Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains 25 columns which are: 1. Country: Corresponding country. 2. Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15 a day (2017 PPP) (% of population): Poverty in country. 3. Life expectancy at birth, total (years): Expected life from birth. 4. Population, total: Population of Country. 5. Population growth (annual %): Population growth each year. 6. Net migration: is the difference between the number of immigrants and the number of emigrants divided by the population. 7. Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1): is an annual measurement prepared by the World Bank. HCI measures which countries are best in mobilizing their human capital, the economic and professional potential of their citizens. The index measures how much capital each country loses through lack of education and health. 8. GDP (current US$)current US$constant US$current LCUconstant LCU: Gross domestic product is a monetary measure of the market value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time period by a country or countries. 9. GDP per capita (current US$)current US$constant US$current LCUconstant LCU: the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes (less subsidies) not included in the valuation of output, divided by mid-year population. 10. GDP growth (annual %): The annual average rate of change of the gross domestic product (GDP) at market prices based on constant local currency, for a given national economy, during a specified period of time. 11. Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (modeled ILO estimate) 12. Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) 13. Personal remittances, received (% of GDP) 14. CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) 15. Forest area (% of land area) 16. Access to electricity (% of population) 17. Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources) 18. Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total) 19. People using safely managed sanitation services (% of population) 20. Intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) 21. Central government debt, total (% of GDP) 22. Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100) 23. Individuals using the Internet (% of population) 24. Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%) 25. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP): is when an investor becomes a significant or lasting investor in a business or corporation in a foreign country, which can be a boost to the global economy.
Economic
217
$5.50
Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Digital Economy Database is a specialized data repository that provides global, regional, and country-level statistics and indicators on the digital economy, particularly in developing countries. It supports analysis and policymaking around e-commerce, digital trade, ICT infrastructure, and the broader digital transformation. Data sets include International merchandise trade, International trade in services, Foreign direct investment (FDI), Economic trends, Commodities, Maritime transport, Digital economy, and Population and labor force. Key tools include the UNCTADstat database, Country Profiles, and Nowcasts for real-time global trade and economic growth estimates. UNCTAD's datasets are widely used by policymakers, researchers, and organizations to analyze global trade dynamics, assess development progress, and formulate evidence-based policies.
This collection includes only a subset of indicators from the source dataset.
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Introduction:
This dataset represents top-ranked international public companies according to the level of the Liabilities. International Entities with Largest liability Load dataset provides the thorough examination of the liability burden of the major corporations across the globe. Including statistical information within a wide range of industries and areas of operation, the dataset reveals the financial stability and predictability of the risks associated with the major international players. Delve into the system of damage it balances, which includes corporate-bonds and long-term borrowing and uncover the interconnection of the global economy. this dataset is gathered from companies market capital website. below i have given the details of the dataset and columns after that i have given some information about the use cases of this dataset.
About Dataset Columns:
In this dataset, I have provided 6 columns, which are as follows:
Rank: It shows the ranking number of the company.
Company: It displays the name of the company.
Stock Symbol: This column contains the stock symbols of the company.
Total Liability (USD): This column provides the total liabilities of the company in trillion US dollars.
Share Price: It contains the share price of the respective company.
Company Origin: This column provides the country name of the respective company.
Use Cases of the dataset:
Financial Analysis: Analyzing debt-to-equity ratios and debt sustainability is a valid use case for assessing the financial health of companies and making investment decisions.
Risk Assessment: Evaluating the debt levels and financial risk exposure of companies across sectors and regions is an appropriate application of this dataset.
Market Research: Understanding corporate borrowing trends and debt levels within specific industries and countries aligns with the purpose of this dataset.
Benchmarking: Comparing the debt profiles of companies against industry peers to identify outliers or potential opportunities is a valid use case for this dataset.
Investor Insights: Gaining insights into how debt levels impact stock prices and investor sentiment is a relevant application of this dataset.
Policy Making: Informing policymakers and regulators about the debt landscape of international corporations for regulatory oversight and risk management purposes is a suitable use case for this dataset.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides values for PRIVATE SECTOR CREDIT reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.
Success.ai offers a cutting-edge solution for businesses and organizations seeking Company Financial Data on private and public companies. Our comprehensive database is meticulously crafted to provide verified profiles, including contact details for financial decision-makers such as CFOs, financial analysts, corporate treasurers, and other key stakeholders. This robust dataset is continuously updated and validated using AI technology to ensure accuracy and relevance, empowering businesses to make informed decisions and optimize their financial strategies.
Key Features of Success.ai's Company Financial Data:
Global Coverage: Access data from over 70 million businesses worldwide, including public and private companies across all major industries and regions. Our datasets span 250+ countries, offering extensive reach for your financial analysis and market research.
Detailed Financial Profiles: Gain insights into company financials, including revenue, profit margins, funding rounds, and operational costs. Profiles are enriched with key contact details, including work emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses, ensuring direct access to decision-makers.
Industry-Specific Data: Tailored datasets for sectors such as financial services, manufacturing, technology, healthcare, and energy, among others. Each dataset is customized to meet the unique needs of industry professionals and analysts.
Real-Time Accuracy: With continuous updates powered by AI-driven validation, our financial data maintains a 99% accuracy rate, ensuring you have access to the most reliable and up-to-date information available.
Compliance and Security: All data is collected and processed in strict adherence to global compliance standards, including GDPR, ensuring ethical and lawful usage.
Why Choose Success.ai for Company Financial Data?
Best Price Guarantee: We pride ourselves on offering the most competitive pricing in the industry, ensuring you receive unparalleled value for comprehensive financial data.
AI-Validated Accuracy: Our advanced AI algorithms meticulously verify every data point to ensure precision and reliability, helping you avoid costly errors in your financial decision-making.
