Analysis of ‘Popular Website Traffic Over Time ’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/yamqwe/popular-website-traffice on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

About this dataset

Background

Have you every been in a conversation and the question comes up, who uses Bing? This question comes up occasionally because people wonder if these sites have any views. For this research study, we are going to be exploring popular website traffic for many popular websites.

Methodology

The data collected originates from SimilarWeb.com.

Source

For the analysis and study, go to The Concept Center

This dataset was created by Chase Willden and contains around 0 samples along with 1/1/2017, Social Media, technical information and other features such as: - 12/1/2016 - 3/1/2017 - and more.

How to use this dataset

• Analyze 11/1/2016 in relation to 2/1/2017
• Study the influence of 4/1/2017 on 1/1/2017
• More datasets

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Chase Willden

Start A New Notebook!

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Click Web Traffic Combined with Transaction Data: A New Dimension of Shopper Insights

Consumer Edge is a leader in alternative consumer data for public and private investors and corporate clients. Click enhances the unparalleled accuracy of CE Transact by allowing investors to delve deeper and browse further into global online web traffic for CE Transact companies and more. Leverage the unique fusion of web traffic and transaction datasets to understand the addressable market and understand spending behavior on consumer and B2B websites. See the impact of changes in marketing spend, search engine algorithms, and social media awareness on visits to a merchant’s website, and discover the extent to which product mix and pricing drive or hinder visits and dwell time. Plus, Click uncovers a more global view of traffic trends in geographies not covered by Transact. Doubleclick into better forecasting, with Click.

Consumer Edge’s Click is available in machine-readable file delivery and enables: • Comprehensive Global Coverage: Insights across 620+ brands and 59 countries, including key markets in the US, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. • Integrated Data Ecosystem: Click seamlessly maps web traffic data to CE entities and stock tickers, enabling a unified view across various business intelligence tools. • Near Real-Time Insights: Daily data delivery with a 5-day lag ensures timely, actionable insights for agile decision-making. • Enhanced Forecasting Capabilities: Combining web traffic indicators with transaction data helps identify patterns and predict revenue performance.

Use Case: Analyze Year Over Year Growth Rate by Region

Problem A public investor wants to understand how a company’s year-over-year growth differs by region.

Solution The firm leveraged Consumer Edge Click data to: • Gain visibility into key metrics like views, bounce rate, visits, and addressable spend • Analyze year-over-year growth rates for a time period • Breakout data by geographic region to see growth trends

Metrics Include: • Spend • Items • Volume • Transactions • Price Per Volume

Inquire about a Click subscription to perform more complex, near real-time analyses on public tickers and private brands as well as for industries beyond CPG like: • Monitor web traffic as a leading indicator of stock performance and consumer demand • Analyze customer interest and sentiment at the brand and sub-brand levels

Consumer Edge offers a variety of datasets covering the US, Europe (UK, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain), and across the globe, with subscription options serving a wide range of business needs.

Consumer Edge is the Leader in Data-Driven Insights Focused on the Global Consumer

Dataset

This dataset was created by DNS_dataset

Contents

The people from Czech are publishing a dataset for the HTTPS traffic classification.

Since the data were captured mainly in the real backbone network, they omitted IP addresses and ports. The datasets consist of calculated from bidirectional flows exported with flow probe Ipifixprobe. This exporter can export a sequence of packet lengths and times and a sequence of packet bursts and time. For more information, please visit ipfixprobe repository (Ipifixprobe).

During research, they divided HTTPS into five categories: L -- Live Video Streaming, P -- Video Player, M -- Music Player, U -- File Upload, D -- File Download, W -- Website, and other traffic.

They have chosen the service representatives known for particular traffic types based on the Alexa Top 1M list and Moz's list of the most popular 500 websites for each category. They also used several popular websites that primarily focus on the audience in Czech. The identified traffic classes and their representatives are provided below:

Live Video Stream Twitch, Czech TV, YouTube Live Video Player DailyMotion, Stream.cz, Vimeo, YouTube Music Player AppleMusic, Spotify, SoundCloud File Upload/Download FileSender, OwnCloud, OneDrive, Google Drive Website and Other Traffic Websites from Alexa Top 1M list

We are publishing a dataset we created for the HTTPS traffic classification.

