Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in the United States was last recorded at 4 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Fed Funds Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
The Federal Reserve sets interest rates to promote conditions that achieve the mandate set by the Congress — high employment, low and stable inflation, sustainable economic growth, and moderate long-term interest rates. Interest rates set by the Fed directly influence the cost of borrowing money. Lower interest rates encourage more people to obtain a mortgage for a new home or to borrow money for an automobile or for home improvement. Lower rates encourage businesses to borrow funds to invest in expansion such as purchasing new equipment, updating plants, or hiring more workers. Higher interest rates restrain such borrowing by consumers and businesses.
This dataset includes data on the economic conditions in the United States on a monthly basis since 1954. The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions trade federal funds (balances held at Federal Reserve Banks) with each other overnight. The rate that the borrowing institution pays to the lending institution is determined between the two banks; the weighted average rate for all of these types of negotiations is called the effective federal funds rate. The effective federal funds rate is determined by the market but is influenced by the Federal Reserve through open market operations to reach the federal funds rate target. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets eight times a year to determine the federal funds target rate; the target rate transitioned to a target range with an upper and lower limit in December 2008. The real gross domestic product is calculated as the seasonally adjusted quarterly rate of change in the gross domestic product based on chained 2009 dollars. The unemployment rate represents the number of unemployed as a seasonally adjusted percentage of the labor force. The inflation rate reflects the monthly change in the Consumer Price Index of products excluding food and energy.
The interest rate data was published by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis' economic data portal. The gross domestic product data was provided by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis; the unemployment and consumer price index data was provided by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
How does economic growth, unemployment, and inflation impact the Federal Reserve's interest rates decisions? How has the interest rate policy changed over time? Can you predict the Federal Reserve's next decision? Will the target range set in March 2017 be increased, decreased, or remain the same?
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Sweden was last recorded at 1.75 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Sweden Interest Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.
Facebook
Twitterhttp://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
Source is Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/"NAME OF MEASURE" Column names are "Name of Measure" from FRED's catalog.
Group 1: Yield Curve Indicators These focus on the shape of the Treasury yield curve, comparing longer-term to shorter-term rates. They are primarily used to: Signal Economic Expectations: A normal curve (longer-term rates higher) suggests expectations of growth and possibly inflation. A flattening or inverted curve (short-term rates near or above long-term) could signal a potential slowdown or recession.
Group 2: Monetary Policy and Market Expectations These spreads look at the difference between Treasury yields and the Federal Funds Rate, the primary tool of monetary policy. They indicate: Market vs. Fed Outlook: Widening spreads could suggest the market expects faster rate hikes or higher long-term inflation than the Fed is signaling. Narrowing spreads could mean the opposite. Risk-Taking: When these spreads widen, it can be a sign of investors moving from safe Treasuries to riskier assets in search of yield.
Group 3: Credit Risk and Market Sentiment These spreads focus on corporate bond yields relative to Treasuries, highlighting the added compensation investors require for holding riskier corporate debt. They signal: Credit Conditions: Widening spreads suggest deteriorating credit conditions or lower risk tolerance among investors. Narrowing spreads suggest the opposite. Economic Confidence: Investors often demand higher premiums for corporate bonds during economic uncertainty, widening these spreads.
Group 4: Breakeven Inflation Rates The breakeven inflation rate represents a measure of expected inflation derived from 30-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Securities (BC_30YEAR) and 30-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Constant Maturity Securities (TC_30YEAR). The latest value implies what market participants expect inflation to be in the next 30 years, on average.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Japan was last recorded at 0.50 percent. This dataset provides - Japan Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States Interest Rates: 12 Months Expectation: Lower data was reported at 21.400 % in Apr 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 23.300 % for Mar 2025. United States Interest Rates: 12 Months Expectation: Lower data is updated monthly, averaging 12.100 % from Jun 1987 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 455 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 45.800 % in Jan 1991 and a record low of 5.200 % in Jun 2018. United States Interest Rates: 12 Months Expectation: Lower data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Conference Board. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.H051: Consumer Confidence Index: Interest Rate Expectation. [COVID-19-IMPACT]
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate In the Euro Area was last recorded at 2.15 percent. This dataset provides - Euro Area Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Poland was last recorded at 4.25 percent. This dataset provides - Poland Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Canada was last recorded at 2.25 percent. This dataset provides - Canada Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.focus-economics.com/terms-and-conditions/https://www.focus-economics.com/terms-and-conditions/
Monthly and long-term Japan Interest Rate data: historical series and analyst forecasts curated by FocusEconomics.
Facebook
TwitterDESCRIPTION
Create a model that predicts whether or not a loan will be default using the historical data.
Problem Statement:
For companies like Lending Club correctly predicting whether or not a loan will be a default is very important. In this project, using the historical data from 2007 to 2015, you have to build a deep learning model to predict the chance of default for future loans. As you will see later this dataset is highly imbalanced and includes a lot of features that make this problem more challenging.
Domain: Finance
Analysis to be done: Perform data preprocessing and build a deep learning prediction model.
Content:
Dataset columns and definition:
credit.policy: 1 if the customer meets the credit underwriting criteria of LendingClub.com, and 0 otherwise.
purpose: The purpose of the loan (takes values "credit_card", "debt_consolidation", "educational", "major_purchase", "small_business", and "all_other").
int.rate: The interest rate of the loan, as a proportion (a rate of 11% would be stored as 0.11). Borrowers judged by LendingClub.com to be more risky are assigned higher interest rates.
installment: The monthly installments owed by the borrower if the loan is funded.
log.annual.inc: The natural log of the self-reported annual income of the borrower.
dti: The debt-to-income ratio of the borrower (amount of debt divided by annual income).
fico: The FICO credit score of the borrower.
days.with.cr.line: The number of days the borrower has had a credit line.
revol.bal: The borrower's revolving balance (amount unpaid at the end of the credit card billing cycle).
revol.util: The borrower's revolving line utilization rate (the amount of the credit line used relative to total credit available).
inq.last.6mths: The borrower's number of inquiries by creditors in the last 6 months.
delinq.2yrs: The number of times the borrower had been 30+ days past due on a payment in the past 2 years.
pub.rec: The borrower's number of derogatory public records (bankruptcy filings, tax liens, or judgments).
Steps to perform:
Perform exploratory data analysis and feature engineering and then apply feature engineering. Follow up with a deep learning model to predict whether or not the loan will be default using the historical data.
Tasks:
Transform categorical values into numerical values (discrete)
Exploratory data analysis of different factors of the dataset.
Additional Feature Engineering
You will check the correlation between features and will drop those features which have a strong correlation
This will help reduce the number of features and will leave you with the most relevant features
After applying EDA and feature engineering, you are now ready to build the predictive models
In this part, you will create a deep learning model using Keras with Tensorflow backend
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Pakistan was last recorded at 11 percent. This dataset provides - Pakistan Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterHave you ever wondered how lenders use various factors such as credit score, annual income, the loan amount approved, tenure, debt-to-income ratio etc. and select your interest rates?
The process, defined as ‘risk-based pricing’, uses a sophisticated algorithm that leverages different determining factors of a loan applicant. Selection of significant factors will help develop a prediction algorithm which can estimate loan interest rates based on clients’ information. On one hand, knowing the factors will help consumers and borrowers to increase their credit worthiness and place themselves in a better position to negotiate for getting a lower interest rate. On the other hand, this will help lending companies to get an immediate fixed interest rate estimation based on clients information. Here, your goal is to use a training dataset to predict the loan rate category (1 / 2 / 3) that will be assigned to each loan in our test set.
You can use any combination of the features in the dataset to make your loan rate category predictions. Some features will be easier to use than others.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
🏦 Synthetic Loan Approval Dataset
A Realistic, High-Quality Dataset for Credit Risk Modelling
🎯 Why This Dataset?
Most loan datasets on Kaggle have unrealistic patterns where:
Unlike most loan datasets available online, this one is built on real banking criteria from US and Canadian financial institutions. Drawing from 3 years of hands-on finance industry experience, the dataset incorporates realistic correlations and business logic that reflect how actual lending decisions are made. This makes it perfect for data scientists looking to build portfolio projects that showcase not just coding ability, but genuine understanding of credit risk modelling.
📊 Dataset Overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Records | 50,000 |
| Features | 20 (customer_id + 18 predictors + 1 target) |
| Target Distribution | 55% Approved, 45% Rejected |
| Missing Values | 0 (Complete dataset) |
| Product Types | Credit Card, Personal Loan, Line of Credit |
| Market | United States & Canada |
| Use Case | Binary Classification (Approved/Rejected) |
🔑 Key Features
Identifier:
-Customer ID (unique identifier for each application)
Demographics:
-Age, Occupation Status, Years Employed
Financial Profile:
-Annual Income, Credit Score, Credit History Length -Savings/Assets, Current Debt
Credit Behaviour:
-Defaults on File, Delinquencies, Derogatory Marks
Loan Request:
-Product Type, Loan Intent, Loan Amount, Interest Rate
Calculated Ratios:
-Debt-to-Income, Loan-to-Income, Payment-to-Income
💡 What Makes This Dataset Special?
1️⃣ Real-World Approval Logic The dataset implements actual banking criteria: - DTI ratio > 50% = automatic rejection - Defaults on file = instant reject - Credit score bands match real lending thresholds - Employment verification for loans ≥$20K
2️⃣ Realistic Correlations - Higher income → Better credit scores - Older applicants → Longer credit history - Students → Lower income, special treatment for small loans - Loan intent affects approval (Education best, Debt Consolidation worst)
3️⃣ Product-Specific Rules - Credit Cards: More lenient, higher limits - Personal Loans: Standard criteria, up to $100K - Line of Credit: Capped at $50K, manual review for high amounts
4️⃣ Edge Cases Included - Young applicants (age 18) building first credit - Students with thin credit files - Self-employed with variable income - High debt-to-income ratios - Multiple delinquencies
🎓 Perfect For - Machine Learning Practice: Binary classification with real patterns - Credit Risk Modelling: Learn actual lending criteria - Portfolio Projects: Build impressive, explainable models - Feature Engineering: Rich dataset with meaningful relationships - Business Analytics: Understand financial decision-making
📈 Quick Stats
Approval Rates by Product - Credit Card: 60.4% more lenient) - Personal Loan: 46.9 (standard) - Line of Credit: 52.6% (moderate)
Loan Intent (Best → Worst Approval Odds) 1. Education (63% approved) 2. Personal (58% approved) 3. Medical/Home (52% approved) 4. Business (48% approved) 5. Debt Consolidation (40% approved)
Credit Score Distribution - Mean: 644 - Range: 300-850 - Realistic bell curve around 600-700
Income Distribution - Mean: $50,063 - Median: $41,608 - Range: $15K - $250K
🎯 Expected Model Performance
With proper feature engineering and tuning: - Accuracy: 75-85% - ROC-AUC: 0.80-0.90 - F1-Score: 0.75-0.85
Important: Feature importance should show: 1. Credit Score (most important) 2. Debt-to-Income Ratio 3. Delinquencies 4. Loan Amount 5. Income
If your model shows different patterns, something's wrong!
🏆 Use Cases & Projects
Beginner - Binary classification with XGBoost/Random Forest - EDA and visualization practice - Feature importance analysis
Intermediate - Custom threshold optimization (profit maximization) - Cost-sensitive learning (false positive vs false negative) - Ensemble methods and stacking
Advanced - Explainable AI (SHAP, LIME) - Fairness analysis across demographics - Production-ready API with FastAPI/Flask - Streamlit deployment with business rules
⚠️ Important Notes
This is SYNTHETIC Data - Generated based on real banking criteria - No real customer data was used - Safe for public sharing and portfolio use
Limitations - Simplified approval logic (real banks use 100+ factors) - No temporal component (no time series) - Single country/currency assumed (USD) - No external factors (economy, market conditions)
Educational Purpose This dataset is designed for: - Learning credit risk modeling - Portfolio projects - ML practice - Understanding lending criteria
NOT for: - Actual lending decisions - Financial advice - Production use without validation
🤝 Contributing
Found an issue? Have suggestions? - Open an issue on GitHub - Suggest i...
Facebook
TwitterPeer-to-peer leading has opened up access to the credit market to clienteles that previously were left out by banks. Due to the fact that they were not bankable in credit scoring terms, the likelihood of default was bigger than the probability of profit for banks (Gomber, Kauffman, Poker, & Webci, 2018). Peer-to-peer lending opens up an opportunity for these individual borrowers to acquire credit. The hardest challenge for investors is to allocate their assets to the right opportunity. This problem is traditionally solved by financial intermediaries, since the investor does not have the information required to make a valid decision. Therefore, the financial intermediaries allocate the money for the small investors and gain money in this way. (Iyer. Ijaz khwaja. Luttmer & Shue ,2016).
Due to technological improvement, Investors have to no longer rely on financial Intermediaries to lead their money to borrowers (Morse,2015). The internet made it possible for people to get in contact more easily and share information faster. The loans on a peer-to-peer leading platform are arranged without the intervention of a traditional financial intermediary. But the platforms offer different products in which they advise the investor on their investment. Due in this, investors do not pick loans themselves; they instead invest in portfolios that are formed by the peer-to-peer lending platforms. For example, the platform gives the investors an indication of the creditworthiness by computing a credit rating. Another feature the platform offer are guarantees that investors get a certain amount of their investment back, so they will not lose their complete investment. The most common feature that is used for this matter is a buyback guarantee, which means that the platform will buy the investment back from you for the principal amount if the repayment is more than 60 days late. However, this comes at the costs of a lower interest rate for the investor as the loan originator will take a bigger share of the interest they ask from the borrowers.
Due to the absence of a third party, investors are exposed to different risks compared to the traditional situation. To investigate these risks, a few effects should be measured. First the determinants of loan default within this new peer-to-peer lending market should be investigated. Secondly, after this research it should be clear what determines the loan default. This research will be structured in the following parts. we will focus on the overview of the data that is used in this research including the descriptive statistics of the variables. The tables will give the relevant information regarding the continuous and categorical variables in the dataset. In the next part the methodology of the research is stated and described. This will introduce various machine learning classifiers that are used. The results of these tests will be presented and considered thoroughly. At last, the results will form the basis for the conclusions and recommendations of this research.
The aim is to implement different statistical learning techniques to try to estimate the probability of default for each loan. Machine learning models are used to Classify a set of unseen data and statistical metrics are used to compare the results.
OBJECTIVE
1. To build a predictive Model.
2. To compute the probability/score of the defaulters.
3. Developing an understanding of the behavioural pattern of the customers before granting the loan.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
By [source]
This dataset explores the potential relationship between art presence and property prices in London neighborhoods. We conducted an analysis to investigate this by measuring the proportion of Flickr photographs with the keyword ‘art’ attached. We then compared that data to residential property price gains for each Inner London neighborhood, seeking out any associations or correlations between art presence and housing value. Our findings demonstrate the impact of aesthetics on neighborhoods, illustrating how visual environment influences socio-economic conditions. With this dataset, we aim to show how online platforms can be leveraged for quantitative data collection and analysis which can visualize these relationships so as to better understand our urban settings
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset can be used to investigate the relationship between art presence and property prices in London neighborhoods. The dataset includes three columns – Postcode.District, Rank.Mean.Change, and Proportion.Art.Photos – which provide quantitative analyses of the association between art presence and price gains for London neighborhoods.
To use this dataset, first identify the postcode district for which you wish to access data by referencing a street list or PostCodeSearcher website that outlines postcodes for each neighborhood in London(http://postcodesearcher.com/london). This will allow you to easily find properties within each neighborhood as there are specific postcode districts that demarcate boundaries of particular areas (for example W2 covers Bayswater).
Once you have identified a postcode district of interest, review the ‘Rank.Mean Change’ column to explore how residential property prices have changed relative to other areas in Inner London since 2010-13 using fractions (1 = highest gain; 25 = lowest gain). Focusing on one particular location will also provide an idea about their current pricing level compared with others in order to evaluate whether further investment is worthwhile or not based on its past history of growth rates . It is important to note that higher rank numbers indicate higher price gains while lower rank numbers indicate lower price gains relative with respect from 2010-13 timeframe therefore comparing these values across many neighborhoods gives an indication as what area offers more value growth wise over given time period..
Finally pay attention how much did art contributes as far change in property price goes? To answer this question , review ‘Proportion Art Photos’ column which provides ratio of Flickr photographs associated with keyword 'art' attached within given regions helps identify visual characteristics within different localities.. Comparing proportions across various locations provide detail information regarding how much did share visual aesthetic characterstics impacts change in pricings accross different region.. For example it can give us further understandings if majority photographs are made up of urban landscape , abstracts or simply portrait presences had any role play when we look at relativity gains over past few years? Such comparisons help inform our understanding about potential impact art presence can have on changes stay relatively stable even during volatile market times..
By combining this data with other datasets related to demographics, infrastructure and socioeconomics present within londons different areas we can gain further insight which then allows us making informed decisions when it comes investing particular locations .
- Use this dataset to develop a predictive analytics model to identify areas in London most likely to experience an increase in residential property prices associated with the presence of art.
- Use this dataset to develop strategies and policies that promote both artistic expression and urban development in Inner London neighborhoods.
- Compare the presence of art across inner London boroughs, as well as against other cities, to gain insight into the socio-economic conditions related to the visual environment of a city and its impact on life quality for citizens
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
**License: [CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication](https://creativecommons.org/publicd...
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-citation-requiredhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-citation-required
View data of the Effective Federal Funds Rate, or the interest rate depository institutions charge each other for overnight loans of funds.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in the United Kingdom was last recorded at 4 percent. This dataset provides - United Kingdom Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Norway was last recorded at 4 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Norway Interest Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in Mexico was last recorded at 7.25 percent. This dataset provides - Mexico Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The benchmark interest rate in the United States was last recorded at 4 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Fed Funds Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.