term longitudinal surveillance of circumscribed populations, typically each covering around 50,000 to 100,000 people. Households are registered and visited regularly by lay field-workers, with a frequency varying from once per year to several times per year. All vital events are registered at each such visit, and any deaths recorded are followed up with verbal autopsy interviews, usually 147 undertaken by specially trained lay interviewers. A few sites were already operational in the 1990s, but in this dataset 95% of the person-time observed related to the period from 2000 onwards, with 58% from 2007 onwards. Two sites, in Nairobi and Ouagadougou, followed urban populations, while the remainder covered areas that were generally more rural in character, although some included local urban centres. Sites covered entire populations, although the Karonga, Malawi, site only contributed VAs for deaths of people aged 12 years and older. Because the sites were not located or designed in a systematic way to be representative of national or regional populations, it is not meaningful to aggregate results over sites.

    All cause of death assignments in this dataset were made using the InterVA-4 model version 4.02 [2]. InterVA-4 uses probabilistic modelling to arrive at likely cause(s) of death for each VA case, the workings of the model being based on a combination of expert medical opinion and relevant available data. InterVA-4 is the only model currently available that processes VA data according to the WHO 2012 standard and categorises causes of death according to ICD-10. Since the VA data reported here were collected before the WHO 2012 standard was formulated, they were all retrospectively transformed into the WHO 2012 and InterVA-4 input format for processing.

    The InterVA-4 model was applied to the data from each site, yielding, for each case, up to three possible causes of death or an indeterminate result. Each cause for a case is a single record in the dataset. In a minority of cases, for example where symptoms were vague, contradictory or mutually inconsistent, it was impossible for InterVA-4 to determine a cause of death, and these deaths were attributed as entirely indeterminate. For the remaining cases, one to three likely causes and their likelihoods were assigned by InterVA-4, and if the sum of their likelihoods was less than one, the residual component was then assigned as being indeterminate. This was an important process for capturing uncertainty in cause of death outcome(s) from the model at the individual level, thus avoiding over-interpretation of specific causes. As a consequence there were three sources of unattributed cause of death: deaths registered for which VAs were not successfully completed; VAs completed but where the cause was entirely indeterminate; and residual components of deaths attributed as indeterminate.

    In this dataset each case has between one and four records, each with its own cause and likelihood. Cases for which VAs were not successfully completed has a single record with the cause of death recorded as “VA not completed” and a likelihood of one. Thus the overall sum of the likelihoods equated to the total number of deaths. Each record also contains a population weighting factor reflecting the ratio of the population fraction for its site, age group, sex and year to the corresponding age group and sex fraction in the standard population (see section on weighting).

    In this context, all of these data are secondary datasets derived from primary data collected separately by each participating site. In all cases the primary data collection was covered by site-level ethical approvals relating to on-going demographic surveillance in those specific locations. No individual identity or household location data are included in this secondary data.

    1. Sankoh O, Byass P. The INDEPTH Network: filling vital gaps in global epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology 2012; 41:579-588.

    2. Byass P, Chandramohan D, Clark SJ, D’Ambruoso L, Fottrell E, Graham WJ, et al. Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool. Global Health Action 2012; 5:19281.

    Geographic coverage

    Demographic surveiallance areas (countries from Africa, Asia and Oceania) of the following HDSSs:

    Code  Country    INDEPTH Centre
    BD011 Bangladesh ICDDR-B : Matlab
    BD012 Bangladesh ICDDR-B : Bandarban
    BD013 Bangladesh ICDDR-B : Chakaria
    BD014 Bangladesh ICDDR-B : AMK BF031 Burkina Faso Nouna BF041 Burkina Faso Ouagadougou
    CI011 Côte d'Ivoire Taabo ET031 Ethiopia Kilite Awlaelo
    GH011 Ghana Navrongo
    GH031 Ghana Dodowa
    GM011 The Gambia Farafenni ID011 Indonesia Purworejo IN011 India Ballabgarh
    IN021 India Vadu
    KE011 Kenya Kilifi
    KE021 Kenya Kisumu
    KE031 Kenya Nairobi
    MW011 Malawi Karonga
    SN011 Senegal IRD : Bandafassi VN012 Vietnam Hanoi Medical University : Filabavi
    ZA011 South Africa Agincourt ZA031 South Africa Africa Centre