Since the data were captured mainly in the real backbone network, we omitted IP addresses and ports. The datasets consist of calculated from bidirectional flows exported with flow probe Ipifixprobe. This exporter can export a sequence of packet lengths and times and a sequence of packet bursts and time. For more information, please visit ipfixprobe repository (Ipifixprobe).

During our research, we divided HTTPS into five categories: L -- Live Video Streaming, P -- Video Player, M -- Music Player, U -- File Upload, D -- File Download, W -- Website, and other traffic.

We have chosen the service representatives known for particular traffic types based on the Alexa Top 1M list and Moz's list of the most popular 500 websites for each category. We also used several popular websites that primarily focus on the audience in our country. The identified traffic classes and their representatives are provided below:

Live Video Stream Twitch, Czech TV, YouTube Live

Video Player DailyMotion, Stream.cz, Vimeo, YouTube

Music Player AppleMusic, Spotify, SoundCloud

File Upload/Download FileSender, OwnCloud, OneDrive, Google Drive

Website and Other Traffic Websites from Alexa Top 1M list

You can also access an API version of this dataset.

TMS

(traffic monitoring system) daily-updated traffic counts API

Important note: due to the size of this dataset, you won't be able to open it fully in Excel. Use notepad / R / any software package which can open more than a million rows.

Data reuse caveats: as per license.

Data quality

statement: please read the accompanying user manual, explaining:

how

 this data is collected identification 

 of count stations traffic 

 monitoring technology monitoring 

 hierarchy and conventions typical 

 survey specification data 

 calculation TMS 

 operation. 

Traffic

monitoring for state highways: user manual

[PDF 465 KB]

The data is at daily granularity. However, the actual update

frequency of the data depends on the contract the site falls within. For telemetry

sites it's once a week on a Wednesday. Some regional sites are fortnightly, and

some monthly or quarterly. Some are only 4 weeks a year, with timing depending

on contractors’ programme of work.

Data quality caveats: you must use this data in

conjunction with the user manual and the following caveats.

The

 road sensors used in data collection are subject to both technical errors and 

 environmental interference.Data 

 is compiled from a variety of sources. Accuracy may vary and the data 

 should only be used as a guide.As 

 not all road sections are monitored, a direct calculation of Vehicle 

 Kilometres Travelled (VKT) for a region is not possible.Data 

 is sourced from Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency TMS data.For 

 sites that use dual loops classification is by length. Vehicles with a length of less than 5.5m are 

 classed as light vehicles. Vehicles over 11m long are classed as heavy 

 vehicles. Vehicles between 5.5 and 11m are split 50:50 into light and 

 heavy.In September 2022, the National Telemetry contract was handed to a new contractor. During the handover process, due to some missing documents and aged technology, 40 of the 96 national telemetry traffic count sites went offline. Current contractor has continued to upload data from all active sites and have gradually worked to bring most offline sites back online. Please note and account for possible gaps in data from National Telemetry Sites. 

The NZTA Vehicle

Classification Relationships diagram below shows the length classification (typically dual loops) and axle classification (typically pneumatic tube counts),

and how these map to the Monetised benefits and costs manual, table A37,

page 254.

Monetised benefits and costs manual [PDF 9 MB]

For the full TMS

classification schema see Appendix A of the traffic counting manual vehicle

classification scheme (NZTA 2011), below.

Traffic monitoring for state highways: user manual [PDF 465 KB]

State highway traffic monitoring (map)

State highway traffic monitoring sites

This traffic-count data is provided by the City of Pittsburgh's Department of Mobility & Infrastructure (DOMI). Counters were deployed as part of traffic studies, including intersection studies, and studies covering where or whether to install speed humps. In some cases, data may have been collected by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) or BikePGH.

Data is currently available for only the most-recent count at each location.

Traffic count data is important to the process for deciding where to install speed humps. According to DOMI, they may only be legally installed on streets where traffic counts fall below a minimum threshhold. Residents can request an evaluation of their street as part of DOMI's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. The City has also shared data on the impact of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program in reducing speeds.

Different studies may collect different data. Speed hump studies capture counts and speeds. SPC and BikePGH conduct counts of cyclists. Intersection studies included in this dataset may not include traffic counts, but reports of individual studies may be requested from the City. Despite the lack of count data, intersection studies are included to facilitate data requests.

Data captured by different types of counting devices are included in this data. StatTrak counters are in use by the City, and capture data on counts and speeds. More information about these devices may be found on the company's website. Data includes traffic counts and average speeds, and may also include separate counts of bicycles.

Tubes are deployed by both SPC and BikePGH and used to count cyclists. SPC may also deploy video counters to collect data.

NOTE: The data in this dataset has not updated since 2021 because of a broken data feed. We're working to fix it.

The dataset provides 12 months (August 2016 to August 2017) of obfuscated Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store , a real ecommerce store that sells Google-branded merchandise, in BigQuery. It’s a great way analyze business data and learn the benefits of using BigQuery to analyze Analytics 360 data Learn more about the data The data includes The data is typical of what an ecommerce website would see and includes the following information:Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate, including data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, and display trafficContent data: information about the behavior of users on the site, such as URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions on the Google Merchandise Store website.Limitations: All users have view access to the dataset. This means you can query the dataset and generate reports but you cannot complete administrative tasks. Data for some fields is obfuscated such as fullVisitorId, or removed such as clientId, adWordsClickInfo and geoNetwork. “Not available in demo dataset” will be returned for STRING values and “null” will be returned for INTEGER values when querying the fields containing no data.This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery

15 smart sensors were installed on Mill Road and surrounding streets to record numbers of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and other vehicles. The data being collated and analysed by the Smart Cambridge programme will help the Greater Cambridge Partnership understand how people use the road network.

Data will be released monthly for these locations until the end of 2020. Please note that due to the level of insight that can be gained from these sensors, additional sensors in more locations have been installed in Cambridge since the summer of 2019. Some sensors will remain beyond 2020 in strategic locations and the network is expected to grow. Data for those more permanent sites, outside of the Mill Road project will be published here: https://data.cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/dataset/cambridge-city-smart-s...

Mill Road Bridge was closed for eight weeks from 1 July 2019 for crucial work being carried out to improve rail services. Pedestrians and cyclists will still be able to cross the railway for most of the working time.

A high concentration of sensors were installed for approximately 18 months to gather data before the closure, during the time when there is no vehicle traffic coming over Mill Road Bridge and then after the bridge is re-opened. This has allowed engineers to see the impact of the closure on surrounding roads, including on air quality. Keeping the sensors in place for this long has also allowed teams to make greater comparisons, by taking in to account daily, weekly, monthly and annual variations in traffic levels.

The below data release offers counts for each sensor over 1 hour periods. The curent data covers the period 03/06/2019 to 13/12/2020.

Hourly counts are broken down by inbound and outbound journeys. .

Counts are also broken down by vehicle type. This includes:

Pedestrians Cyclists Buses LGV OGV 1 OGV 2 The release also includes a full list of sensor sites with geographic point location data.

This dataset contains the locations of intersections with traffic counts and links to collected data. Information on traffic counts is collected by staff at intersections and includes detailed information by lane and direction. Traffic information is also collected by automated counters at mid-block locations and focuses on direction specifically. That is found in separate dataset, Directional traffic count locations. Data currencyThis is a static dataset Data accuracyThe locations are approximate, either in the intersection of two or more streets or along a block between intersections. Websites for further information​Traffic count data

The dataset is a set of network traffic traces in pcap/csv format captured from a single user. The traffic is classified in 5 different activities (Video, Bulk, Idle, Web, and Interactive) and the label is shown in the filename. There is also a file (mapping.csv) with the mapping of the host's IP address, the csv/pcap filename and the activity label.

