3 datasets found
  1. u

    Replication Data for: "Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and...

    • iro.uiowa.edu
    Updated May 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Byung-Deuk Woo; Hyein Ko; Yuehong Cassandra Tai; Yue Hu; Frederick Solt (2025). Replication Data for: "Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and Over Time." Social Science Quarterly [Dataset]. https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/Replication-Data-for-Public-Support-for/9984824323302771
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Byung-Deuk Woo; Hyein Ko; Yuehong Cassandra Tai; Yue Hu; Frederick Solt
    Time period covered
    2024
    Description

    Objective. Support for gay rights has increased in the publics of many countries over recent decades, but the scholarship on the topic has been hindered by the limited available data on these trends in public opinion. The goal of the Support for Gay Rights (SGR) dataset is to overcome this problem. Method. The SGR dataset is constructed by combining a comprehensive collection of survey data with a latent-variable model to provide annual time-series estimates of public support for gay rights across 118 countries and over as many as 51 years that are comparable across space and time. Results. We show these data perform well in validation tests and demonstrate their potential by replicating the influential but recently questioned finding of Andersen and Fetner (2008) that more income inequality yields less tolerant and supportive attitudes toward gay people. Conclusion. We anticipate that the SGR data will become a crucial source for cross-national, cross-regional, and longitudinal research that improves our understanding of the sources and consequences of public support for gay rights.

  2. g

    European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Matrix Design...

    • search.gesis.org
    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • +3more
    Updated Oct 20, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wolf, Christof; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Reeskens, Tim; Ernst Stähli, Michèle (2020). European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017) - Matrix Design Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.13561
    Explore at:
    (1636289), (2129034)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 20, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS search
    GESIS Data Archive
    Authors
    Wolf, Christof; Jónsdóttir, Guðbjörg A.; Reeskens, Tim; Ernst Stähli, Michèle
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Description

    The European Values Study is a large-scale, cross-national and longitudinal survey research program on how Europeans think about family, work, religion, politics, and society. Repeated every nine years in an increasing number of countries, the survey provides insights into the ideas, beliefs, preferences, attitudes, values, and opinions of citizens all over Europe.

    As previous waves conducted in 1981, 1990, 1999, 2008, the fifth EVS wave maintains a persistent focus on a broad range of values. Questions are highly comparable across waves and regions, making EVS suitable for research aimed at studying trends over time.

    The new wave has seen a strengthening of the methodological standards. The full release of the EVS 2017 includes data and documentation of altogether 37 participating countries. For more information, please go to the EVS website.

    Morale, religious, societal, political, work, and family values of Europeans.

    Topics: 1. Perceptions of life: importance of work, family, friends and acquaintances, leisure time, politics and religion; happiness; self-assessment of own health; memberships in voluntary organisations (religious or church organisations, cultural activities, trade unions, political parties or groups, environment, ecology, animal rights, professional associations, sports, recreation, or other groups, none); active or inactive membership of humanitarian or charitable organisation, consumer organisation, self-help group or mutual aid; voluntary work in the last six months; tolerance towards minorities (people of a different race, heavy drinkers, immigrants, foreign workers, drug addicts, homosexuals, Christians, Muslims, Jews, and gypsies - social distance); trust in people; estimation of people´s fair and helpful behavior; internal or external control; satisfaction with life; importance of educational goals: desirable qualities of children.

    1. Work: attitude towards work (job needed to develop talents, receiving money without working is humiliating, people turn lazy not working, work is a duty towards society, work always comes first); importance of selected aspects of occupational work; give priority to nationals over foreigners as well as men over women in jobs.

    2. Religion and morale: religious denomination; current and former religious denomination; current frequency of church attendance and at the age of 12; self-assessment of religiousness; belief in God, life after death, hell, heaven, and re-incarnation; personal god vs. spirit or life force; importance of God in one´s life (10-point-scale); frequency of prayers; morale attitudes (scale: claiming state benefits without entitlement, cheating on taxes, taking soft drugs, accepting a bribe, homosexuality, abortion, divorce, euthanasia, suicide, paying cash to avoid taxes, casual sex, avoiding fare on public transport, prostitution, in-vitro fertilization, political violence, death penalty).

    3. Family: trust in family; most important criteria for a successful marriage or partnership (faithfulness, adequate income, good housing, sharing household chores, children, time for friends and personal hobbies); marriage is an outdated institution; attitude towards traditional understanding of one´s role of man and woman in occupation and family (gender roles); homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples; duty towards society to have children; responsibility of adult children for their parents when they are in need of long-term care; to make own parents proud is a main goal in life.

    4. Politics and society: political interest; political participation; preference for individual freedom or social equality; self-assessment on a left-right continuum (10-point-scale) (left-right self-placement); individual vs. state responsibility for providing; take any job vs. right to refuse job when unemployed; competition good vs. harmful for people; equal incomes vs. incentives for individual effort; private vs. government ownership of business and industry; postmaterialism (scale); most important aims of the country for the next ten years; willingness to fight for the country; expectation of future development (less importance placed on work and greater respect for authority); trust in institutions; essential characteristics of democracy; importance of democracy for the respondent; rating democracy in own country; satisfaction with the political system in the country; preferred type of political system (strong leader, expert decisions, army should ru...

  3. f

    Key themes for LGBT and its component identities based on highest frequency...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Apr 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Reuben Ng; Ting Yu Joanne Chow; Wenshu Yang (2024). Key themes for LGBT and its component identities based on highest frequency descriptors over a decade (2010–2020). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300385.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Reuben Ng; Ting Yu Joanne Chow; Wenshu Yang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Key themes for LGBT and its component identities based on highest frequency descriptors over a decade (2010–2020).

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Byung-Deuk Woo; Hyein Ko; Yuehong Cassandra Tai; Yue Hu; Frederick Solt (2025). Replication Data for: "Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and Over Time." Social Science Quarterly [Dataset]. https://iro.uiowa.edu/esploro/outputs/dataset/Replication-Data-for-Public-Support-for/9984824323302771

Replication Data for: "Public Support for Gay Rights Across Countries and Over Time." Social Science Quarterly

Explore at:
4 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
May 30, 2025
Dataset provided by
Harvard Dataverse
Authors
Byung-Deuk Woo; Hyein Ko; Yuehong Cassandra Tai; Yue Hu; Frederick Solt
Time period covered
2024
Description

Objective. Support for gay rights has increased in the publics of many countries over recent decades, but the scholarship on the topic has been hindered by the limited available data on these trends in public opinion. The goal of the Support for Gay Rights (SGR) dataset is to overcome this problem. Method. The SGR dataset is constructed by combining a comprehensive collection of survey data with a latent-variable model to provide annual time-series estimates of public support for gay rights across 118 countries and over as many as 51 years that are comparable across space and time. Results. We show these data perform well in validation tests and demonstrate their potential by replicating the influential but recently questioned finding of Andersen and Fetner (2008) that more income inequality yields less tolerant and supportive attitudes toward gay people. Conclusion. We anticipate that the SGR data will become a crucial source for cross-national, cross-regional, and longitudinal research that improves our understanding of the sources and consequences of public support for gay rights.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu