9 datasets found
  1. How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) 2017, 2020, 2022, United States

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Feb 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rosenfeld, Michael J.; Thomas, Reuben J.; Hausen, Sonia (2024). How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) 2017, 2020, 2022, United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38873.v1
    Explore at:
    r, sas, stata, spss, delimited, asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Rosenfeld, Michael J.; Thomas, Reuben J.; Hausen, Sonia
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38873/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38873/terms

    Time period covered
    2017
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) is a study on how Americans meet their romantic partners. This is a nationally representative study of American adult respondents with no overlap in subjects from the original HCMST survey [ICPSR 30103] which was first fielded in 2009.

  2. How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST)

    • redivis.com
    application/jsonl +7
    Updated Nov 3, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stanford University Libraries (2022). How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.57761/ktkz-wg93
    Explore at:
    spss, arrow, application/jsonl, stata, avro, sas, parquet, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Redivis Inc.
    Authors
    Stanford University Libraries
    Description

    Abstract

    How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) is a study of how Americans meet their spouses and romantic partners.

    • The study is a nationally representative study of American adults.
    • 4,002 adults responded to the survey, 3,009 of those had a spouse or main
      romantic partner.
    • The study oversamples self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults
    • Follow-up surveys were implemented one and two years after the main survey, to study couple dissolution rates. Version 3.0 of the dataset includes two follow- up surveys, waves 2 and 3.
    • Waves 4 and 5 are provided as separate data files that can be linked back to the main file via variable caseid_new.

    The study will provide answers to the following research questions:

    1. Do traditional couples and nontraditional couples meet in the same way? What kinds of couples are more likely to have met online?
    2. Have the most recent marriage cohorts (especially the traditional heterosexual same-race married couples) met in the same way their parents and grandparents did?
    3. Does meeting online lead to greater or less couple stability?
    4. How do the couple dissolution rates of nontraditional couples compare to the couple dissolution rates of more traditional same-race heterosexual couples?
    5. How does the availability of civil union, domestic partnership or same-sex marriage rights affect couple stability for same-sex couples? This study will provide the first nationally representative data on the couple dissolution rates of same-sex couples.

    Methodology

    Universe:

    The universe for the HCMST survey is English literate adults in the U.S.

    **Unit of Analysis: **

    Individual

    **Type of data collection: **

    Survey Data

    **Time of data collection: **

    Wave I, the main survey, was fielded between February 21 and April 2, 2009. Wave 2 was fielded March 12, 2010 to June 8, 2010. Wave 3 was fielded March 22, 2011 to August 29, 2011. Wave 4 was fielded between March and November of 2013. Wave 5 was fielded between November, 2014 and March, 2015. Dates for the background demographic surveys are described in the User's Guide, under documentation below.

    Geographic coverage:

    United States of America

    Smallest geographic unit:

    US region

    **Sample description: **

    The survey was carried out by survey firm Knowledge Networks (now called GfK). The survey respondents were recruited from an ongoing panel. Panelists are recruited via random digit dial phone survey. Survey questions were mostly answered online; some follow-up surveys were conducted by phone. Panelists who did not have internet access at home were given an internet access device (WebTV). For further information about how the Knowledge Networks hybrid phone-internet survey compares to other survey methodology, see attached documentation.

    The dataset contains variables that are derived from several sources. There are variables from the Main Survey Instrument, there are variables generated from the investigators which were created after the Main Survey, and there are demographic background variables from Knowledge Networks which pre-date the Main Survey. Dates for main survey and for the prior background surveys are included in the dataset for each respondent. The source for each variable is identified in the codebook, and in notes appended within the dataset itself (notes may only be available for the Stata version of the dataset).

    Respondents who had no spouse or main romantic partner were dropped from the Main Survey. Unpartnered respondents remain in the dataset, and demographic background variables are available for them.

    **Sample response rate: **

    Response to the main survey in 2009 from subjects, all of whom were already in the Knowledge Networks panel, was 71%. If we include the the prior initial Random Digit Dialing phone contact and agreement to join the Knowledge Networks panel (participation rate 32.6%), and the respondents’ completion of the initial demographic survey (56.8% completion), the composite overall response rate is a much lower .326*.568*.71= 13%. For further information on the calculation of response rates, and relevant citations, see the Note on Response Rates in the documentation. Response rates for the subsequent waves of the HCMST survey are simpler, using the denominator of people who completed wave 1 and who were eligible for follow-up. Response to wave 2 was 84.5%. Response rate to wave 3 was 72.9%. Response rate to wave 4 was 60.0%. Response rate to wave 5 was 46%. Response to wave 6 was 91.3%. Wave 6 was Internet only, so people who had left the GfK KnowledgePanel were not contacted.

    **Weights: **

    See "Notes on the Weights" in the Documentation section.

    Usage

    When you use the data, you agree to the following conditions:

    1. I will not use the data to identify individuals.
    2. I will not charge a fee for the data if I distribute it to others.
    3. I will inform the contact person abo
  3. Number of marriages in the U.S. 1990-2022

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of marriages in the U.S. 1990-2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195931/number-of-marriages-in-the-united-states-since-1990/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2022, there were around **** million marriages in the United States. This is an increase from the previous year, when about **** million marriages were registered in the country. The divorce rate in the United States can be accessed here.