    Analysis unit

    Death Cause

    Universe

    Surveillance population Deceased individuals Cause of death

    Kind of data

    Verbal autopsy-based cause of death data

    Frequency of data collection

    Rounds per year varies between sites from once to three times per year

    Sampling procedure

    No sampling, covers total population in demographic surveillance area

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The Verbal Autopsy Questionnaires used by the various sites differed, but in most cases they were a derivation from the original WHO Verbal Autopsy questionnaire.

    http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbalautopsystandards/en/index1.html

    Cleaning operations

    One cause of death record was inserted for every death where a verbal autopsy was not conducted. The cuase of death assigned in these cases is "XX VA not completed"

  19. f

    Data from: Genetic Heterogeneity in Algerian Human Populations

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    Updated Sep 24, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Comas, David; Calafell, Francesc; Bekada, Asmahan; Benhamamouch, Soraya; Deba, Tahria; Arauna, Lara R. (2015). Genetic Heterogeneity in Algerian Human Populations [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001877653
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2015
    Authors
    Comas, David; Calafell, Francesc; Bekada, Asmahan; Benhamamouch, Soraya; Deba, Tahria; Arauna, Lara R.
    Area covered
    Algeria
    Description

    The demographic history of human populations in North Africa has been characterized by complex processes of admixture and isolation that have modeled its current gene pool. Diverse genetic ancestral components with different origins (autochthonous, European, Middle Eastern, and sub-Saharan) and genetic heterogeneity in the region have been described. In this complex genetic landscape, Algeria, the largest country in Africa, has been poorly covered, with most of the studies using a single Algerian sample. In order to evaluate the genetic heterogeneity of Algeria, Y-chromosome, mtDNA and autosomal genome-wide makers have been analyzed in several Berber- and Arab-speaking groups. Our results show that the genetic heterogeneity found in Algeria is not correlated with geography or linguistics, challenging the idea of Berber groups being genetically isolated and Arab groups open to gene flow. In addition, we have found that external sources of gene flow into North Africa have been carried more often by females than males, while the North African autochthonous component is more frequent in paternally transmitted genome regions. Our results highlight the different demographic history revealed by different markers and urge to be cautious when deriving general conclusions from partial genomic information or from single samples as representatives of the total population of a region.

  20. A Systematic Review of Tobacco Smoking Prevalence and Description of Tobacco...

    • figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    doc
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rachel Brathwaite; Juliet Addo; Liam Smeeth; Karen Lock (2023). A Systematic Review of Tobacco Smoking Prevalence and Description of Tobacco Control Strategies in Sub-Saharan African Countries; 2007 to 2014 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132401
    Explore at:
    docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Rachel Brathwaite; Juliet Addo; Liam Smeeth; Karen Lock
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa
    Description

    ObjectiveTo systematically review current smoking prevalence among adults in sub-Saharan Africa from 2007 to May 2014 and to describe the context of tobacco control strategies in these countries.Data SourcesFive databases, Medline, Embase, Africa-wide Information, Cinahl Plus, and Global Health were searched using a systematic search strategy. There were no language restrictions.Study Selection26 included studies measured current smoking prevalence in nationally representative adult populations in sub-Saharan African countries.Data ExtractionStudy details were independently extracted using a standard datasheet. Data on tobacco control policies, taxation and trends in prices were obtained from the Implementation Database of the WHO FCTC website.ResultsStudies represented 13 countries. Current smoking prevalence varied widely ranging from 1.8% in Zambia to 25.8% in Sierra Leone. The prevalence of smoking was consistently lower in women compared to men with the widest gender difference observed in Malawi (men 25.9%, women 2.9%). Rwanda had the highest prevalence of women smokers (12.6%) and Ghana had the lowest (0.2%). Rural, urban patterns were inconsistent. Most countries have implemented demand-reduction measures including bans on advertising, and taxation rates but to different extents.ConclusionSmoking prevalence varied widely across sub-Saharan Africa, even between similar country regions, but was always higher in men. High smoking rates were observed among countries in the eastern and southern regions of Africa, mainly among men in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Zambia and women in Rwanda and rural Zambia. Effective action to reduce smoking across sub-Saharan Africa, particularly targeting population groups at increased risk remains a pressing public health priority.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). POPULATION by Country in AFRICA/1000 [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/population?continent=africa/1000

POPULATION by Country in AFRICA/1000

POPULATION by Country in AFRICA/1000 (2025)

Explore at:
6 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
json, csv, excel, xmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Oct 20, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
TRADING ECONOMICS
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
2025
Area covered
Africa
Description

This dataset provides values for POPULATION reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu