UK residents by individual countries of birth and citizenship, broken down by UK country, local authority, unitary authority, metropolitan and London boroughs, and counties. Estimates from the Annual Population Survey.

This map shows what country naturalized US citizens were born in using the Charts & Size and Predominance mapping styles. The area with the highest amount of foreign born naturalized US citizens is shown by color. Areas are: Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, Northern America, and Oceania.Data are available in 5-year estimates at the state, county, and tract level for the entire US.The data in this map contains the most recent American Community Survey (ACS) data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Living Atlas layer in this map updates annually when the Census releases their new figures. To learn more, visit this FAQ, or visit the ACS website. Web Map originally owned by Summers Cleary

While the presence of foreign-born footballers in national teams has a long history, it is often believed that the World Cup has become more migratory over time. The presumed increases in the volume and diversity of foreign-born footballers have, however, remained empirically untested. In this article, we empirically test whether the presence of foreign-born footballers at the World Cup has changed over time in respect to these two dimensions of migration. We conducted an analysis on 4.761 footballers, derived from the fifteen national teams that competed in at least ten editions of the World Cup between 1930 and 2018, which comprises of 301 foreign-born football players. We argue that countries’ different histories of migration, in combination with historically used citizenship regimes, largely influence the migratory dimensions of their representative football teams. Our outcomes show that the (absolute) volume of foreign-born footballers in World Cups is indeed increasing over time. Moreover, foreign-born footballers seem to come from an increasingly diverse range of countries. We, therefore, conclude that the World Cup has become more migratory in terms of volume and diversity from an immigration perspective.

The Multi-aspect Integrated Migration Indicators (MIMI) dataset is the result of the process of gathering, embedding and combining traditional migration datasets, mostly from sources like Eurostat and UNSD Demographic Statistics Database, and alternative types of data, which consists in multidisciplinary features and measures not typically employed in migration studies, such as the Facebook Social Connectedness Index (SCI). Its purpose is to exploit these novel types of data for: nowcasting migration flows and stocks, studying integration of multiple sources and knowledge, and investigating migration drivers. The MIMI dataset is designed to have a unique pair of countries for each row. Each record contains country-to-country information about: migrations flows and stock their share, their strength of Facebook connectedness and other features, such as corresponding populations, GDP, coordinates, NET migration, and many others. Methodology. After having collected bilateral flows records about international human mobility by citizenship, residence and country of birth (available for both sexes and, in some cases, for different age groups), they have been merged together in order to obtain a unique dataset in which each ordered couple (country-of-origin, country-of-destination) appears once. To avoid duplicate couples, flow records have been selected by following this priority: first migration by citizenship, then migration by residence and lastly by country of birth. The integration process started by choosing, collecting and meaningfully including many other indicators that could be helpful for the dataset final purpose mentioned above. International migration stocks (having a five-year range of measurement) for each couple of countries. Geographical features for each country: ISO3166 name and official name, ISO3166-1 alpha-2 and alpha-3 codes, continent code and name of belonging, latitude and longitude of the centroid, list of bordering countries, country area in square kilometres. Also, the following features have been included for each pair of countries: geodesic distance (in kilometres) computed between their respective centroids. Non-bidirectional migration measures for each country: total number of immigrants and emigrants for each year, NET migration and NET migration rate in a five-year range. Other multidisciplinary indicators (cultural, social, anthropological, demographical, historical features) related to each country: religion (single one or list), yearly GDP at PPP, spoken language (or list of languages), yearly population stocks (and population densities if available), number of Facebook users, percentage of Facebook users, cultural indicators (PDI, IDV, MAS, UAI, LTO). Also the following feature have been included for each pair of countries: Facebook Social Connectedness Index. Once traditional and non-traditional knowledge is gathered and integrated, we move to the pre-processing phase where we manage the data cleaning, preparation and transformation. Here our dataset was subjected to various computational standard processes and additionally reshaped in the final structure established by our design choices. The data quality assessment phase was one of the longest and most delicate, since many values were missing and this could have had a negative impact on the quality of the desired resulting knowledge. They have been integrated from additional sources such as The World Bank, World Population Review, Statista, DataHub, Wikipedia and in some cases extracted from Python libraries such as PyPopulation, CountryInfo and PyCountry. The final dataset has the structure of a huge matrix having countries couples as index (uniquely identified by coupling their ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 codes): it comprises 28725 entries and 485 columns.

Eurostat's annual collections of statistics on international migration flows are structured as follows:

• NOWCAST: Annual collection of provisional monthly data on live births and deaths covering at least 6 months of the reference year (Article 4.3 of https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2014/205/oj/eng" target="_self">Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2014) and provisional monthly data on migrants covering at least 6 months of the reference year on a voluntary basis.
• DEMOBAL (Demographic balance): Annual collection of provisional data on population, total live births and total deaths at national level (Article 4.1 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 205/2014) and provisional data on total migrants at national level on a voluntary basis.
• POPSTAT (population statistics): The most in-depth annual national and regional data collection on demography and migration, for population, births, deaths, immigrants, emigrants, marriages and divorces by a large number of breakdowns. (Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1260/2013 and Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 862/2007).

The aim is to collect annual mandatory and voluntary data from the national statistical institutes. Mandatory data are those defined by the legislation listed under ‘6.1. Institutional mandate — legal acts and other agreements’.

The quality of the demographic data collected on a voluntary basis depends on the availability and quality of information provided by the national statistical institutes.

For more information on mandatory/voluntary data collection, see 6.1. Institutional mandate — legal acts and other agreements.

The following data on migrants are collected under unified demographic data collection:

• Immigrants by age, sex and:
  • Country of citizenship;
  • Country of birth;
  • Country of previous residence.
• Immigrants by country of citizenship and country of birth.
• Emigrants by age, sex and:
  • Country of citizenship;
  • Country of birth;
  • Country of next residence.

Within the framework of the Immigrant German Election Study (IMGES), for the first time in Germany exclusively persons with a Turkish migration background or an origin from countries of the former Soviet Union were interviewed about political attitudes and behaviour. One of the main objectives of the study was to investigate whether the voting behaviour of German citizens with a migration background can be explained by established theories of electoral research or whether it is more dependent on migration-specific characteristics. The survey was conducted after the 2017 federal elections and was conducted simultaneously with the post-election survey of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES). The project was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) between October 2016 and March 2020. Migration background of the respondent and the partner: Political interest; born in Germany; country of birth; month and year of moving close to Germany; acquisition of German citizenship at birth or later; year of acquisition of German citizenship; previous citizenship; dual citizenship; second citizenship; reason for migration; parents born in Germany, country of birth of father and mother; Year when father and mother moved to Germany; nationality of father and mother; region of origin in Turkey, Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine; marital status; living together with a partner; partner born in Germany, country of birth of partner; country of birth of father and mother of partner 2. Germany - political problems, goals, economic situation: currently most important and second most important problem in Germany; most suitable party to solve the problems; most important problem in Germany for one´s own migration group; most suitable party to solve this problem; most important and second most important goal of the Federal Republic of Germany in the next 10 years (Inglehart Index) assessment of the general economic situation in Germany; assessment of the current economic situation of one´s own migration group; turnout in the last Bundestag election; postal vote; election decision Bundestag election (first and second vote); hypothetical turnout and election decision (respondents under 18 years of age); date of election decision; recall Bundestag election 2013: Voter participation and decision (first and second vote). 3. Political orientation and assessment of political actors: Sympathy Scale for the parties CDU, CSU, SPD,FDP, Die Linke, Grüne and AfD; Sympathy Scale for selected top politicians (Angela Merkel, Martin Schulz, Christian Lindner, Sahra Wagenknecht, Dietmar Bartsch, Horst Seehofer, Cem Özdemir, Katrin Göring-Eckardt, Alice Weidel and Alexander Gauland); satisfaction with the performance of the federal government from CDU/CSU and SPD (Scale); left-right classification of the above-mentioned parties; left-right self-classification; satisfaction with democracy; address during the election campaign for the 2017 Bundestag elections; address during the election campaign by which party; address during the election campaign as a migrant; address during the election campaign on German politics by various organisations; assessment of the current own economic situation; state elections Voter turnout at the last state elections in NRW; election receipt at the state elections (first vote and second vote). 4. Political issues: agreement on various statements: demand for a legally established women´s quota for the supervisory boards of large companies, government should take measures to reduce income disparities, registered same-sex partnerships should be given equal status to marriage; too much influence of foreign governments (Turkey or Russia) on politics in Germany; opinion on religious instruction at state schools in Germany; opinion on voting rights in local elections for foreigners living permanently in Germany who do not come from an EU member state; political knowledge First vote/ second vote, 5% hurdle; party positions and own position on the topic of taxes and welfare state benefits (socio-economic dimension); personal importance of the topic of taxes and welfare state benefits (salience socio-economic dimension); party positions and own position on the topic of facilitated or limited opportunities for foreigners to move to Germany (libertarian-authoritarian dimension); personal importance of the topic of opportunities for foreigners to move to Germany; party positions regarding their relationship to the respondent´s country of origin; importance of the relationship of German parties to the country of origin. 5. Religion and affiliation: self-assessment of religiousness; denomination or faith community; frequency of participation in religious meetings; denomination of the partner; social identity: group membership; strongest group membership; important for identity as a German/German (being born in Germany, sharing German values and traditions, being able to speak German, having German ancestors); refusal to marry a person of German origin without a migration background, Syrian origin, Russian-German origin, Turkish origin, Christian faith or Muslim faith 6. Political opinions: attitude towards politics: Voter participation as a civic duty, politicians only represent interests of the rich and powerful, political issues often difficult to understand, strong political leader good for Germany, even if he bends the laws; attitude towards the immigration of different groups of people to Germany (workers from EU countries, workers from non-EU countries, refugees from war zones, politically persecuted refugees, economic refugees); type of political participation in the last 12 months (e.g. establishing contact with a politician, working in a political party or grouping, etc.); supported party; participation in activities of various organisations in the last 12 months (e.g. employers´ organisations, religious/church groups, sports and leisure club, etc.); at least half of the members of the participants of this organisation with a migration background; institutional trust Germany (parliament, judiciary, government, police, political parties, media); general social trust; likelihood of voting for the following parties: CDU, CSU, SPD, Die Linke, Grüne, FDP and AfD; frequency of discussions about politics in the past week; party affiliation; strength of party identification; type of party identification (e.g. party means a lot to me, party in itself means less to me, but it makes the better politics); frequency of visits to the country of origin; direct family members in the country of origin; home ownership in the country of origin; frequency of use of different media for information about the country of origin (German newspapers, German television, Turkish/Russian newspapers or television, newspapers or television of the country of origin); frequency of contact with relatives in the country of origin; political interest in relation to the country of origin; voter participation in the last national election in the country of origin; voting decision in the last election in the country of origin; dual citizens: intended voting decision in parliamentary elections in the country of origin; hypothetical voting decision in parliamentary elections in the country of origin; institutional trust in the country of origin; membership of a foreign party or Donation of money to that party; participation in activities of a foreign party in the last two years; opinion on Turkey´s membership of the EU; participation in a referendum on constitutional reform in Turkey; decision for or against constitutional reform; hypothetical decision concerning that referendum; sympathy scale for politicians of foreign origin (Turkish President Erdogan/Russian President Putin); support or rejection of the Russian Federation´s approach to the integration of Crimea. 7. Discrimination and social network: identity as a member of a group disadvantaged in Germany; reasons for discrimination (e.g. foreign descent, etc.); areas of discrimination (e.g. finding accommodation, etc.) Social trust with regard to one´s own migrant group; composition of circle of friends and colleagues (proportion with migrant background); self-assessment of language skills (German, Turkish, Kurdish, Russian, other language of origin); language mainly used at work, with friends and in the family; frequency of discussions about Turkish/Russian policy with the family; family member present with positive and negative evaluation of the current policy of the Turkish/Russian government; number of family members with positive and negative evaluation. Demography: sex; age (year of birth; household size; age of persons in the household; country of last school attendance (Germany or other country); highest school leaving certificate; years of school attendance abroad; vocational training completed in Germany or in another country; type of vocational training certificate; type of vocational training abroad; current or previous employment; current or previous employment; current or previous occupational status; job title; temporary work; current or previous employment sector; fear of unemployment or loss of business; self-assessment of shift membership; union member in household; net household income (categorised); education and occupation of partner: country of schooling; years of schooling abroad; school-leaving certificate; current or previous employment; current or previous job. Additionally coded: timestamp modules 1 - 15 incoming; timestamp modules 1 - 15 outgoing; sequential number; date of interview (day, month, year); state; sample: subsample after onomastics/ subsample after screening; data collection mode (CAPI or CASI); language of data collection (CAPI German, CASI Turkish, CASI Russian); consent to interview; control questions; willingness to re-interview; PSU: point number; weighting factors; return code; screening questions: origin; German citizenship; end of interview (no

The number of people born outside of Sweden as a share of the Swedish population increased since 2010. That year, 1.38 million of the country's inhabitants were born outside of Sweden, whereas this number had increased to 2.17 million by 2023. In other words, foreign-born citizens made up around 20 percent of the population in Sweden in 2023. Of the 2.17 million people born outside of Sweden, the highest number came from Syria.

IntroductionImmigrants were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 and experience unique vaccination barriers. In Canada (37 million people), 23% of the population is foreign-born. Immigrants constitute 60% of the country’s racialized (non-white) population and over half of immigrants reside in Ontario, the country’s most populous province. Ontario had several strategies aimed at improving vaccine equity including geographic targeting of vaccine supply and clinics, as well as numerous community-led efforts. Our objectives were to (1) compare primary series vaccine coverage after it was widely available, and first booster coverage 6 months after its availability, between immigrants and other Ontario residents and (2) identify subgroups experiencing low coverage.Materials and methodsUsing linked immigration and health administrative data, we conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study including all community-dwelling adults in Ontario, Canada as of January 1, 2021. We compared primary series (two-dose) vaccine coverage by September 2021, and first booster (three-dose) coverage by March 2022 among immigrants and other Ontarians, and across sociodemographic and immigration characteristics. We used multivariable log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR).ResultsOf 11,844,221 adults, 22% were immigrants. By September 2021, 72.6% of immigrants received two doses (vs. 76.4%, other Ontarians) and by March 2022 46.1% received three doses (vs. 58.2%). Across characteristics, two-dose coverage was similar or slightly lower, while three-dose coverage was much lower, among immigrants compared to other Ontarians. Across neighborhood SARS-CoV-2 risk deciles, differences in two-dose coverage were smaller in higher risk deciles and larger in the lower risk deciles; with larger differences across all deciles for three-dose coverage. Compared to other Ontarians, immigrants from Central Africa had the lowest two-dose (aRR = 0.60 [95% CI 0.58–0.61]) and three-dose coverage (aRR = 0.36 [95% CI 0.34–0.37]) followed by Eastern Europeans and Caribbeans, while Southeast Asians were more likely to receive both doses. Compared to economic immigrants, resettled refugees and successful asylum-claimants had the lowest three-dose coverage (aRR = 0.68 [95% CI 0.68–0.68] and aRR = 0.78 [95% CI 0.77–0.78], respectively).ConclusionTwo dose coverage was more equitable than 3. Differences by immigrant region of birth were substantial. Community-engaged approaches should be re-invigorated to close gaps and promote the bivalent booster.

People who have been granted permanent resident status in Canada. Please note that in these datasets, the figures have been suppressed or rounded to prevent the identification of individuals when the datasets are compiled and compared with other publicly available statistics. Values between 0 and 5 are shown as “--“ and all other values are rounded to the nearest multiple of 5. This may result to the sum of the figures not equating to the totals indicated.

Although there is a common belief that more footballers are representing another country than their native ones in recent World Cup editions, a historical overview on migrant footballers representing national teams is lacking. To fill this lacuna, we created a database consisting of 9.400 football players who participated in the FIFA World Cup (1930-2014). In order to count the number of migrant footballers in national teams over time, we critically reflect on the term migrant and the commonly used foreign-born proxy in mainstream migration research. We argue that such a foreign-born approach overlooks historical-geopolitical changes like the redrawing of international boundaries and colonial relationships, and tends to shy away from citizenship complexities, leading to an overestimation of the number of migrant footballers in the database. Therefore, we offer an alternative approach which, through historical contextualization with an emphasis on citizenship, results in more accurate and reliable data on migrant football players. We coin this the contextual-nationality approach. Although the reliability of the information on Wikipedia-pages can be questioned, we used this source because the data we needed was pretty straightforward and not readily accessible at other, perhaps more trustworthy, online football databases like Transfermarkt.co.uk or Footballdatabase.eu. In case a footballer was foreign-born or (possibly) a migrant, we verified the Wikipedia-data with information from (inter)national newspapers and football magazines. Reliable data on the genealogy of players was often harder to find, as the majority of (grand-) parents are, or were, not internationally famous themselves.The depositor provided the data file in XLSX format. DANS added the ODS format of this file.On April 16th 2018, a small correction was made in the rows related to football player Tony Cascarino.

Total external debt is debt owed to non residents repayable in foreign currency, goods, or services. Total external debt is the sum of public, publicly guaranteed, and private non-guaranteed long-term debt, use of IMF credit, and short-term debt. Short-term debt includes all debt having an original maturity of one year or less and interest in arrears on long-term debt. Data are in million current U.S. dollars. This Data set uses 0 = no value, however the original data source uses -9999 as its original value. Data was found online at http://geodata.grid.unep.ch

• Nationality of the interviewee.
• Most important problems in Spain. Problems that, personally, most affect you.
• Assessment of the protection offered by the State to different groups: elderly people living alone, unemployed pensioners and immigrants.
• Definition of immigration.
• Nationalities of immigrants.
• Estimation of the number of foreigners residing in Spain and in their place of residence.
• Assessment of the volume of immigrants living in Spain.
• Importance (0-10) of different aspects to allow the entry of an immigrant to Spain: good educational level, relatives living nearby, speak Spanish or regional language,...
• More appropriate policy regarding the entry of illegal immigrant workers and persons who have applied for political asylum. Tolerance with the laws regulating the entry of immigrants into Spain.
• Assessment (0-10) of the coexistence in Spanish society of people from different countries, cultures, religions and races.
• Treatment of foreign immigrants by Spaniards. Factor influencing such treatment.
• Positioning before the rights that stable and legal immigrants should have: family reunification, receipt of unemployment benefit, right to vote in municipalities, possibility of creating associations, and obtaining Spanish nationality.
• Agreement with phrases on health care and immigrants: the quality decreases due to the presence of immigrants, preference of Spaniards in access to health care,...
• Agreement with phrases on education and immigrants: the quality decreases due to the presence of immigrants, preference of Spaniards in access to a school place, investment should be increased,...
• Assessment of the compensation received by immigrants for what they contribute.
• Positive and negative aspects of immigration.
• Responsible for the integration of immigrants into society.
• Permissiveness with cultural and religious aspects of immigrants.
• Contribution of immigrants to the enrichment of Spanish culture.
• Agreement with phrases about the world of work and immigrants: they work in occupations that the Spaniards do not want, they work for lower wages, they take jobs,... Approval of situations resulting from the relationship between immigrants and natives: excluding a student for wearing a veil, hiring a Spaniard before an immigrant, protests over the construction of a mosque, expelling criminal immigrants.
• Immigration assessment for Spain Acceptance of various types of relationship with immigrants: cohabitation in the same neighborhood, in the same house, renting an apartment, at work, marriage / friendship with a child, ...
• Type of personal relationship of the interviewee with immigrants in Spain: neighborhood, friendship, work and family.
• Sympathy and antipathy towards different groups of immigrants. Reason for antipathy.
• Frequency of violent actions by immigrants against Spaniards.
• Justification of racism by violent phenomena of immigrants against Spaniards.
• Acceptance of a racist party in Spain.
• Punishment of citizens who utter racist insults.
• Perception of comments against immigrants.
• Origin of anti-immigrant comments.
• Attention paid in the media to the issue of immigration.
• The media's assessment of the image of immigration.
• Scale of trust in people and self-definition of racist of the person interviewed.
• Ideological self-location of the interviewee (0-10).
• Voter turnout and recall in the 2008 general election.
• Possession of children of non-university school age and type of school in which they study.
• Type of health service, public or private, used.
• Stay at the place of residence of the interviewee. Time of residence in the city / town for those who have not always resided in the same place.
• Residence abroad of parents/relatives.
• Religious practice.
• Assessment of personal economic situation. Possibility of having been unemployed or threatened in the last 5 years. Country of birth.

The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) is a continuous programme of cross-national collaboration running annual surveys on topics important for the social sciences. The programme started in 1984 with four founding members - Australia, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States – and has now grown to almost 50 member countries from all over the world. As the surveys are designed for replication, they can be used for both, cross-national and cross-time comparisons. Each ISSP module focuses on a specific topic, which is repeated in regular time intervals. Please, consult the documentation for details on how the national ISSP surveys are fielded. The present study focuses on questions about national consciousness and national identity. Solidarity with the part of town, the city, the region, the nation and with the respective continent as well as readiness to leave these regions to improve work or housing situation; importance of national unity; most important characteristics for national identity; identification with one´s own nation (scale); national pride; perceived pride in the democracy of the country, the political influence of the country in the world, the economic successes, the welfare-state services, the scientific achievements, the athletic successes, the achievements in art or literature, the military forces, the history and equal rights of all social groups in the country; preference for protective duty to support the national economy; attitude to the right of international institutions to enforce solutions to be accepted nationally; attitude to improved foreign language instruction in schools; attitude to enforcing national interests regarding other countries; rejection of acquisition of land by foreigners in one´s country; preference for national films and national television stations; attitude to government support of national minorities to preserve their customs and habits; preference for assimilation of minorities or retention of their identity; hostility to foreigners and prejudices against immigrants (scale); attitude to a reduction of immigration of foreigners; attitude to the right to asylum for politically persecuted refugees; origins from a rural or urban region; length of residence at current place of residence; length of stays abroad; native language; knowledge of foreign languages; citizenship; citizenship of parents at birth of respondent; citizenship of ancestors; perceived national affiliation and strength of this feeling of solidarity; advantageousness of membership of the country in the organization encompassing countries (such as e.g. EU); attitude to stricter measures regarding illegal immigrants; city size; superior function; union membership; self-assessment of social class; religiousness; party preference. Das International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) ist ein länderübergreifendes, fortlaufendes Umfrageprogramm, das jährlich Erhebungen zu Themen durchführt, die für die Sozialwissenschaften wichtig sind. Das Programm begann 1984 mit vier Gründungsmitgliedern - Australien, Deutschland, Großbritannien und den Vereinigten Staaten - und ist inzwischen auf fast 50 Mitgliedsländer aus aller Welt angewachsen. Da die Umfragen auf Replikationen ausgelegt sind, können die Daten sowohl für länder- als auch für zeitübergreifende Vergleiche genutzt werden. Jedes ISSP-Modul konzentriert sich auf ein bestimmtes Thema, das in regelmäßigen Zeitabständen wiederholt wird. Details zur Durchführung der nationalen ISSP-Umfragen entnehmen Sie bitte der Dokumentation. Die vorliegende Studie konzentriert sich auf Fragen zu nationalem Bewusstsein und nationaler Identität. Verbundenheit mit dem Stadtteil, der Stadt, der Region, der Nation und mit dem jeweiligen Kontinent sowie Bereitschaft, diese Regionen zur Verbesserung der Arbeits- oder Wohnsituation zu verlassen; Wichtigkeit der nationalen Einheit; wichtigste Merkmale für nationale Identität; Identifikation mit der eigenen Nation (Skala); Nationalstolz; empfundener Stolz auf die Demokratie des Landes, auf den politischen Einfluß des Landes in der Welt, auf die wirtschaftlichen Erfolge, die sozialstaatlichen Leistungen, die wissenschaftlichen Errungenschaften, die sportlichen Erfolge, die Leistungen in Kunst bzw. Literatur, die Streitkräfte, die Geschichte und die Gleichberechtigung aller gesellschaftlichen Gruppen im Lande; Präferenz für Schutzzölle zur Stützung der nationalen Wirtschaft; Einstellung zum Recht internationaler Institutionen zum Durchsetzen von national zu akzeptierenden Lösungen; Einstellung zu einem verbesserten Fremdsprachenunterricht in Schulen; Einstellung zum Durchsetzen nationaler Interessen gegenüber anderen Ländern; Ablehnung des Grunderwerbs durch Ausländer im eigenen Land; Präferenz für nationale Filme und nationale Fernsehprogramme; Einstellung zur staatlichen Unterstützung von nationalen Minderheiten zum Erhalt ihrer Sitten und Gebräuche; Präferenz zur Assimilation von Minderheiten oder Beibehalt ihrer Identität; Ausländerfeindlichkeit und Vorurteile gegen Einwanderer (Skala); Einstellung zu einer Reduzierung der Zuwanderung von Ausländern; Einstellung zum Asylrecht für politisch verfolgte Flüchtlinge; Herkunft aus einer ländlichen oder städtischen Region; Wohndauer am derzeitigen Wohnort; Dauer von Auslandsaufenthalten; Muttersprache; Fremdsprachenkenntnisse; Staatsangehörigkeit; Staatsangehörigkeit der Eltern bei Geburt des Befragten; Staatsangehörigkeit der Vorfahren; empfundene nationale Zugehörigkeit und Stärke dieses Verbundenheitsgefühls; Vorteilhaftigkeit der Mitgliedschaft des Landes in der länderübergreifenden Organisation (wie z.B. EU; Einstellung zu verschärften Maßnahmen gegenüber illegalen Zuwanderern; Ortsgröße; Vorgesetztenfunktion; Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Selbsteinschätzung der Schichtzugehörigkeit; Religiosität; Parteipräferenz.

This dataset is an analysis of the long-term migrant population of England and Wales by country of birth, passports held and other characteristics based on Census 2021.

Usual resident

A usual resident is anyone who on Census Day, 21 March 2021 was in the UK and had stayed or intended to stay in the UK for a period of 12 months or more, or had a permanent UK address and was outside the UK and intended to be outside the UK for less than 12 months.

Country of birth

The country in which a person was born. The following country of birth classifications are used in this dataset:

• Country of birth 12a: Political groupings of countries by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Country of birth 190a: Individual countries. This classification includes geographical groupings for low volume countries.
• Country of birth (3 categories): These categories have been derived from country of birth 12a and include all UK countries in "Europe: United Kingdom", all EU countries in "Europe: EU countries" and all remaining countries including British Overseas territories in "Non-EU countries (including British Overseas)".

Country of birth classifications

Passports held

The country or countries that a person holds, or is entitled to hold, a passport for. Where a person recorded having more than one passport, they were counted only once, categorised in the following priority order: 1. UK passport, 2. Irish passport, 3. Other passport.

The following classifications were created for this dataset for comparability with other international migration releases:

• Passports held (4 categories): High level political groupings of passport held by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Passports held (12 categories): Political groupings of passport held by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Passports held (150 categories): Individual countries for passport held. This classification includes geographical groupings for low volume countries.

Alternate passports held classifications

Economic activity status

The economic activity status of a person on Census Day, 21 March 2021. The following classification was created for this dataset:

• Economic activity status (6 categories): These categories have been derived from the base classification to create employed, self-employed, unemployed (seeking work), economically inactive students and economically active other groups.

Students who are economically active are included in either the Employee, Self-employed, or Unemployed (Looking for work) category

Economic activity status classifications

Industry

The industry worked in for those in current employment. The following classification was used for this dataset:

• Industry (current) classification 22a

Industry classifications

This is the Swedish part of the 2003 'International Social Survey Program' (ISSP), and it is the second time ISSP focuses on national identity. The questions on national consciousness and national identity include: Identification with the town, the city, the region, the nation and with the respective continent; most important characteristics for national identity; identification with one's own nation and national pride (scale); perceived pride in the democracy of the country, the political influence of the country in the world, the economic achievement, the social security system, the scientific achievements, the achievements in sports, the achievements in arts or literature, the armed forces, the history and equal rights of all social groups in society; preference for protective duty to support the national economy; attitude to the right of international institutions to enforce solutions to be accepted nationally; attitude to enforcing national interests regardless of evoking conflicts with other countries; rejection of acquisition of land by foreigners in one's country; preference for national films in national television stations; damage done by large international companies to the local business; attitude to free trade; attitude to follow the decisions of international organisations even if the local government does not agree with them; international organisations take away too much power from the country; availability of worldwide information as a benefit of the internet; importance of sharing national customs and traditions to achieve full nationality; attitude to government support of national minorities to preserve their customs and habits; preference for assimilation of minorities or retention of their identity; hostility to foreigners and prejudices against immigrants (scale); attitude to a reduction of immigration of foreigners; respondents citizenship; citizenship of parents at birth of respondent; birthplace or citizenship of parents should allow naturalization of children; same rights for citizens and legal immigrants; attitude towards stronger measures regarding illegal immigrants; languages spoken at home; perceived ethnic affiliation and strength of this feeling; advantageousness of membership of the country in the EU; benefits from EU-membership; attitude towards a powerful EU-government. Demographic variables include sex; age; marital status; steady life-partner; years in school, current employment status; current employment status of spouse; hours worked weekly; occupation of respondent and spouse (ISCO-88); respondent and spouse working for private, public sector or self-employed; supervisor function; union membership; household size; family income; respondents earnings; household composition; self-placement on a left-right continuum; party preference; vote last election; religious denomination; frequency of church attendance; self-placement on a top-bottom scale; region; town size, rural or urban region; ethnicity or nationality. Purpose: ISSP aims to design and implement internationally comparable attitude surveys. The study in 2003 investigating National Identity. Detta är den svenska studien inom det internationella forskningsprojektet ISSP. Temat för studien 2003 är ”National Identity”. Detta är andra gången studien genomförs på det här temat (SND 0502). International Social Survey Program, ISSP, är ett globalt forskningsprojekt som har till uppgift att konstruera och genomföra internationellt jämförbara attitydstudier. Sedan 1985 har attityddata årligen samlats in och utgör nu en databas som är fritt tillgänglig för forskarsamhället. I dagsläget är 48 länder, från sex olika världsdelar, involverade i projektet. Genom bredden av medlemsländer skapas möjlighet till jämförelser i flera dimensioner. Det finns möjligheter att både jämföra länder som har en likartad samhällsstruktur och historia, och länder som skiljer sig påtagligt från varandra. Sverige har varit medlem i ISSP sedan 1992 och det är Sociologiska intuitionen vid Umeå universitet som är huvudman för studierna i Sverige. Sedan starten 1985 har attityder från flera olika områden undersökts. Vissa områden har återkommit genom åren, vilket gör det möjligt att även jämföra dem över tid. Följande ämnen har behandlats: 1985 The Role of Government I 1986 Social Networks I 1987 Social Inequality I 1988 Family and Changing Gender Roles I 1989 Work Orientations I 1990 The Role of Government II 1991 Religion I 1992 Social Inequality II 1993 Environment I 1994 Family and Changing Gender Roles II 1995 National Identity I 1996 The Role of Government III 1997 Work Orientations II 1998 Religion II 1999 Social Inequality III 2000 Environment II 2001 Social Networks II 2002 Family and Changing Gender Roles III 2003 National Identity II 2004 Social Citizenship I 2005 Work Orientations III 2006 Role of Government IV 2007 Leisure and Sports I 2008 Religion III 2009 Social Inequality IV 2010 Environment III 2011 Health 2012 Family, Work and Gender Roles IV 2012 Family, Work and Gender Roles IV Syfte: ISSP har som syfte att konstruera och genomföra internationellt jämförbara attitydstudier. Studien för 2003 undersöker åsikter om nationell identitet.