Activities:

Interactive: applications that perform real-time interactions in order to provide a suitable user experience, such as editing a file in google docs and remote CLI's sessions by SSH. Bulk data transfer: applications that perform a transfer of large data volume files over the network. Some examples are SCP/FTP applications and direct downloads of large files from web servers like Mediafire, Dropbox or the university repository among others. Web browsing: contains all the generated traffic while searching and consuming different web pages. Examples of those pages are several blogs and new sites and the moodle of the university. Vídeo playback: contains traffic from applications that consume video in streaming or pseudo-streaming. The most known server used are Twitch and Youtube but the university online classroom has also been used. Idle behaviour: is composed by the background traffic generated by the user computer when the user is idle. This traffic has been captured with every application closed and with some opened pages like google docs, YouTube and several web pages, but always without user interaction.

The capture is performed in a network probe, attached to the router that forwards the user network traffic, using a SPAN port. The traffic is stored in pcap format with all the packet payload. In the csv file, every non TCP/UDP packet is filtered out, as well as every packet with no payload. The fields in the csv files are the following (one line per packet): Timestamp, protocol, payload size, IP address source and destination, UDP/TCP port source and destination. The fields are also included as a header in every csv file.

The amount of data is stated as follows:

Bulk : 19 traces, 3599 s of total duration, 8704 MBytes of pcap files Video : 23 traces, 4496 s, 1405 MBytes Web : 23 traces, 4203 s, 148 MBytes Interactive : 42 traces, 8934 s, 30.5 MBytes Idle : 52 traces, 6341 s, 0.69 MBytes

The code of our machine learning approach is also included. There is a README.txt file with the documentation of how to use the code.

AADT represents current (most recent) Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locations Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical AADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: Christy Prentice, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA

Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.


Link to ESRI Feature Service:

Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations

Context

This file contains 5 years of daily time series data for several measures of traffic on a statistical forecasting teaching notes website whose alias is statforecasting.com. The variables have complex seasonality that is keyed to the day of the week and to the academic calendar. The patterns you you see here are similar in principle to what you would see in other daily data with day-of-week and time-of-year effects. Some good exercises are to develop a 1-day-ahead forecasting model, a 7-day ahead forecasting model, and an entire-next-week forecasting model (i.e., next 7 days) for unique visitors.

Content

The variables are daily counts of page loads, unique visitors, first-time visitors, and returning visitors to an academic teaching notes website. There are 2167 rows of data spanning the date range from September 14, 2014, to August 19, 2020. A visit is defined as a stream of hits on one or more pages on the site on a given day by the same user, as identified by IP address. Multiple individuals with a shared IP address (e.g., in a computer lab) are considered as a single user, so real users may be undercounted to some extent. A visit is classified as "unique" if a hit from the same IP address has not come within the last 6 hours. Returning visitors are identified by cookies if those are accepted. All others are classified as first-time visitors, so the count of unique visitors is the sum of the counts of returning and first-time visitors by definition. The data was collected through a traffic monitoring service known as StatCounter.

Inspiration

This file and a number of other sample datasets can also be found on the website of RegressIt, a free Excel add-in for linear and logistic regression which I originally developed for use in the course whose website generated the traffic data given here. If you use Excel to some extent as well as Python or R, you might want to try it out on this dataset.

This competition involves advertisement data provided by BuzzCity Pte. Ltd. BuzzCity is a global mobile advertising network that has millions of consumers around the world on mobile phones and devices. In Q1 2012, over 45 billion ad banners were delivered across the BuzzCity network consisting of more than 10,000 publisher sites which reach an average of over 300 million unique users per month. The number of smartphones active on the network has also grown significantly. Smartphones now account for more than 32% phones that are served advertisements across the BuzzCity network. The "raw" data used in this competition has two types: publisher database and click database, both provided in CSV format. The publisher database records the publisher's (aka partner's) profile and comprises several fields:

publisherid - Unique identifier of a publisher. Bankaccount - Bank account associated with a publisher (may be empty) address - Mailing address of a publisher (obfuscated; may be empty) status - Label of a publisher, which can be the following: "OK" - Publishers whom BuzzCity deems as having healthy traffic (or those who slipped their detection mechanisms) "Observation" - Publishers who may have just started their traffic or their traffic statistics deviates from system wide average. BuzzCity does not have any conclusive stand with these publishers yet "Fraud" - Publishers who are deemed as fraudulent with clear proof. Buzzcity suspends their accounts and their earnings will not be paid

On the other hand, the click database records the click traffics and has several fields:

id - Unique identifier of a particular click numericip - Public IP address of a clicker/visitor deviceua - Phone model used by a clicker/visitor publisherid - Unique identifier of a publisher adscampaignid - Unique identifier of a given advertisement campaign usercountry - Country from which the surfer is clicktime - Timestamp of a given click (in YYYY-MM-DD format) publisherchannel - Publisher's channel type, which can be the following: ad - Adult sites co - Community es - Entertainment and lifestyle gd - Glamour and dating in - Information mc - Mobile content pp - Premium portal se - Search, portal, services referredurl - URL where the ad banners were clicked (obfuscated; may be empty). More details about the HTTP Referer protocol can be found in this article. Related Publication: R. J. Oentaryo, E.-P. Lim, M. Finegold, D. Lo, F.-D. Zhu, C. Phua, E.-Y. Cheu, G.-E. Yap, K. Sim, M. N. Nguyen, K. Perera, B. Neupane, M. Faisal, Z.-Y. Aung, W. L. Woon, W. Chen, D. Patel, and D. Berrar. (2014). Detecting click fraud in online advertising: A data mining approach, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 99-140.

The census count of vehicles on city streets is normally reported in the form of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts. These counts provide a good estimate for the actual number of vehicles on an average weekday at select street segments. Specific block segments are selected for a count because they are deemed as representative of a larger segment on the same roadway. ADT counts are used by transportation engineers, economists, real estate agents, planners, and others professionals for planning and operational analysis. The frequency for each count varies depending on City staff’s needs for analysis in any given area. This report covers the counts taken in our City during the past 12 years approximately.

Linear network representing the estimated traffic flows for roads and highways managed by the Ministry of Transport and Sustainable Mobility (MTMD). These flows are obtained using a statistical estimation method applied to data from more than 4,500 collection sites spread over the main roads of Quebec. It includes DJMA (annual average daily flow), DJME (summer average daily flow), DJME (summer average daily flow (June, July, August, September) and DJMH (average daily winter flow (December, January, February, March) as well as other traffic data. It is important to note that these values are calculated for total traffic directions. Interactive map: Some files are accessible by querying a section of traffic à la carte with a click (the file links are displayed in the descriptive table that is displayed when clicking): • Historical aggregated data (PDF) • Annual reports for permanent sites (PDF and Excel) • Hourly data (hourly average per weekday per month) (Excel) • Annual reports for permanent sites (PDF and Excel) • Hourly data (hourly average per weekday per month) (Excel)**This third party metadata element was translated using an automated translation tool (Amazon Translate).**

The traffic_tmscls feature class shows the location of traffic monitoring sites maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation, Transportation Data and Analytics office's Traffic data section. The sites have daily classification data by direction for the most recent six months. This feature class is updated daily using event mapping against the FDOT TDA linear referencing system (LRS). The feature class also contains information about total volume, managing district, and county location. This dataset is maintained by the Transportation Data & Analytics office (TDA). This hosted feature layer was updated on: 05-21-2025 06:00:05.Download Data: Enter Guest as Username to download the source shapefile from here: https://ftp.fdot.gov/file/d/FTP/FDOT/co/planning/transtat/gis/shapefiles/traffic_tmscls.zip

TRIMARC (Traffic Response and Incident Management Assisting the River City) camera locations in Louisville Metro Kentucky. This feature layer was created from a TRIMARC JSON files of camera locations. This item includes description, direction, and videos links and is used in the Louisville Metro Snow Map. The cameras are used to monitor the roadways and verify incidents to assist in freeway and incident management This feature is a static extract and will be reviewed before each snow season for updates. For more information on this feature layer and it's use please contact Louisville Metro GIS or LOJIC. To learn more about TRIMARC please visit the following website http://www.trimarc.org.

The most common way to quantify roadkill risk in different sections of infrastructures is to collect information on the location of casualties and then, model the probability using the environmental and infrastructure variables associated with the roadkill sites. This approach is not applicable in roads with low traffic intensity as they have a small number of victims (e.g. unpaved roads), where there is a high removal rate of casualties by scavengers (e.g. in natural areas), or when it has to be estimated before the infrastructure is built. We developed an indirect approach to evaluate the risk of collisions with wildlife within Doñana Natural Area (SW Spain), considering the abundance and phenology of species, the characteristics of the environment, and traffic intensity. First we characterized the road network, corresponding to 2190 km of roads (4.04 km/km2) of which only 2% were paved; and extracted environmental variables for the complete network in sections of 200m. Then, we characterized the traffic using data from automatic counting systems for main roads and for the rest we built a model of traffic intensity using data from a stratified sampling design in 62 sites using magnetometers, estimating traffic intensity to the whole network of roads. We characterized the abundance of multiple species using track censuses in 183 sites using 200 m transects; obtaining information on abundance, crossing intensity and the distance moved along the road (estimator of the time of exposure to vehicles or exposure). With this information we created a model of the number of crossing events per species in sections of 200 m using environmental predictors and applied the models to the whole network of roads. We estimated the roadkill risk using the index risk = log (no. crossings x traffic intensity x exposure), standardized between 0 and 1. We calculated the index for the whole network of roads. As an example, we show the predictions corresponding to the roadkill risk for several species, clearly identifying areas of high risk which are localized along roads with high traffic intensity and within them, specific sections with maximum risk. The predictions matched well with the observations of road-killed data recorded in the area.

Unlock the Power of Behavioural Data with GDPR-Compliant Clickstream Insights.

Swash clickstream data offers a comprehensive and GDPR-compliant dataset sourced from users worldwide, encompassing both desktop and mobile browsing behaviour. Here's an in-depth look at what sets us apart and how our data can benefit your organisation.

User-Centric Approach: Unlike traditional data collection methods, we take a user-centric approach by rewarding users for the data they willingly provide. This unique methodology ensures transparent data collection practices, encourages user participation, and establishes trust between data providers and consumers.

Wide Coverage and Varied Categories: Our clickstream data covers diverse categories, including search, shopping, and URL visits. Whether you are interested in understanding user preferences in e-commerce, analysing search behaviour across different industries, or tracking website visits, our data provides a rich and multi-dimensional view of user activities.

GDPR Compliance and Privacy: We prioritise data privacy and strictly adhere to GDPR guidelines. Our data collection methods are fully compliant, ensuring the protection of user identities and personal information. You can confidently leverage our clickstream data without compromising privacy or facing regulatory challenges.

Market Intelligence and Consumer Behaviuor: Gain deep insights into market intelligence and consumer behaviour using our clickstream data. Understand trends, preferences, and user behaviour patterns by analysing the comprehensive user-level, time-stamped raw or processed data feed. Uncover valuable information about user journeys, search funnels, and paths to purchase to enhance your marketing strategies and drive business growth.

High-Frequency Updates and Consistency: We provide high-frequency updates and consistent user participation, offering both historical data and ongoing daily delivery. This ensures you have access to up-to-date insights and a continuous data feed for comprehensive analysis. Our reliable and consistent data empowers you to make accurate and timely decisions.

Custom Reporting and Analysis: We understand that every organisation has unique requirements. That's why we offer customisable reporting options, allowing you to tailor the analysis and reporting of clickstream data to your specific needs. Whether you need detailed metrics, visualisations, or in-depth analytics, we provide the flexibility to meet your reporting requirements.

Data Quality and Credibility: We take data quality seriously. Our data sourcing practices are designed to ensure responsible and reliable data collection. We implement rigorous data cleaning, validation, and verification processes, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our clickstream data. You can confidently rely on our data to drive your decision-making processes.