APISCRAPY's AI & ML training data is meticulously curated and labelled to ensure the best quality. Our training data comes from a variety of areas, including healthcare and banking, as well as e-commerce and natural language processing.

Sure! I'd be happy to provide you with an introduction to machine learning basics for beginners. Machine learning is a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI) that focuses on enabling computers to learn and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. Here are some key concepts and terms to help you get started:

1. Supervised Learning: In supervised learning, the machine learning algorithm learns from labeled training data. The training data consists of input examples and their corresponding correct output or target values. The algorithm learns to generalize from this data and make predictions or classify new, unseen examples.

2. Unsupervised Learning: Unsupervised learning involves learning patterns and relationships from unlabeled data. Unlike supervised learning, there are no target values provided. Instead, the algorithm aims to discover inherent structures or clusters in the data.

3. Training Data and Test Data: Machine learning models require a dataset to learn from. The dataset is typically split into two parts: the training data and the test data. The model learns from the training data, and the test data is used to evaluate its performance and generalization ability.

4. Features and Labels: In supervised learning, the input examples are often represented by features or attributes. For example, in a spam email classification task, features might include the presence of certain keywords or the length of the email. The corresponding output or target values are called labels, indicating the class or category to which the example belongs (e.g., spam or not spam).

5. Model Evaluation Metrics: To assess the performance of a machine learning model, various evaluation metrics are used. Common metrics include accuracy (the proportion of correctly predicted examples), precision (the proportion of true positives among all positive predictions), recall (the proportion of true positives predicted correctly), and F1 score (a combination of precision and recall).

6. Overfitting and Underfitting: Overfitting occurs when a model becomes too complex and learns to memorize the training data instead of generalizing well to unseen examples. On the other hand, underfitting happens when a model is too simple and fails to capture the underlying patterns in the data. Balancing the complexity of the model is crucial to achieve good generalization.

7. Feature Engineering: Feature engineering involves selecting or creating relevant features that can help improve the performance of a machine learning model. It often requires domain knowledge and creativity to transform raw data into a suitable representation that captures the important information.

8. Bias and Variance Trade-off: The bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept in machine learning. Bias refers to the errors introduced by the model's assumptions and simplifications, while variance refers to the model's sensitivity to small fluctuations in the training data. Reducing bias may increase variance and vice versa. Finding the right balance is important for building a well-performing model.

9. Supervised Learning Algorithms: There are various supervised learning algorithms, including linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, support vector machines (SVM), and neural networks. Each algorithm has its own strengths, weaknesses, and specific use cases.

10. Unsupervised Learning Algorithms: Unsupervised learning algorithms include clustering algorithms like k-means clustering and hierarchical clustering, dimensionality reduction techniques like principal component analysis (PCA) and t-SNE, and anomaly detection algorithms, among others.

These concepts provide a starting point for understanding the basics of machine learning. As you delve deeper, you can explore more advanced topics such as deep learning, reinforcement learning, and natural language processing. Remember to practice hands-on with real-world datasets to gain practical experience and further refine your skills.

As of 2024, customer data was the leading source of information used to train artificial intelligence (AI) models in South Korea, with nearly ** percent of surveyed companies answering that way. About ** percent responded to use public sector support initiatives.

This dataset features over 80,000 high-quality images of construction sites sourced from photographers worldwide. Built to support AI and machine learning applications, it delivers richly annotated and visually diverse imagery capturing real-world construction environments, machinery, and processes.

Key Features: 1. Comprehensive Metadata: the dataset includes full EXIF data such as aperture, ISO, shutter speed, and focal length. Each image is annotated with construction phase, equipment types, safety indicators, and human activity context—making it ideal for object detection, site monitoring, and workflow analysis. Popularity metrics based on performance on our proprietary platform are also included.

1. Unique Sourcing Capabilities: images are collected through a proprietary gamified platform, with competitions focused on industrial, construction, and labor themes. Custom datasets can be generated within 72 hours to target specific scenarios, such as building types, stages (excavation, framing, finishing), regions, or safety compliance visuals.

2. Global Diversity: sourced from contributors in over 100 countries, the dataset reflects a wide range of construction practices, materials, climates, and regulatory environments. It includes residential, commercial, industrial, and infrastructure projects from both urban and rural areas.

3. High-Quality Imagery: includes a mix of wide-angle site overviews, close-ups of tools and equipment, drone shots, and candid human activity. Resolution varies from standard to ultra-high-definition, supporting both macro and contextual analysis.

4. Popularity Scores: each image is assigned a popularity score based on its performance in GuruShots competitions. These scores provide insight into visual clarity, engagement value, and human interest—useful for safety-focused or user-facing AI models.

5. AI-Ready Design: this dataset is structured for training models in real-time object detection (e.g., helmets, machinery), construction progress tracking, material identification, and safety compliance. It’s compatible with standard ML frameworks used in construction tech.

6. Licensing & Compliance: fully compliant with privacy, labor, and workplace imagery regulations. Licensing is transparent and ready for commercial or research deployment.

Use Cases: 1. Training AI for safety compliance monitoring and PPE detection. 2. Powering progress tracking and material usage analysis tools. 3. Supporting site mapping, autonomous machinery, and smart construction platforms. 4. Enhancing augmented reality overlays and digital twin models for construction planning.

This dataset provides a comprehensive, real-world foundation for AI innovation in construction technology, safety, and operational efficiency. Custom datasets are available on request. Contact us to learn more!

The AI Training Dataset market is booming, projected to reach $69 billion by 2033 with a CAGR exceeding 20%! This comprehensive analysis explores market drivers, trends, restraints, and key players like Google and Amazon, covering applications from healthcare to autonomous vehicles. Discover the latest insights and regional market share data.

Bats play crucial ecological roles and provide valuable ecosystem services, yet many populations face serious threats from various ecological disturbances. The North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat) aims to assess status and trends of bat populations while developing innovative and community-driven conservation solutions using its unique data and technology infrastructure. To support scalability and transparency in the NABat acoustic data pipeline, we developed a fully-automated machine-learning algorithm. This dataset includes audio files of bat echolocation calls that were considered to develop V1.0 of the NABat machine-learning algorithm, however the test set (i.e., holdout dataset) has been excluded from this release. These recordings were collected by various bat monitoring partners across North America using ultrasonic acoustic recorders for stationary acoustic and mobile acoustic surveys. For more information on how these surveys may be conducted, see Chapters 4 and 5 of “A Plan for the North American Bat Monitoring Program” (https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-208). These data were then post-processed by bat monitoring partners to remove noise files (or those that do not contain recognizable bat calls) and apply a species label to each file. There is undoubtedly variation in the steps that monitoring partners take to apply a species label, but the steps documented in “A Guide to Processing Bat Acoustic Data for the North American Bat Monitoring Program” (https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181068) include first processing with an automated classifier and then manually reviewing to confirm or downgrade the suggested species label. Once a manual ID label was applied, audio files of bat acoustic recordings were submitted to the NABat database in Waveform Audio File format. From these available files in the NABat database, we considered files from 35 classes (34 species and a noise class). Files for 4 species were excluded due to low sample size (Corynorhinus rafinesquii, N=3; Eumops floridanus, N =3; Lasiurus xanthinus, N = 4; Nyctinomops femorosaccus, N =11). From this pool, files were randomly selected until files for each species/grid cell combination were exhausted or the number of recordings reach 1250. The dataset was then randomly split into training, validation, and test sets (i.e., holdout dataset). This data release includes all files considered for training and validation, including files that had been excluded from model development and testing due to low sample size for a given species or because the threshold for species/grid cell combinations had been met. The test set (i.e., holdout dataset) is not included. Audio files are grouped by species, as indicated by the four-letter species code in the name of each folder. Definitions for each four-letter code, including Family, Genus, Species, and Common name, are also included as a dataset in this release.

Utilize our machine learning datasets to develop and validate your models. Our datasets are designed to support a variety of machine learning applications, from image recognition to natural language processing and recommendation systems. You can access a comprehensive dataset or tailor a subset to fit your specific requirements, using data from a combination of various sources and websites, including custom ones. Popular use cases include model training and validation, where the dataset can be used to ensure robust performance across different applications. Additionally, the dataset helps in algorithm benchmarking by providing extensive data to test and compare various machine learning algorithms, identifying the most effective ones for tasks such as fraud detection, sentiment analysis, and predictive maintenance. Furthermore, it supports feature engineering by allowing you to uncover significant data attributes, enhancing the predictive accuracy of your machine learning models for applications like customer segmentation, personalized marketing, and financial forecasting.

This is a test collection for passage and document retrieval, produced in the TREC 2023 Deep Learning track. The Deep Learning Track studies information retrieval in a large training data regime. This is the case where the number of training queries with at least one positive label is at least in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands or more. This corresponds to real-world scenarios such as training based on click logs and training based on labels from shallow pools (such as the pooling in the TREC Million Query Track or the evaluation of search engines based on early precision).Certain machine learning based methods, such as methods based on deep learning are known to require very large datasets for training. Lack of such large scale datasets has been a limitation for developing such methods for common information retrieval tasks, such as document ranking. The Deep Learning Track organized in the previous years aimed at providing large scale datasets to TREC, and create a focused research effort with a rigorous blind evaluation of ranker for the passage ranking and document ranking tasks.Similar to the previous years, one of the main goals of the track in 2022 is to study what methods work best when a large amount of training data is available. For example, do the same methods that work on small data also work on large data? How much do methods improve when given more training data? What external data and models can be brought in to bear in this scenario, and how useful is it to combine full supervision with other forms of supervision?The collection contains 12 million web pages, 138 million passages from those web pages, search queries, and relevance judgments for the queries.

The global Artificial Intelligence (AI) Training Dataset market is projected to reach $1605.2 million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 9.4% from 2025 to 2033. The surge in demand for AI training datasets is driven by the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning technologies in various industries such as healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing. Moreover, the growing need for reliable and high-quality data for training AI models is further fueling the market growth. Key market trends include the increasing adoption of cloud-based AI training datasets, the emergence of synthetic data generation, and the growing focus on data privacy and security. The market is segmented by type (image classification dataset, voice recognition dataset, natural language processing dataset, object detection dataset, and others) and application (smart campus, smart medical, autopilot, smart home, and others). North America is the largest regional market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. Key companies operating in the market include Appen, Speechocean, TELUS International, Summa Linguae Technologies, and Scale AI. Artificial Intelligence (AI) training datasets are critical for developing and deploying AI models. These datasets provide the data that AI models need to learn, and the quality of the data directly impacts the performance of the model. The AI training dataset market landscape is complex, with many different providers offering datasets for a variety of applications. The market is also rapidly evolving, as new technologies and techniques are developed for collecting, labeling, and managing AI training data.

Advances in neuroimaging, genomic, motion tracking, eye-tracking and many other technology-based data collection methods have led to a torrent of high dimensional datasets, which commonly have a small number of samples because of the intrinsic high cost of data collection involving human participants. High dimensional data with a small number of samples is of critical importance for identifying biomarkers and conducting feasibility and pilot work, however it can lead to biased machine learning (ML) performance estimates. Our review of studies which have applied ML to predict autistic from non-autistic individuals showed that small sample size is associated with higher reported classification accuracy. Thus, we have investigated whether this bias could be caused by the use of validation methods which do not sufficiently control overfitting. Our simulations show that K-fold Cross-Validation (CV) produces strongly biased performance estimates with small sample sizes, and the bias is still evident with sample size of 1000. Nested CV and train/test split approaches produce robust and unbiased performance estimates regardless of sample size. We also show that feature selection if performed on pooled training and testing data is contributing to bias considerably more than parameter tuning. In addition, the contribution to bias by data dimensionality, hyper-parameter space and number of CV folds was explored, and validation methods were compared with discriminable data. The results suggest how to design robust testing methodologies when working with small datasets and how to interpret the results of other studies based on what validation method was used.

The training samples of the entire year (from yr-2 of simulation) are compressed in SPCAM_ML_Han_et_al_0.tar.gz, and testing samples of the entire year (from yr-3 of simulation) are compressed in SPCAM_ML_Han_et_al_1.tar.gz. In each dataset, there are a data documentation file and 365 netCDF data files (one file for each day) that are marked by its date. The variable fields contain temperature and moisture tendencies and cloud water and cloud ice from the CRM, and vertical profiles of temperature and moisture and large-scale temperature and moisture tendencies from the dynamic core of SPCAM’s host model CAM5 and PBL diffusion. In addition, we include surface sensible and latent heat fluxes. For more details, please read the data documentation inside the tar.gz files.

This dataset supports the implementation described in the manuscript "Breaking the Barrier of Human-Annotated Training Data for Machine-Learning-Aided Biological Research Using Aerial Imagery." It comprises UAV aerial imagery used to execute the code available at https://github.com/pixelvar79/GAN-Flowering-Detection-paper. For detailed information on dataset usage and instructions for implementing the code to reproduce the study, please refer to the GitHub repository.

The booming AI training data market is projected for explosive growth, reaching significant value by 2033. Learn about key market drivers, trends, restraints, and leading companies shaping this rapidly expanding sector. Explore regional breakdowns and application segments in this comprehensive market analysis.

Objective: Biomechanical Machine Learning (ML) models, particularly deep-learning models, demonstrate the best performance when trained using extensive datasets. However, biomechanical data are frequently limited due to diverse challenges. Effective methods for augmenting data in developing ML models, specifically in the human posture domain, are scarce. Therefore, this study explored the feasibility of leveraging generative artificial intelligence (AI) to produce realistic synthetic posture data by utilizing three-dimensional posture data.Methods: Data were collected from 338 subjects through surface topography. A Variational Autoencoder (VAE) architecture was employed to generate and evaluate synthetic posture data, examining its distinguishability from real data by domain experts, ML classifiers, and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). The benefits of incorporating augmented posture data into the learning process were exemplified by a deep autoencoder (AE) for automated feature representation.Results: Our findings highlight the challenge of differentiating synthetic data from real data for both experts and ML classifiers, underscoring the quality of synthetic data. This observation was also confirmed by SPM. By integrating synthetic data into AE training, the reconstruction error can be reduced compared to using only real data samples. Moreover, this study demonstrates the potential for reduced latent dimensions, while maintaining a reconstruction accuracy comparable to AEs trained exclusively on real data samples.Conclusion: This study emphasizes the prospects of harnessing generative AI to enhance ML tasks in the biomechanics domain.

Round 1 Training Dataset The data being generated and disseminated is the training data used to construct trojan detection software solutions. This data, generated at NIST, consists of human level AIs trained to perform a variety of tasks (image classification, natural language processing, etc.). A known percentage of these trained AI models have been poisoned with a known trigger which induces incorrect behavior. This data will be used to develop software solutions for detecting which trained AI models have been poisoned via embedded triggers. This dataset consists of 1000 trained, human level, image classification AI models using the following architectures (Inception-v3, DenseNet-121, and ResNet50). The models were trained on synthetically created image data of non-real traffic signs superimposed on road background scenes. Half (50%) of the models have been poisoned with an embedded trigger which causes misclassification of the images when the trigger is present. Errata: This dataset had a software bug in the trigger embedding code that caused 4 models trained for this dataset to have a ground truth value of 'poisoned' but which did not contain any triggers embedded. These models should not be used. Models Without a Trigger Embedded: id-00000184 id-00000599 id-00000858 id-00001088 Google Drive Mirror: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uwVt3UCRL2fCX9Xvi2tLoz_z-DwbU6Ce

This dataset contains data used to train the models.

1. Overview This dataset is a collection of 30,000+ images of Face ID + 106 key points facial landmark that are ready to use for optimizing the accuracy of computer vision models. Images in the dataset includes People image with specific requirements as follow:
2. Age: above 20
3. Race: various

4. Angle: no more than 90 degree All of the contents is sourced from PIXTA's stock library of 100M+ Asian-featured images and videos.

5. Annotated Imagery Data of Face ID + 106 key points facial landmark This dataset contains 30,000+ images of Face ID + 106 key points facial landmark. The dataset has been annotated in - face bounding box, Attribute of race, gender, age, skin tone and 106 keypoints facial landmark. Each data set is supported by both AI and human review process to ensure labelling consistency and accuracy.

6. About PIXTA PIXTASTOCK is the largest Asian-featured stock platform providing data, contents, tools and services since 2005. PIXTA experiences 15 years of integrating advanced AI technology in managing, curating, processing over 100M visual materials and serving global leading brands for their creative and data demands.

