To create the dataset, the top 10 countries leading in the incidence of COVID-19 in the world were selected as of October 22, 2020 (on the eve of the second full of pandemics), which are presented in the Global 500 ranking for 2020: USA, India, Brazil, Russia, Spain, France and Mexico. For each of these countries, no more than 10 of the largest transnational corporations included in the Global 500 rating for 2020 and 2019 were selected separately. The arithmetic averages were calculated and the change (increase) in indicators such as profitability and profitability of enterprises, their ranking position (competitiveness), asset value and number of employees. The arithmetic mean values of these indicators for all countries of the sample were found, characterizing the situation in international entrepreneurship as a whole in the context of the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 on the eve of the second wave of the pandemic. The data is collected in a general Microsoft Excel table. Dataset is a unique database that combines COVID-19 statistics and entrepreneurship statistics. The dataset is flexible data that can be supplemented with data from other countries and newer statistics on the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the fact that the data in the dataset are not ready-made numbers, but formulas, when adding and / or changing the values in the original table at the beginning of the dataset, most of the subsequent tables will be automatically recalculated and the graphs will be updated. This allows the dataset to be used not just as an array of data, but as an analytical tool for automating scientific research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship. The dataset includes not only tabular data, but also charts that provide data visualization. The dataset contains not only actual, but also forecast data on morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 for the period of the second wave of the pandemic in 2020. The forecasts are presented in the form of a normal distribution of predicted values and the probability of their occurrence in practice. This allows for a broad scenario analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship, substituting various predicted morbidity and mortality rates in risk assessment tables and obtaining automatically calculated consequences (changes) on the characteristics of international entrepreneurship. It is also possible to substitute the actual values identified in the process and following the results of the second wave of the pandemic to check the reliability of pre-made forecasts and conduct a plan-fact analysis. The dataset contains not only the numerical values of the initial and predicted values of the set of studied indicators, but also their qualitative interpretation, reflecting the presence and level of risks of a pandemic and COVID-19 crisis for international entrepreneurship.

• About Dataset Safa S. Abdul-Jabbar, Alaa k. Farhan

• Context This is the first Dataset for various ordinary patients in Iraq. The Dataset provides the patients’ Cell Blood Count test information that can be used to create a Hematology diagnosis/prediction system. Also, this Data was collected in 2022 from Al-Zahraa Al-Ahly Hospital. These data can be cleaned & analyzed using any programming language because it is provided in an excel file that can be accessed and manipulated easily. The user just needs to understand how rows and columns are arranged because the data was collected as images(CBC images) from the laboratories and then stored the extracted data in an excel file.  Content This Dataset contains 500 rows. For each row (patient information), there are 21 columns containing CBC test features that can be described as follows:

• ID: Patients Identifier

• WBC: White Blood Cell, Normal Ranges: 4.0 to 10.0, Unit: 10^9/L.

• LYMp: Lymphocytes percentage, which is a type of white blood cell, Normal Ranges: 20.0 to 40.0, Unit: %

• MIDp: Indicates the percentage combined value of the other types of white blood cells not classified as lymphocytes or granulocytes, Normal Ranges: 1.0 to 15.0, Unit: %

• NEUTp: Neutrophils are a type of white blood cell (leukocytes); neutrophils percentage, Normal Ranges: 50.0 to 70.0, Unit: %

• LYMn: Lymphocytes number are a type of white blood cell, Normal Ranges: 0.6 to 4.1, Unit: 10^9/L.

• MIDn: Indicates the combined number of other white blood cells not classified as lymphocytes or granulocytes, Normal Ranges: 0.1 to 1.8, Unit: 10^9/L.

• NEUTn: Neutrophils Number, Normal Ranges: 2.0 to 7.8, Unit: 10^9/L.

• RBC: Red Blood Cell, Normal Ranges: 3.50 to 5.50, Unit: 10^12/L

• HGB: Hemoglobin, Normal Ranges: 11.0 to 16.0, Unit: g/dL

• HCT: Hematocrit is the proportion, by volume, of the Blood that consists of red blood cells, Normal Ranges: 36.0 to 48.0, Unit: %

• MCV: Mean Corpuscular Volume, Normal Ranges: 80.0 to 99.0, Unit: fL

• MCH: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin is the average amount of haemoglobin in the average red cell, Normal Ranges: 26.0 to 32.0, Unit: pg

• MCHC: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Normal Ranges: 32.0 to 36.0, Unit: g/dL

• RDWSD: Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Normal Ranges: 37.0 to 54.0, Unit: fL

• RDWCV: Red blood cell distribution width, Normal Ranges: 11.5 to 14.5, Unit: %

• PLT: Platelet Count, Normal Ranges: 100 to 400, Unit: 10^9/L

• MPV: Mean Platelet Volume, Normal Ranges: 7.4 to 10.4, Unit: fL

• PDW: Red Cell Distribution Width, Normal Ranges: 10.0 to 17.0, Unit: %

• PCT: The level of Procalcitonin in the Blood, Normal Ranges: 0.10 to 0.28, Unit: %

• PLCR: Platelet Large Cell Ratio, Normal Ranges: 13.0 to 43.0, Unit: %

• Acknowledgements We thank the entire Al-Zahraa Al-Ahly Hospital Hospital team, especially the hospital manager, for cooperating with us in collecting this data while maintaining patients' confidentiality.

Materials and Methods The study was held in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department and Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, from November 2019 to October 2021 after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC: 924/2019). The study included patients between 18-70 years. Patients with associated diseases like cysts or tumors of the jaw bones, pregnant women, and those with underlying psychological issues were excluded from the study. The patients were assessed 8-12 weeks after surgical intervention. A data schedule was prepared to document age, sex, and fracture type. The study consisted of 182 subjects divided into two groups of 91 each (Group A: Mild to moderate facial injury and Group B: Severe facial injury) based on the severity of maxillofacial fractures and facial injury. Informed consent was obtained from each of the study participants. We followed Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) to determine the severity of facial fractures and injuries. The face is divided horizontally into the mandibular, mid-facial, and upper facial thirds. Fractures in these thirds are given points based on their type (Table 1). Injuries with a total score above 4.4 were considered severe facial injuries (Group A), and those with a total score below 4.4 were considered mild/ moderate facial injuries (Group B). The QOL was compared between the two groups. Meticulous management of hard and soft tissue injuries in our state-of-the-art tertiary care hospital was implemented. All elective cases were surgically treated at least 72 hours after the initial trauma. The facial fractures were adequately reduced and fixed with high–end Titanium miniplates and screws (AO Principles of Fracture Management). Soft tissue injuries were managed by wound debridement, removal of foreign bodies, and layered wound closure. Adequate pain-relieving medication was prescribed to the patients postoperatively for effective pain control. The QOL of the subjects was assessed using the 'Twenty-point Quality of life assessment in facial trauma patients in Indian population' assessment tool. This tool contains 20 questions and uses a five-point Likert response scale. The Twenty – point quality of life assessment tool included two zones: Zone 1 (Psychosocial impact) and Zone 2 (Functional and esthetic impact), with ten questions (domains) each (Table 2). The scores for each question ranged from 1- 5, the higher score denoting better Quality of life. Accordingly, the score in each zone for a patient ranged from 10 -50, and the total scores of both zones were recorded to determine the QOL. The sum of both zones determined the prognosis following surgery (Table 2). The data collected was entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 22(Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Descriptive data were presented in the form of frequency and percentage for categorical variables and in the form of mean, median, standard deviation, and quartiles for continuous variables. Since the data were not following normal distribution, a non-parametric test was used. QOL scores were compared between the study groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Five files, one of which is a ZIP archive, containing data that support the findings of this study. PDF file "IA screenshots CSU Libraries search config" contains screenshots captured from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine for all 24 CalState libraries' homepages for years 2017 - 2019. Excel file "CCIHE2018-PublicDataFile" contains Carnegie Classifications data from the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research for all of the CalState campuses from 2018. CSV file "2017-2019_RAW" contains the raw data exported from Ex Libris Primo Analytics (OBIEE) for all 24 CalState libraries for calendar years 2017 - 2019. CSV file "clean_data" contains the cleaned data from Primo Analytics which was used for all subsequent analysis such as charting and import into SPSS for statistical testing. ZIP archive file "NonparametricStatisticalTestsFromSPSS" contains 23 SPSS files [.spv format] reporting the results of testing conducted in SPSS. This archive includes things such as normality check, descriptives, and Kruskal-Wallis H-test results.