  4. f

    Minimal dataset.

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jan 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shaki Aktar; Shakil Ahmed; Tanjeena Tahrin Islam; Tarana -E-Ferdous; Meftah Uddin Ahmed; Syed Hassan Imtiaz; Salma Akter; Shathil Miah; Md. Sharful Islam Khan; Ruchira Tabassum Naved; Shams El Arifeen; Quamrun Nahar; Anisuddin Ahmed; S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi; Fauzia Akhter Huda (2025). Minimal dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316230.s002
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Shaki Aktar; Shakil Ahmed; Tanjeena Tahrin Islam; Tarana -E-Ferdous; Meftah Uddin Ahmed; Syed Hassan Imtiaz; Salma Akter; Shathil Miah; Md. Sharful Islam Khan; Ruchira Tabassum Naved; Shams El Arifeen; Quamrun Nahar; Anisuddin Ahmed; S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi; Fauzia Akhter Huda
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) aim to enhance quality of life through safe sexual experiences, reproductive autonomy, and protection against gender-based violence. However, existing SRHR research and interventions in low- and middle-income countries like Bangladesh predominantly focus on women, often understating men and neglecting the nuanced contextual issues faced by married couples. This study contributes to filling this gap by examining SRHR dynamics among newlyweds in rural and poor urban areas of Bangladesh, especially focusing on marital satisfaction, fertility preferences, and post-marriage adaptation mechanisms. Employing a prospective cohort design across four Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) managed by icddr,b, the study spans from November 2021 to March 2025, with data collection starting in December 2022. Of the 2011 newlywed couples identified, 666 who met eligibility criteria (married for ≤6 months, first marriage, and no pregnancy history) were enrolled. Participants will undergo six quantitative interview sessions over a two-year period. Additionally, 44 in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 purposefully selected couples. Demographic data reveal that a significant proportion of husbands (67.3% in rural areas, 71.8% in poor urban areas) are aged 20–29 years, while a majority of wives (67.9% in rural areas, 84.8% in poor urban areas) are adolescents. Education levels varied, with a higher proportion of poor urban husbands lack formal education compared to their rural counterparts (7.2% vs. 3.0%), while no significant variation was observed among wives (0.6% vs 1.0%). Arranged marriages are more common among rural couples (80%) compared to those in poor urban areas (50%). Moreover, poor urban participants tend to marry at a younger age than the rural participants, with poor urban wives marrying earlier than rural wives (60.4% vs 39.7%). This pioneering study provides valuable insights into the SRHR needs of newlywed couples in Bangladesh. The findings will be instrumental for designing targeted interventions aimed at improving SRHR service utilization and enhancing overall well-being, particularly in rural and poor urban areas of the country.

  5. f

    Marriage dynamics of the cohort.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jan 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shaki Aktar; Shakil Ahmed; Tanjeena Tahrin Islam; Tarana -E-Ferdous; Meftah Uddin Ahmed; Syed Hassan Imtiaz; Salma Akter; Shathil Miah; Md. Sharful Islam Khan; Ruchira Tabassum Naved; Shams El Arifeen; Quamrun Nahar; Anisuddin Ahmed; S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi; Fauzia Akhter Huda (2025). Marriage dynamics of the cohort. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316230.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Shaki Aktar; Shakil Ahmed; Tanjeena Tahrin Islam; Tarana -E-Ferdous; Meftah Uddin Ahmed; Syed Hassan Imtiaz; Salma Akter; Shathil Miah; Md. Sharful Islam Khan; Ruchira Tabassum Naved; Shams El Arifeen; Quamrun Nahar; Anisuddin Ahmed; S. M. Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi; Fauzia Akhter Huda
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) aim to enhance quality of life through safe sexual experiences, reproductive autonomy, and protection against gender-based violence. However, existing SRHR research and interventions in low- and middle-income countries like Bangladesh predominantly focus on women, often understating men and neglecting the nuanced contextual issues faced by married couples. This study contributes to filling this gap by examining SRHR dynamics among newlyweds in rural and poor urban areas of Bangladesh, especially focusing on marital satisfaction, fertility preferences, and post-marriage adaptation mechanisms. Employing a prospective cohort design across four Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) managed by icddr,b, the study spans from November 2021 to March 2025, with data collection starting in December 2022. Of the 2011 newlywed couples identified, 666 who met eligibility criteria (married for ≤6 months, first marriage, and no pregnancy history) were enrolled. Participants will undergo six quantitative interview sessions over a two-year period. Additionally, 44 in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 purposefully selected couples. Demographic data reveal that a significant proportion of husbands (67.3% in rural areas, 71.8% in poor urban areas) are aged 20–29 years, while a majority of wives (67.9% in rural areas, 84.8% in poor urban areas) are adolescents. Education levels varied, with a higher proportion of poor urban husbands lack formal education compared to their rural counterparts (7.2% vs. 3.0%), while no significant variation was observed among wives (0.6% vs 1.0%). Arranged marriages are more common among rural couples (80%) compared to those in poor urban areas (50%). Moreover, poor urban participants tend to marry at a younger age than the rural participants, with poor urban wives marrying earlier than rural wives (60.4% vs 39.7%). This pioneering study provides valuable insights into the SRHR needs of newlywed couples in Bangladesh. The findings will be instrumental for designing targeted interventions aimed at improving SRHR service utilization and enhancing overall well-being, particularly in rural and poor urban areas of the country.

