CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
For questions about this data please contact ITOpenData@minneapolismn.gov2014 Minneapolis Community Technology Survey Data
Thanks to the 3,015 residents for their participation, the third year's results are in on a survey the City of Minneapolis conducted to understand how Minneapolis residents use computers, mobile devices and the Internet. Access to computers and the Internet, along with the skills to use these tools is critical as technology becomes more and more a part of our daily lives and is integrated in our economic, educational, health, and workforce systems. The results will inform priorities for the City’s digital inclusion initiatives, and help engage businesses, neighborhood and community groups, public sector partners, and funders to more effectively address community technology and economic development needs. In addition, the survey provides data to measure changes in the community over time.
The City of Minneapolis Information Technology Department contracted with National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) to conduct a survey of residents to inform the City’s efforts to overcome the digital equity gap between individuals and groups in their access to and use and knowledge of information and communication technologies. This is the third iteration of the Minneapolis Community Technology Survey; the first was conducted in 2012 and the second in 2013.Summary of Data Fields:Field 1 – Overall percentage of respondents who have lived in Minneapolis for 5 years or less by community and user levelField 2 – Overall percentage of foreign-born respondents by community and user levelField 3 – Overall percentage of respondents who rent their homes by community and user levelField 4 – Overall percentage of respondents who live in attached homes by community and user levelField 5 – Overall percentage of respondents living in households with three or more people by community and user levelField 6 – Overall percentage of respondents living in households with children under the age of 18 by community and user levelField 7 – Overall percentage of female respondents by community and user levelField 8 – Overall percentage of respondents aged 55 years or older by community and user levelField 9 – Overall percentage of respondents who are hispanic and/or any race other than white by community and user levelField 10 – Overall percentage of respondents who prefer to speak a language other than English at home by community and user levelField 11 – Overall percentage of respondents having annual household incomes of less than $50,000 by community and user levelField 12 – Overall percentage of respondents who do not work full- or part-time by community and user level
Field 13 – Overall percentage of respondents who do not have a 4-year degree by community and user level
Full data set (Raw data and data dictionary in Excel format)
The workbook has two tabs, the first is the data dictionary that is needed to translate the data; the second is the raw data.
See data summarized in a variety of formats at: http://www.minneapolismn.gov/it/inclusion/WCMS1P-118865
For additional details about the survey, the survey questionnaire, methodology and more, see: http://www.minneapolismn.gov/it/inclusion/WCMS1P-118865 or contact: Elise Ebhardt, 612-673-2026, City of Minneapolis IT Department
See also: 2012 and 2013 survey results
The City's IT Vision includes a component for addressing the digital divide in Minneapolis: All City residents, institutions and businesses will have the tools, skills and motivation to gain value from the digital society. Our residents and businesses need to be equipped to effectively compete with others around the world—to be smarter, more creative, more knowledgeable, and more innovative. Leveraging technology is a necessary ingredient of success.
VITAL SIGNS INDICATOR Home Prices (EC7)
FULL MEASURE NAME Home Prices
LAST UPDATED August 2019
DESCRIPTION Home prices refer to the cost of purchasing one’s own house or condominium. While a significant share of residents may choose to rent, home prices represent a primary driver of housing affordability in a given region, county or city.
DATA SOURCE Zillow Median Sale Price (1997-2018) http://www.zillow.com/research/data/
Bureau of Labor Statistics: Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers Data Table (1997-2018; specific to each metro area) http://data.bls.gov
CONTACT INFORMATION vitalsigns.info@bayareametro.gov
METHODOLOGY NOTES (across all datasets for this indicator) Median housing price estimates for the region, counties, cities, and zip code come from analysis of individual home sales by Zillow. The median sale price is the price separating the higher half of the sales from the lower half. In other words, 50 percent of home sales are below or above the median value. Zillow defines all homes as single-family residential, condominium, and co-operative homes with a county record. Single-family residences are detached, which means the home is an individual structure with its own lot. Condominiums are units that you own in a multi-unit complex, such as an apartment building. Co-operative homes are slightly different from condominiums where the homeowners own shares in the corporation that owns the building, not the actual units themselves.
For metropolitan area comparison values, the Bay Area metro area’s median home sale price is the population-weighted average of the nine counties’ median home prices. Home sales prices are not reliably available for Houston, because Texas is a non-disclosure state. For more information on non-disclosure states, see: http://www.zillow.com/blog/chronicles-of-data-collection-ii-non-disclosure-states-3783/
Inflation-adjusted data are presented to illustrate how home prices have grown relative to overall price increases; that said, the use of the Consumer Price Index does create some challenges given the fact that housing represents a major chunk of consumer goods bundle used to calculate CPI. This reflects a methodological tradeoff between precision and accuracy and is a common concern when working with any commodity that is a major component of CPI itself.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Airbnb has a total of 6,132 employees that work for the company. 52.5% of Airbnb workers are male and 47.5% are female.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Listings per region on Airbnb declined from 2020 to 2021. Globally in 2021, there were a total of 12.7 million listings.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The majority of guests on Airbnb are women. Most Airbnb guests are aged 25 to 34.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
These are the Airbnb statistics on gross revenue by country.
The 2015/16 Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey (KIHBS) was conducted over a 12-month period to obtain up-to-date data on a range of socioeconomic indicators used to monitor the implementation of development initiatives. The Survey collected data on household characteristics, housing conditions, education, general health characteristics, nutrition, household income and credit, household transfers, information communication technology, domestic tourism, shocks to household welfare and access to justice. The findings are presented at national, county, rural and urban domains.
Household Characteristics The findings of the 2015/16 KIHBS basic characteristics of the population show that the sex ratio is 97.5. About 70 per cent of households were headed by males and the reported average household size was 4 members. The age dependency ratio declined to 81.6 per cent in 2015/16 KIHBS as compared to 84.0 per cent recorded in 2005/06 KIHBS. Majority (54.4%) of the population aged 18 years and above are in monogamous unions. At the national level, 8.4 per cent of children were orphans.
Housing Conditions and amenities Information regarding housing conditions and ownership, access to water, energy, sanitation and waste disposal was collected in the 2015/16 KIHBS. Bungalow was the most common dwelling type of housing occupied by 55.4 per cent of the households. About 60 per cent of households reported that they owned the dwellings that they resided in. The findings show that 72.6 per cent of households use improved drinking water sources. The statistics show that six out ten households had access to improved human waste disposal methods. Overall, 41.4 per cent of households were connected to electricity from the main grid.
Education Findings on education are presented for; pre-primary, primary, secondary, middle level college and university levels; and informal education, Madrassa/Duksi. Nationally, 89.4 per cent of the population aged three years and above had ever attended school. The overall Gross Attendance (GAR) for pre-primary, primary and secondary levels was 94.4 per cent, 107.2 per cent and 66.2 per cent, respectively. The population aged 3 years and above that did not have any educational qualification was 49.7 per cent. Most of the population aged 3 years and above that had not attended school cited not being allowed to attend by parent(s) as the reason for non-attendance. The proportion of the population aged 15-24 years that was literate, based on respondents' self -assessment, was 88.3 per cent.
General Health Characteristics General health characteristics discussed in the report comprise: morbidity by sex, health seeking behaviour, utilization of health care services and facilities, disability and engagement in economic activities and health insurance coverage. Information on child survival such as place of delivery, assistance during delivery, immunization and incidences of diarrhoea is also presented. The results show that two out of ten individuals reported a sickness or injury over the four weeks preceding the survey. Majority of the individuals (55.5 %) with a sickness or injury visited a health worker at a health facility for diagnosis. Disabilities were reported by 2.8 per cent of the population. Slightly more than a third of persons with disabilities reported having difficulty in engaging in economic activities. moderately stunted. A higher proportion (32.4%) of children in the rural areas were moderately stunted compared to those in urban areas (24.5%). Overall, 13.0 per cent of children were moderately wasted while 6.7 per cent were moderately underweight. The statistics further indicate that 98.8 per cent of children aged 0-59 months were ever breast fed. The mean length of breastfeeding nationally stood at 16.8 months. Porridge was the most common type of first supplement given to majority (35.9%) of children aged 0-23 months. The survey findings show that eight out of ten children participated in community-based nutritional programmes.
Household Income and Credit Household income is the aggregate earnings of all household members. It includes all forms of income arising from employment, household enterprises, agricultural produce, rent, pension and financial investment. The discussion in this report focuses on income from rent, pension, financial investment and other related incomes. Information is also provided on access and sources of credit. At national level, 7.2 per cent of households reported having received income from rent, pension, financial investment and other related incomes within the 12 months preceding the survey. A third of the households sought credit and over 90 per cent successfully acquired credit.
Household Transfers Transfers constitute income, in cash or in kind, that the household receives without working for it and it augments household income by improving its welfare. Three out of ten households reported having received cash transfers within the 12 months preceding the survey period. The average amount received per household from cash transfers was KSh. 27,097. Majority of households received cash transfers through a family member. Money transfer agents were the preferred mode of transmitting money for most beneficiaries of transfers received from outside Kenya. Over half of the households gave out transfers in kind.
Information and Communication Technology The 2015/16 KIHBS collected information on ICT equipment use and ownership. Findings show that three in every four individuals aged 18 years and above owned a mobile phone with an average number of 1.3 SIM cards per person. The most commonly used ICT equipment is the radio and mobile phone, reported by 79.3 per cent and 68.5 per cent of individuals aged 3 years and above, respectively. The highest proportion (50.3%) of those that did not own a mobile phone cited its high cost as the reason. Urban areas had the highest proportion of population with ownership of a mobile phone. Nairobi City County had the highest proportion of population with a mobile phone while Turkana County had the lowest. The population aged 3 years and above that reported using internet over the last three months preceding the survey was 16.6 per cent. Three in every ten households had internet connectivity and use of internet in mobility was reported as the most common place of use of internet. The internet was used mainly for social networking. No need to use the internet was the most predominant reason for not using the internet reported by 30.1 per cent of those who did not use it.
Domestic Tourism Domestic tourism comprises activities of residents travelling to and staying at least over a night in places outside their usual environment within the country, for not more than 12 months, for leisure, business or other purposes. At national level, 13.4 per cent of individuals reported that they travelled within Kenya in the 3 months preceding the survey. Visiting friends and relatives was reported by the highest proportion (71.1%) of individuals taking trips. Majority of those who took a trip (66.4%) reported that they sponsored themselves. Transport costs accounted for the largest share (38.4%) of expenditure on domestic tourism. Majority of those who did not take a trip reported high cost as a reason.
Shocks to Household Welfare A shock is an event that may trigger a decline in the well-being of an individual, a community, a region, or even a nation. The report presents information on shocks which occurred during the five-year period preceding the survey and had a negative impact on households' economic status or welfare. Three in every five households reported having experienced at least one shock within the five years preceding the survey. A large rise infood prices was reported by the highest proportion (30.1 per cent) of households as a first severe shock. Most households reported that they spent their savings to cope with the shock(s).
Justice The survey sought information from household members on their experiences regarding grievances/disputes, resolution mechanisms, status of grievance/dispute resolution and costs incurred. Majority of households (26.2%) experienced grievances related to succession and inheritance. Approximately seven out of ten households that experienced grievances reported that they were resolved by parties from whom they sought interventions. Lawyers on average received the highest amount of money (KSh 59,849) paid to a primary organization for grievance resolution through a formal channel. Courts accounted for the highest informal costs averaging KSh 6,260 in grievance resolution.
The survey covers all the Counties in Kenya based on the following levels National, Urban, Rural and County
Households Indviduals within Households and Community
Sample survey data [ssd]
Design and Sample Selection The second Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey 2015/16 will be the eighth household budget survey to be conducted in Kenya following those conducted in 1981/82, 1983/84, 1992, 1994, 1997 and 2005/06. The KIHBS 2015/16 is a multi-indicator survey in nature with the main objective of updating the household consumption patterns in all the Counties.
KIHBS 2015/16 is designed to provide estimates for various indicators at the County-level. A total of 50 study domains are envisaged. These are; all the forty-seven (47) counties (Each as a separate domain), urban and rural (each as a separate domain at National level), and lastly the National-level aggregate.
Sampling frame The sampling frame used for KIHBS 2015/16 is the fifth National Sample Survey and Evaluation Program (NASSEP V) master frame developed from the Population and Housing Census (KPHC) conducted in
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
For questions about this data please contact ITOpenData@minneapolismn.gov2014 Minneapolis Community Technology Survey Data
Thanks to the 3,015 residents for their participation, the third year's results are in on a survey the City of Minneapolis conducted to understand how Minneapolis residents use computers, mobile devices and the Internet. Access to computers and the Internet, along with the skills to use these tools is critical as technology becomes more and more a part of our daily lives and is integrated in our economic, educational, health, and workforce systems. The results will inform priorities for the City’s digital inclusion initiatives, and help engage businesses, neighborhood and community groups, public sector partners, and funders to more effectively address community technology and economic development needs. In addition, the survey provides data to measure changes in the community over time.
The City of Minneapolis Information Technology Department contracted with National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) to conduct a survey of residents to inform the City’s efforts to overcome the digital equity gap between individuals and groups in their access to and use and knowledge of information and communication technologies. This is the third iteration of the Minneapolis Community Technology Survey; the first was conducted in 2012 and the second in 2013.Summary of Data Fields:Field 1 – Overall percentage of respondents who have lived in Minneapolis for 5 years or less by community and user levelField 2 – Overall percentage of foreign-born respondents by community and user levelField 3 – Overall percentage of respondents who rent their homes by community and user levelField 4 – Overall percentage of respondents who live in attached homes by community and user levelField 5 – Overall percentage of respondents living in households with three or more people by community and user levelField 6 – Overall percentage of respondents living in households with children under the age of 18 by community and user levelField 7 – Overall percentage of female respondents by community and user levelField 8 – Overall percentage of respondents aged 55 years or older by community and user levelField 9 – Overall percentage of respondents who are hispanic and/or any race other than white by community and user levelField 10 – Overall percentage of respondents who prefer to speak a language other than English at home by community and user levelField 11 – Overall percentage of respondents having annual household incomes of less than $50,000 by community and user levelField 12 – Overall percentage of respondents who do not work full- or part-time by community and user level
Field 13 – Overall percentage of respondents who do not have a 4-year degree by community and user level
Full data set (Raw data and data dictionary in Excel format)
The workbook has two tabs, the first is the data dictionary that is needed to translate the data; the second is the raw data.
See data summarized in a variety of formats at: http://www.minneapolismn.gov/it/inclusion/WCMS1P-118865
For additional details about the survey, the survey questionnaire, methodology and more, see: http://www.minneapolismn.gov/it/inclusion/WCMS1P-118865 or contact: Elise Ebhardt, 612-673-2026, City of Minneapolis IT Department
See also: 2012 and 2013 survey results
The City's IT Vision includes a component for addressing the digital divide in Minneapolis: All City residents, institutions and businesses will have the tools, skills and motivation to gain value from the digital society. Our residents and businesses need to be equipped to effectively compete with others around the world—to be smarter, more creative, more knowledgeable, and more innovative. Leveraging technology is a necessary ingredient of success.