The benchmark interest rate in the United States was last recorded at 4.50 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Fed Funds Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

The benchmark interest rate in Japan was last recorded at 0.50 percent. This dataset provides - Japan Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The benchmark interest rate in Indonesia was last recorded at 5.25 percent. This dataset provides - Indonesia Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Dataset Description

This dataset contains the actual and predicted federal funds target rate for the United States from 1990 to 2023. The federal funds target rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions lend their excess reserves to each other overnight. It is set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and is a key tool used by the Federal Reserve to influence the economy.

The dataset includes the following five columns:

Release Date: The date on which the data was released by the Federal Reserve. Time: The time of day at which the data was released. Actual: The actual federal funds target rate. Predicted: The predicted federal funds target rate. Forecast: The forecast federal funds target rate.

Data Usage

This dataset can be used for a variety of purposes, including: - Analyzing trends in the federal funds target rate over time. - Forecasting the future path of the federal funds target rate. - Assessing the effectiveness of monetary policy. - Data Quality

The data for this dataset is of high quality. The Federal Reserve is a reputable source of data and the data is updated regularly.

Data Limitations

The data for this dataset is limited to the United States. Additionally, the data does not include information on the factors that influenced the Federal Open Market Committee's decision to set the federal funds target rate.

The benchmark interest rate in Mexico was last recorded at 8 percent. This dataset provides - Mexico Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Graph and download economic data for FOMC Summary of Economic Projections for the Fed Funds Rate, Median (FEDTARMD) from 2025 to 2027 about projection, federal, median, rate, and USA.

View data of the Effective Federal Funds Rate, or the interest rate depository institutions charge each other for overnight loans of funds.

The U.S. federal funds rate peaked in 2023 at its highest level since the 2007-08 financial crisis, reaching 5.33 percent by December 2023. A significant shift in monetary policy occurred in the second half of 2024, with the Federal Reserve implementing regular rate cuts. By December 2024, the rate had declined to 4.48 percent. What is a central bank rate? The federal funds rate determines the cost of overnight borrowing between banks, allowing them to maintain necessary cash reserves and ensure financial system liquidity. When this rate rises, banks become more inclined to hold rather than lend money, reducing the money supply. While this decreased lending slows economic activity, it helps control inflation by limiting the circulation of money in the economy. Historic perspective The federal funds rate historically follows cyclical patterns, falling during recessions and gradually rising during economic recoveries. Some central banks, notably the European Central Bank, went beyond traditional monetary policy by implementing both aggressive asset purchases and negative interest rates.

The benchmark interest rate In the Euro Area was last recorded at 2.15 percent. This dataset provides - Euro Area Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

FocusEconomics' economic data is provided by official state statistical reporting agencies as well as our global network of leading banks, think tanks and consultancies. Our datasets provide not only historical data, but also Consensus Forecasts and individual forecasts from the aformentioned global network of economic analysts. This includes the latest forecasts as well as historical forecasts going back to 2010. Our global network consists of over 1000 world-renowned economic analysts from which we calculate our Consensus Forecasts. In this specific dataset you will find economic data for Japan Interest Rate.

The benchmark interest rate in Russia was last recorded at 18 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Russia Interest Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

The benchmark interest rate in Brazil was last recorded at 15 percent. This dataset provides - Brazil Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This dataset contains a wealth of information from 52,000 loan applications, offering detailed insights into the factors that influence loan approval decisions. Collected from financial institutions, this data is highly valuable for credit risk analysis, financial modeling, and predictive analytics. The dataset is particularly useful for anyone interested in applying machine learning techniques to real-world financial decision-making scenarios.

Overview: This dataset provides information about various applicants and the loans they applied for, including their demographic details, income, loan terms, and approval status. By analyzing this data, one can gain an understanding of which factors are most critical for determining the likelihood of loan approval. The dataset can also help in evaluating credit risk and building robust credit scoring systems.

Dataset Columns: Applicant_ID: Unique identifier for each loan application. Gender: Gender of the applicant (Male/Female). Age: Age of the applicant. Marital_Status: Marital status of the applicant (Single/Married). Dependents: Number of dependents the applicant has. Education: Education level of the applicant (Graduate/Not Graduate). Employment_Status: Employment status of the applicant (Employed, Self-Employed, Unemployed). Occupation_Type: Type of occupation, which provides insights into the nature of the applicant’s job (Salaried, Business, Others). Residential_Status: Type of residence (Owned, Rented, Mortgage). City/Town: The city or town where the applicant resides. Annual_Income: The total annual income of the applicant, a key factor in loan eligibility. Monthly_Expenses: The monthly expenses of the applicant, indicating their financial obligations. Credit_Score: The applicant's credit score, reflecting their creditworthiness. Existing_Loans: Number of existing loans the applicant is servicing. Total_Existing_Loan_Amount: The total amount of all existing loans the applicant has. Outstanding_Debt: The remaining amount of debt yet to be paid by the applicant. Loan_History: The applicant’s previous loan history (Good/Bad), indicating their repayment reliability. Loan_Amount_Requested: The loan amount the applicant has applied for. Loan_Term: The term of the loan in months. Loan_Purpose: The purpose of the loan (e.g., Home, Car, Education, Personal, Business). Interest_Rate: The interest rate applied to the loan. Loan_Type: The type of loan (Secured/Unsecured). Co-Applicant: Indicates if there is a co-applicant for the loan (Yes/No). Bank_Account_History: Applicant’s banking history, showing past transactions and reliability. Transaction_Frequency: The frequency of financial transactions in the applicant’s bank account (Low/Medium/High). Default_Risk: The risk level of the applicant defaulting on the loan (Low/Medium/High). Loan_Approval_Status: Final decision on the loan application (Approved/Rejected).

