The benchmark interest rate in the United States was last recorded at 4.50 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Fed Funds Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Fixed 30-year mortgage rates in the United States averaged 6.77 percent in the week ending July 4 of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States MBA 30-Yr Mortgage Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

30 Year Mortgage Rate in the United States increased to 6.72 percent in July 10 from 6.67 percent in the previous week. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States 30 Year Mortgage Rate.

The total amount of data created, captured, copied, and consumed globally is forecast to increase rapidly, reaching *** zettabytes in 2024. Over the next five years up to 2028, global data creation is projected to grow to more than *** zettabytes. In 2020, the amount of data created and replicated reached a new high. The growth was higher than previously expected, caused by the increased demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as more people worked and learned from home and used home entertainment options more often. Storage capacity also growing Only a small percentage of this newly created data is kept though, as just * percent of the data produced and consumed in 2020 was saved and retained into 2021. In line with the strong growth of the data volume, the installed base of storage capacity is forecast to increase, growing at a compound annual growth rate of **** percent over the forecast period from 2020 to 2025. In 2020, the installed base of storage capacity reached *** zettabytes.

Dataset

This dataset was created by @data is life

Released under Apache 2.0

Contents

Household Saving Rate in the United States decreased to 4.50 percent in May from 4.90 percent in April of 2025. This dataset provides - United States Personal Savings Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

AI Training Dataset Market Outlook

The global AI training dataset market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.5% from 2024 to 2032. This substantial growth is driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence across various industries, the necessity for large-scale and high-quality datasets to train AI models, and the ongoing advancements in AI and machine learning technologies.

One of the primary growth factors in the AI training dataset market is the exponential increase in data generation across multiple sectors. With the proliferation of internet usage, the expansion of IoT devices, and the digitalization of industries, there is an unprecedented volume of data being generated daily. This data is invaluable for training AI models, enabling them to learn and make more accurate predictions and decisions. Moreover, the need for diverse and comprehensive datasets to improve AI accuracy and reliability is further propelling market growth.

Another significant factor driving the market is the rising investment in AI and machine learning by both public and private sectors. Governments around the world are recognizing the potential of AI to transform economies and improve public services, leading to increased funding for AI research and development. Simultaneously, private enterprises are investing heavily in AI technologies to gain a competitive edge, enhance operational efficiency, and innovate new products and services. These investments necessitate high-quality training datasets, thereby boosting the market.

The proliferation of AI applications in various industries, such as healthcare, automotive, retail, and finance, is also a major contributor to the growth of the AI training dataset market. In healthcare, AI is being used for predictive analytics, personalized medicine, and diagnostic automation, all of which require extensive datasets for training. The automotive industry leverages AI for autonomous driving and vehicle safety systems, while the retail sector uses AI for personalized shopping experiences and inventory management. In finance, AI assists in fraud detection and risk management. The diverse applications across these sectors underline the critical need for robust AI training datasets.

As the demand for AI applications continues to grow, the role of Ai Data Resource Service becomes increasingly vital. These services provide the necessary infrastructure and tools to manage, curate, and distribute datasets efficiently. By leveraging Ai Data Resource Service, organizations can ensure that their AI models are trained on high-quality and relevant data, which is crucial for achieving accurate and reliable outcomes. The service acts as a bridge between raw data and AI applications, streamlining the process of data acquisition, annotation, and validation. This not only enhances the performance of AI systems but also accelerates the development cycle, enabling faster deployment of AI-driven solutions across various sectors.

Regionally, North America currently dominates the AI training dataset market due to the presence of major technology companies and extensive R&D activities in the region. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid technological advancements, increasing investments in AI, and the growing adoption of AI technologies across various industries in countries like China, India, and Japan. Europe and Latin America are also anticipated to experience significant growth, supported by favorable government policies and the increasing use of AI in various sectors.

Data Type Analysis

The data type segment of the AI training dataset market encompasses text, image, audio, video, and others. Each data type plays a crucial role in training different types of AI models, and the demand for specific data types varies based on the application. Text data is extensively used in natural language processing (NLP) applications such as chatbots, sentiment analysis, and language translation. As the use of NLP is becoming more widespread, the demand for high-quality text datasets is continually rising. Companies are investing in curated text datasets that encompass diverse languages and dialects to improve the accuracy and efficiency of NLP models.

Image data is critical for computer vision application

Context

This dataset was actually made to check the correlations between a housing price index and its crime rate. Rise and fall of housing prices can be due to various factors with obvious reasons being the facilities of the house and its neighborhood. Think of a place like Detroit where there are hoodlums and you don't want to end up buying a house in the wrong place. This data set will serve as historical data for crime rate data and this in turn can be used to predict whether the housing price will rise or fall. Rise in housing price will suggest decrease in crime rate over the years and vice versa.

Content

The headers are self explanatory. index_nsa is the housing price non seasonal index.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to my team who helped in achieving this.

Inspiration

https://www.kaggle.com/marshallproject/crime-rates https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/fhfa-house-price-indexes-hpis Data was collected from these 2 sources and merged to get the resulting dataset.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global AI Training Dataset Market size will be USD 2962.4 million in 2025. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.60% from 2025 to 2033.

North America held the major market share for more than 37% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1096.09 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 26.4% from 2025 to 2033.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 29% of the global revenue, with a market size of USD 859.10 million.
APAC held a market share of around 24% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 710.98 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.6% from 2025 to 2033.
South America has a market share of more than 3.8% of the global revenue, with a market size of USD 112.57 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.6% from 2025 to 2033.
Middle East had a market share of around 4% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 118.50 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.9% from 2025 to 2033.
Africa had a market share of around 2.20% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 65.17 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.3% from 2025 to 2033.
Data Annotation category is the fastest growing segment of the AI Training Dataset Market

Market Dynamics of AI Training Dataset Market

Key Drivers for AI Training Dataset Market

Government-Led Open Data Initiatives Fueling AI Training Dataset Market Growth

In recent years, Government-initiated open data efforts have strongly driven the development of the AI Training Dataset Market through offering affordable, high-quality datasets that are vital in training sound AI models. For instance, the U.S. government's drive for openness and innovation can be seen through portals such as Data.gov, which provides an enormous collection of datasets from many industries, ranging from healthcare, finance, and transportation. Such datasets are basic building blocks in constructing AI applications and training models using real-world data. In the same way, the platform data.gov.uk, run by the U.K. government, offers ample datasets to aid AI research and development, creating an environment that is supportive of technological growth. By releasing such information into the public domain, governments not only enhance transparency but also encourage innovation in the AI industry, resulting in greater demand for training datasets and helping to drive the market's growth.

India's IndiaAI Datasets Platform Accelerates AI Training Dataset Market Growth

India's upcoming launch of the IndiaAI Datasets Platform in January 2025 is likely to greatly increase the AI Training Dataset Market. The project, which is part of the government's ?10,000 crore IndiaAI Mission, will establish an open-source repository similar to platforms such as HuggingFace to enable developers to create, train, and deploy AI models. The platform will collect datasets from central and state governments and private sector organizations to provide a wide and rich data pool. Through improved access to high-quality, non-personal data, the platform is filling an important requirement for high-quality datasets for training AI models, thus driving innovation and development in the AI industry. This public initiative reflects India's determination to become a global AI hub, offering the infrastructure required to facilitate startups, researchers, and businesses in creating cutting-edge AI solutions. The initiative not only simplifies data access but also creates a model for public-private partnerships in AI development.

Restraint Factor for the AI Training Dataset Market

Data Privacy Regulations Impeding AI Training Dataset Market Growth

Strict data privacy laws are coming up as a major constraint in the AI Training Dataset Market since governments across the globe are establishing legislation to safeguard personal data. In the European Union, explicit consent for using personal data is required under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), reducing the availability of datasets for training AI. Likewise, the data protection regulator in Brazil ordered Meta and others to stop the use of Brazilian personal data in training AI models due to dangers to individuals' funda...

The benchmark interest rate In the Euro Area was last recorded at 2.15 percent. This dataset provides - Euro Area Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Graph and download economic data for Personal Saving Rate (PSAVERT) from Jan 1959 to May 2025 about savings, personal, rate, and USA.

Updates

• Notice of data discontinuation: Since the start of the pandemic, AP has reported case and death counts from data provided by Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University has announced that they will stop their daily data collection efforts after March 10. As Johns Hopkins stops providing data, the AP will also stop collecting daily numbers for COVID cases and deaths. The HHS and CDC now collect and visualize key metrics for the pandemic. AP advises using those resources when reporting on the pandemic going forward.

  • CDC Weekly case and death counts (national and state level)
  • CDC County level cases and deaths
  • HHS New hospital admissions
  • CDC NowCast COVID variant proportions (national and regional level)

• April 9, 2020

  • The population estimate data for New York County, NY has been updated to include all five New York City counties (Kings County, Queens County, Bronx County, Richmond County and New York County). This has been done to match the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 data, which aggregates counts for the five New York City counties to New York County.

• April 20, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins death totals in the US now include confirmed and probable deaths in accordance with CDC guidelines as of April 14. One significant result of this change was an increase of more than 3,700 deaths in the New York City count. This change will likely result in increases for death counts elsewhere as well. The AP does not alter the Johns Hopkins source data, so probable deaths are included in this dataset as well.

• April 29, 2020

  • The AP is now providing timeseries data for counts of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The raw counts are provided here unaltered, along with a population column with Census ACS-5 estimates and calculated daily case and death rates per 100,000 people. Please read the updated caveats section for more information.

• September 1st, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins is now providing counts for the five New York City counties individually.

• February 12, 2021

  • The Ohio Department of Health recently announced that as many as 4,000 COVID-19 deaths may have been underreported through the state’s reporting system, and that the "daily reported death counts will be high for a two to three-day period."
  • Because deaths data will be anomalous for consecutive days, we have chosen to freeze Ohio's rolling average for daily deaths at the last valid measure until Johns Hopkins is able to back-distribute the data. The raw daily death counts, as reported by Johns Hopkins and including the backlogged death data, will still be present in the new_deaths column.

• February 16, 2021

  - Johns Hopkins has reconciled Ohio's historical deaths data with the state.

  Overview

The AP is using data collected by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering as our source for outbreak caseloads and death counts for the United States and globally.

The Hopkins data is available at the county level in the United States. The AP has paired this data with population figures and county rural/urban designations, and has calculated caseload and death rates per 100,000 people. Be aware that caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.

This data is from the Hopkins dashboard that is updated regularly throughout the day. Like all organizations dealing with data, Hopkins is constantly refining and cleaning up their feed, so there may be brief moments where data does not appear correctly. At this link, you’ll find the Hopkins daily data reports, and a clean version of their feed.

The AP is updating this dataset hourly at 45 minutes past the hour.

To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

Queries

Use AP's queries to filter the data or to join to other datasets we've made available to help cover the coronavirus pandemic

• Filter cases by state here

• Rank states by their status as current hotspots. Calculates the 7-day rolling average of new cases per capita in each state: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=481e82a4-1b2f-41c2-9ea1-d91aa4b3b1ac

• Find recent hotspots within your state by running a query to calculate the 7-day rolling average of new cases by capita in each county: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=b566f1db-3231-40fe-8099-311909b7b687&showTemplatePreview=true

• Join county-level case data to an earlier dataset released by AP on local hospital capacity here. To find out more about the hospital capacity dataset, see the full details.

• Pull the 100 counties with the highest per-capita confirmed cases here

• Rank all the counties by the highest per-capita rate of new cases in the past 7 days here. Be aware that because this ranks per-capita caseloads, very small counties may rise to the very top, so take into account raw caseload figures as well.

Interactive

The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 cases reported by Johns Hopkins.

@(https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/15/)

Interactive Embed Code

<iframe title="USA counties (2018) choropleth map Mapping COVID-19 cases by county" aria-describedby="" id="datawrapper-chart-nRyaf" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/10/" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="400"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">(function() {'use strict';window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {if (typeof event.data['datawrapper-height'] !== 'undefined') {for (var chartId in event.data['datawrapper-height']) {var iframe = document.getElementById('datawrapper-chart-' + chartId) || document.querySelector("iframe[src*='" + chartId + "']");if (!iframe) {continue;}iframe.style.height = event.data['datawrapper-height'][chartId] + 'px';}}});})();</script>

Caveats

• This data represents the number of cases and deaths reported by each state and has been collected by Johns Hopkins from a number of sources cited on their website.
• In some cases, deaths or cases of people who've crossed state lines -- either to receive treatment or because they became sick and couldn't return home while traveling -- are reported in a state they aren't currently in, because of state reporting rules.
• In some states, there are a number of cases not assigned to a specific county -- for those cases, the county name is "unassigned to a single county"
• This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking project. The AP is simply making it available here for ease of use for reporters and members.
• Caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.
• Population estimates at the county level are drawn from 2014-18 5-year estimates from the American Community Survey.
• The Urban/Rural classification scheme is from the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's National Center for Health Statistics. It puts each county into one of six categories -- from Large Central Metro to Non-Core -- according to population and other characteristics. More details about the classifications can be found here.

Johns Hopkins timeseries data - Johns Hopkins pulls data regularly to update their dashboard. Once a day, around 8pm EDT, Johns Hopkins adds the counts for all areas they cover to the timeseries file. These counts are snapshots of the latest cumulative counts provided by the source on that day. This can lead to inconsistencies if a source updates their historical data for accuracy, either increasing or decreasing the latest cumulative count. - Johns Hopkins periodically edits their historical timeseries data for accuracy. They provide a file documenting all errors in their timeseries files that they have identified and fixed here

Attribution

This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 tracking project

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Colorado population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Colorado across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2024, the population of Colorado was 5.96 million, a 0.95% increase year-by-year from 2023. Previously, in 2023, Colorado population was 5.9 million, an increase of 0.86% compared to a population of 5.85 million in 2022. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2024, population of Colorado increased by 1.63 million. In this period, the peak population was 5.96 million in the year 2024. The numbers suggest that the population has not reached its peak yet and is showing a trend of further growth. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2024

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2024)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Colorado is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Colorado population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Colorado Population by Year. You can refer the same here

Note: Find data at source. ・ Federal and state decarbonization goals have led to numerous financial incentives and policies designed to increase access and adoption of renewable energy systems. In combination with the declining cost of both solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems and rising electric utility rates, residential renewable adoption has become more favorable than ever. However, not all states provide the same opportunity for cost recovery, and the complicated and changing policy and utility landscape can make it difficult for households to make an informed decision on whether to install a renewable system. This paper is intended to provide a guide to households considering renewable adoption by introducing relevant factors that influence renewable system performance and payback, summarized in a state lookup table for quick reference. Five states are chosen as case studies to perform economic optimizations based on net metering policy, utility rate structure, and average electric utility price; these states are selected to be representative of the possible combinations of factors to aid in the decision-making process for customers in all states. The results of this analysis highlight the dual importance of both state support for renewables and price signals, as the benefits of residential renewable systems are best realized in states with net metering policies facing the challenge of above-average electric utility rates.This dataset is intended to allow readers to reproduce and customize the analysis performed in this work to their benefit. Suggested modifications include: location, household load profile, rate tariff structure, and renewable energy system design.

Reporting of new Aggregate Case and Death Count data was discontinued May 11, 2023, with the expiration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declaration. This dataset will receive a final update on June 1, 2023, to reconcile historical data through May 10, 2023, and will remain publicly available.

Aggregate Data Collection Process Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, data have been gathered through a robust process with the following steps:

• A CDC data team reviews and validates the information obtained from jurisdictions’ state and local websites via an overnight data review process.
• If more than one official county data source exists, CDC uses a comprehensive data selection process comparing each official county data source, and takes the highest case and death counts respectively, unless otherwise specified by the state.
• CDC compiles these data and posts the finalized information on COVID Data Tracker.
• County level data is aggregated to obtain state and territory specific totals.

This process is collaborative, with CDC and jurisdictions working together to ensure the accuracy of COVID-19 case and death numbers. County counts provide the most up-to-date numbers on cases and deaths by report date. CDC may retrospectively update counts to correct data quality issues.

Methodology Changes Several differences exist between the current, weekly-updated dataset and the archived version:

• Source: The current Weekly-Updated Version is based on county-level aggregate count data, while the Archived Version is based on State-level aggregate count data.
• Confirmed/Probable Cases/Death breakdown:  While the probable cases and deaths are included in the total case and total death counts in both versions (if applicable), they were reported separately from the confirmed cases and deaths by jurisdiction in the Archived Version.  In the current Weekly-Updated Version, the counts by jurisdiction are not reported by confirmed or probable status (See Confirmed and Probable Counts section for more detail).
• Time Series Frequency: The current Weekly-Updated Version contains weekly time series data (i.e., one record per week per jurisdiction), while the Archived Version contains daily time series data (i.e., one record per day per jurisdiction).
• Update Frequency: The current Weekly-Updated Version is updated weekly, while the Archived Version was updated twice daily up to October 20, 2022.

Important note: The counts reflected during a given time period in this dataset may not match the counts reflected for the same time period in the archived dataset noted above. Discrepancies may exist due to differences between county and state COVID-19 case surveillance and reconciliation efforts.

Confirmed and Probable Counts In this dataset, counts by jurisdiction are not displayed by confirmed or probable status. Instead, confirmed and probable cases and deaths are included in the Total Cases and Total Deaths columns, when available. Not all jurisdictions report probable cases and deaths to CDC.* Confirmed and probable case definition criteria are described here:

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (ymaws.com).

Deaths CDC reports death data on other sections of the website: CDC COVID Data Tracker: Home, CDC COVID Data Tracker: Cases, Deaths, and Testing, and NCHS Provisional Death Counts. Information presented on the COVID Data Tracker pages is based on the same source (total case counts) as the present dataset; however, NCHS Death Counts are based on death certificates that use information reported by physicians, medical examiners, or coroners in the cause-of-death section of each certificate. Data from each of these pages are considered provisional (not complete and pending verification) and are therefore subject to change. Counts from previous weeks are continually revised as more records are received and processed.

Number of Jurisdictions Reporting There are currently 60 public health jurisdictions reporting cases of COVID-19. This includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, New York City, the U.S. territories of American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S Virgin Islands as well as three independent countries in compacts of free association with the United States, Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Republic of Palau. New York State’s reported case and death counts do not include New York City’s counts as they separately report nationally notifiable conditions to CDC.

CDC COVID-19 data are available to the public as summary or aggregate count files, including total counts of cases and deaths, available by state and by county. These and other data on COVID-19 are available from multiple public locations, such as:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html

https://www.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/index.html

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/open-america/surveillance-data-analytics.html

Additional COVID-19 public use datasets, include line-level (patient-level) data, are available at: https://data.cdc.gov/browse?tags=covid-19.

Archived Data Notes:

November 3, 2022: Due to a reporting cadence issue, case rates for Missouri counties are calculated based on 11 days’ worth of case count data in the Weekly United States COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by State data released on November 3, 2022, instead of the customary 7 days’ worth of data.

November 10, 2022: Due to a reporting cadence change, case rates for Alabama counties are calculated based on 13 days’ worth of case count data in the Weekly United States COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by State data released on November 10, 2022, instead of the customary 7 days’ worth of data.

November 10, 2022: Per the request of the jurisdiction, cases and deaths among non-residents have been removed from all Hawaii county totals throughout the entire time series. Cumulative case and death counts reported by CDC will no longer match Hawaii’s COVID-19 Dashboard, which still includes non-resident cases and deaths. 

November 17, 2022: Two new columns, weekly historic cases and weekly historic deaths, were added to this dataset on November 17, 2022. These columns reflect case and death counts that were reported that week but were historical in nature and not reflective of the current burden within the jurisdiction. These historical cases and deaths are not included in the new weekly case and new weekly death columns; however, they are reflected in the cumulative totals provided for each jurisdiction. These data are used to account for artificial increases in case and death totals due to batched reporting of historical data.

December 1, 2022: Due to cadence changes over the Thanksgiving holiday, case rates for all Ohio counties are reported as 0 in the data released on December 1, 2022.

January 5, 2023: Due to North Carolina’s holiday reporting cadence, aggregate case and death data will contain 14 days’ worth of data instead of the customary 7 days. As a result, case and death metrics will appear higher than expected in the January 5, 2023, weekly release.

January 12, 2023: Due to data processing delays, Mississippi’s aggregate case and death data will be reported as 0. As a result, case and death metrics will appear lower than expected in the January 12, 2023, weekly release.

January 19, 2023: Due to a reporting cadence issue, Mississippi’s aggregate case and death data will be calculated based on 14 days’ worth of data instead of the customary 7 days in the January 19, 2023, weekly release.

January 26, 2023: Due to a reporting backlog of historic COVID-19 cases, case rates for two Michigan counties (Livingston and Washtenaw) were higher than expected in the January 19, 2023 weekly release.

January 26, 2023: Due to a backlog of historic COVID-19 cases being reported this week, aggregate case and death counts in Charlotte County and Sarasota County, Florida, will appear higher than expected in the January 26, 2023 weekly release.

January 26, 2023: Due to data processing delays, Mississippi’s aggregate case and death data will be reported as 0 in the weekly release posted on January 26, 2023.

February 2, 2023: As of the data collection deadline, CDC observed an abnormally large increase in aggregate COVID-19 cases and deaths reported for Washington State. In response, totals for new cases and new deaths released on February 2, 2023, have been displayed as zero at the state level until the issue is addressed with state officials. CDC is working with state officials to address the issue.

February 2, 2023: Due to a decrease reported in cumulative case counts by Wyoming, case rates will be reported as 0 in the February 2, 2023, weekly release. CDC is working with state officials to verify the data submitted.

February 16, 2023: Due to data processing delays, Utah’s aggregate case and death data will be reported as 0 in the weekly release posted on February 16, 2023. As a result, case and death metrics will appear lower than expected and should be interpreted with caution.

February 16, 2023: Due to a reporting cadence change, Maine’s

The benchmark interest rate in Sweden was last recorded at 2 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Sweden Interest Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Oregon population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Oregon across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2024, the population of Oregon was 4.27 million, a 0.44% increase year-by-year from 2023. Previously, in 2023, Oregon population was 4.25 million, an increase of 0.15% compared to a population of 4.25 million in 2022. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2024, population of Oregon increased by 841,632. In this period, the peak population was 4.27 million in the year 2024. The numbers suggest that the population has not reached its peak yet and is showing a trend of further growth. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2024

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2024)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Oregon is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Oregon population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Oregon Population by Year. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the United States population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of United States across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2024, the population of United States was 340.11 million, a 0.98% increase year-by-year from 2023. Previously, in 2023, United States population was 336.81 million, an increase of 0.83% compared to a population of 334.02 million in 2022. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2024, population of United States increased by 57.95 million. In this period, the peak population was 340.11 million in the year 2024. The numbers suggest that the population has not reached its peak yet and is showing a trend of further growth. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2024

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2024)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the United States is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in United States population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for United States Population by Year. You can refer the same here

In the Annual Budget Document, the Budget Office presents information about the annual cost of various city services/fees for the typical ratepayer. These services and fees include Austin Energy, Austin Water, Austin Resource Recovery, the Clean Community Fee, the Transportation User Fee, the Drainage Utility Fee, and the Property Tax Bill. This dataset supports the SD23 measure, "Dollar amount and percentage increase of major rates and fees for a range of customer types" (EOA.C.5.c). It contains the approved and amended rates for the typical ratepayer, the annual dollar change, and the annual percent change for each service/fee. This dataset can be used to help understand the cost of city services over time. View more details and insights related to this dataset on the story page: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Dollar-Amount-and-Percentage-Increase-of-Major-Rat/56uv-46qi/

Market Summary of Database Security Market:

• The Global Database Security market size in 2023 was XX Million. The Database Security Industry's compound annual growth rate (CAGR) will be XX% from 2024 to 2031. • The database security industry is growing faster and is expected to expand at a faster rate due to these strict regulatory frameworks. Also, the increase in advanced technology for better protection of data is driving the growth of the Database security market. • The dominating segment is the software. It includes encryption, auditing, tokenization, data masking, and access control management. • Due to the increase in internet users, remote working demand, and risk of data breaches, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a beneficial effect on the market for data security solutions. • The database security market is dominated by North America in terms of both revenue and market share. This can be attributed to the region's concentration of significant industry participants and increasing technical advancements in their product line.

Market Dynamics of Database Security Market:

Key Drivers of Database Security Market:

The Database Security Market is driven by the strict regulatory framework to address information security

Regulatory frameworks can establish standards that developers and users must follow to guarantee a secure database. The market is growing as a result of increasingly stringent regulations enforced globally to protect sensitive data by governments and other relevant authorities in numerous nations. Currently, rules for data localization are in place in most of the countries. These have significant effects on how businesses interact with local regulations as well as their IT footprints, data governance, and data architectures. The general goals of localization regulations are to stop cybercrimes (such as identity theft), boost local economies, and possibly most importantly address growing privacy concerns. The desire of firms to utilize data for their commercial advantage is often the most contentious topic, with different governments arriving at different judgments about how to balance it. Data must be processed and stored within a specific nation or region to comply with geographic constraints on data export. For each of these, businesses must build a unique infrastructure, set of computing resources, and teams. For Instance, two sets of standard contractual agreements were adopted by the European Commission, one was meant for use between controllers and processors, and the other was meant for the transfer of personal data to third parties. They ensure a high level of data privacy for citizens by reflecting new standards under the General Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR) and taking the Court of Justice's Schrems II ruling into consideration. These new tools will provide European firms with greater legal stability and aid SMEs in particular to maintain compliance with secure data transfer standards while enabling unrestricted cross-border data movement. (Source: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2847) Furthermore, Federal Financial Institutions, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS), Examination Council (FFIEC), etc are some strict regulatory measures for protection. So, the database security industry is growing faster and is expected to expand at a faster rate due to these strict regulatory frameworks.

Key Restraints of Database Security Market

Lack of skills and technological knowledge in database security market

Inadequate information security may lead to disruptions in socially significant activities, inability to do business appropriately and efficiently, and loss of personal integrity protection. Nevertheless, obstacles including unclear career routes, out-of-date education, expensive certifications, and high levels of job stress deter people from choosing cybersecurity as a vocation. For Instance, As of May 2023, there were 40,000 cybersecurity job openings in India; however, a significant lack of skilled workers prevented 30% of these positions from being filled, according to TeamLease Digital, a division of TeamLease Services. The need for cybersecurity experts has outpaced supply, making it difficult for m...