https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37879/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37879/terms
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1973-2018 provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death, as well as those who had their sentences commuted or vacated and prisoners who were executed. This study examines basic sociodemographic classifications including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state and region of incarceration. Criminal history information includes prior felony convictions and prior convictions for criminal homicide and the legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 2018. The dataset consists of one part which contains 9,583 cases. The file provides information on inmates whose death sentences were removed in addition to information on those inmates who were executed. The file also gives information about inmates who received a second death sentence by yearend 2018 as well as inmates who were already on death row.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Introduction
This repository hosts the Testing Roads for Autonomous VEhicLes (TRAVEL) dataset. TRAVEL is an extensive collection of virtual roads that have been used for testing lane assist/keeping systems (i.e., driving agents) and data from their execution in state of the art, physically accurate driving simulator, called BeamNG.tech. Virtual roads consist of sequences of road points interpolated using Cubic splines.
Along with the data, this repository contains instructions on how to install the tooling necessary to generate new data (i.e., test cases) and analyze them in the context of test regression. We focus on test selection and test prioritization, given their importance for developing high-quality software following the DevOps paradigms.
This dataset builds on top of our previous work in this area, including work on
test generation (e.g., AsFault, DeepJanus, and DeepHyperion) and the SBST CPS tool competition (SBST2021),
test selection: SDC-Scissor and related tool
test prioritization: automated test cases prioritization work for SDCs.
Dataset Overview
The TRAVEL dataset is available under the data folder and is organized as a set of experiments folders. Each of these folders is generated by running the test-generator (see below) and contains the configuration used for generating the data (experiment_description.csv), various statistics on generated tests (generation_stats.csv) and found faults (oob_stats.csv). Additionally, the folders contain the raw test cases generated and executed during each experiment (test..json).
The following sections describe what each of those files contains.
Experiment Description
The experiment_description.csv contains the settings used to generate the data, including:
Time budget. The overall generation budget in hours. This budget includes both the time to generate and execute the tests as driving simulations.
The size of the map. The size of the squared map defines the boundaries inside which the virtual roads develop in meters.
The test subject. The driving agent that implements the lane-keeping system under test. The TRAVEL dataset contains data generated testing the BeamNG.AI and the end-to-end Dave2 systems.
The test generator. The algorithm that generated the test cases. The TRAVEL dataset contains data obtained using various algorithms, ranging from naive and advanced random generators to complex evolutionary algorithms, for generating tests.
The speed limit. The maximum speed at which the driving agent under test can travel.
Out of Bound (OOB) tolerance. The test cases' oracle that defines the tolerable amount of the ego-car that can lie outside the lane boundaries. This parameter ranges between 0.0 and 1.0. In the former case, a test failure triggers as soon as any part of the ego-vehicle goes out of the lane boundary; in the latter case, a test failure triggers only if the entire body of the ego-car falls outside the lane.
Experiment Statistics
The generation_stats.csv contains statistics about the test generation, including:
Total number of generated tests. The number of tests generated during an experiment. This number is broken down into the number of valid tests and invalid tests. Valid tests contain virtual roads that do not self-intersect and contain turns that are not too sharp.
Test outcome. The test outcome contains the number of passed tests, failed tests, and test in error. Passed and failed tests are defined by the OOB Tolerance and an additional (implicit) oracle that checks whether the ego-car is moving or standing. Tests that did not pass because of other errors (e.g., the simulator crashed) are reported in a separated category.
The TRAVEL dataset also contains statistics about the failed tests, including the overall number of failed tests (total oob) and its breakdown into OOB that happened while driving left or right. Further statistics about the diversity (i.e., sparseness) of the failures are also reported.
Test Cases and Executions
Each test..json contains information about a test case and, if the test case is valid, the data observed during its execution as driving simulation.
The data about the test case definition include:
The road points. The list of points in a 2D space that identifies the center of the virtual road, and their interpolation using cubic splines (interpolated_points)
The test ID. The unique identifier of the test in the experiment.
Validity flag and explanation. A flag that indicates whether the test is valid or not, and a brief message describing why the test is not considered valid (e.g., the road contains sharp turns or the road self intersects)
The test data are organized according to the following JSON Schema and can be interpreted as RoadTest objects provided by the tests_generation.py module.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "id": { "type": "integer" }, "is_valid": { "type": "boolean" }, "validation_message": { "type": "string" }, "road_points": { §\label{line:road-points}§ "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "schemas/pair" }, }, "interpolated_points": { §\label{line:interpolated-points}§ "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "schemas/pair" }, }, "test_outcome": { "type": "string" }, §\label{line:test-outcome}§ "description": { "type": "string" }, "execution_data": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref" : "schemas/simulationdata" } } }, "required": [ "id", "is_valid", "validation_message", "road_points", "interpolated_points" ] }
Finally, the execution data contain a list of timestamped state information recorded by the driving simulation. State information is collected at constant frequency and includes absolute position, rotation, and velocity of the ego-car, its speed in Km/h, and control inputs from the driving agent (steering, throttle, and braking). Additionally, execution data contain OOB-related data, such as the lateral distance between the car and the lane center and the OOB percentage (i.e., how much the car is outside the lane).
The simulation data adhere to the following (simplified) JSON Schema and can be interpreted as Python objects using the simulation_data.py module.
{ "$id": "schemas/simulationdata", "type": "object", "properties": { "timer" : { "type": "number" }, "pos" : { "type": "array", "items":{ "$ref" : "schemas/triple" } } "vel" : { "type": "array", "items":{ "$ref" : "schemas/triple" } } "vel_kmh" : { "type": "number" }, "steering" : { "type": "number" }, "brake" : { "type": "number" }, "throttle" : { "type": "number" }, "is_oob" : { "type": "number" }, "oob_percentage" : { "type": "number" } §\label{line:oob-percentage}§ }, "required": [ "timer", "pos", "vel", "vel_kmh", "steering", "brake", "throttle", "is_oob", "oob_percentage" ] }
Dataset Content
The TRAVEL dataset is a lively initiative so the content of the dataset is subject to change. Currently, the dataset contains the data collected during the SBST CPS tool competition, and data collected in the context of our recent work on test selection (SDC-Scissor work and tool) and test prioritization (automated test cases prioritization work for SDCs).
SBST CPS Tool Competition Data
The data collected during the SBST CPS tool competition are stored inside data/competition.tar.gz. The file contains the test cases generated by Deeper, Frenetic, AdaFrenetic, and Swat, the open-source test generators submitted to the competition and executed against BeamNG.AI with an aggression factor of 0.7 (i.e., conservative driver).
Name
Map Size (m x m)
Max Speed (Km/h)
Budget (h)
OOB Tolerance (%)
Test Subject
DEFAULT
200 × 200
120
5 (real time)
0.95
BeamNG.AI - 0.7
SBST
200 × 200
70
2 (real time)
0.5
BeamNG.AI - 0.7
Specifically, the TRAVEL dataset contains 8 repetitions for each of the above configurations for each test generator totaling 64 experiments.
SDC Scissor
With SDC-Scissor we collected data based on the Frenetic test generator. The data is stored inside data/sdc-scissor.tar.gz. The following table summarizes the used parameters.
Name
Map Size (m x m)
Max Speed (Km/h)
Budget (h)
OOB Tolerance (%)
Test Subject
SDC-SCISSOR
200 × 200
120
16 (real time)
0.5
BeamNG.AI - 1.5
The dataset contains 9 experiments with the above configuration. For generating your own data with SDC-Scissor follow the instructions in its repository.
Dataset Statistics
Here is an overview of the TRAVEL dataset: generated tests, executed tests, and faults found by all the test generators grouped by experiment configuration. Some 25,845 test cases are generated by running 4 test generators 8 times in 2 configurations using the SBST CPS Tool Competition code pipeline (SBST in the table). We ran the test generators for 5 hours, allowing the ego-car a generous speed limit (120 Km/h) and defining a high OOB tolerance (i.e., 0.95), and we also ran the test generators using a smaller generation budget (i.e., 2 hours) and speed limit (i.e., 70 Km/h) while setting the OOB tolerance to a lower value (i.e., 0.85). We also collected some 5, 971 additional tests with SDC-Scissor (SDC-Scissor in the table) by running it 9 times for 16 hours using Frenetic as a test generator and defining a more realistic OOB tolerance (i.e., 0.50).
Generating new Data
Generating new data, i.e., test cases, can be done using the SBST CPS Tool Competition pipeline and the driving simulator BeamNG.tech.
Extensive instructions on how to install both software are reported inside the SBST CPS Tool Competition pipeline Documentation;
There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series on homicides per capita for New York City that spans two centuries. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. Data were also gathered on various other sites, particularly in England, to allow for comparisons on important issues, such as the post-World War II wave of violence. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. The annual count data (Parts 1 and 3) were derived from multiple sources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports and Supplementary Homicide Reports, as well as other official counts from the New York City Police Department and the City Inspector in the early 19th century. The data include a combined count of murder and manslaughter because charge bargaining often blurs this legal distinction. The individual-level data (Part 2) were drawn from coroners' indictments held by the New York City Municipal Archives, and from daily newspapers. Duplication was avoided by keeping a record for each victim. The estimation technique known as "capture-recapture" was used to estimate homicides not listed in either source. Part 1 variables include counts of New York City homicides, arrests, and convictions, as well as the homicide rate, race or ethnicity and gender of victims, type of weapon used, and source of data. Part 2 includes the date of the murder, the age, sex, and race of the offender and victim, and whether the case led to an arrest, trial, conviction, execution, or pardon. Part 3 contains annual homicide counts and rates for various comparison sites including Liverpool, London, Kent, Canada, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco.
https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
After over two years of public reporting, the Community Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release will be on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at CDC’s COVID Data Tracker.
The Community Profile Report (CPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, under the White House COVID-19 Team. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The CPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for all regions, states, core-based statistical areas (CBSAs), and counties across the United States. It is a snapshot in time that:
Data in this report may differ from data on state and local websites. This may be due to differences in how data were reported (e.g., date specimen obtained, or date reported for cases) or how the metrics are calculated. Historical data may be updated over time due to delayed reporting. Data presented here use standard metrics across all geographic levels in the United States. It facilitates the understanding of COVID-19 pandemic trends across the United States by using standardized data. The footnotes describe each data source and the methods used for calculating the metrics. For additional data for any particular locality, visit the relevant health department website. Additional data and features are forthcoming.
*Color thresholds for each category are defined on the color thresholds tab
Effective April 30, 2021, the Community Profile Report will be distributed on Monday through Friday. There will be no impact to the data represented in these reports due to this change.
Effective June 22, 2021, the Community Profile Report will only be updated twice a week, on Tuesdays and Fridays.
Effective August 2, 2021, the Community Profile Report will return to being updated Monday through Friday.
Effective June 22, 2022, the Community Profile Report will only be updated twice a week, on Wednesdays and Fridays.
https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
After over two years of public reporting, the State Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release was on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at CDC’s COVID Data Tracker.
The State Profile Report (SPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, in collaboration with the White House. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The SPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for each state, down to the county level.
It is a weekly snapshot in time that:
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/21200/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/21200/terms
The purpose of the Habeas Corpus Litigation in United States District Courts: An Empirical Study, 2007 is to provide empirical information about habeas corpus cases filed by state prisoners in United States District Courts under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The writ of habeas corpus is a remedy regulated by statute and available in federal court to persons "in custody in violation of the Constitution..." When a federal court grants a writ of habeas corpus, it orders the state court to release the prisoner, or to repeat the trial, sentencing, or other proceeding that led to the prisoner's custody. Each year, state prisoners file between 16,000 and 18,000 cases seeking habeas corpus relief. The study was the first to collect empirical information about this litigation, a decade after AEDPA was passed. It sought to shed light upon an otherwise unexplored area of habeas corpus law by looking at samples of capital and non-capital cases and describing the court processing and general demographic information of these cases in detail. AEDPA changed habeas law by: Establishing a 1-year statute of limitation for filing a federal habeas petition, which begins when appeal of the state judgment is complete, and is tolled during "properly filed" state post-conviction proceedings; Authorizing federal judges to deny on the merits any claim that a petitioner failed to exhaust in state court; Prohibiting a federal court from holding an evidentiary hearing when the petitioner failed to develop the facts in state court, except in limited circumstances; Barring successive petitions, except in limited circumstances; and Mandating a new standard of review for evaluating state court determinations of fact and applications of constitutional law. The information found within this study is for policymakers who design or assess changes in habeas law, for litigants and courts who address the scope and meaning of the habeas statutes, and for researchers who seek information concerning the processing of habeas petitions in federal courts. Descriptive findings are provided detailing petitioner demographics, state proceedings, representation of petitioner in federal court, petitions, type of proceeding challenged, claims raised, intermediate orders, litigation steps, processing time, non-merits dispositions and merits disposition for both capital and non-capital cases which lead into the comparative and explanatory findings that provide information on current and past habeas litigation and how it has been effected by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37879/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37879/terms
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES, 1973-2018 provides annual data on prisoners under a sentence of death, as well as those who had their sentences commuted or vacated and prisoners who were executed. This study examines basic sociodemographic classifications including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status at time of imprisonment, level of education, and state and region of incarceration. Criminal history information includes prior felony convictions and prior convictions for criminal homicide and the legal status at the time of the capital offense. Additional information is provided on those inmates removed from death row by yearend 2018. The dataset consists of one part which contains 9,583 cases. The file provides information on inmates whose death sentences were removed in addition to information on those inmates who were executed. The file also gives information about inmates who received a second death sentence by yearend 2018 as well as inmates who were already on death row.