Monetary policy is generally regarded as a central element in the attempts of policy makers to attenuate business-cycle fluctuations. According to the New Keynesian paradigm, central banks are able to stimulate or depress aggregate demand in the short run by adjusting their nominal interest rate targets. The effects of interest rate changes on aggregate consumption, the largest component of aggregate demand, are well understood in the context of this paradigm, on which the canonical "workhorse'' model used in monetary policy analysis is grounded. A key feature of the model is that aggregate consumption is fully described by the amount of goods consumed by a representative household. A decline in the policy rate for instance implies that the real interest rate declines, the representative household saves less and hence increase its demand for consumption. At the same time, general equilibrium effects let labour income grow causing consumption to increase further. However, the mechanism outlined above ignores a considerable amount of empirically-observed heterogeneity among households. For example, households with a higher earnings elasticity to interest rate changes benefit more from a rate cut than those with a lower elasticity; households with large debt positions are at a relative advantage over households with large bond holdings; and households with low exposure to inflation are relatively better off than those holding a sizeable amount of nominal assets. As a result, the contribution to the aggregate consumption response differs substantially across households, implying that monetary expansions and tightenings produce relative "winners'' and relative "losers''. The aim of the project laid out in this proposal is to give a disaggregated account of the heterogeneous effects of monetary-policy induced interest rate changes on household consumption and a detailed analysis of the channels underlying them. Additionally, it seeks to draw conclusions about the determinants of the strength of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy. To do so, it relies on a large panel comprising detailed data from the universe of all households residing in Norway between 1993 and 2015 supplemented with additional micro-data provided by the European Commission. I will be assisted by two project partners, Pascal Paul who is a member of the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and Martin Holm who is affiliated with the Research Unit of Statistics Norway and the University of Oslo. In addition, I would like to collaborate with and help train a doctoral student based at the University of Lausanne on this project. Existing empirical studies of the consumption response to monetary policy at the micro level rely on survey data. Therefore, they are subject to a number of severe data limitations. The surveys employed typically have either no or only a short panel dimension, suffer from attrition, include only limited information on income and wealth, are top-coded, and contain a significant amount of measurement error. The administrative data set provided to us by Statistics Norway suffers from none of these issues, implying that we are in a unique position to evaluate the household-level effects of policy rate changes. In a first step, we use forecasts published by the Norwegian central bank to derive monetary policy shocks that are robust to the simultaneity problem inherent in the identification of the effects of monetary policy following Romer and Romer (2004). We then confront the micro-data with the estimated shocks to study the consumption response along different segments of the income and wealth distribution and to test the importance of heterogeneity in labour earnings, financial income, liquid assets, inflation exposure and interest rate exposure among others. The findings will be of high relevance as they will not only allow us to evaluate channels hypothesised in the analytical literature, improve our understanding of the monetary policy transmission mechanism and its distributional consequences but also serve as a benchmark for structural models built both by theorists and practitioners.

The benchmark interest rate in the United Kingdom was last recorded at 4.25 percent. This dataset provides - United Kingdom Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This table contains 39 series, with data for starting from 1991 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 item: Canada); Financial market statistics (39 items: Government of Canada Treasury Bills, 1-month (composite rates); Government of Canada Treasury Bills, 2-month (composite rates); Government of Canada Treasury Bills, 3-month (composite rates);Government of Canada Treasury Bills, 6-month (composite rates); ...).

This Decision shall be effective from 01 August 2010 and replace the Decision No. 1565/QD-NHNN dated 24 June 2010 of the Governor of the State Bank on the base interest rate in Vietnamese Dong.

1) Data Introduction • The (Cleaned) Credit Score Dataset for Classification Dataset is a structured dataset designed for training machine learning models to classify individuals into credit score categories based on various credit-related attributes.

2) Data Utilization (1) Characteristics of the (Cleaned) Credit Score Dataset for Classification Dataset: • The dataset includes key financial variables that influence credit scoring, such as delinquency history, credit limit, credit utilization ratio, and repayment records. The credit score category serves as the multiclass classification label.

(2) Applications of the (Cleaned) Credit Score Dataset for Classification Dataset: • Credit score classification model training: The dataset can be used to train machine learning models that predict an individual’s credit score category based on financial indicators. • Financial risk assessment and customer segmentation: It can support tasks such as loan approval decision-making, interest rate setting, and personalized financial product recommendations by identifying a customer’s credit level in advance.

The benchmark interest rate in Poland was last recorded at 5 percent. This dataset provides - Poland Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Lending Club offers peer-to-peer (P2P) loans through a technological platform for various personal finance purposes and is today one of the companies that dominate the US P2P lending market. The original dataset is publicly available on Kaggle and corresponds to all the loans issued by Lending Club between 2007 and 2018. The present version of the dataset is for constructing a granting model, that is, a model designed to make decisions on whether to grant a loan based on information available at the time of the loan application. Consequently, our dataset only has a selection of variables from the original one, which are the variables known at the moment the loan request is made. Furthermore, the target variable of a granting model represents the final status of the loan, that are "default" or "fully paid". Thus, we filtered out from the original dataset all the loans in transitory states. Our dataset comprises 1,347,681 records or obligations (approximately 60% of the original) and it was also cleaned for completeness and consistency (less than 1% of our dataset was filtered out).

TARGET VARIABLE

The dataset includes a target variable based on the final resolution of the credit: the default category corresponds to the event charged off and the non-default category to the event fully paid. It does not consider other values in the loan status variable since this variable represents the state of the loan at the end of the considered time window. Thus, there are no loans in transitory states. The original dataset includes the target variable “loan status”, which contains several categories ('Fully Paid', 'Current', 'Charged Off', 'In Grace Period', 'Late (31-120 days)', 'Late (16-30 days)', 'Default'). However, in our dataset, we just consider loans that are either “Fully Paid” or “Default” and transform this variable into a binary variable called “Default”, with a 0 for fully paid loans and a 1 for defaulted loans.

EXPLANATORY VARIABLES

The explanatory variables that we use correspond only to the information available at the time of the application. Variables such as the interest rate, grade, or subgrade are generated by the company as a result of a credit risk assessment process, so they were filtered out from the dataset as they must not be considered in risk models to predict the default in granting of credit.

FULL LIST OF VARIABLES

Loan identification variables:

id: Loan id (unique identifier).

issue_d: Month and year in which the loan was approved.

Quantitative variables:

revenue: Borrower's self-declared annual income during registration.

dti_n: Indebtedness ratio for obligations excluding mortgage. Monthly information. This ratio has been calculated considering the indebtedness of the whole group of applicants. It is estimated as the ratio calculated using the co-borrowers’ total payments on the total debt obligations divided by the co-borrowers’ combined monthly income.

loan_amnt: Amount of credit requested by the borrower.

fico_n: Defined between 300 and 850, reported by Fair Isaac Corporation as a risk measure based on historical credit information reported at the time of application. This value has been calculated as the average of the variables “fico_range_low” and “fico_range_high” in the original dataset.

experience_c: Binary variable that indicates whether the borrower is new to the entity. This variable is constructed from the credit date of the previous obligation in LC and the credit date of the current obligation; if the difference between dates is positive, it is not considered as a new experience with LC.

Categorical variables:

emp_length: Categorical variable with the employment length of the borrower (includes the no information category)

purpose: Credit purpose category for the loan request.

home_ownership_n: Homeownership status provided by the borrower in the registration process. Categories defined by LC: “mortgage”, “rent”, “own”, “other”, “any”, “none”. We merged the categories “other”, “any” and “none” as “other”.

addr_state: Borrower's residence state from the USA.

zip_code: Zip code of the borrower's residence.

Textual variables

title: Title of the credit request description provided by the borrower.

desc: Description of the credit request provided by the borrower.

We cleaned the textual variables. First, we removed all those descriptions that contained the default description provided by Lending Club on its web form (“Tell your story. What is your loan for?”). Moreover, we removed the prefix “Borrower added on DD/MM/YYYY >” from the descriptions to avoid any temporal background on them. Finally, as these descriptions came from a web form, we substituted all the HTML elements by their character (e.g. “&” was substituted by “&”, “<” was substituted by “<”, etc.).

RELATED WORKS

This dataset has been used in the following academic articles:

Sanz-Guerrero, M. Arroyo, J. (2024). Credit Risk Meets Large Language Models: Building a Risk Indicator from Loan Descriptions in P2P Lending. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16458. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.16458

Ariza-Garzón, M.J., Arroyo, J., Caparrini, A., Segovia-Vargas, M.J. (2020). Explainability of a machine learning granting scoring model in peer-to-peer lending. IEEE Access 8, 64873 - 64890. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984412