Customized Data Solutions: Whether you need data for a specific region, industry, or type of business, we tailor our datasets to align perfectly with your requirements.
Scalable Data Access: From small startups to global enterprises, our platform caters to businesses of all sizes, delivering scalable solutions to suit your operational needs.
Comprehensive Use Cases for Financial Data:
Leverage our detailed financial profiles to create accurate budgets, forecasts, and strategic plans. Gain insights into competitors’ financial health and market positions to make data-driven decisions.
Access key financial details and contact information to streamline your M&A processes. Identify potential acquisition targets or partners with verified profiles and financial data.
Evaluate the financial performance of public and private companies for informed investment decisions. Use our data to identify growth opportunities and assess risk factors.
Enhance your sales outreach by targeting CFOs, financial analysts, and other decision-makers with verified contact details. Utilize accurate email and phone data to increase conversion rates.
Understand market trends and financial benchmarks with our industry-specific datasets. Use the data for competitive analysis, benchmarking, and identifying market gaps.
APIs to Power Your Financial Strategies:
Enrichment API: Integrate real-time updates into your systems with our Enrichment API. Keep your financial data accurate and current to drive dynamic decision-making and maintain a competitive edge.
Lead Generation API: Supercharge your lead generation efforts with access to verified contact details for key financial decision-makers. Perfect for personalized outreach and targeted campaigns.
Tailored Solutions for Industry Professionals:
Financial Services Firms: Gain detailed insights into revenue streams, funding rounds, and operational costs for competitor analysis and client acquisition.
Corporate Finance Teams: Enhance decision-making with precise data on industry trends and benchmarks.
Consulting Firms: Deliver informed recommendations to clients with access to detailed financial datasets and key stakeholder profiles.
Investment Firms: Identify potential investment opportunities with verified data on financial performance and market positioning.
What Sets Success.ai Apart?
Extensive Database: Access detailed financial data for 70M+ companies worldwide, including small businesses, startups, and large corporations.
Ethical Practices: Our data collection and processing methods are fully comp...
Estache and Goicoechea present an infrastructure database that was assembled from multiple sources. Its main purposes are: (i) to provide a snapshot of the sector as of the end of 2004; and (ii) to facilitate quantitative analytical research on infrastructure sectors. The related working paper includes definitions, source information and the data available for 37 performance indicators that proxy access, affordability and quality of service (most recent data as of June 2005). Additionally, the database includes a snapshot of 15 reform indicators across infrastructure sectors.
This is a first attempt, since the effort made in the World Development Report 1994, at generating a database on infrastructure sectors and it needs to be recognized as such. This database is not a state of the art output—this is being worked on by sector experts on a different time table. The effort has however generated a significant amount of new information. The database already provides enough information to launch a much more quantitative debate on the state of infrastructure. But much more is needed and by circulating this information at this stage, we hope to be able to generate feedback and fill the major knowledge gaps and inconsistencies we have identified.
The database covers the following countries: - Afghanistan - Albania - Algeria - American Samoa - Andorra - Angola - Antigua and Barbuda - Argentina - Armenia - Aruba - Australia - Austria - Azerbaijan - Bahamas, The - Bahrain - Bangladesh - Barbados - Belarus - Belgium - Belize - Benin - Bermuda - Bhutan - Bolivia - Bosnia and Herzegovina - Botswana - Brazil - Brunei - Bulgaria - Burkina Faso - Burundi - Cambodia - Cameroon - Canada - Cape Verde - Cayman Islands - Central African Republic - Chad - Channel Islands - Chile - China - Colombia - Comoros - Congo, Dem. Rep. - Congo, Rep. - Costa Rica - Cote d'Ivoire - Croatia - Cuba - Cyprus - Czech Republic - Denmark - Djibouti - Dominica - Dominican Republic - Ecuador - Egypt, Arab Rep. - El Salvador - Equatorial Guinea - Eritrea - Estonia - Ethiopia - Faeroe Islands - Fiji - Finland - France - French Polynesia - Gabon - Gambia, The - Georgia - Germany - Ghana - Greece - Greenland - Grenada - Guam - Guatemala - Guinea - Guinea-Bissau - Guyana - Haiti - Honduras - Hong Kong, China - Hungary - Iceland - India - Indonesia - Iran, Islamic Rep. - Iraq - Ireland - Isle of Man - Israel - Italy - Jamaica - Japan - Jordan - Kazakhstan - Kenya - Kiribati - Korea, Dem. Rep. - Korea, Rep. - Kuwait - Kyrgyz Republic - Lao PDR - Latvia - Lebanon - Lesotho - Liberia - Libya - Liechtenstein - Lithuania - Luxembourg - Macao, China - Macedonia, FYR - Madagascar - Malawi - Malaysia - Maldives - Mali - Malta - Marshall Islands - Mauritania - Mauritius - Mayotte - Mexico - Micronesia, Fed. Sts. - Moldova - Monaco - Mongolia - Morocco - Mozambique - Myanmar - Namibia - Nepal - Netherlands - Netherlands Antilles - New Caledonia - New Zealand - Nicaragua - Niger - Nigeria - Northern Mariana Islands - Norway - Oman - Pakistan - Palau - Panama - Papua New Guinea - Paraguay - Peru - Philippines - Poland - Portugal - Puerto Rico - Qatar - Romania - Russian Federation - Rwanda - Samoa - San Marino - Sao Tome and Principe - Saudi Arabia - Senegal - Seychelles - Sierra Leone - Singapore - Slovak Republic - Slovenia - Solomon Islands - Somalia - South Africa - Spain - Sri Lanka - St. Kitts and Nevis - St. Lucia - St. Vincent and the Grenadines - Sudan - Suriname - Swaziland - Sweden - Switzerland - Syrian Arab Republic - Tajikistan - Tanzania - Thailand - Togo - Tonga - Trinidad and Tobago - Tunisia - Turkey - Turkmenistan - Uganda - Ukraine - United Arab Emirates - United Kingdom - United States - Uruguay - Uzbekistan - Vanuatu - Venezuela, RB - Vietnam - Virgin Islands (U.S.) - West Bank and Gaza - Yemen, Rep. - Yugoslavia, FR (Serbia/Montenegro) - Zambia - Zimbabwe
Aggregate data [agg]
Face-to-face [f2f]
Sector Performance Indicators
Energy The energy sector is relatively well covered by the database, at least in terms of providing a relatively recent snapshot for the main policy areas. The best covered area is access where data are available for 2000 for about 61% of the 207 countries included in the database. The technical quality indicator is available for 60% of the countries, and at least one of the perceived quality indicators is available for 40% of the countries. Price information is available for about 41% of the countries, distinguishing between residential and non residential.
