Update May 2024: Fixed a data type issue with "id" column that prevented twitter ids from rendering correctly.

Recent progress in generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has enabled the generation of photo-realistic and artistically-inspiring photos at a single click, catering to millions of users online. To explore how people use gen-AI models such as DALLE and StableDiffusion, it is critical to understand the themes, contents, and variations present in the AI-generated photos. In this work, we introduce TWIGMA (TWItter Generative-ai images with MetadatA), a comprehensive dataset encompassing 800,000 gen-AI images collected from Jan 2021 to March 2023 on Twitter, with associated metadata (e.g., tweet text, creation date, number of likes).

Through a comparative analysis of TWIGMA with natural images and human artwork, we find that gen-AI images possess distinctive characteristics and exhibit, on average, lower variability when compared to their non-gen-AI counterparts. Additionally, we find that the similarity between a gen-AI image and human images (i) is correlated with the number of likes; and (ii) can be used to identify human images that served as inspiration for the gen-AI creations. Finally, we observe a longitudinal shift in the themes of AI-generated images on Twitter, with users increasingly sharing artistically sophisticated content such as intricate human portraits, whereas their interest in simple subjects such as natural scenes and animals has decreased. Our analyses and findings underscore the significance of TWIGMA as a unique data resource for studying AI-generated images.

Note that in accordance with the privacy and control policy of Twitter, NO raw content from Twitter is included in this dataset and users could and need to retrieve the original Twitter content used for analysis using the Twitter id. In addition, users who want to access Twitter data should consult and follow rules and regulations closely at the official Twitter developer policy at https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/policy.

At the end of October 2022, Elon Musk concluded his acquisition of Twitter. In the weeks and months before that, several questions were publicly discussed that were not only of interest to the platform's future buyers, but also of high relevance to the Computational Social Science research community. For example, how many active users does the platform have? What percentage of accounts on the site are bots? And, what are the dominating topics and sub-topical spheres on the platform? In a globally coordinated effort of 80 scholars to shed light on these questions, and to offer a dataset that will equip other researchers to do the same, we have collected 375 million tweets published within a 24-hour time period starting on September 21, 2022. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first complete 24-hour Twitter dataset that is available for the research community. With it, the present work aims to accomplish two goals. First, we seek to answer the aforementioned questions and provide descriptive metrics about Twitter that can serve as references for other researchers. Second, we create a baseline dataset for future research that can be used to study the potential impact of the platform's ownership change.

Context

The following information can also be found at https://www.kaggle.com/davidwallach/financial-tweets. Out of curosity, I just cleaned the .csv files to perform a sentiment analysis. So both the .csv files in this dataset are created by me.

Anything you read in the description is written by David Wallach and using all this information, I happen to perform my first ever sentiment analysis.

"I have been interested in using public sentiment and journalism to gather sentiment profiles on publicly traded companies. I first developed a Python package (https://github.com/dwallach1/Stocker) that scrapes the web for articles written about companies, and then noticed the abundance of overlap with Twitter. I then developed a NodeJS project that I have been running on my RaspberryPi to monitor Twitter for all tweets coming from those mentioned in the content section. If one of them tweeted about a company in the stocks_cleaned.csv file, then it would write the tweet to the database. Currently, the file is only from earlier today, but after about a month or two, I plan to update the tweets.csv file (hopefully closer to 50,000 entries.

I am not quite sure how this dataset will be relevant, but I hope to use these tweets and try to generate some sense of public sentiment score."

Content

This dataset has all the publicly traded companies (tickers and company names) that were used as input to fill the tweets.csv. The influencers whose tweets were monitored were: ['MarketWatch', 'business', 'YahooFinance', 'TechCrunch', 'WSJ', 'Forbes', 'FT', 'TheEconomist', 'nytimes', 'Reuters', 'GerberKawasaki', 'jimcramer', 'TheStreet', 'TheStalwart', 'TruthGundlach', 'Carl_C_Icahn', 'ReformedBroker', 'benbernanke', 'bespokeinvest', 'BespokeCrypto', 'stlouisfed', 'federalreserve', 'GoldmanSachs', 'ianbremmer', 'MorganStanley', 'AswathDamodaran', 'mcuban', 'muddywatersre', 'StockTwits', 'SeanaNSmith'

Acknowledgements

The data used here is gathered from a project I developed : https://github.com/dwallach1/StockerBot

Inspiration

I hope to develop a financial sentiment text classifier that would be able to track Twitter's (and the entire public's) feelings about any publicly traded company (and cryptocurrency)

One of the biggest advantages of Twitter is the speed at which information can be passed around. People use Twitter primarily to get news and for entertainment. This is the breakdown of why people use Twitter today.

Due to the relevance of the COVID-19 global pandemic, we are releasing our dataset of tweets acquired from the Twitter Stream related to COVID-19 chatter. The first 9 weeks of data (from January 1st, 2020 to March 11th, 2020) contain very low tweet counts as we filtered other data we were collecting for other research purposes, however, one can see the dramatic increase as the awareness for the virus spread. Dedicated data gathering started from March 11th to March 29th which yielded over 4 million tweets a day.

The data collected from the stream captures all languages, but the higher prevalence are: English, Spanish, and French. We release all tweets and retweets on the full_dataset.tsv file (70,569,368 unique tweets), and a cleaned version with no retweets on the full_dataset-clean.tsv file (13,535,912 unique tweets). There are several practical reasons for us to leave the retweets, tracing important tweets and their dissemination is one of them. For NLP tasks we provide the top 1000 frequent terms in frequent_terms.csv, the top 1000 bigrams in frequent_bigrams.csv, and the top 1000 trigrams in frequent_trigrams.csv. Some general statistics per day are included for both datasets in the statistics-full_dataset.tsv and statistics-full_dataset-clean.tsv files.

More details can be found (and will be updated faster at: https://github.com/thepanacealab/covid19_twitter)

As always, the tweets distributed here are only tweet identifiers (with date and time added) due to the terms and conditions of Twitter to re-distribute Twitter data. The need to be hydrated to be used.

Utilize our Twitter dataset for diverse applications to enrich business strategies and market insights. Analyzing this dataset provides a comprehensive understanding of social media trends, empowering organizations to refine their communication and marketing strategies. Access the entire dataset or customize a subset to fit your needs. Popular use cases include market research to identify trending topics and hashtags, AI training by reviewing factors such as tweet content, retweets, and user interactions for predictive analytics, and trend forecasting by examining correlations between specific themes and user engagement to uncover emerging social media preferences.

This is the dataset for the article "A Predictive Method to Improve the Effectiveness of Twitter Communication in a Cultural Heritage Scenario".

Abstract:

Museums are embracing social technologies in the attempt to broaden their audience and to engage people. Although social communication seems an easy task, media managers know how hard it is to reach millions of people with a simple message. Indeed, millions of posts are competing every day to get visibility in terms of likes and shares and very little research focused on museums communication to identify best practices. In this paper, we focus on Twitter and we propose a novel method that exploits interpretable machine learning techniques to: (a) predict whether a tweet will likely be appreciated by Twitter users or not; (b) present simple suggestions that will help enhancing the message and increasing the probability of its success. Using a real-world dataset of around 40,000 tweets written by 23 world famous museums, we show that our proposed method allows identifying tweet features that are more likely to influence the tweet success.

Code to run a selection of experiments is available at https://github.com/rmartoglia/predict-twitter-ch

Dataset structure

The dataset contains the dataset used in the experiments of the above research paper. Only the extracted features for the museum tweet threads (and not the message full text) are provided and needed for the analyses.

We selected 23 well known world spread art museums and grouped them into five groups: G1 (museums with at least three million of followers); G2 (museums with more than one million of followers); G3 (museums with more than 400,000 followers); G4 (museums with more that 200,000 followers); G5 (Italian museums). From these museums, we analyzed ca. 40,000 tweets, with a number varying from 5k ca. to 11k ca. for each museum group, depending on the number of museums in each group.

Content features: these are the features that can be drawn form the content of the tweet itself. We further divide such features in the following two categories:

– Countable: these features have a value ranging into different intervals. We take into consideration: the number of hashtags (i.e., words preceded by #) in the tweet, the number of URLs (i.e., links to external resources), the number of images (e.g., photos and graphical emoticons), the number of mentions (i.e., twitter accounts preceded by @), the length of the tweet;

– On-Off : these features have binary values in {0, 1}. We observe whether the tweet has exclamation marks, question marks, person names, place names, organization names, other names. Moreover, we also take into consideration the tweet topic density: assuming that the involved topics correspond to the hashtags mentioned in the text, we define a tweet as dense of topics if the number of hashtags it contains is greater than a given threshold, set to 5. Finally, we observe the tweet sentiment that might be present (positive or negative) or not (neutral).

Context features: these features are not drawn form the content of the tweet itself and might give a larger picture of the context in which the tweet was sent. Namely, we take into consideration the part of the day in which the tweet was sent (morning, afternoon, evening and night respectively from 5:00am to 11:59am, from 12:00pm to 5:59pm, from 6:00pm to 10:59pm and from 11pm to 4:59am), and a boolean feature indicating whether the tweet is a retweet or not.

User features: these features are proper of the user that sent the tweet, and are the same for all the tweets of this user. Namely we consider the name of the museum and the number of followers of the user.

The current dataset contains Tweet IDs for tweets mentioning "COVID" (e.g., COVID-19, COVID19) and shared between March and July of 2020.Sampling Method: hourly requests sent to Twitter Search API using Social Feed Manager, an open source software that harvests social media data and related content from Twitter and other platforms.NOTE: 1) In accordance with Twitter API Terms, only Tweet IDs are provided as part of this dataset. 2) To recollect tweets based on the list of Tweet IDs contained in these datasets, you will need to use tweet 'rehydration' programs like Hydrator (https://github.com/DocNow/hydrator) or Python library Twarc (https://github.com/DocNow/twarc). 3) This dataset, like most datasets collected via the Twitter Search API, is a sample of the available tweets on this topic and is not meant to be comprehensive. Some COVID-related tweets might not be included in the dataset either because the tweets were collected using a standardized but intermittent (hourly) sampling protocol or because tweets used hashtags/keywords other than COVID (e.g., Coronavirus or #nCoV). 4) To broaden this sample, consider comparing/merging this dataset with other COVID-19 related public datasets such as: https://github.com/thepanacealab/covid19_twitter https://ieee-dataport.org/open-access/corona-virus-covid-19-tweets-dataset https://github.com/echen102/COVID-19-TweetIDs

Advertising makes up 89% of its total revenue and data licensing makes up about 11%.

Author: Víctor Yeste. Universitat Politècnica de Valencia.The object of this study is the design of a cybermetric methodology whose objectives are to measure the success of the content published in online media and the possible prediction of the selected success variables.In this case, due to the need to integrate data from two separate areas, such as web publishing and the analysis of their shares and related topics on Twitter, has opted for programming as you access both the Google Analytics v4 reporting API and Twitter Standard API, always respecting the limits of these.The website analyzed is hellofriki.com. It is an online media whose primary intention is to solve the need for information on some topics that provide daily a vast number of news in the form of news, as well as the possibility of analysis, reports, interviews, and many other information formats. All these contents are under the scope of the sections of cinema, series, video games, literature, and comics.This dataset has contributed to the elaboration of the PhD Thesis:Yeste Moreno, VM. (2021). Diseño de una metodología cibermétrica de cálculo del éxito para la optimización de contenidos web [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/176009Data have been obtained from each last-minute news article published online according to the indicators described in the doctoral thesis. All related data are stored in a database, divided into the following tables:tesis_followers: User ID list of media account followers.tesis_hometimeline: data from tweets posted by the media account sharing breaking news from the web.status_id: Tweet IDcreated_at: date of publicationtext: content of the tweetpath: URL extracted after processing the shortened URL in textpost_shared: Article ID in WordPress that is being sharedretweet_count: number of retweetsfavorite_count: number of favoritestesis_hometimeline_other: data from tweets posted by the media account that do not share breaking news from the web. Other typologies, automatic Facebook shares, custom tweets without link to an article, etc. With the same fields as tesis_hometimeline.tesis_posts: data of articles published by the web and processed for some analysis.stats_id: Analysis IDpost_id: Article ID in WordPresspost_date: article publication date in WordPresspost_title: title of the articlepath: URL of the article in the middle webtags: Tags ID or WordPress tags related to the articleuniquepageviews: unique page viewsentrancerate: input ratioavgtimeonpage: average visit timeexitrate: output ratiopageviewspersession: page views per sessionadsense_adunitsviewed: number of ads viewed by usersadsense_viewableimpressionpercent: ad display ratioadsense_ctr: ad click ratioadsense_ecpm: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewstesis_stats: data from a particular analysis, performed at each published breaking news item. Fields with statistical values can be computed from the data in the other tables, but total and average calculations are saved for faster and easier further processing.id: ID of the analysisphase: phase of the thesis in which analysis has been carried out (right now all are 1)time: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterstart_date: date and time of measurement on the day of publicationend_date: date and time when the measurement is made 14 days latermain_post_id: ID of the published article to be analysedmain_post_theme: Main section of the published article to analyzesuperheroes_theme: "1" if about superheroes, "0" if nottrailer_theme: "1" if trailer, "0" if notname: empty field, possibility to add a custom name manuallynotes: empty field, possibility to add personalized notes manually, as if some tag has been removed manually for being considered too generic, despite the fact that the editor put itnum_articles: number of articles analysednum_articles_with_traffic: number of articles analysed with traffic (which will be taken into account for traffic analysis)num_articles_with_tw_data: number of articles with data from when they were shared on the media’s Twitter accountnum_terms: number of terms analyzeduniquepageviews_total: total page viewsuniquepageviews_mean: average page viewsentrancerate_mean: average input ratioavgtimeonpage_mean: average duration of visitsexitrate_mean: average output ratiopageviewspersession_mean: average page views per sessiontotal: total of ads viewedadsense_adunitsviewed_mean: average of ads viewedadsense_viewableimpressionpercent_mean: average ad display ratioadsense_ctr_mean: average ad click ratioadsense_ecpm_mean: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewsTotal: total incomeretweet_count_mean: average incomefavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesterms_ini_num_tweets: total tweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who spoke about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms on the day of publicationterms_end_num_tweets: total tweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total bookmarks on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of media Twitter account followers who have recently posted a tweet talking about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who have spoken about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: the average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms 14 days after publication.tesis_terms: data of the terms (tags) related to the processed articles.stats_id: Analysis IDtime: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterterm_id: Term ID (tag) in WordPressname: Name of the termslug: URL of the termnum_tweets: number of tweetsretweet_count_total: total retweetsretweet_count_mean: average retweetsfavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesfollowers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the termuser_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who were talking about the termuser_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who were talking about the termuser_age_mean: average age in days of users who were talking about the termurl_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio

Due to the relevance of the COVID-19 global pandemic, we are releasing our dataset of tweets acquired from the Twitter Stream related to COVID-19 chatter. Since our first release we have received additional data from our new collaborators, allowing this resource to grow to its current size. Dedicated data gathering started from March 11th yielding over 4 million tweets a day. We have added additional data provided by our new collaborators from January 27th to March 27th, to provide extra longitudinal coverage.

The data collected from the stream captures all languages, but the higher prevalence are: English, Spanish, and French. We release all tweets and retweets on the full_dataset.tsv file (152,920,832 unique tweets), and a cleaned version with no retweets on the full_dataset-clean.tsv file (30,990,645 unique tweets). There are several practical reasons for us to leave the retweets, tracing important tweets and their dissemination is one of them. For NLP tasks we provide the top 1000 frequent terms in frequent_terms.csv, the top 1000 bigrams in frequent_bigrams.csv, and the top 1000 trigrams in frequent_trigrams.csv. Some general statistics per day are included for both datasets in the statistics-full_dataset.tsv and statistics-full_dataset-clean.tsv files.

More details can be found (and will be updated faster at: https://github.com/thepanacealab/covid19_twitter)

As always, the tweets distributed here are only tweet identifiers (with date and time added) due to the terms and conditions of Twitter to re-distribute Twitter data ONLY for research purposes. The need to be hydrated to be used.

Twitter is an online Social Media Platform where people share their their though as tweets. It is observed that some people misuse it to tweet hateful content. Twitter is trying to tackle this problem and we shall help it by creating a strong NLP based-classifier model to distinguish the negative tweets & block such tweets. Can you build a strong classifier model to predict the same?

Each row contains the text of a tweet and a sentiment label. In the training set you are provided with a word or phrase drawn from the tweet (selected_text) that encapsulates the provided sentiment.

Make sure, when parsing the CSV, to remove the beginning / ending quotes from the text field, to ensure that you don't include them in your training.

You're attempting to predict the word or phrase from the tweet that exemplifies the provided sentiment. The word or phrase should include all characters within that span (i.e. including commas, spaces, etc.)

Columns: textID - unique ID for each piece of text text - the text of the tweet sentiment - the general sentiment of the tweet Acknowledgement: The dataset is download from Kaggle Competetions:
https://www.kaggle.com/c/tweet-sentiment-extraction/data?select=train.csv

Objective: Understand the Dataset & cleanup (if required). Build classification models to predict the twitter sentiments. Compare the evaluation metrics of vaious classification algorithms.

Original Data Source: Twitter Tweets Sentiment Dataset

-This Dataset was gathered by crawling Twitter's REST API using the Python library tweepy 3. This dataset contains the tweets of the 20 most popular twitter users (with the most followers) whereby retweets are neglected. These accounts belong to public people, such as Katy Perry and Barack Obama, platforms, YouTube, Instagram, and television channels shows, e.g., CNN Breaking News and The Ellen Show. -Consequently, the dataset contains a mix of relatively structured tweets, tweets written in a formal and informative manner, and completely unstructured tweets written in a colloquial style. Unfortunately, the geocoordinates were not available for those tweets. - H -This Dataset has been used to generate reserach paper under title "Machine Learning Techniques for Anomalies Detection in Post Arrays". -Crawled attributes are: Author (Twitter User), Content (Tweet), Date_Time, id (Twitter User ID), language (Tweet Langugage), Number_of_Likes, Number_of_Shares. Overall: 52543 tweets of top 20 users in twitter Screen_Name #Tweets Time span (in days) TheEllenShow 3,147 - 662 jimmyfallon 3,123 - 1231 ArianaGrande 3,104 - 613 YouTube 3,077 - 411 KimKardashian 2,939 - 603 katyperry 2,924 - 1,598 selenagomez 2,913 - 2,266 rihanna 2,877 - 1,557 BarackObama 2,863 - 849 britneyspears 2,776 - 1,548 instagram 2,577 - 456 shakira 2,530 - 1,850 Cristiano 2,507 - 2,407 jtimberlake 2,478 - 2,491 ladygaga 2,329 - 894 Twitter 2,290 - 2,593 ddlovato 2,217 - 741 taylorswift13 2,029 - 2,091 justinbieber 2,000 - 664 cnnbrk 1,842 - 183

The "Famous Keyword Twitter Replies Dataset" is a comprehensive collection of Twitter data that focuses on popular keywords and their associated replies. This dataset contains five essential columns that provide valuable insights into the Twitter conversation dynamics:

Keyword: This column represents the specific keyword or topic of interest that generated the original tweet. It helps identify the context or subject matter around which the conversation revolves.

Main_tweet: The main_tweet column contains the original tweet related to the keyword. It serves as the starting point or focal point of the conversation and often provides essential information or opinions on the given topic.

Main_likes: This column provides the number of likes received by the main_tweet. Likes serve as a measure of engagement and indicate the level of popularity or resonance of the original tweet within the Twitter community.

Reply: The reply column consists of the replies or responses to the main_tweet. These replies may include comments, opinions, additional information, or discussions related to the keyword or the original tweet itself. The replies help capture the diverse perspectives and conversations that emerge in response to the main_tweet.

Reply_likes: This column records the number of likes received by each reply. Similar to the main_likes column, the reply_likes column measures the level of engagement and popularity of individual replies. It enables the identification of particularly noteworthy or well-received replies within the dataset.

By analyzing this "Famous Keyword Twitter Replies Dataset," researchers, analysts, and data scientists can gain valuable insights into how popular keywords spark discussions on Twitter and how these discussions evolve through replies.

The dataset's information on likes allows for the evaluation of tweet and reply popularity, helping to identify influential or impactful content.

This dataset serves as a valuable resource for various applications, including sentiment analysis, trend identification, opinion mining, and understanding social media dynamics.

Number of tweets for each pairs of tweet and reply

Total has 17255 pairs of tweet/reply

1) Data introduction • Twitter-tweets-sentiment dataset is a dataset that aims to analyze tweet sentiment for Twitter and natural language processing.

2) Data utilization (1)Twitter-tweets-sentiment data has characteristics that: • The data consists of three columns, including emotion and text, and aims to block negative tweets through a powerful classification model. (2) Twitter-tweets-sentiment data can be used to: • Social Media Monitoring: Businesses and organizations can use data to monitor social media platforms and gauge public sentiment about a brand, product, event, or social issue. • Sentiment analysis: This dataset can be used to train models that classify the sentiment of tweets, which can help companies and researchers understand public opinion on a variety of topics.

Our dataset comprises 1000 tweets, which were taken from Twitter using the Python programming language. The dataset was stored in a CSV file and generated using various modules. The random module was used to generate random IDs and text, while the faker module was used to generate random user names and dates. Additionally, the textblob module was used to assign a random sentiment to each tweet.

This systematic approach ensures that the dataset is well-balanced and represents different types of tweets, user behavior, and sentiment. It is essential to have a balanced dataset to ensure that the analysis and visualization of the dataset are accurate and reliable. By generating tweets with a range of sentiments, we have created a diverse dataset that can be used to analyze and visualize sentiment trends and patterns.

In addition to generating the tweets, we have also prepared a visual representation of the data sets. This visualization provides an overview of the key features of the dataset, such as the frequency distribution of the different sentiment categories, the distribution of tweets over time, and the user names associated with the tweets. This visualization will aid in the initial exploration of the dataset and enable us to identify any patterns or trends that may be present.

Categories Natural Language Processing, Machine Learning Algorithm, Deep Learning

Acknowledgements & Source Jannatul Ferdoshi

Institutions: BRAC University

Data Source

Image Source:Twitter Sentiment Analysis Using Python GeeksforGeeks | lacienciadelcafe.com.ar

Please don't forget to upvote if you find this useful.

License

CC0

Original Data Source: Twitter Sentiment Analysis using Roberta and VaderTwitter Sentiment Analysis using Roberta and Vader

These are the key Twitter user statistics that you need to know.

The dataset consists of various columns containing information related to tweets posted on Twitter. Each row in the dataset represents a single tweet. Here's an explanation of the columns in the dataset from a third-person perspective:

Tweet: This column contains the actual text content of the tweet. It includes the message that the user posted on Twitter. Tweets can vary in length from a few characters to the maximum allowed by Twitter.

Sentiment: This column indicates the sentiment or emotional tone of the tweet. Sentiment can be classified into categories such as positive, negative, or neutral. It reflects the overall opinion or attitude expressed in the tweet.

Username: This column contains the username of the Twitter account that posted the tweet. Each Twitter user has a unique username that identifies their account.

Timestamp: This column contains the timestamp indicating when the tweet was posted. It includes information about the date and time when the tweet was published on Twitter.

Retweets: This column represents the number of times the tweet has been retweeted by other Twitter users. A retweet is when a user shares another user's tweet with their followers.

Likes: This column indicates the number of likes or favorites received by the tweet. Users can express their appreciation for a tweet by liking it.

Hashtags: This column contains any hashtags included in the tweet. Hashtags are keywords or phrases preceded by the "#" symbol, used to categorize or label tweets and make them more discoverable.

Mentions: This column includes any Twitter usernames mentioned in the tweet. Mentions are when a user tags another user in their tweet by including their username preceded by the "@" symbol.

Location: This column provides information about the location associated with the tweet. It may include details such as the city, state, country, or geographical coordinates from which the tweet was posted, if available.

Source: This column specifies the source or platform used to post the tweet. It indicates whether the tweet was posted from the Twitter website, a mobile app, or a third-party application.

Context

This dataset consists of tweets scraped from Twitter containing the hashtag "videogames". There are 1135 tweets from August 2020 to December 2020. For simplicity of use, I have added another column that consists of clean tweets in tokenized form.

Content

This dataset consists of 1135 tweets and 5 columns: timestamp: Contains both the dates in YYYY-MM-DD format and time in HH:MM:SS format from August 2020 to December 2020. text: Tweets in their raw text format. likes: Number of likes the tweet received. retweets: Number of times the tweet was retweeted. clean_text: Tweets after they were cleaned (punctuations, stopwords, emojis and URLs removed, lemmatized, tokenized)

Inspiration

• Predict the number of likes or retweets for a given tweet.
• Find the sentiment polarity of tweets.
• Predict the sentiments of the given tweets using a pre-trained model.
• Analyze the tweets to understand the positive and negative aspects of games through the perception of a user.
• Frequency of Positive vs Negative tweets.
• Topic modeling to group the most recurrent topic for a given sentiment.

Social network X/Twitter is particularly popular in the United States, and as of February 2025, the microblogging service had an audience reach of 103.9 million users in the country. Japan and the India were ranked second and third with more than 70 million and 25 million users respectively. Global Twitter usage As of the second quarter of 2021, X/Twitter had 206 million monetizable daily active users worldwide. The most-followed Twitter accounts include figures such as Elon Musk, Justin Bieber and former U.S. president Barack Obama. X/Twitter and politics X/Twitter has become an increasingly relevant tool in domestic and international politics. The platform has become a way to promote policies and interact with citizens and other officials, and most world leaders and foreign ministries have an official Twitter account. Former U.S. president Donald Trump used to be a prolific Twitter user before the platform permanently suspended his account in January 2021. During an August 2018 survey, 61 percent of respondents stated that Trump's use of Twitter as President of the United States was inappropriate.