  6. International marriages South Korea 1990-2024, by type

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). International marriages South Korea 1990-2024, by type [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/647754/south-korea-number-international-marriages-type/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 16, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    South Korea
    Description

    In 2024, 15,624 South Korean men and 5,135 South Korean women married a foreign national. The total number of international marriages in South Korea amounted to more than 20,700 cases that year.

  7. Average age at marriage in the Netherlands 1950-2022, by gender

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Average age at marriage in the Netherlands 1950-2022, by gender [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/520103/average-age-at-marriage-in-the-netherlands-by-gender/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Netherlands
    Description

    Between the 1950s and today, the average age to marry in the Netherlands increased significantly for both genders. Whereas in 1950, men were on average 30 years old when they married and women were nearly 27 years old, in 2022 this was 39.1 and 36.4 years respectively. This raise in the average age at marriage however meant a decrease in the number of marriages per person, which decreased by almost 0.20 in the last decade alone. The average Dutch person married between 0.48 and 0.47 times in 2021.

     Number of marriages   

    In 2021, roughly 56,000 marriages took place. The majority of these marriages were closed between a man and a woman, but since same-sex marriages were legalized in the Netherlands in 2001, each year also between 1,000 and 2,400 same-sex couples tie the knot. In the last decade, the number of marriages peaked in 2010, when almost 86,000 marriages took place.

    Living happily ever after  

    In 2021, nearly 60,000 couples celebrated 12.5 years of marital bliss, and a further 51.9 thousand couples had been married for 25 years. And of course, with time the number of special wedding anniversaries decreases, as divorce or death dissolves many a marriage. Still, that year 327 couples celebrated 70 years of wedded life together.

  8. Divorce rates in Europe 2020, by country (per 100 marriages)

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Divorce rates in Europe 2020, by country (per 100 marriages) [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/612207/divorce-rates-in-european-countries-per-100-marriages/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2020
    Area covered
    Europe
    Description

    According to the 2020 UNIDOMO questionnaire, Portugal clearly led the list of European countries with the highest divorce rate per 100 marriages. With 91.5 divorces the Portuguese Republic led the list, followed by Spain and Luxembourg. All three countries boast a significantly higher share than the other European countries, each reporting a divorce rate over 80 divorces.

    A different way to look at Portugal

    While Portugal clearly has the most divorces per 100 marriages, looking at divorce rates per 1.000 inhabitants in other European countries alters the picture of the country as one unsettled by significant numbers of divorces. With nearly 1.7 divorces per 1,000 inhabitants Portugal has roughly the same divorce rate as Germany and the Netherlands. Interesting is furthermore that although marriages in Portugal tend to result in divorce lightly more often as in Luxembourg (80.3%), the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg experienced a 0.6 point higher divorce rate.

    What about the rest of the World?

    While compared with Latin American countries like Guatemala or Peru, ranked among the countries with the lowest divorce rates in the world, Luxembourg’s divorce rate seems excessive. However, when compared with divorce rates (per 1.000 inhabitants) of countries like the United States (2.7) or China (3.5) divorce rates from Luxembourg and Europe are not out of the ordinary.

  9. Average age at first marriage in Sweden 2013-2023, by gender

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Average age at first marriage in Sweden 2013-2023, by gender [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/611826/sweden-average-age-at-marriage-by-gender/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Sweden
    Description

    After increasing from 2011 to 2020, the average age of people at their first marriage fell marginally in 2021 for both men and women. However, it increased slightly again in 2022 and 2023. Men were on average older than women at their first marriage, with 36.8 years and 34.9 years respectively in 2023. Most common age at first marriage In 2022, more than 80,000 people got married in Sweden . Of these, people between 30 and 34 years made up the largest age group. Length of a marriage A marriage in Sweden lasted on average 47.3 years in 2022 if it was dissolved by death. For marriages dissolved by divorce, the average length was 12.2 years. The length of marriages dissolved by divorce increased slightly over the last 10 years, while the length of marriages dissolved by death was relatively stable.

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Rosenfeld, Michael J.; Thomas, Reuben J.; Hausen, Sonia (2024). How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) 2017, 2020, 2022, United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38873.v1
Organization logo

How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) 2017, 2020, 2022, United States

Explore at:
r, sas, stata, spss, delimited, asciiAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Feb 7, 2024
Dataset provided by
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
Authors
Rosenfeld, Michael J.; Thomas, Reuben J.; Hausen, Sonia
License

https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38873/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38873/terms

Time period covered
2017
Area covered
United States
Description

How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) is a study on how Americans meet their romantic partners. This is a nationally representative study of American adult respondents with no overlap in subjects from the original HCMST survey [ICPSR 30103] which was first fielded in 2009.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu