About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of New Britain by race. It includes the population of New Britain across racial categories (excluding ethnicity) as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of New Britain across relevant racial categories.

Key observations

The percent distribution of New Britain population by race (across all racial categories recognized by the U.S. Census Bureau): 82.88% are white, 4.57% are Black or African American, 0.35% are American Indian and Alaska Native, 5.78% are Asian, 0.39% are some other race and 6.02% are multiracial.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Racial categories include:

• White
• Black or African American
• American Indian and Alaska Native
• Asian
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
• Some other race
• Two or more races (multiracial)

Variables / Data Columns

• Race: This column displays the racial categories (excluding ethnicity) for the New Britain
• Population: The population of the racial category (excluding ethnicity) in the New Britain is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each race as a proportion of New Britain total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for New Britain Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of England by race. It includes the population of England across racial categories (excluding ethnicity) as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of England across relevant racial categories.

Key observations

The percent distribution of England population by race (across all racial categories recognized by the U.S. Census Bureau): 68.50% are white, 22% are Black or African American, 0.31% are American Indian and Alaska Native, 4.52% are some other race and 4.67% are multiracial.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Racial categories include:

• White
• Black or African American
• American Indian and Alaska Native
• Asian
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
• Some other race
• Two or more races (multiracial)

Variables / Data Columns

• Race: This column displays the racial categories (excluding ethnicity) for the England
• Population: The population of the racial category (excluding ethnicity) in the England is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each race as a proportion of England total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for England Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Non-Hispanic population of England by race. It includes the distribution of the Non-Hispanic population of England across various race categories as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to understand the Non-Hispanic population distribution of England across relevant racial categories.

Key observations

Of the Non-Hispanic population in England, the largest racial group is White alone with a population of 1,759 (71.74% of the total Non-Hispanic population).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Racial categories include:

• White
• Black or African American
• American Indian and Alaska Native
• Asian
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
• Some other race
• Two or more races (multiracial)

Variables / Data Columns

• Race: This column displays the racial categories (for Non-Hispanic) for the England
• Population: The population of the racial category (for Non-Hispanic) in the England is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each race as a proportion of England total Non-Hispanic population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for England Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

This measures percentage point differences in the proportions of each Black Minority and Ethnic (BME) group of young people on youth justice disposals against the proportions of each BME group in the equivalent local population. BME main groups are classified as those main groups in the 2001 census. The ONS latest mid-year estimated figures used for the local youth population by BME group. It is important to do the analysis by each of the ethnic groups and not the overall BME group, otherwise the under-represented groups counter-balance the over-represented groups – giving the false impression there is no over-representation of particular BME groups. Areas would only need to submit values for the number of offenders in each ethnic group, as the local population data would be sourced from ONS to do the required calculations. Young people are those aged 10-17 years.

Experimental statistics for population estimates by ethnic group broken down into age and sex at a national regional level for England and Wales.

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 2014 to 2023 for Uk Early Childhood Lab vs. Kentucky and Fayette County School District

The data collection contains population projections for UK ethnic groups and all local area by age (single year of age up to 100+) and sex. Included in the data set are also input data to the cohort component model that was used to project populations into the future-fertility rates, mortality rates, international migration flows and internal migration probabilities. Also included in data set are output data: Number of deaths, births and internal migrants. All data included are for the years 2011 to 2061. We have produced two ethnic population projections for UK local authorities, based on information on 2011 Census ethnic populations and 2010-2011-2012 ethnic components. Both projections align fertility and mortality assumptions to ONS assumptions. Where they differ is in the migration assumptions. In LEEDS L1 we employ internal migration rates for 2001 to 2011, including periods of boom and bust. We use a new assumption about international migration anticipating that the UK may leave the EU (BREXIT). In LEEDS L2 we use average internal migration rates for the 5 year period 2006-11 and the official international migration flow assumptions with a long term balance of +185 thousand per annum. This project aims to understand and to forecast the ethnic transition in the United Kingdom's population at national and sub-national levels. The ethnic transition is the change in population composition from one dominated by the White British to much greater diversity. In the decade 2001-2011 the UK population grew strongly as a result of high immigration, increased fertility and reduced mortality. Both the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Leeds University estimated the growth or decline in the sixteen ethnic groups making up the UK's population in 2001. The 2011 Census results revealed that both teams had over-estimated the growth of the White British population and under-estimated the growth of the ethnic minority populations. The wide variation between our local authority projected populations in 2011 and the Census suggested inaccurate forecasting of internal migration. We propose to develop, working closely with ONS as our first external partner, fresh estimates of mid-year ethnic populations and their components of change using new data on the later years of the decade and new methods to ensure the estimates agree in 2011 with the Census. This will involve using population accounting theory and an adjustment technique known as iterative proportional fitting to generate a fully consistent set of ethnic population estimates between 2001 and 2011. We will study, at national and local scales, the development of demographic rates for ethnic group populations (fertility, mortality, internal migration and international migration). The ten year time series of component summary indicators and age-specific rates will provide a basis for modelling future assumptions for projections. We will, in our main projection, align the assumptions to the ONS 2012-based principal projection. The national assumptions will need conversion to ethnic groups and to local scale. The ten years of revised ethnic-specific component rates will enable us to study the relationships between national and local demographic trends. In addition, we will analyse a consistent time series of local authority internal migration. We cannot be sure, at this stage, how the national-local relationships for each ethnic group will be modelled but we will be able to test our models using the time series. Of course, all future projections of the population are uncertain. We will therefore work to measure the uncertainty of component rates. The error distributions can be used to construct probability distributions of future populations via stochastic projections so that we can define confidence intervals around our projections. Users of projections are always interested in the impact of the component assumptions on future populations. We will run a set of reference projections to estimate the magnitude and direction of impact of international migrations assumptions (net effect of immigration less emigration), of internal migration assumptions (the net effect of in-migration less out-migration), of fertility assumptions compared with replacement level, of mortality assumptions compared with no change and finally the effect of the initial age distribution (i.e. demographic potential). The outputs from the project will be a set of technical reports on each aspect of the research, journal papers submitted for peer review and a database of projection inputs and outputs available to users via the web. The demographic inputs will be subject to quality assurance by Edge Analytics, our second external partner. They will also help in disseminating these inputs to local government users who want to use them in their own ethnic projections. In sum, the project will show how a wide range of secondary data sources can be used in theoretically refined demographic models to provide us with a more reliable picture of how the UK population is going to change in ethnic composition. Base year data (2011) are derived from the 2011 census, vital statistics and ONS migration data. Subsequent population data are computed with a cohort component model.

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 1991 to 2023 for England School District vs. Arkansas

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 2001 to 2008 for England Middle School vs. Arkansas and England School District

Live births, stillbirths and infant deaths by ethnicity of the baby, England and Wales, 2007 to 2019

The latest population figures produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on 28 June 2018 show that an estimated 534,800 people live in Bradford District – an increase of 2,300 people (0.4%) since the previous year.

Bradford District is the fifth largest metropolitan district (in terms of population) in England, after Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield and Manchester although the District’s population growth is lower than other major cities.

The increase in the District’s population is largely due to “natural change”- there have been around 3,300 more births than deaths, although this has been balanced by a larger number of people leaving Bradford to live in other parts of the UK than coming to live here and a lower number of international migrants. In 2016/17 the net internal migration was -2,700 and the net international migration was 1,700.

A large proportion of Bradford’s population is dominated by the younger age groups. More than one-quarter (29%) of the District’s population is aged less than 20 and nearly seven in ten people are aged less than 50. Bradford has the highest percentage of the under 16 population in England after the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, Slough Borough Council and Luton Borough Council.

The population of Bradford is ethnically diverse. The largest proportion of the district’s population (63.9%) identifies themselves as White British. The district has the largest proportion of people of Pakistani ethnic origin (20.3%) in England.

The largest religious group in Bradford is Christian (45.9% of the population). Nearly one quarter of the population (24.7%) are Muslim. Just over one fifth of the district’s population (20.7%) stated that they had no religion.

There are 216,813 households in the Bradford district. Most households own their own home (29.3% outright and 35.7% with a mortgage). The percentage of privately rented households is 18.1%. 29.6% of households were single person households.

Information from the Annual Population Survey in December 2017 found that Bradford has 228,100 people aged 16-64 in employment. At 68% this is significantly lower than the national rate (74.9%). 91,100 (around 1 in 3 people) aged 16-64, are not in work. The claimant count rate is 2.9% which is higher than the regional and national averages.

Skill levels are improving with 26.5% of 16 to 74 year olds educated to degree level. 18% of the district’s employed residents work in retail/wholesale. The percentage of people working in manufacturing has continued to decrease from 13.4% in 2009 to 11.9% in 2016. This is still higher than the average for Great Britain (8.1%).

This data is derived from the Maternity Indicators dataset which is provided to the Welsh Government by Digital Health and Care Wales (DHCW). The Maternity Indicators dataset was established in 2016. It combines records from a mother’s initial assessment with a child’s birth record and enabled Welsh Government to monitor its initial set of outcome indicators and performance measures (Maternity Indicators) which were established to measure the effectiveness and quality of Welsh maternity services. The Maternity Indicators dataset allows us to analyse characteristics of the mother’s pregnancy and birth process. The process for producing this data extract is complex largely because there can be multiple initial assessment data and records for both initial assessments and births are not always complete. Full details of every data item available in the Maternity Indicators dataset are available through the NHS Wales Data Dictionary: http://www.datadictionary.wales.nhs.uk/#!WordDocuments/datasetstructure20.htm The data dictionary also defines how ethnic groups are classified, namely: White (any white background); Asian (Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, Indian, any other Asian background); Mixed/multiple (white and Asian, white and black African, white and black Caribbean, any other mixed background); Other (any other ethnic group); Black (African, Caribbean, any other black background).

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 1993 to 2023 for Little Britain Elementary School vs. New York and Washingtonville Central School District

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 2011 to 2023 for New Britain Transition Center vs. Connecticut and New Britain School District

This data is derived from the Maternity Indicators dataset which is provided to the Welsh Government by Digital Health and Care Wales (DHCW). The Maternity Indicators dataset was established in 2016. It combines records from a mother’s initial assessment with a child’s birth record and enabled Welsh Government to monitor its initial set of outcome indicators and performance measures (Maternity Indicators) which were established to measure the effectiveness and quality of Welsh maternity services. The Maternity Indicators dataset allows us to analyse characteristics of the mother’s pregnancy and birth process. The process for producing this data extract is complex largely because there can be multiple initial assessment data and records for both initial assessments and births are not always complete. Full details of every data item available in the Maternity Indicators dataset are available through the NHS Wales Data Dictionary: http://www.datadictionary.wales.nhs.uk/#!WordDocuments/datasetstructure20.htm The mental health conditions listed on the record are categorised as: puerperal psychosis (severe postnatal depression); bi-polar effective disorder/manic depression; psychosis; psychotic depression; schizophrenia; and other (any other mental health condition). The data dictionary also defines how ethnic groups are classified, namely: White (any white background); Asian (Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, Indian, any other Asian background); Mixed/multiple (white and Asian, white and black African, white and black Caribbean, any other mixed background); Other (any other ethnic group); Black (African, Caribbean, any other black background).

Part of the dissertation Pitch of Voiced Speech in the Short-Time Fourier Transform: Algorithms, Ground Truths, and Evaluation Methods.
© 2020, Bastian Bechtold. All rights reserved.

Estimating the fundamental frequency of speech remains an active area of research, with varied applications in speech recognition, speaker identification, and speech compression. A vast number of algorithms for estimatimating this quantity have been proposed over the years, and a number of speech and noise corpora have been developed for evaluating their performance. The present dataset contains estimated fundamental frequency tracks of 25 algorithms, six speech corpora, two noise corpora, at nine signal-to-noise ratios between -20 and 20 dB SNR, as well as an additional evaluation of synthetic harmonic tone complexes in white noise.