The dataset contains 541,677 images of 185 butterfly and moth species that were recorded by citizen scientists in Austria with the application "Schmetterlinge Österreichs" of the foundation Blühendes Österreich (https://www.schmetterlingsapp.at/) between 2016 and 2023. Each image is identified on species level (with the exception of four species pairs). Correct identification was confirmed by an experienced entomologist. The images are organized in indiviudal .zip files for each species. The file pytorch_model.bin contains the weights of a MaxVit-t model (Tu et al., 2022) that was trained on species identification with the dataset. The file scripts_model_training.zip contains the scripts which was used for model training and testing on the EuroHPC supercomputer LUMI hosted by CSC (Finland) and the LUMI consortium. The file images_per_species.csv contains a list with the species in the dataset and the number of images of each species.More information on the dataset and model training are available in:Barkmann, F., Lindner, A., Würflinger, R., Höttinger, H., Rüdisser, J., 2025. Machine learning training data: over 500,000 images of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) with species labels. Sci Data 12(1), 1369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05708-z

Synthetic Training Data Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global synthetic training data market size in 2024 is valued at USD 1.45 billion, demonstrating robust momentum as organizations increasingly adopt artificial intelligence and machine learning solutions. The market is projected to grow at a remarkable CAGR of 38.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated USD 22.46 billion by 2033. This exponential growth is primarily driven by the rising demand for high-quality, diverse, and privacy-compliant datasets that fuel advanced AI models, as well as the escalating need for scalable data solutions across various industries.

One of the primary growth factors propelling the synthetic training data market is the escalating complexity and diversity of AI and machine learning applications. As organizations strive to develop more accurate and robust AI models, the need for vast amounts of annotated and high-quality training data has surged. Traditional data collection methods are often hampered by privacy concerns, high costs, and time-consuming processes. Synthetic training data, generated through advanced algorithms and simulation tools, offers a compelling alternative by providing scalable, customizable, and bias-mitigated datasets. This enables organizations to accelerate model development, improve performance, and comply with evolving data privacy regulations such as GDPR and CCPA, thus driving widespread adoption across sectors like healthcare, finance, autonomous vehicles, and robotics.

Another significant driver is the increasing adoption of synthetic data for data augmentation and rare event simulation. In sectors such as autonomous vehicles, manufacturing, and robotics, real-world data for edge-case scenarios or rare events is often scarce or difficult to capture. Synthetic training data allows for the generation of these critical scenarios at scale, enabling AI systems to learn and adapt to complex, unpredictable environments. This not only enhances model robustness but also reduces the risk associated with deploying AI in safety-critical applications. The flexibility to generate diverse data types, including images, text, audio, video, and tabular data, further expands the applicability of synthetic data solutions, making them indispensable tools for innovation and competitive advantage.

The synthetic training data market is also experiencing rapid growth due to the heightened focus on data privacy and regulatory compliance. As data protection regulations become more stringent worldwide, organizations face increasing challenges in accessing and utilizing real-world data for AI training without violating user privacy. Synthetic data addresses this challenge by creating realistic yet entirely artificial datasets that preserve the statistical properties of original data without exposing sensitive information. This capability is particularly valuable for industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and government, where data sensitivity and compliance requirements are paramount. As a result, the adoption of synthetic training data is expected to accelerate further as organizations seek to balance innovation with ethical and legal responsibilities.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the synthetic training data market, driven by the presence of major technology companies, robust R&D investments, and early adoption of AI technologies. However, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, fueled by expanding AI initiatives, government support, and the rapid digital transformation of industries. Europe is also emerging as a key market, particularly in sectors where data privacy and regulatory compliance are critical. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually increasing their market share as awareness and adoption of synthetic data solutions grow. Overall, the global landscape is characterized by dynamic regional trends, with each region contributing uniquely to the marketÂ’s expansion.

The introduction of a Synthetic Data Generation Engine has revolutionized the way organizations approach data creation and management. This engine leverages cutting-edge algorithms to produce high-quality synthetic datasets that mirror real-world data without compromising privacy. By sim

Blockchain data dashboard: Machine Learning - Model Training Data