Water & Sanitation Because the sector is part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), it enjoys a lot of effort on data generation in terms of the access rates. The WHO is the main engine behind this effort in collaboration with the multilateral and bilateral aid agencies. The coverage is actually quite high -some national, urban and rural information is available for 75 to 85% of the countries- but there are significant concerns among the research community about the fact that access rates have been measured without much consideration to the quality of access level. The data on technical quality are only available for 27% of the countries. There are data on perceived quality for roughly 39% of the countries but it cannot be used to qualify the information provided by the raw access rates (i.e. access 3 hours a day is not equivalent to access 24 hours a day).
Information and Communication Technology The ICT sector is probably the best covered among the infrastructure sub-sectors to a large extent thanks to the fact that the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has taken on the responsibility to collect the data. ITU covers a wide spectrum of activity under the communications heading and its coverage ranges from 85 to 99% for all national access indicators. The information on prices needed to make assessments of affordability is also quite extensive since it covers roughly 85 to 95% of the 207 countries. With respect to quality, the coverage of technical indicators is over 88% while the information on perceived quality is only available for roughly 40% of the countries.
Transport The transport sector is possibly the least well covered in terms of the service orientation of infrastructure indicators. Regarding access, network density is the closest approximation to access to the service and is covered at a rate close to 90% for roads but only at a rate of 50% for rail. The relevant data on prices only cover about 30% of the sample for railways. Some type of technical quality information is available for 86% of the countries. Quality perception is only available for about 40% of the countries.
Institutional Reform Indicators
Electricity The data on electricity policy reform were collected from the following sources: ABS Electricity Deregulation Report (2004), AEI-Brookings telecommunications and electricity regulation database (2003), Bacon (1999), Estache and Gassner (2004), Estache, Trujillo, and Tovar de la Fe (2004), Global Regulatory Network Program (2004), Henisz et al. (2003), International Porwer Finance Review (2003-04), International Power and Utilities Finance Review (2004-05), Kikukawa (2004), Wallsten et al. (2004), World Bank Caribbean Infrastructure Assessment (2004), World Bank Global Energy Sector Reform in Developing Countries (1999), World Bank staff, and country regulators. The coverage for the three types of institutional indicators is quite good for the electricity sector. For regulatory institutions and private participation in generation and distribution, the coverage is about 80% of the 207 counties. It is somewhat lower on the market structure with only 58%.
Water & Sanitation The data on water policy reform were collected from the following sources: ABS Water and Waste Utilities of the World (2004), Asian Developing Bank (2000), Bayliss (2002), Benoit (2004), Budds and McGranahan (2003), Hall, Bayliss, and Lobina (2002), Hall and Lobina (2002), Hall, Lobina, and De La Mote (2002), Halpern (2002), Lobina (2001), World Bank Caribbean Infrastructure Assessment (2004), World Bank Sector Note on Water Supply and Sanitation for Infrastructure in EAP (2004), and World Bank staff. The coverage for institutional reforms in W&S is not as exhaustive as for the other utilities. Information on the regulatory institutions responsible for large utilities is available for about 67% of the countries. Ownership data are available for about 70% of the countries. There is no information on the market structure good enough to be reported here at this stage. In most countries small scale operators are important private actors but there is no systematic record of their existence. Most of the information available on their role and importance is only anecdotal.
Information and Communication Technology The report Trends in Telecommunications Reform from ITU (revised by World Bank staff) is the main source of information for this sector. The information on institutional reforms in the sector is however not as exhaustive as it is for its sector performance indicators. While the coverage on the regulatory institutions is 100%, it varies between 76 and 90% of the countries for more of the other indicators. Quite surprisingly also, in contrast to what is available for other sectors, it proved difficult to obtain data on the timing of reforms and of the creation of the regulatory agencies.
Transport Information on transport institutions and reforms is not systematically generated by any agency. Even though more data are needed to have a more comprenhensive picture of the transport sector, it was possible to collect data on railways policy reform from Janes World Railways (2003-04) and complement it with
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The size of the US Data Center Industry market was valued at USD XX Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD XXX Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 6.00% during the forecast period.A data center is a facility that keeps computer systems and networking equipment housed, processing, and transmitting data. It represents the infrastructure on which organizations carry out their IT operations and host websites, email servers, and database servers. Data centers, therefore, are imperative to any size business: small start-ups or large enterprise since they enable digital transformation, thus making business applications available.The US data center industry is one of the largest and most developed in the world. The country boasts robust digital infrastructure, abundant energy resources, and a highly skilled workforce, making it an attractive destination for data center operators. Some of the drivers of the US data center market are the growing trend of cloud computing, internet of things (IoT), and high-performance computing requirements.Top-of-the-line technology companies along with cloud service providers set up major data center footprints in the US, mostly in key regions such as Silicon Valley and Northern Virginia, Dallas, for example. These data centers support applications such as e-commerce-a manner of accessing streaming services-whose development depends on its artificial intelligence financial service type. As demand increases concerning data center capacity, therefore, the US data centre industry will continue to prosper as the world's hub for reliable and scalable solutions. Recent developments include: February 2023: The expansion of Souther Telecom to its data center in Atlanta, Georgia, at 345 Courtland Street, was announced by H5 Data Centers, a colocation and wholesale data center operator. One of the top communication service providers in the southeast is Southern Telecom. Customers in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi will receive better service due to the expansion of this low-latency fiber optic network.December 2022: DigitalBridge Group, Inc. and IFM Investors announced completing their previously announced transaction in which funds affiliated with the investment management platform of DigitalBridge and an affiliate of IFM Investors acquired all outstanding common shares of Switch, Inc. for USD approximately USD 11 billion, including the repayment of outstanding debt.October 2022: Three additional data centers in Charlotte, Nashville, and Louisville have been made available to Flexential's cloud customers, according to the supplier of data center colocation, cloud computing, and connectivity. By the end of the year, clients will have access to more than 220MW of hybrid IT capacity spread across 40 data centers in 19 markets, which is well aligned with Flexential's 2022 ambition to add 33MW of new, sustainable data center development projects.. Key drivers for this market are: , High Mobile penetration, Low Tariff, and Mature Regulatory Authority; Successful Privatization and Liberalization Initiatives. Potential restraints include: , Difficulties in Customization According to Business Needs. Notable trends are: OTHER KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS COVERED IN THE REPORT.
Analyzing and simulating trade policy scenarios in a complex and intertwined global economy requires a database with a complete bilateral trade matrix at the level of highly disaggregated industries over several decades. Such a database has not been created until now. This paper introduces the International Trade and Production Database for Simulation (ITPD-S). In combination with the International Trade and Production Database for Estimation (ITPD-E), we use it to quantify the impact of globalization on bilateral trade, real income, and inequality in the world at the detailed industry level in 1990-2019. To perform the analysis, we rely on a new quantitative trade model that enables us to estimate the magnitude of globalization and then perform a counterfactual analysis of the impact of globalization on real output within the same framework. Our estimates reveal that, on average, bilateral globalization forces have led to a remarkable increase in international trade of about 570%, between 1990 and 2019, with very wide but intuitive variation across industries. Our counterfactual analysis reveals that globalization has benefited most countries but relatively more so smaller and more open economies, which are typically developing countries. As a result, this ‘catch-up’ implies less cross-country income inequality.
Well-functioning financial systems serve a vital purpose, offering savings, credit, payment, and risk management products to people with a wide range of needs. Yet until now little had been known about the global reach of the financial sector - the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and youth are excluded from formal financial systems. Systematic indicators of the use of different financial services had been lacking for most economies.
The Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database provides such indicators. This database contains the first round of Global Findex indicators, measuring how adults in more than 140 economies save, borrow, make payments, and manage risk. The data set can be used to track the effects of financial inclusion policies globally and develop a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how people around the world manage their day-to-day finances. By making it possible to identify segments of the population excluded from the formal financial sector, the data can help policy makers prioritize reforms and design new policies.
National Coverage.
Individual
The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above. The sample is nationally representative.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The Global Findex indicators are drawn from survey data collected by Gallup, Inc. over the 2011 calendar year, covering more than 150,000 adults in 148 economies and representing about 97 percent of the world's population. Since 2005, Gallup has surveyed adults annually around the world, using a uniform methodology and randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The second round of Global Findex indicators was collected in 2014 and is forthcoming in 2015. The set of indicators will be collected again in 2017.
Surveys were conducted face-to-face in economies where landline telephone penetration is less than 80 percent, or where face-to-face interviewing is customary. The first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units, consisting of clusters of households. The primary sampling units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households by means of the Kish grid.
Surveys were conducted by telephone in economies where landline telephone penetration is over 80 percent. The telephone surveys were conducted using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In selected countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to teach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of year.
The sample size in Japan was 1,000 individuals.
Landline telephone
The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup, Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in over 20 countries using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in 142 languages upon request.
Questions on insurance, mobile payments, and loan purposes were asked only in developing economies. The indicators on awareness and use of microfinance insitutions (MFIs) are not included in the public dataset. However, adults who report saving at an MFI are considered to have an account; this is reflected in the composite account indicator.
Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country- and indicator-specific standard errors, refer to the Annex and Country Table in Demirguc-Kunt, Asli and L. Klapper. 2012. "Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Findex." Policy Research Working Paper 6025, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Success.ai’s Company Data Solutions provide businesses with powerful, enterprise-ready B2B company datasets, enabling you to unlock insights on over 28 million verified company profiles. Our solution is ideal for organizations seeking accurate and detailed B2B contact data, whether you’re targeting large enterprises, mid-sized businesses, or small business contact data.
Success.ai offers B2B marketing data across industries and geographies, tailored to fit your specific business needs. With our white-glove service, you’ll receive curated, ready-to-use company datasets without the hassle of managing data platforms yourself. Whether you’re looking for UK B2B data or global datasets, Success.ai ensures a seamless experience with the most accurate and up-to-date information in the market.
Why Choose Success.ai’s Company Data Solution? At Success.ai, we prioritize quality and relevancy. Every company profile is AI-validated for a 99% accuracy rate and manually reviewed to ensure you're accessing actionable and GDPR-compliant data. Our price match guarantee ensures you receive the best deal on the market, while our white-glove service provides personalized assistance in sourcing and delivering the data you need.
Why Choose Success.ai?
Our database spans 195 countries and covers 28 million public and private company profiles, with detailed insights into each company’s structure, size, funding history, and key technologies. We provide B2B company data for businesses of all sizes, from small business contact data to large corporations, with extensive coverage in regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.
Comprehensive Data Points: Success.ai delivers in-depth information on each company, with over 15 data points, including:
Company Name: Get the full legal name of the company. LinkedIn URL: Direct link to the company's LinkedIn profile. Company Domain: Website URL for more detailed research. Company Description: Overview of the company’s services and products. Company Location: Geographic location down to the city, state, and country. Company Industry: The sector or industry the company operates in. Employee Count: Number of employees to help identify company size. Technologies Used: Insights into key technologies employed by the company, valuable for tech-based outreach. Funding Information: Track total funding and the most recent funding dates for investment opportunities. Maximize Your Sales Potential: With Success.ai’s B2B contact data and company datasets, sales teams can build tailored lists of target accounts, identify decision-makers, and access real-time company intelligence. Our curated datasets ensure you’re always focused on high-value leads—those who are most likely to convert into clients. Whether you’re conducting account-based marketing (ABM), expanding your sales pipeline, or looking to improve your lead generation strategies, Success.ai offers the resources you need to scale your business efficiently.
Tailored for Your Industry: Success.ai serves multiple industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and more. Our B2B marketing data solutions are particularly valuable for businesses looking to reach professionals in key sectors. You’ll also have access to small business contact data, perfect for reaching new markets or uncovering high-growth startups.
From UK B2B data to contacts across Europe and Asia, our datasets provide global coverage to expand your business reach and identify new markets. With continuous data updates, Success.ai ensures you’re always working with the freshest information.
Key Use Cases:
https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
The Chinese Domestic Databases market size is set for robust growth, projected to grow from USD 2 billion in 2023 to USD 6.5 billion by 2032, reflecting an impressive CAGR of 13.5%. This growth is driven by the increasing demand for data sovereignty, technological advancements, and regulatory support from the Chinese government. The market is primed for expansion, propelled by factors such as the burgeoning digital economy, increased cloud adoption, and the strategic focus on indigenous technological advancements.
One of the primary growth factors for the Chinese Domestic Databases market is the increasing emphasis on data sovereignty and security. With the Chinese government imposing stringent regulations on data storage and management, domestic companies are compelled to utilize local databases to ensure compliance. This has created a favorable environment for the growth of domestic database providers who are tailored to meet these unique requirements. Additionally, the rise in cyber threats has further driven the need for secure and reliable database solutions, contributing significantly to market growth.
Technological advancements and innovation within the database industry are also pivotal growth drivers. The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) technologies has allowed for more efficient and intelligent database management systems. Innovations in data handling, processing speed, and storage capabilities provide a significant competitive edge to domestic databases over international counterparts. Furthermore, the integration of AI and ML with databases enables advanced analytics and insights, helping businesses make more informed decisions, thus driving the market forward.
The digital transformation across various sectors in China has also fueled the demand for robust database solutions. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, and retail are increasingly relying on digital platforms for their operations, necessitating sophisticated and reliable databases to manage vast amounts of data. The push towards a digital economy by the Chinese government, coupled with initiatives like the "New Infrastructure" program, which focuses on the development of digital infrastructure including big data centers, has significantly boosted the demand for domestic databases.
Regionally, East China dominates the market due to the presence of major economic hubs like Shanghai and Hangzhou, which are home to numerous technology companies and data centers. North China, with Beijing as its central hub, also plays a significant role in the market due to the concentration of governmental bodies and financial institutions that demand secure and compliant database solutions. South China, particularly Shenzhen, is another critical region, given its prominence as a technology and innovation hub. Central China and other regions are gradually catching up as investments in digital infrastructure spread across the country. Overall, the regional dynamics of the Chinese Domestic Databases market present a diverse and rapidly evolving landscape.
The Chinese Domestic Databases market comprises various types, including Relational Databases, NoSQL Databases, NewSQL Databases, and others. Relational Databases have been the cornerstone of the database industry for decades, offering structured data storage and easy retrieval through SQL queries. Despite their age, they remain highly relevant due to their robustness, reliability, and the vast ecosystems that have developed around them. In China, relational databases continue to be widely adopted across various industries, particularly in sectors like finance and government, where data accuracy and consistency are paramount.
NoSQL Databases have gained significant traction in recent years due to their flexibility, scalability, and ability to handle unstructured data. Unlike traditional relational databases, NoSQL databases can seamlessly manage large volumes of diverse data types, making them ideal for applications in big data and real-time web applications. In China, the adoption of NoSQL databases is particularly prominent in the e-commerce and social media sectors, where the ability to scale out horizontally and handle high-velocity data is crucial.
NewSQL Databases represent a hybrid approach that combines the best features of traditional relational databases and NoSQL databases. They offer the scalability and flexibility of NoSQL while maintaining the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) prope
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset is NOT a reflection of my personal views.
The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is the most widely used global corruption ranking in the world. It measures how corrupt each country’s public sector is perceived to be, according to experts and businesspeople (source).
Each country’s score is a combination of at least 3 data sources drawn from 13 different corruption surveys and assessments. These data sources are collected by a variety of reputable institutions, including the World Bank and the World Economic Forum (source).
This dataset contains evaluation of corruption from two major agencies, Transparency International and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), a World Bank project. The data from Transparency International is split into two files because they don't have exactly the same columns, although most columns are the same. It makes more sense to have them seperately, and you can merge them if you would like to.
- transparency_active.csv
contains Transparency International data from 2012-2021
- transparency_legacy.csv
contains Transparency International data from 1995-2011
- wgidataset.csv
contains WGI data from 1996-2021
- wgidataset_readme.pdf
is a documentation that explains what the indicators mean in wgidataset.csv
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America delivers an exhaustive and nuanced analysis of trade activities across the North American continent. This extensive dataset provides detailed insights into import and export transactions involving companies across various sectors within North America.
Coverage Across All North American Countries
The dataset encompasses all key countries within North America, including:
The dataset provides detailed trade information for the United States, the largest economy in the region. It includes extensive data on trade volumes, product categories, and the key trading partners of the U.S. 2. Canada
Data for Canada covers a wide range of trade activities, including import and export transactions, product classifications, and trade relationships with major global and regional partners. 3. Mexico
Comprehensive data for Mexico includes detailed records on its trade activities, including exports and imports, key sectors, and trade agreements affecting its trade dynamics. 4. Central American Countries:
Belize Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama The dataset covers these countries with information on their trade flows, key products, and trade relations with North American and international partners. 5. Caribbean Countries:
Bahamas Barbados Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Grenada Haiti Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Trade data for these Caribbean nations includes detailed transaction records, sector-specific trade information, and their interactions with North American trade partners. Comprehensive Data Features
Transaction Details: The dataset includes precise details on each trade transaction, such as product descriptions, quantities, values, and dates. This allows for an accurate understanding of trade flows and patterns across North America.
Company Information: It provides data on companies involved in trade, including names, locations, and industry sectors, enabling targeted business analysis and competitive intelligence.
Categorization: Transactions are categorized by industry sectors, product types, and trade partners, offering insights into market dynamics and sector-specific trends within North America.
Trade Trends: Historical data helps users analyze trends over time, identify emerging markets, and assess the impact of economic or political events on trade flows in the region.
Geographical Insights: The data offers insights into regional trade flows and cross-border dynamics between North American countries and their global trade partners, including significant international trade relationships.
Regulatory and Compliance Data: Information on trade regulations, tariffs, and compliance requirements is included, helping businesses navigate the complex regulatory environments within North America.
Applications and Benefits
Market Research: Companies can leverage the data to discover new market opportunities, analyze competitive landscapes, and understand demand for specific products across North American countries.
Strategic Planning: Insights from the data enable companies to refine trade strategies, optimize supply chains, and manage risks associated with international trade in North America.
Economic Analysis: Analysts and policymakers can monitor economic performance, evaluate trade balances, and make informed decisions on trade policies and economic development strategies.
Investment Decisions: Investors can assess trade trends and market potentials to make informed decisions about investments in North America's diverse economies.
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America offers a vital resource for organizations involved in international trade, providing a thorough, reliable, and detailed view of trade activities across the continent.
The British Geological Survey has one of the largest databases in the world on the production and trade of minerals. The dataset contains annual production statistics by mass for more than 70 mineral commodities covering the majority of economically important and internationally-traded minerals, metals and mineral-based materials. For each commodity the annual production statistics are recorded for individual countries, grouped by continent. Import and export statistics are also available for years up to 2002. Maintenance of the database is funded by the Science Budget and output is used by government, private industry and others in support of policy, economic analysis and commercial strategy. As far as possible the production data are compiled from primary, official sources. Quality assurance is maintained by participation in such groups as the International Consultative Group on Non-ferrous Metal Statistics. Individual commodity and country tables are available for sale on request.
Well-functioning financial systems serve a vital purpose, offering savings, credit, payment, and risk management products to people with a wide range of needs. Yet until now little had been known about the global reach of the financial sector - the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and youth are excluded from formal financial systems. Systematic indicators of the use of different financial services had been lacking for most economies.
The Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database provides such indicators. This database contains the first round of Global Findex indicators, measuring how adults in more than 140 economies save, borrow, make payments, and manage risk. The data set can be used to track the effects of financial inclusion policies globally and develop a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how people around the world manage their day-to-day finances. By making it possible to identify segments of the population excluded from the formal financial sector, the data can help policy makers prioritize reforms and design new policies.
National Coverage.
Individual
The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above. The sample is nationally representative.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The Global Findex indicators are drawn from survey data collected by Gallup, Inc. over the 2011 calendar year, covering more than 150,000 adults in 148 economies and representing about 97 percent of the world's population. Since 2005, Gallup has surveyed adults annually around the world, using a uniform methodology and randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The second round of Global Findex indicators was collected in 2014 and is forthcoming in 2015. The set of indicators will be collected again in 2017.
Surveys were conducted face-to-face in economies where landline telephone penetration is less than 80 percent, or where face-to-face interviewing is customary. The first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units, consisting of clusters of households. The primary sampling units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households by means of the Kish grid.
Surveys were conducted by telephone in economies where landline telephone penetration is over 80 percent. The telephone surveys were conducted using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In selected countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to teach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of year.
The sample size in Latvia was 1,006 individuals.
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup, Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in over 20 countries using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in 142 languages upon request.
Questions on insurance, mobile payments, and loan purposes were asked only in developing economies. The indicators on awareness and use of microfinance insitutions (MFIs) are not included in the public dataset. However, adults who report saving at an MFI are considered to have an account; this is reflected in the composite account indicator.
Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country- and indicator-specific standard errors, refer to the Annex and Country Table in Demirguc-Kunt, Asli and L. Klapper. 2012. "Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Findex." Policy Research Working Paper 6025, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Success.ai’s Construction Data for Building Materials & Construction Industry Leaders in Europe provides a reliable dataset tailored for businesses seeking to connect with leaders in the European construction and building materials sectors. Covering contractors, suppliers, architects, and project managers, this dataset offers verified profiles, firmographic insights, and decision-maker contacts.
With access to over 700 million verified global profiles and data from 70 million businesses, Success.ai ensures that your outreach, market analysis, and strategic partnerships are powered by accurate, continuously updated, and AI-validated information. Backed by our Best Price Guarantee, this solution empowers you to engage effectively with the construction industry across Europe.
Why Choose Success.ai’s Construction Data?
Verified Contact Data for Industry Leaders
Comprehensive Coverage Across Europe’s Construction Sector
Continuously Updated Datasets
Ethical and Compliant
Data Highlights:
Key Features of the Dataset:
Leadership Profiles in Construction
Advanced Filters for Precision Campaigns
Firmographic Insights and Project Data
AI-Driven Enrichment
Strategic Use Cases:
Sales and Vendor Development
Market Research and Competitive Analysis
Partnership Development and Supply Chain Optimization
Recruitment and Workforce Solutions
Why Choose Success.ai?
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This paper analyzes the relationship between the relative size of the small and medium enterprise (SME) Sector and the business environment in 76 countries. The paper first describes a new and unique cross-country database that presents consistent and comparable information on the contribution of the SME sector to total employment in manufacturing and GDP across different countries. We then relate the importance of SMEs and the informal economy to indicators of different dimensions of the business environment. We find that several dimensions of the business environment, such as lower costs of entry and better credit information sharing are associated with a larger size of the SME sector, while higher exit costs are associated with a larger informal economy.
Well-functioning financial systems serve a vital purpose, offering savings, credit, payment, and risk management products to people with a wide range of needs. Yet until now little had been known about the global reach of the financial sector - the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and youth are excluded from formal financial systems. Systematic indicators of the use of different financial services had been lacking for most economies.
The Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database provides such indicators. This database contains the first round of Global Findex indicators, measuring how adults in more than 140 economies save, borrow, make payments, and manage risk. The data set can be used to track the effects of financial inclusion policies globally and develop a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how people around the world manage their day-to-day finances. By making it possible to identify segments of the population excluded from the formal financial sector, the data can help policy makers prioritize reforms and design new policies.
See Methodology document for country-specific geographic coverage details.
Individual
The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The Global Findex indicators are drawn from survey data collected by Gallup, Inc. over the 2011 calendar year, covering more than 150,000 adults in 148 economies and representing about 97 percent of the world's population. Since 2005, Gallup has surveyed adults annually around the world, using a uniform methodology and randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The second round of Global Findex indicators was collected in 2014 and is forthcoming in 2015. The set of indicators will be collected again in 2017.
Surveys were conducted face-to-face in economies where landline telephone penetration is less than 80 percent, or where face-to-face interviewing is customary. The first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units, consisting of clusters of households. The primary sampling units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households by means of the Kish grid.
Surveys were conducted by telephone in economies where landline telephone penetration is over 80 percent. The telephone surveys were conducted using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In selected countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to teach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of year.
The sample size in the majority of economies was 1,000 individuals.
Face-to-face [f2f] OR Landline telephone OR Landline and cellular telephone
The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup, Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in over 20 countries using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in 142 languages upon request.
Questions on insurance, mobile payments, and loan purposes were asked only in developing economies. The indicators on awareness and use of microfinance insitutions (MFIs) are not included in the public dataset. However, adults who report saving at an MFI are considered to have an account; this is reflected in the composite account indicator.
Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country- and indicator-specific standard errors, refer to the Annex and Country Table in Demirguc-Kunt, Asli and L. Klapper. 2012. "Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Findex." Policy Research Working Paper 6025, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This 6MB download is a zip file containing 5 pdf documents and 2 xlsx spreadsheets. Presentation on COVID-19 and the potential impacts on employment
May 2020Waka Kotahi wants to better understand the potential implications of the COVID-19 downturn on the land transport system, particularly the potential impacts on regional economies and communities.
To do this, in May 2020 Waka Kotahi commissioned Martin Jenkins and Infometrics to consider the potential impacts of COVID-19 on New Zealand’s economy and demographics, as these are two key drivers of transport demand. In addition to providing a scan of national and international COVID-19 trends, the research involved modelling the economic impacts of three of the Treasury’s COVID-19 scenarios, to a regional scale, to help us understand where the impacts might be greatest.
Waka Kotahi studied this modelling by comparing the percentage difference in employment forecasts from the Treasury’s three COVID-19 scenarios compared to the business as usual scenario.
The source tables from the modelling (Tables 1-40), and the percentage difference in employment forecasts (Tables 41-43), are available as spreadsheets.
Arataki - potential impacts of COVID-19 Final Report
Employment modelling - interactive dashboard
The modelling produced employment forecasts for each region and district over three time periods – 2021, 2025 and 2031. In May 2020, the forecasts for 2021 carried greater certainty as they reflected the impacts of current events, such as border restrictions, reduction in international visitors and students etc. The 2025 and 2031 forecasts were less certain because of the potential for significant shifts in the socio-economic situation over the intervening years. While these later forecasts were useful in helping to understand the relative scale and duration of potential COVID-19 related impacts around the country, they needed to be treated with care recognising the higher levels of uncertainty.
The May 2020 research suggested that the ‘slow recovery scenario’ (Treasury’s scenario 5) was the most likely due to continuing high levels of uncertainty regarding global efforts to manage the pandemic (and the duration and scale of the resulting economic downturn).
The updates to Arataki V2 were framed around the ‘Slower Recovery Scenario’, as that scenario remained the most closely aligned with the unfolding impacts of COVID-19 in New Zealand and globally at that time.
Find out more about Arataki, our 10-year plan for the land transport system
May 2021The May 2021 update to employment modelling used to inform Arataki Version 2 is now available. Employment modelling dashboard - updated 2021Arataki used the May 2020 information to compare how various regions and industries might be impacted by COVID-19. Almost a year later, it is clear that New Zealand fared better than forecast in May 2020.Waka Kotahi therefore commissioned an update to the projections through a high-level review of:the original projections for 2020/21 against performancethe implications of the most recent global (eg International monetary fund world economic Outlook) and national economic forecasts (eg Treasury half year economic and fiscal update)The treasury updated its scenarios in its December half year fiscal and economic update (HYEFU) and these new scenarios have been used for the revised projections.Considerable uncertainty remains about the potential scale and duration of the COVID-19 downturn, for example with regards to the duration of border restrictions, update of immunisation programmes. The updated analysis provides us with additional information regarding which sectors and parts of the country are likely to be most impacted. We continue to monitor the situation and keep up to date with other cross-Government scenario development and COVID-19 related work. The updated modelling has produced employment forecasts for each region and district over three time periods - 2022, 2025, 2031.The 2022 forecasts carry greater certainty as they reflect the impacts of current events. The 2025 and 2031 forecasts are less certain because of the potential for significant shifts over that time.
Data reuse caveats: as per license.
Additionally, please read / use this data in conjunction with the Infometrics and Martin Jenkins reports, to understand the uncertainties and assumptions involved in modelling the potential impacts of COVID-19.
COVID-19’s effect on industry and regional economic outcomes for NZ Transport Agency [PDF 620 KB]
Data quality statement: while the modelling undertaken is high quality, it represents two point-in-time analyses undertaken during a period of considerable uncertainty. This uncertainty comes from several factors relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, including:
a lack of clarity about the size of the global downturn and how quickly the international economy might recover differing views about the ability of the New Zealand economy to bounce back from the significant job losses that are occurring and how much of a structural change in the economy is required the possibility of a further wave of COVID-19 cases within New Zealand that might require a return to Alert Levels 3 or 4.
While high levels of uncertainty remain around the scale of impacts from the pandemic, particularly in coming years, the modelling is useful in indicating the direction of travel and the relative scale of impacts in different parts of the country.
Data quality caveats: as noted above, there is considerable uncertainty about the potential scale and duration of the COVID-19 downturn. Please treat the specific results of the modelling carefully, particularly in the forecasts to later years (2025, 2031), given the potential for significant shifts in New Zealand's socio-economic situation before then.
As such, please use the modelling results as a guide to the potential scale of the impacts of the downturn in different locations, rather than as a precise assessment of impacts over the coming decade.
Well-functioning financial systems serve a vital purpose, offering savings, credit, payment, and risk management products to people with a wide range of needs. Yet until now little had been known about the global reach of the financial sector - the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and youth are excluded from formal financial systems. Systematic indicators of the use of different financial services had been lacking for most economies.
The Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) database provides such indicators. This database contains the first round of Global Findex indicators, measuring how adults in more than 140 economies save, borrow, make payments, and manage risk. The data set can be used to track the effects of financial inclusion policies globally and develop a deeper and more nuanced understanding of how people around the world manage their day-to-day finances. By making it possible to identify segments of the population excluded from the formal financial sector, the data can help policy makers prioritize reforms and design new policies.
National Coverage.
Individual
The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The Global Findex indicators are drawn from survey data collected by Gallup, Inc. over the 2011 calendar year, covering more than 150,000 adults in 148 economies and representing about 97 percent of the world's population. Since 2005, Gallup has surveyed adults annually around the world, using a uniform methodology and randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The second round of Global Findex indicators was collected in 2014 and is forthcoming in 2015. The set of indicators will be collected again in 2017.
Surveys were conducted face-to-face in economies where landline telephone penetration is less than 80 percent, or where face-to-face interviewing is customary. The first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units, consisting of clusters of households. The primary sampling units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households by means of the Kish grid.
Surveys were conducted by telephone in economies where landline telephone penetration is over 80 percent. The telephone surveys were conducted using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In selected countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to teach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of year.
The sample size in Afghanistan was 1,000 individuals. Gender-matched sampling was used during the final stage of selection.
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup, Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in over 20 countries using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in 142 languages upon request.
Questions on insurance, mobile payments, and loan purposes were asked only in developing economies. The indicators on awareness and use of microfinance insitutions (MFIs) are not included in the public dataset. However, adults who report saving at an MFI are considered to have an account; this is reflected in the composite account indicator.
Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country- and indicator-specific standard errors, refer to the Annex and Country Table in Demirguc-Kunt, Asli and L. Klapper. 2012. "Measuring Financial Inclusion: The Global Findex." Policy Research Working Paper 6025, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains 25 columns which are: 1. Country: Corresponding country. 2. Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15 a day (2017 PPP) (% of population): Poverty in country. 3. Life expectancy at birth, total (years): Expected life from birth. 4. Population, total: Population of Country. 5. Population growth (annual %): Population growth each year. 6. Net migration: is the difference between the number of immigrants and the number of emigrants divided by the population. 7. Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1): is an annual measurement prepared by the World Bank. HCI measures which countries are best in mobilizing their human capital, the economic and professional potential of their citizens. The index measures how much capital each country loses through lack of education and health. 8. GDP (current US$)current US$constant US$current LCUconstant LCU: Gross domestic product is a monetary measure of the market value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time period by a country or countries. 9. GDP per capita (current US$)current US$constant US$current LCUconstant LCU: the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes (less subsidies) not included in the valuation of output, divided by mid-year population. 10. GDP growth (annual %): The annual average rate of change of the gross domestic product (GDP) at market prices based on constant local currency, for a given national economy, during a specified period of time. 11. Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (modeled ILO estimate) 12. Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) 13. Personal remittances, received (% of GDP) 14. CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita) 15. Forest area (% of land area) 16. Access to electricity (% of population) 17. Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources) 18. Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total) 19. People using safely managed sanitation services (% of population) 20. Intentional homicides (per 100,000 people) 21. Central government debt, total (% of GDP) 22. Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100) 23. Individuals using the Internet (% of population) 24. Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%) 25. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP): is when an investor becomes a significant or lasting investor in a business or corporation in a foreign country, which can be a boost to the global economy.
Economic
217
$5.50