The dataset also contains pre-calculated performance measures both novel and traditional, in reference to each speech corpus’ ground truth, the algorithms’ own clean-speech estimate, and our own consensus truth. It can thus serve as the basis for a comparison study, or to replicate existing studies from a larger dataset, or as a reference for developing new fundamental frequency estimation algorithms. All source code and data is available to download, and entirely reproducible, albeit requiring about one year of processor-time.

Included Code and Data

• ground truth data.zip is a JBOF dataset of fundamental frequency estimates and ground truths of all speech files in the following corpora:
  • CMU-ARCTIC (consensus truth) [1]
  • FDA (corpus truth and consensus truth) [2]
  • KEELE (corpus truth and consensus truth) [3]
  • MOCHA-TIMIT (consensus truth) [4]
  • PTDB-TUG (corpus truth and consensus truth) [5]
  • TIMIT (consensus truth) [6]
• noisy speech data.zip is a JBOF datasets of fundamental frequency estimates of speech files mixed with noise from the following corpora:
  • NOISEX [7]
  • QUT-NOISE [8]
• synthetic speech data.zip is a JBOF dataset of fundamental frequency estimates of synthetic harmonic tone complexes in white noise.
• noisy_speech.pkl and synthetic_speech.pkl are pickled Pandas dataframes of performance metrics derived from the above data for the following list of fundamental frequency estimation algorithms:
  • AUTOC [9]
  • AMDF [10]
  • BANA [11]
  • CEP [12]
  • CREPE [13]
  • DIO [14]
  • DNN [15]
  • KALDI [16]
  • MAPS
  • MBSC [17]
  • NLS [18]
  • PEFAC [19]
  • PRAAT [20]
  • RAPT [21]
  • SACC [22]
  • SAFE [23]
  • SHR [24]
  • SIFT [25]
  • SRH [26]
  • STRAIGHT [27]
  • SWIPE [28]
  • YAAPT [29]
  • YIN [30]
• noisy speech evaluation.py and synthetic speech evaluation.py are Python programs to calculate the above Pandas dataframes from the above JBOF datasets. They calculate the following performance measures:
  • Gross Pitch Error (GPE), the percentage of pitches where the estimated pitch deviates from the true pitch by more than 20%.
  • Fine Pitch Error (FPE), the mean error of grossly correct estimates.
  • High/Low Octave Pitch Error (OPE), the percentage pitches that are GPEs and happens to be at an integer multiple of the true pitch.
  • Gross Remaining Error (GRE), the percentage of pitches that are GPEs but not OPEs.
  • Fine Remaining Bias (FRB), the median error of GREs.
  • True Positive Rate (TPR), the percentage of true positive voicing estimates.
  • False Positive Rate (FPR), the percentage of false positive voicing estimates.
  • False Negative Rate (FNR), the percentage of false negative voicing estimates.
  • F₁, the harmonic mean of precision and recall of the voicing decision.
• Pipfile is a pipenv-compatible pipfile for installing all prerequisites necessary for running the above Python programs.

The Python programs take about an hour to compute on a fast 2019 computer, and require at least 32 Gb of memory.

References:

1. John Kominek and Alan W Black. CMU ARCTIC database for speech synthesis, 2003.
2. Paul C Bagshaw, Steven Hiller, and Mervyn A Jack. Enhanced Pitch Tracking and the Processing of F0 Contours for Computer Aided Intonation Teaching. In EUROSPEECH, 1993.
3. F Plante, Georg F Meyer, and William A Ainsworth. A Pitch Extraction Reference Database. In Fourth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 837–840, Madrid, Spain, 1995.
4. Alan Wrench. MOCHA MultiCHannel Articulatory database: English, November 1999.
5. Gregor Pirker, Michael Wohlmayr, Stefan Petrik, and Franz Pernkopf. A Pitch Tracking Corpus with Evaluation on Multipitch Tracking Scenario. page 4, 2011.
6. John S. Garofolo, Lori F. Lamel, William M. Fisher, Jonathan G. Fiscus, David S. Pallett, Nancy L. Dahlgren, and Victor Zue. TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus, 1993.
7. Andrew Varga and Herman J.M. Steeneken. Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recog- nition systems. Speech Communication, 12(3):247–251, July 1993.
8. David B. Dean, Sridha Sridharan, Robert J. Vogt, and Michael W. Mason. The QUT-NOISE-TIMIT corpus for the evaluation of voice activity detection algorithms. Proceedings of Interspeech 2010, 2010.
9. Man Mohan Sondhi. New methods of pitch extraction. Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2):262—266, 1968.
10. Myron J. Ross, Harry L. Shaffer, Asaf Cohen, Richard Freudberg, and Harold J. Manley. Average magnitude difference function pitch extractor. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 22(5):353—362, 1974.
11. Na Yang, He Ba, Weiyang Cai, Ilker Demirkol, and Wendi Heinzelman. BaNa: A Noise Resilient Fundamental Frequency Detection Algorithm for Speech and Music. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(12):1833–1848, December 2014.
12. Michael Noll. Cepstrum Pitch Determination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41(2):293–309, 1967.
13. Jong Wook Kim, Justin Salamon, Peter Li, and Juan Pablo Bello. CREPE: A Convolutional Representation for Pitch Estimation. arXiv:1802.06182 [cs, eess, stat], February 2018. arXiv: 1802.06182.
14. Masanori Morise, Fumiya Yokomori, and Kenji Ozawa. WORLD: A Vocoder-Based High-Quality Speech Synthesis System for Real-Time Applications. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E99.D(7):1877–1884, 2016.
15. Kun Han and DeLiang Wang. Neural Network Based Pitch Tracking in Very Noisy Speech. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(12):2158–2168, Decem- ber 2014.
16. Pegah Ghahremani, Bagher BabaAli, Daniel Povey, Korbinian Riedhammer, Jan Trmal, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. A pitch extraction algorithm tuned for automatic speech recognition. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 2494–2498. IEEE, 2014.
17. Lee Ngee Tan and Abeer Alwan. Multi-band summary correlogram-based pitch detection for noisy speech. Speech Communication, 55(7-8):841–856, September 2013.
18. Jesper Kjær Nielsen, Tobias Lindstrøm Jensen, Jesper Rindom Jensen, Mads Græsbøll Christensen, and Søren Holdt Jensen. Fast fundamental frequency estimation: Making a statistically

This dataset contains two distinct sets of data. One shows School Pupils Black and Minority Ethnicity (BME), and the other one shows School Pupils with English as an Additional Language (EAL). Both show the Number and Percentage of current and main pupils on the roll of Schools in Lincolnshire at a given point in the year, and include Gender breakouts. Pupils are allocated to geographical areas (such as Wards and NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups) based on home address. BME includes pupils not either White British, White English, White Welsh, White Scottish or White Cornish. EAL refers to pupils for whom first language has been specified and is other than English. (Pupils where language information has not been provided are not counted as EAL, eg. where parents have exercised their right to refuse to provide the information). Figures shown in the data as ‘Out of County’ represent pupils not resident within the Lincolnshire administrative boundary. Those are included in the Lincolnshire total. Data is suppressed where appropriate 5 persons and below (which may be shown as zero or by missing data). That and any unmatched postcodes may mean numbers for small areas might not add up exactly to figures shown for larger areas. Data is from the Schools Census and shows a snapshot in January. It is updated annually. Data source: Lincolnshire County Council Childrens Services. For any enquiries about this publication contact SchoolCensus@lincolnshire.gov.uk .

Success.ai’s Company Data Solutions provide businesses with powerful, enterprise-ready B2B company datasets, enabling you to unlock insights on over 28 million verified company profiles. Our solution is ideal for organizations seeking accurate and detailed B2B contact data, whether you’re targeting large enterprises, mid-sized businesses, or small business contact data.

Success.ai offers B2B marketing data across industries and geographies, tailored to fit your specific business needs. With our white-glove service, you’ll receive curated, ready-to-use company datasets without the hassle of managing data platforms yourself. Whether you’re looking for UK B2B data or global datasets, Success.ai ensures a seamless experience with the most accurate and up-to-date information in the market.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Company Data Solution? At Success.ai, we prioritize quality and relevancy. Every company profile is AI-validated for a 99% accuracy rate and manually reviewed to ensure you're accessing actionable and GDPR-compliant data. Our price match guarantee ensures you receive the best deal on the market, while our white-glove service provides personalized assistance in sourcing and delivering the data you need.

Why Choose Success.ai?

• Best Price Guarantee: We offer industry-leading pricing and beat any competitor.
• Global Reach: Access over 28 million verified company profiles across 195 countries.
• Comprehensive Data: Over 15 data points, including company size, industry, funding, and technologies used.
• Accurate & Verified: AI-validated with a 99% accuracy rate, ensuring high-quality data.
• Real-Time Updates: Stay ahead with continuously updated company information.
• Ethically Sourced Data: Our B2B data is compliant with global privacy laws, ensuring responsible use.
• Dedicated Service: Receive personalized, curated data without the hassle of managing platforms.
• Tailored Solutions: Custom datasets are built to fit your unique business needs and industries.

Our database spans 195 countries and covers 28 million public and private company profiles, with detailed insights into each company’s structure, size, funding history, and key technologies. We provide B2B company data for businesses of all sizes, from small business contact data to large corporations, with extensive coverage in regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Comprehensive Data Points: Success.ai delivers in-depth information on each company, with over 15 data points, including:

Company Name: Get the full legal name of the company. LinkedIn URL: Direct link to the company's LinkedIn profile. Company Domain: Website URL for more detailed research. Company Description: Overview of the company’s services and products. Company Location: Geographic location down to the city, state, and country. Company Industry: The sector or industry the company operates in. Employee Count: Number of employees to help identify company size. Technologies Used: Insights into key technologies employed by the company, valuable for tech-based outreach. Funding Information: Track total funding and the most recent funding dates for investment opportunities. Maximize Your Sales Potential: With Success.ai’s B2B contact data and company datasets, sales teams can build tailored lists of target accounts, identify decision-makers, and access real-time company intelligence. Our curated datasets ensure you’re always focused on high-value leads—those who are most likely to convert into clients. Whether you’re conducting account-based marketing (ABM), expanding your sales pipeline, or looking to improve your lead generation strategies, Success.ai offers the resources you need to scale your business efficiently.

Tailored for Your Industry: Success.ai serves multiple industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and more. Our B2B marketing data solutions are particularly valuable for businesses looking to reach professionals in key sectors. You’ll also have access to small business contact data, perfect for reaching new markets or uncovering high-growth startups.

From UK B2B data to contacts across Europe and Asia, our datasets provide global coverage to expand your business reach and identify new markets. With continuous data updates, Success.ai ensures you’re always working with the freshest information.

Key Use Cases:

• Targeted Lead Generation: Build accurate lead lists by filtering data by company size, industry, or location. Target decision-makers in key industries to streamline your B2B sales outreach.
• Account-Based Marketing (ABM): Use B2B company data to personalize marketing campaigns, focusing on high-value accounts and improving conversion rates.
• Investment Research: Track company growth, funding rounds, and employee trends to identify investment opportunities or potential M&A targets.
• Market Research: Enrich your market intelligence initiatives by gain...

This dataset displays the population statistics by county and age for England and Wales. This data is derived from statistics from the 2001 UK Census. Due to variation in the data and the shapefile data is not available for Merseyside, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, and Tyne and Wear.

This dataset tracks annual white student percentage from 1991 to 2023 for Britain Elementary School vs. Texas and Irving Independent School District