The purpose of the study: to analyse Lithuanian residents’ social and political engagement, their relationship with the state, and their attitudes toward Lithuania as well as various social groups living in the country. Major investigated questions: the survey began by examining which factors respondents consider essential for being recognized as a true Lithuanian (… to have been born in Lithuania; … to have Lithuanian citizenship.; 6 items in total). A subsequent set of statements assessed national identity, pride in Lithuania, and loyalty to the country (I would rather be a citizen of Lithuania than of any other country in the world; There are some things about Lithuania today that make me feel ashamed of Lithuania; 5 items in total). The study also explored whether respondents believe that each nation should have its own state in which it can independently make decisions. Further, the survey investigated perceptions of Lithuanian identity acquisition - specifically, whether one can become a true Lithuanian through personal effort or whether it is necessary to be born Lithuanian. Another question block assessed the extent to which Lithuanian residents feel pride in their country based on various factors (… the way democracy works; … its political influence in the world; 6 items in total). The survey then focused on respondents’ views regarding the protection of national interests and international cooperation in economic, cultural, and political domains (Lithuania should limit the import of foreign products in order to protect its national economy; For certain problems, like environment pollution, international bodies should have the right to enforce solutions; 6 items in total). Attitudes toward immigrants residing in Lithuania were also evaluated (Immigrants increase crime rates; Immigrants are generally good for Lithuania’s economy; 5 items in total). Respondents were asked whether, in their opinion, the number of immigrants to Lithuania should significantly increase in the near future. The study examined attitudes toward the cultural integration of immigrants - whether they should preserve their native culture, combine it with Lithuanian culture, or fully adopt Lithuanian cultural norms. A separate question block allowed respondents to indicate what they believe constitutes being a good citizen (Never to try to evade taxes; Always to obey laws and regulations; 5 items in total). In assessing the state of democracy, respondents evaluated how well democracy functions in Lithuania today, how it functioned 10 years ago, and how they expect it to function 10 years from now. Another set of questions explored views on human rights within a democratic system (That all citizens have an adequate standard of living; That government authorities respect and protect the rights of minorities; 4 items in total). The survey also addressed whether the government should be responsible for reducing income inequality between the rich and the poor. Respondents were asked to position themselves on a left–right political spectrum. Political efficacy was assessed through questions measuring the extent to which respondents feel their opinions are considered by the government (People like me don’t have any say about what the government does; I don’t think the government cares much what people like me think). Respondents also evaluated the extent to which the civil service serves the public and the perceived prevalence of corruption within it. The final set of statements focused on perceptions of political authority, its relationship with society, and trust in decision-making by experts versus citizens (The people, and not politicians, should make our most important policy decisions; Politicians talk too much and take too little action; 6 items in total). Additionally, the survey explored respondents’ media consumption habits - including television, press, radio, and internet use - for political news and information, as well as perceptions of bias in political reporting. Finally, the survey assessed interpersonal trust by asking whether respondents believe most people would take advantage of them if given the opportunity or act honestly, and whether people in general can be trusted or should be approached with caution. At the end of the survey, respondents were asked whether they are citizens of Lithuania. Socio-demographic characteristics: gender, age, level of education, membership in organizations, religion, marital status, nationality, political views, political participation, size of household, respondent's average personal income, place of residence, working situation of the respondent and of his/her spouse or partner. Temporary accessibility restrictions apply for this dataset. Data will be made available without restrictions from 2026-01-01.

Census 2021 data on international student population of England and Wales by country of birth, passport held, age, sex and other characteristics.

These datasets are part of the release: The changing picture of long-term international migration, England and Wales: Census 2021. Figures may differ slightly in future releases because of the impact of removing rounding and applying further statistical processes.

Figures are based on geography boundaries as of 1 April 2022.

This release includes comparisons to the folllowing 2011 Census data:

• Students in full-time education
• International students (by Region)
• International students by country of birth
• International students by Top 100 countries of birth

Quality notes can be found here

Quality information about demography and migration can be found here

Quality information about labour market can be found here

Usual resident

A usual resident is anyone who on Census Day, 21 March 2021 was in the UK and had stayed or intended to stay in the UK for a period of 12 months or more, or had a permanent UK address and was outside the UK and intended to be outside the UK for less than 12 months.

International student

An international student is defined as someone who was a usual resident in England and Wales and meets all the following criteria:

• in-full-time education
• non-UK-born
• non-UK passport holder
• aged 17 years or over upon most recent arrival in the UK
• aged 18 years or over on Census Day.

Country of birth

The country in which a person was born. The following country of birth classifications are used in this dataset:

• Country of birth 12a: Political groupings of countries by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Country of birth 190a: Individual countries. This classification includes geographical groupings for low volume countries.
• Country of birth (3 categories): These categories have been derived from country of birth 12a and include all UK countries in "Europe: United Kingdom", all EU countries in "Europe: EU countries" and all remaining countries including British Overseas territories in "Non-EU countries (including British Overseas)".

More information about country of birth classifications can be found here.

Passports held

The country or countries that a person holds, or is entitled to hold, a passport for. Where a person recorded having more than one passport, they were counted only once, categorised in the following priority order: 1. UK passport, 2. Irish passport, 3. Other passport. The following classifications were created for this dataset for comparability with other international migration releases:

• Passports held (4 categories): High level political groupings of passport held by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Passports held (12 categories): Political groupings of passport held by EU membership and geographical location for non-EU countries.
• Passports held (150 categories): Individual countries for passport held. This classification includes geographical groupings for low volume countries.

More information can be found here

Economic activity status

The economic activity status of a person on Census Day, 21 March 2021. The following classification is used in this dataset:

• Economic activity status classification status_12a

Industry

The industry worked in for those in current employment. The following classification was used for this dataset:

• Industry (current) classification 22a

Student accommodation

Student accommodation breaks down household type by typical households used by students. This includes communal establishments, all student households, households containing a single family, households containing multiple families, living with parents and living alone.

More information can be found here

Second address indicator

The second address indicator is used to define an address (in or out of the UK) a person stays at for more than 30 days per year that is not their place of usual residence. Second addresses typically include: armed forces bases, addresses used by people working away from home, a student’s home address, the address of another parent or guardian, a partner’s address, a holiday home. There are 3 categories in this classification.

Detailed description can be found here

Main language (detailed)

This is used to define a person's first or preferred language. This breaks down the responses given in the write-in option "Other, write in (including British Sign Language)". There are 95 categories in the primary classification.

More details can be found here

Proficiency in English language

Proficiency in English language is used to determine how well a person whose main language is not English (English or Welsh in Wales) feels they can speak English. There are a total number of 6 categories in this classification.

More details can be found here

Fragen zum Nationalbewußtsein und zur nationalen Identität. Themen: Verbundenheit mit dem Stadtteil, der Stadt, der Region, derNation und mit dem jeweiligen Kontinent sowie Bereitschaft, dieseRegionen zur Verbesserung der Arbeits- oder Wohnsituation zu verlassen;Wichtigkeit der nationalen Einheit; wichtigste Merkmale für nationaleIdentität; Identifikation mit der eigenen Nation (Skala); Nationalstolz;empfundener Stolz auf die Demokratie des Landes, auf den politischenEinfluß des Landes in der Welt, auf die wirtschaftlichen Erfolge, diesozialstaatlichen Leistungen, die wissenschaftlichen Errungenschaften,die sportlichen Erfolge, die Leistungen in Kunst bzw. Literatur, dieStreitkräfte, die Geschichte und die Gleichberechtigung allergesellschaftlichen Gruppen im Lande; Präferenz für Schutzzölle zurStützung der nationalen Wirtschaft; Einstellung zum Rechtinternationaler Institutionen zum Durchsetzen von national zuakzeptierenden Lösungen; Einstellung zu einem verbessertenFremdsprachenunterricht in Schulen; Einstellung zum Durchsetzennationaler Interessen gegenüber anderen Ländern; Ablehnung desGrunderwerbs durch Ausländer im eigenen Land; Präferenz für nationaleFilme und nationale Fernsehprogramme; Einstellung zur staatlichenUnterstützung von nationalen Minderheiten zum Erhalt ihrer Sitten undGebräuche; Präferenz zur Assimilation von Minderheiten oder Beibehaltihrer Identität; Ausländerfeindlichkeit und Vorurteile gegen Einwanderer(Skala); Einstellung zu einer Reduzierung der Zuwanderung vonAusländern; Einstellung zum Asylrecht für politisch verfolgteFlüchtlinge; Herkunft aus einer ländlichen oder städtischen Region;Wohndauer am derzeitigen Wohnort; Dauer von Auslandsaufenthalten;Muttersprache; Fremdsprachenkenntnisse; Staatsangehörigkeit;Staatsangehörigkeit der Eltern bei Geburt des Befragten;Staatsangehörigkeit der Vorfahren; empfundene nationale Zugehörigkeitund Stärke dieses Verbundenheitsgefühls; Vorteilhaftigkeit derMitgliedschaft des Landes in der länderübergreifenden Organisation (wiez.B. EU; Einstellung zu verschärften Maßnahmen gegenüber illegalenZuwanderern; Ortsgröße; Vorgesetztenfunktion;Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Selbsteinschätzung derSchichtzugehörigkeit; Religiosität; Parteipräferenz. Questions on national consciousness and national identity.Topics: solidarity with the part of town, the city, the region, the nation andwith the respective continent as well as readiness to leave these regionsto improve work or housing situation;importance of national unity;most important characteristics for national identity;identification with one's own nation (scale);national pride;perceived pride in the democracy of the country, the political influenceof the country in the world, the economic successes, the welfare-state services,the scientific achievements, the athletic successes,the achievements in art or literature, the military forces,the history and equal rights of all social groups in the country;preference for protective duty to support the national economy;attitude to the right of international institutions to enforce solutionsto be accepted nationally;attitude to improved foreign language instruction in schools;attitude to enforcing national interests regarding other countries;rejection of acquisition of land by foreigners in one's country;preference for national films and national television stations;attitude to government support of national minoritiesto preserve their customs and habits;preference for assimilation of minorities or retention of their identity;hostility to foreigners and prejudices against immigrants (scale);attitude to a reduction of immigration of foreigners;attitude to the right to asylum for politically persecuted refugees;origins from a rural or urban region;length of residence at current place of residence;length of stays abroad;native language;knowledge of foreign languages;citizenship;citizenship of parents at birth of respondent;citizenship of ancestors;perceived national affiliation and strength of this feeling of solidarity;advantageousness of membership of the country in the organizationencompassing countries (such as e.g. EU);attitude to stricter measures regarding illegal immigrants;city size;superior function;union membership;self-assessment of social class;religiousness;party preference.