Graph and download economic data for Net Worth Held by the Top 0.1% (99.9th to 100th Wealth Percentiles) (WFRBLTP1246) from Q3 1989 to Q1 2025 about net worth, wealth, percentile, Net, and USA.

Cross-national research on the causes and consequences of income inequality has been hindered by the limitations of existing inequality datasets: greater coverage across countries and over time is available from these sources only at the cost of significantly reduced comparability across observations. The goal of the Standardized World Income Inequality Database (SWIID) is to overcome these limitations. A custom missing-data algorithm was used to standardize the United Nations University's World Income Inequality Database and data from other sources; data collected by the Luxembourg Income Study served as the standard. The SWIID provides comparable Gini indices of gross and net income inequality for 192 countries for as many years as possible from 1960 to the present along with estimates of uncertainty in these statistics. By maximizing comparability for the largest possible sample of countries and years, the SWIID is better suited to broadly cross-national research on income inequality than previously available sources: it offers coverage double that of the next largest income inequality dataset, and its record of comparability is three to eight times better than those of alternate datasets. In any papers or publications that use the SWIID, authors are asked to cite the article of record for the data set and give the version number as follows: Solt, Frederick. 2016. "The Standardized World Income Inequality Database." Social Science Quarterly 97(5):1267-1281. SWIID Version 7.1, August 2018.

The United States is leading the ranking by number of high networth individuals , recording **** million individuals. Following closely behind is China with **** million individuals, while Lesotho is trailing the ranking with * thousand individuals, resulting in a difference of **** million individuals to the ranking leader, the United States. High Net Worth Individuals are here defined as persons with investible assets of at least *********** U.S. dollars in current exchange rate terms.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in more than *** countries and regions worldwide. All input data are sourced from international institutions, national statistical offices, and trade associations. All data has been are processed to generate comparable datasets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

Taiwan Net Worth: HH data was reported at 117,661,272.387 NTD mn in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 113,898,800.801 NTD mn for 2015. Taiwan Net Worth: HH data is updated yearly, averaging 95,038,254.251 NTD mn from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2016, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 117,661,272.387 NTD mn in 2016 and a record low of 76,133,057.586 NTD mn in 2009. Taiwan Net Worth: HH data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Taiwan – Table TW.AB014: Balance Sheet: Households.

United States RW: Change in Balance Sheet Account: Change in Net Worth data was reported at 750.040 USD bn in Jun 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of -13.564 USD bn for Mar 2018. United States RW: Change in Balance Sheet Account: Change in Net Worth data is updated quarterly, averaging -0.233 USD bn from Dec 1951 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 267 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 900.774 USD bn in Sep 2008 and a record low of -418.623 USD bn in Jun 2009. United States RW: Change in Balance Sheet Account: Change in Net Worth data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal Reserve Board. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.AB081: Integrated Macroeconomic Accounts: Rest of the World.

The OECD Income Distribution database (IDD) has been developed to benchmark and monitor countries' performance in the field of income inequality and poverty. It contains a number of standardised indicators based on the central concept of "equivalised household disposable income", i.e. the total income received by the households less the current taxes and transfers they pay, adjusted for household size with an equivalence scale. While household income is only one of the factors shaping people's economic well-being, it is also the one for which comparable data for all OECD countries are most common. Income distribution has a long-standing tradition among household-level statistics, with regular data collections going back to the 1980s (and sometimes earlier) in many OECD countries.

Achieving comparability in this field is a challenge, as national practices differ widely in terms of concepts, measures, and statistical sources. In order to maximise international comparability as well as inter-temporal consistency of data, the IDD data collection and compilation process is based on a common set of statistical conventions (e.g. on income concepts and components). The information obtained by the OECD through a network of national data providers, via a standardized questionnaire, is based on national sources that are deemed to be most representative for each country.

Small changes in estimates between years should be treated with caution as they may not be statistically significant.

Fore more details, please refer to: https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/IDD-Metadata.pdf and https://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm

Graph and download economic data for Gross National Income for Low Income Countries (NYGNPMKTPCDLIC) from 1960 to 2024 about GNI and income.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Earth. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Earth population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Earth, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 380 men and 236 women in the workforce. Among them, 217 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 79 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 8.29% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 34.18% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 23.96% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while none of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Earth median household income by race. You can refer the same here

The World Top Incomes Database provides statistical information on the shares of top income groups for 30 countries. The construction of this database was possible thanks to the research of over thirty contributing authors. There has been a marked revival of interest in the study of the distribution of top incomes using tax data. Beginning with the research by Thomas Piketty of the long-run distribution of top incomes in France, a succession of studies has constructed top income share time series over the long-run for more than twenty countries to date. These projects have generated a large volume of data, which are intended as a research resource for further analysis. In using data from income tax records, these studies use similar sources and methods as the pioneering work by Kuznets for the United States.The findings of recent research are of added interest, since the new data provide estimates covering nearly all of the twentieth century -a length of time series unusual in economics. In contrast to existing international databases, generally restricted to the post-1970 or post-1980 period, the top income data cover a much longer period, which is important because structural changes in income and wealth distributions often span several decades. The data series is fairly homogenous across countries, annual, long-run, and broken down by income source for several cases. Users should be aware also about their limitations. Firstly, the series measure only top income shares and hence are silent on how inequality evolves elsewhere in the distribution. Secondly, the series are largely concerned with gross incomes before tax. Thirdly, the definition of income and the unit of observation (the individual vs. the family) vary across countries making comparability of levels across countries more difficult. Even within a country, there are breaks in comparability that arise because of changes in tax legislation affecting the definition of income, although most studies try to correct for such changes to create homogenous series. Finally and perhaps most important, the series might be biased because of tax avoidance and tax evasion. The first theme of the research programme is the assembly and analysis of historical evidence from fiscal records on the long-run development of economic inequality. “Long run” is a relative term, and here it means evidence dating back before the Second World War, and extending where possible back into the nineteenth century. The time span is determined by the sources used, which are based on taxes on incomes, earnings, wealth and estates. Perspective on current concerns is provided by the past, but also by comparison with other countries. The second theme of the research programme is that of cross-country comparisons. The research is not limited to OECD countries and will draw on evidence globally. In order to understand the drivers of inequality, it is necessary to consider the sources of economic advantage. The third theme is the analysis of the sources of income, considering separately the roles of earned incomes and property income, and examining the historical and comparative evolution of earned and property income, and their joint distribution. The fourth theme is the long-run trend in the distribution of wealth and its transmission through inheritance. Here again there are rich fiscal data on the passing of estates at death. The top income share series are constructed, in most of the cases presented in this database, using tax statistics (China is an exception; for the time being the estimates come from households surveys). The use of tax data is often regarded by economists with considerable disbelief. These doubts are well justified for at least two reasons. The first is that tax data are collected as part of an administrative process, which is not tailored to the scientists' needs, so that the definition of income, income unit, etc., are not necessarily those that we would have chosen. This causes particular difficulties for comparisons across countries, but also for time-series analysis where there have been substantial changes in the tax system, such as the moves to and from the joint taxation of couples. Secondly, it is obvious that those paying tax have a financial incentive to present their affairs in a way that reduces tax liabilities. There is tax avoidance and tax evasion. The rich, in particular, have a strong incentive to understate their taxable incomes. Those with wealth take steps to ensure that the return comes in the form of asset appreciation, typically taxed at lower rates or not at all. Those with high salaries seek to ensure that part of their remuneration comes in forms, such as fringe benefits or stock-options which receive favorable tax treatment. Both groups may make use of tax havens that allow income to be moved beyond the reach of the national tax net. These shortcomings limit what can be said from tax data, but this does not mean that the data are worthless. Like all economic data, they measure with error the 'true' variable in which we are interested. References Atkinson, Anthony B. and Thomas Piketty (2007). Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: A Contrast between Continental European and English-Speaking Countries (Volume 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 585 pp. Atkinson, Anthony B. and Thomas Piketty (2010). Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: A Global Perspective (Volume 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 776 pp. Atkinson, Anthony B., Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez (2011). Top Incomes in the Long Run of History, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), pp. 3-71. Kuznets, Simon (1953). Shares of Upper Income Groups in Income and Savings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 707 pp. Piketty, Thomas (2001). Les Hauts Revenus en France au 20ème siècle. Paris: Grasset, 807 pp. Piketty, Thomas (2003). Income Inequality in France, 1901-1998, Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), pp. 1004-42.

The UNU-WIDER World Income Inequality Database (WIID) collects and stores information on income inequality for developed, developing, and transition countries.

Net secondary income of Viet Nam went down by 0.20% from 13,055,000,000 US dollars in 2023 to 13,029,000,000 US dollars in 2024. Since the 9.16% jump in 2021, net secondary income soared by 26.23% in 2024. Net current transfers are recorded in the balance of payments whenever an economy provides or receives goods, services, income, or financial items without a quid pro quo. All transfers not considered to be capital are current. Data are in current U.S. dollars.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Earth, TX, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 11,168, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 155,486. This indicates that the top earners earn 14 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 256,470, which is 164.95% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 2296.47% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Earth median household income. You can refer the same here

Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current US$) in South Sudan was reported at --1475000000 USD in 2015, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. South Sudan - Net income from abroad - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Black Earth, WI, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 16,027, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 183,651. This indicates that the top earners earn 11 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 250,158, which is 136.21% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 1560.85% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Black Earth median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the mean household income for each of the five quintiles in Blue Earth County, MN, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in mean household income across quintiles, offering valuable insights into income distribution and inequality.

Key observations

• Income disparities: The mean income of the lowest quintile (20% of households with the lowest income) is 16,106, while the mean income for the highest quintile (20% of households with the highest income) is 215,031. This indicates that the top earners earn 13 times compared to the lowest earners.
• *Top 5%: * The mean household income for the wealthiest population (top 5%) is 361,296, which is 168.02% higher compared to the highest quintile, and 2243.24% higher compared to the lowest quintile.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income Levels:

• Lowest Quintile
• Second Quintile
• Third Quintile
• Fourth Quintile
• Highest Quintile
• Top 5 Percent

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Level: This column showcases the income levels (As mentioned above).
• Mean Household Income: Mean household income, in 2023 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific income level.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Blue Earth County median household income. You can refer the same here

Greece GR: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data was reported at 26.200 % in 2015. This records an increase from the previous number of 26.100 % for 2014. Greece GR: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data is updated yearly, averaging 26.000 % from Dec 2003 (Median) to 2015, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26.700 % in 2006 and a record low of 24.600 % in 2003. Greece GR: Income Share Held by Highest 10% data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Greece – Table GR.World Bank.WDI: Poverty. Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles.; ; World Bank, Development Research Group. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/index.htm).; ; The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than one thousand six hundred household surveys across 164 countries in six regions and 25 other high income countries (industrialized economies). While income distribution data are published for all countries with data available, poverty data are published for low- and middle-income countries and countries eligible to receive loans from the World Bank (such as Chile) and recently graduated countries (such as Estonia) only. See PovcalNet (http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/WhatIsNew.aspx) for definitions of geographical regions and industrialized countries.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the median household income in Earth. It can be utilized to understand the trend in median household income and to analyze the income distribution in Earth by household type, size, and across various income brackets.

Content

The dataset will have the following datasets when applicable

Please note: The 2020 1-Year ACS estimates data was not reported by the Census Bureau due to the impact on survey collection and analysis caused by COVID-19. Consequently, median household income data for 2020 is unavailable for large cities (population 65,000 and above).

• Earth, TX Median Household Income Trends (2010-2021, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
• Median Household Income Variation by Family Size in Earth, TX: Comparative analysis across 7 household sizes
• Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in Earth, TX
• Earth, TX households by income brackets: family, non-family, and total, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Interested in deeper insights and visual analysis?

Explore our comprehensive data analysis and visual representations for a deeper understanding of Earth median household income. You can refer the same here

This dataset provides a gridded subnational datasets for Income inequality (Gini coefficient) at admin 1 level Gross national income (GNI) per capita PPP at admin 1 level The datasets are based on reported subnational admin data and spans three decades from 1990 to 2021. The dataset is presented in details in the following publication. Please cite this paper when using data. Chrisendo D, Niva V, Hoffman R, Sayyar SM, Rocha J, Sandström V, Solt F, Kummu M. 2024. Income inequality has increased for over two-thirds of the global population. Preprint. doi: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5548291/v1 Code is available at following repositories: Gini coefficient data creation: https://github.com/mattikummu/subnatGini GNI per capita data creation: https://github.com/mattikummu/subnatGNI analyses for the article: https://github.com/mattikummu/gini_gni_analyses The following data is given (formats in brackets) Income inequality (Gini coefficient) at admin 0 level (national) (GeoTIFF, gpkg, csv) Income inequality (Gini coefficient) at admin 1 level (subnational) (GeoTIFF, gpkg, csv) Gross national income (GNI) per capita PPP at admin 0 level (national) (GeoTIFF, gpkg, csv) Gross national income (GNI) per capita PPP at admin 1 level (subnational) (GeoTIFF, gpkg, csv) Slope for Gini coefficient at admin 1 level (GeoTIFF; slope is given also in gpk and csv files) Slope for GNI per capita at admin 1 level (GeoTIFF; slope is given also in gpk and csv files) Input data for the script that was used to generate the Gini coefficient (input_data_gini.zip) Input data for the script that was used to generate the GNI per capita PPP (input_data_GNI.zip) Files are named as followsFormat: raster data (GeoTIFF) starts with rast_*, polygon data (gpkg) with polyg_*, and tabulated with tabulated_*. Admin levels: adm0 for admin 0 level, adm1 for admin 1 levelProduct type: _gini_disp_ for gini coefficient based on disposable income _gni_perCapita_ for GNI per capita PPP Metadata Grids Resolution: 5 arc-min (0.083333333 degrees) Spatial extent: Lon: -180, 180; -90, 90 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax) Coordinate ref system: EPSG:4326 - WGS 84 Format: Multiband geotiff; one band for each year over 1990-2021 Unit: no unit for Gini coefficient and PPP USD in 2017 international dollars for GNI per capita Geospatial polygon (gpkg) files: Spatial extent: -180, 180; -90, 83.67 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax) Temporal extent: annual over 1990-2021 Coordinate ref system: EPSG:4326 - WGS 84 Format: gkpk Unit: no unit for Gini coefficient and PPP USD in 2017 international dollars for GNI per capita

Lucror Analytics: Fundamental Fixed Income Data and Financial Models for High-Yield Bond Issuers

At Lucror Analytics, we deliver expertly curated data solutions focused on corporate credit and high-yield bond issuers across Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Our data offerings integrate comprehensive fundamental analysis, financial models, and analyst-adjusted insights tailored to support professionals in the credit and fixed-income sectors. Covering 400+ bond issuers, our datasets provide a high level of granularity, empowering asset managers, institutional investors, and financial analysts to make informed decisions with confidence.

By combining proprietary financial models with expert analysis, we ensure our Fixed Income Data is actionable, precise, and relevant. Whether you're conducting credit risk assessments, building portfolios, or identifying investment opportunities, Lucror Analytics offers the tools you need to navigate the complexities of high-yield markets.

What Makes Lucror’s Fixed Income Data Unique?

Comprehensive Fundamental Analysis Our datasets focus on issuer-level credit data for complex high-yield bond issuers. Through rigorous fundamental analysis, we provide deep insights into financial performance, credit quality, and key operational metrics. This approach equips users with the critical information needed to assess risk and uncover opportunities in volatile markets.

Analyst-Adjusted Insights Our data isn’t just raw numbers—it’s refined through the expertise of seasoned credit analysts with 14 years average fixed income experience. Each dataset is carefully reviewed and adjusted to reflect real-world conditions, providing clients with actionable intelligence that goes beyond automated outputs.

Focus on High-Yield Markets Lucror’s specialization in high-yield markets across Europe, Asia, and Latin America allows us to offer a targeted and detailed dataset. This focus ensures that our clients gain unparalleled insights into some of the most dynamic and complex credit markets globally.

How Is the Data Sourced? Lucror Analytics employs a robust and transparent methodology to source, refine, and deliver high-quality data:

• Public Sources: Includes issuer filings, bond prospectuses, financial reports, and market data.
• Proprietary Analysis: Leveraging proprietary models, our team enriches raw data to provide actionable insights.
• Expert Review: Data is validated and adjusted by experienced analysts to ensure accuracy and relevance.
• Regular Updates: Models are continuously updated to reflect market movements, regulatory changes, and issuer-specific developments.

This rigorous process ensures that our data is both reliable and actionable, enabling clients to base their decisions on solid foundations.

Primary Use Cases 1. Fundamental Research Institutional investors and analysts rely on our data to conduct deep-dive research into specific issuers and sectors. The combination of raw data, adjusted insights, and financial models provides a comprehensive foundation for decision-making.

1. Credit Risk Assessment Lucror’s financial models provide detailed credit risk evaluations, enabling investors to identify potential vulnerabilities and mitigate exposure. Analyst-adjusted insights offer a nuanced understanding of creditworthiness, making it easier to distinguish between similar issuers.

2. Portfolio Management Lucror’s datasets support the development of diversified, high-performing portfolios. By combining issuer-level data with robust financial models, asset managers can balance risk and return while staying aligned with investment mandates.

3. Strategic Decision-Making From assessing market trends to evaluating individual issuers, Lucror’s data empowers organizations to make informed, strategic decisions. The regional focus on Europe, Asia, and Latin America offers unique insights into high-growth and high-risk markets.

Key Features of Lucror’s Data - 400+ High-Yield Bond Issuers: Coverage across Europe, Asia, and Latin America ensures relevance in key regions. - Proprietary Financial Models: Created by one of the best independent analyst teams on the street. - Analyst-Adjusted Data: Insights refined by experts to reflect off-balance sheet items and idiosyncrasies. - Customizable Delivery: Data is provided in formats and frequencies tailored to the needs of individual clients.

Why Choose Lucror Analytics? Lucror Analytics and independent provider free from conflicts of interest. We are committed to delivering high-quality financial models for credit and fixed-income professionals. Our proprietary approach combines proprietary models with expert insights, ensuring accuracy, relevance, and utility.

By partnering with Lucror Analytics, you can: - Safe costs and create internal efficiencies by outsourcing a highly involved and time-consuming processes, including financial analysis and modelling. - Enhance your credit risk ...

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Black Earth. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Black Earth population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Black Earth, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 677 men and 591 women in the workforce. Among them, 290 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 233 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 5.52% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 3.86% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 15.86% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 13.30% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Black Earth median household income by race. You can refer the same here