Context

The purpose behind this dataset was, initially, to visualize, compare and understand how emerging economies are developing, both in relation to each other and internally. Since the data provided by The World Bank is very insightful, I've decided to gather it in a standardized and updated format and upload it, so others can also provide us with better analysis and, perhaps, better insights into each country's economies.

Content

This dataset contains 5 files: Economy, EducationAndEnvironment, HealthAndPoverty, PrivateSector and PublicSector data. All files are formatted in the following structure:

SeriesName | SeriesCode | CountryName | CountryCode | Year | Value

Acknowledgements

The data present in this dataset is only possible due to the work and services of https://databank.worldbank.org.

Inspiration

Is it possible to extract some fundamental correlations between emerging economies and their impacts on social welfare? What are the relations between a country's education expenditure and their employment rate? What other aspects of society can we better understand through this data and avoid common pitfalls that have occurred to other countries?

This dataset offers a detailed comparison of key global players like USA, Russia, China, India, Canada, Australia, and others across various economic, social, and environmental metrics. By comparing countries on indicators such as GDP, population, healthcare access, education levels, internet penetration, military spending, and much more, this dataset provides valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and analysts.

🔍 Key Comparisons:

Economic Indicators: GDP, inflation rates, unemployment rates, etc. Social Indicators: Literacy rates, healthcare quality, life expectancy, etc. Environmental Indicators: CO2 emissions, renewable energy usage, protected areas, etc. Technological Advancements: Internet users, mobile subscriptions, tech exports, etc. Military Spending: Defense budgets, military personnel numbers, etc. This dataset is perfect for those who want to compare countries in terms of development, growth, and global standing. It can be used for data analysis, policy planning, research, and even education.

✨ Key Features:

Comprehensive Coverage: Includes multiple countries with key metrics. Multiple Domains: Economic, social, environmental, technological, and military data. Up-to-date Information: Covers data from the last decade to provide recent insights. Research Ready: Suitable for academic research, visualizations, and analysis.

China Exports to Russia was US$115.28 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China Exports to Russia - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

Abstract The aim of this article is to research the main characteristics of two Russian groups coming to the State of São Paulo after World War II: DPs from Europe and Russian refugees from China. To that end, data contained in the database on DPs in the State of São Paulo, consolidated by Salles et al. (2013), was systematized and analyzed. Research revealed that the Brazilian policy on admission of DPs as industrial workforce had direct impact on the profile of the Russian population selected to immigrate to Brazil, mainly moving to the capital of the State of São Paulo. Russian refugees from China had a different demographic and social profile; the group had the most women and children and employed predominantly in the service sector. The professional characteristics of these two groups determined their distribution in the districts of São Paulo. As Europe’s Russian DPs moved to peripheral and industrial districts, Russians from China settled in neighborhoods closer to the city center.

Spatial distribution map of roads, railways and pipelines in China Mongolia Russia economic corridor from 1990 to 2020 1) Spatial data of highway, railway and pipeline in 1990; Spatial data of roads, railways and pipelines in China Mongolia Russia economic corridor in 2015; Spatial data of roads, railways and pipelines in China Mongolia Russia economic corridor in 2020; 2) Download the remote sensing images within the China Mongolia Russia economic corridor on NASA website and use arcgis10 2 software manual interpretation and extraction of highway and railway; Map elements are marked with the help of Russian atlas; The pipeline data shall be manually marked with reference to relevant maps; 3) The scale of the atlas is 1:2500000, which clearly reflects the changes of traffic and pipelines in the China Mongolia Russia economic corridor in recent 30 years,; 4) The data shows in detail the changes of traffic and pipelines in the China Mongolia Russia economic corridor in recent 30 years, which provides a data basis for the later study of the impact of traffic and pipeline construction on the change of ecological environment.

Relative pollen productivity (RPP) estimates allow to recalculate vegetation cover from pollen counts. This dataset contains: a comprehensive compilation of available RPP studies and their data including information on the study design and models used to calculate the RPP values in the original studies. taxonomically harmonised RPP datasets for America (including Greenland), Europe (including Arctic Russia), China and one combined for the whole Northern hemisphere extratropics built out of the available studies. fall speeds, which are necessary to reconstruct vegetation cover out of pollen counts and RPP values. We advise the user to read the manuscript doi:10.5194/essd-2019-242 accompanying the dataset prior to use especially the taxonomically harmonised datasets.

This database contains tobacco consumption data from 1970-2015 collected through a systematic search coupled with consultation with country and subject-matter experts. Data quality appraisal was conducted by at least two research team members in duplicate, with greater weight given to official government sources. All data was standardized into units of cigarettes consumed and a detailed accounting of data quality and sourcing was prepared. Data was found for 82 of 214 countries for which searches for national cigarette consumption data were conducted, representing over 95% of global cigarette consumption and 85% of the world’s population. Cigarette consumption fell in most countries over the past three decades but trends in country specific consumption were highly variable. For example, China consumed 2.5 million metric tonnes (MMT) of cigarettes in 2013, more than Russia (0.36 MMT), the United States (0.28 MMT), Indonesia (0.28 MMT), Japan (0.20 MMT), and the next 35 highest consuming countries combined. The US and Japan achieved reductions of more than 0.1 MMT from a decade earlier, whereas Russian consumption plateaued, and Chinese and Indonesian consumption increased by 0.75 MMT and 0.1 MMT, respectively. These data generally concord with modelled country level data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and have the additional advantage of not smoothing year-over-year discontinuities that are necessary for robust quasi-experimental impact evaluations. Before this study, publicly available data on cigarette consumption have been limited—either inappropriate for quasi-experimental impact evaluations (modelled data), held privately by companies (proprietary data), or widely dispersed across many national statistical agencies and research organisations (disaggregated data). This new dataset confirms that cigarette consumption has decreased in most countries over the past three decades, but that secular country specific consumption trends are highly variable. The findings underscore the need for more robust processes in data reporting, ideally built into international legal instruments or other mandated processes. To monitor the impact of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and other tobacco control interventions, data on national tobacco production, trade, and sales should be routinely collected and openly reported. The first use of this database for a quasi-experimental impact evaluation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control is: Hoffman SJ, Poirier MJP, Katwyk SRV, Baral P, Sritharan L. Impact of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control on global cigarette consumption: quasi-experimental evaluations using interrupted time series analysis and in-sample forecast event modelling. BMJ. 2019 Jun 19;365:l2287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2287 Another use of this database was to systematically code and classify longitudinal cigarette consumption trajectories in European countries since 1970 in: Poirier MJ, Lin G, Watson LK, Hoffman SJ. Classifying European cigarette consumption trajectories from 1970 to 2015. Tobacco Control. 2022 Jan. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056627. Statement of Contributions: Conceived the study: GEG, SJH Identified multi-country datasets: GEG, MP Extracted data from multi-country datasets: MP Quality assessment of data: MP, GEG Selection of data for final analysis: MP, GEG Data cleaning and management: MP, GL Internet searches: MP (English, French, Spanish, Portuguese), GEG (English, French), MYS (Chinese), SKA (Persian), SFK (Arabic); AG, EG, BL, MM, YM, NN, EN, HR, KV, CW, and JW (English), GL (English) Identification of key informants: GEG, GP Project Management: LS, JM, MP, SJH, GEG Contacts with Statistical Agencies: MP, GEG, MYS, SKA, SFK, GP, BL, MM, YM, NN, HR, KV, JW, GL Contacts with key informants: GEG, MP, GP, MYS, GP Funding: GEG, SJH SJH: Hoffman, SJ; JM: Mammone J; SRVK: Rogers Van Katwyk, S; LS: Sritharan, L; MT: Tran, M; SAK: Al-Khateeb, S; AG: Grjibovski, A.; EG: Gunn, E; SKA: Kamali-Anaraki, S; BL: Li, B; MM: Mahendren, M; YM: Mansoor, Y; NN: Natt, N; EN: Nwokoro, E; HR: Randhawa, H; MYS: Yunju Song, M; KV: Vercammen, K; CW: Wang, C; JW: Woo, J; MJPP: Poirier, MJP; GEG: Guindon, EG; GP: Paraje, G; GL Gigi Lin Key informants who provided data: Corne van Walbeek (South Africa, Jamaica) Frank Chaloupka (US) Ayda Yurekli (Turkey) Dardo Curti (Uruguay) Bungon Ritthiphakdee (Thailand) Jakub Lobaszewski (Poland) Guillermo Paraje (Chile, Argentina) Key informants who provided useful insights: Carlos Manuel Guerrero López (Mexico) Muhammad Jami Husain (Bangladesh) Nigar Nargis (Bangladesh) Rijo M John (India) Evan Blecher (Nigeria, Indonesia, Philippines, South Africa) Yagya Karki (Nepal) Anne CK Quah (Malaysia) Nery Suarez Lugo (Cuba) Agencies providing assistance: Iranian Tobacco Co. Institut National de la Statistique (Tunisia) HM Revenue & Customs (UK) Eidgenössisches Finanzdepartement EFD/Département...

TThe ERS International Macroeconomic Data Set provides historical and projected data for 181 countries that account for more than 99 percent of the world economy. These data and projections are assembled explicitly to serve as underlying assumptions for the annual USDA agricultural supply and demand projections, which provide a 10-year outlook on U.S. and global agriculture. The macroeconomic projections describe the long-term, 10-year scenario that is used as a benchmark for analyzing the impacts of alternative scenarios and macroeconomic shocks.

Explore the International Macroeconomic Data Set 2015 for annual growth rates, consumer price indices, real GDP per capita, exchange rates, and more. Get detailed projections and forecasts for countries worldwide.

Annual growth rates, Consumer price indices (CPI), Real GDP per capita, Real exchange rates, Population, GDP deflator, Real gross domestic product (GDP), Real GDP shares, GDP, projections, Forecast, Real Estate, Per capita, Deflator, share, Exchange Rates, CPI

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Côte d'Ivoire, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe, WORLD Follow data.kapsarc.org for timely data to advance energy economics research. Notes:

Developed countries/1 Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Other Western Europe, European Union 27, North America

Developed countries less USA/2 Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Other Western Europe, European Union 27, Canada

Developing countries/3 Africa, Middle East, Other Oceania, Asia less Japan, Latin America;

Low-income developing countries/4 Haiti, Afghanistan, Nepal, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zimbabwe;

Emerging markets/5 Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Russia, China, India, Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore

BRIICs/5 Brazil, Russia, India, Indonesia, China; Former Centrally Planned Economies

Former centrally planned economies/7 Cyprus, Malta, Recently acceded countries, Other Central Europe, Former Soviet Union

USMCA/8 Canada, Mexico, United States

Europe and Central Asia/9 Europe, Former Soviet Union

Middle East and North Africa/10 Middle East and North Africa

Other Southeast Asia outlook/11 Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam

Other South America outlook/12 Chile, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay

Indicator Source

Real gross domestic product (GDP) World Bank World Development Indicators, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service all converted to a 2015 base year.

Real GDP per capita U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, GDP table and Population table.

GDP deflator World Bank World Development Indicators, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service, all converted to a 2015 base year.

Real GDP shares U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, GDP table.

Real exchange rates U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Macroeconomic Data Set, CPI table, and Nominal XR and Trade Weights tables developed by the Economic Research Service.

Consumer price indices (CPI) International Financial Statistics International Monetary Fund, IHS Global Insight, Oxford Economics Forecasting, as well as estimated and projected values developed by the Economic Research Service, all converted to a 2015 base year.

Population Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, International Data Base.

Explore real GDP growth projections dataset, including insights into the impact of COVID-19 on economic trends. This dataset covers countries such as Spain, Australia, France, Italy, Brazil, and more.

growth rate, Real, COVID-19, GDP

Spain, Australia, France, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Russia, Turkiye, World, China, Mexico, Korea, India, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Germany, Indonesia, JapanFollow data.kapsarc.org for timely data to advance energy economics research..Source: OECD Economic Outlook database.- India projections are based on fiscal years, starting in April. The European Union is a full member of the G20, but the G20 aggregate only includes countries that are also members in their own right. Spain is a permanent invitee to the G20. World and G20 aggregates use moving nominal GDP weights at purchasing power parities. Difference in percentage points, based on rounded figures.

The World Values Survey (WVS) is an international research program devoted to the scientific and academic study of social, political, economic, religious and cultural values of people in the world. The project’s goal is to assess which impact values stability or change over time has on the social, political and economic development of countries and societies. The project grew out of the European Values Study and was started in 1981 by its Founder and first President (1981-2013) Professor Ronald Inglehart from the University of Michigan (USA) and his team, and since then has been operating in more than 120 world societies. The main research instrument of the project is a representative comparative social survey which is conducted globally every 5 years. Extensive geographical and thematic scope, free availability of survey data and project findings for broad public turned the WVS into one of the most authoritative and widely-used cross-national surveys in the social sciences. At the moment, WVS is the largest non-commercial cross-national empirical time-series investigation of human beliefs and values ever executed. World Values Survey Interview Mode of collection: mixed mode. Face-to-face interview: CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview). Face-to-face interview: PAPI (Paper and Pencil Interview). Telephone interview: CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview). Self-administered questionnaire: CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview). Self-administered questionnaire: Paper. In all countries, fieldwork was conducted on the basis of detailed and uniform instructions prepared by the WVS scientific advisory committee and WVSA secretariat. The main data collection mode in WVS 2017-2022 is face to face (interviewer-administered). Several countries employed self-administered interview or mixed-mode approach to data collection: Australia (CAWI & postal survey); Canada (CAWI); Hong Kong SAR (PAPI & CAWI); Malaysia (CAWI & PAPI); Netherlands (CAWI); USA (CAWI & CATI). The WVS Master Questionnaire was provided in English, Arabic, Russian and Spanish. Each national survey team had to ensure that the questionnaire was translated into all the languages spoken by 15% or more of the population in the country. WVSA Secretariat and Data archive monitored the translation process; every translation is subject to multi-stage validation procedure before the fieldwork can be started. The target population is defined as: individuals aged 18 (16/17 is acceptable in the countries with such voting age) or older (with no upper age limit), regardless of their nationality, citizenship or language, that have been residing in the [country/ territory] within private households for the past 6 months prior to the date of beginning of fieldwork (or in the date of the first visit to the household, in case of random-route selection). Research area: Andorra (AD); Argentina (AR); Armenia (AM); Australia (AU); Bangladesh (BD); Bolivia (BO); Brazil (BR); Canada (CA); Colombia (CO); Chile (CL); China (CN); Cyprus (CY); Ecuador (EC); Egypt (EG); Ethiopia (ET); Germany (DE); Greece (GR); Guatemala (GT); Hong Kong SAR PRC (HK); Indonesia (ID); Iran (IR); Iraq (IQ); Japan (JP); Jordan (JO); Kazakhstan (KZ); Kenya (KE); Kyrgyzstan (KG); Lebanon (LB); Libya (LY); Macao SAR PRC (MO); Malaysia (MY); Maldives (MV); Mexico (MX); Mongolia (MN); Morocco (MA); Myanmar (MM); Netherlands (NL); New Zealand (NZ); Nicaragua (NI); Nigeria (NG); Pakistan (PK); Peru (PE); Philippines (PH); Puerto Rico (PR); Romania (RO); Russia (RU); Serbia (RS); Singapore (SG); South Korea (KR); Taiwan ROC (TW); Tajikistan (TJ); Thailand (TH); Tunisia (TN); Turkey (TR); Ukraine (UA); United States (US); Venezuela (VE); Vietnam (VN); Zimbabwe (ZW). The sampling procedures differ from country to country; probability sample: Multistage Sample, Probability Sample, Simple Random Sample Representative single stage or multi-stage sampling of the adult population of the country 18 (16) years old and older was used for the WVS 2017-2021. Sample size was set as effective sample size: 1200 for countries with population over 2 million, 1000 for countries with population less than 2 million. Countries with great population size and diversity (e.g. India, China, USA, Russia, Brazil etc.) are requirred to reach an effective sample of N=1500 or larger. Only 2 countries (Argentina, Chile) deviated from the guidelines with an effective sample size below the set threshold. Sample design and other relevant information about sampling were reviewed by the WVS Scientific Advisory Committee and approved prior to contracting of fieldwork agency or starting of data collection. The sampling was documented using the Survey Design Form delivered by the national teams which included the description of the sampling frame and each sampling stage as well as the calculation of the planned gross and net sample size to achieve the required effective sample. Additionally, it included the analytical description of the inclusion probabilities of the sampling design that are used to calculate design weights.

The aim of the article is to compare health system outcomes in the BRICS countries, assess the trends of their changes in 2000−2017, and verify whether they are in any way correlated with the economic context. The indicators considered were: nominal and per capita current health expenditure, government health expenditure, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, GDP growth, unemployment, inflation, and composition of GDP. The study covered five countries of the BRICS group over a period of 18 years. We decided to characterize countries covered with a dataset of selected indicators describing population health status, namely: life expectancy at birth, level of immunization, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, and tuberculosis case detection rate. We constructed a unified synthetic measure depicting the performance of individual health systems in terms of their outcomes with a single numerical value. Descriptive statistical analysis of quantitative traits consisted of the arithmetic mean (xsr), standard deviation (SD), and, where needed, the median. The normality of the distribution of variables was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Spearman's rho and Kendall tau rank coefficients were used for correlation analysis between measures. The correlation analyses have been supplemented with factor analysis. We found that the best results in terms of health care system performance were recorded in Russia, China, and Brazil. India and South Africa are noticeably worse. However, the entire group performs visibly worse than the developed countries. The health system outcomes appeared to correlate on a statistically significant scale with health expenditures per capita, governments involvement in health expenditures, GDP per capita, and industry share in GDP; however, these correlations are relatively weak, with the highest strength in the case of government's involvement in health expenditures and GDP per capita. Due to weak correlation with economic background, other factors may play a role in determining health system outcomes in BRICS countries. More research should be recommended to find them and determine to what extent and how exactly they affect health system outcomes.

The expansion of irrigated agriculture has increased global crop production but resulted in widespread stress to freshwater resources. Ensuring that increases in irrigated production only occur in places where water is relatively abundant is a key objective of sustainable agriculture, and knowledge of how irrigated land has evolved is important for measuring progress towards water sustainability. Yet a spatially detailed understanding of the evolution of global area equipped for irrigation (AEI) is missing. Here we utilize the latest sub-national irrigation statistics (covering 17298 administrative units) from various official sources to develop a gridded (5 arc-min resolution) global product of AEI for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. We find that AEI increased by 11% from 2000 (297 Mha) to 2015 (330 Mha) with locations of both substantial expansion (e.g., northwest India, northeast China) and decline (e.g., Russia). Combining these outputs with information on green (i.e., rainfall) and blue (i.e., surface and ground) water stress, we also examine to what extent irrigation has expanded unsustainably (i.e., in places already experiencing water stress). We find that more than half (52%) of irrigation expansion has taken place in regions that were already water stressed, with India alone accounting for 36% of global unsustainable expansion. These findings provide new insights into the evolving patterns of global irrigation with important implications for global water sustainability and food security.

Recommended citation:

Mehta, P., Siebert, S., Kummu, M. et al. Half of twenty-first century global irrigation expansion has been in water-stressed regions. Nat Water (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00206-9

Open-access peer reviewed publication available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00206-9

Files G_AEI_*.ASC were produced using the GMIA dataset[https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/f79213a0-88fd-11da-a88f-000d939bc5d8].

Files MEIER_G_AEI_*.ASC were produced using Meier et al. (2018) dataset [https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.884744].

The Soil and Physiographic Database for Northern and Central Eurasia (1:5 Million Scale) CD-ROM contains reports, databases, and digital maps for North and Central Eurasia region [covering China (including the Taiwan Province of China), Mongolia, and all countries of the former Soviet Union (CIS and Baltic States)]. The database was prepared by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in co-operation with the Dokuchaiev Institute of Soil Science, Moscow, Russia and the Institute of Soil Science, Academia Sinica, Nanjing, China. The preparation of this database is part of a larger FAO programme that aims to produce a systematic update of the soil and terrain database for the whole world. This effort is supported by a number of international institutes and organizations such as the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Soil Resources Information Centre (ISRIC), and the European Soil Bureau (ESB), and is only possible through contribution of national soil institutes worldwide.

The soil information in this database has been derived from several sources, in particular the 1:2.5 Million Soil Map of the Former Soviet Union prepared by Friedland in the Dokuchaiev Institute, Moscow, and the Soil Map of China at 1:4 million scale prepared by the Institute of Soil Science of the Academia Sinica in Nanjing. All soil information has been correlated with the Revised Legend of the Soil Map of the World.

For Mongolia and the countries of the CIS and Baltic States, the physiographic coverage was prepared by the Dokuchaiev Institute according to the principles developed for soil and terrain databases (SOTER) by ISRIC, FAO and UNEP. For China, the physiographic layer was prepared as part of a larger project assessing land degradation in Asia according to the same principles.

For the Russian Federation and China, an integration of the soil and physiographic layer has been carried out; for the other areas, both layers have been prepared separately and no correlation has been attempted.

Apart from selected examples in the report on soils of China, the database does not contain any soil profile description nor soil analytical results. Documentation on the soils of the Russian Federation, the physiography of the CIS and Baltic States, and on soils of China is included on the CD-ROM.

The results presented on the CD-ROM are in part provisional, as efforts are under way to produce a full SOTER database for Eastern Europe at 1:2.5 million scale. This will improve the information available for the European part of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Belarus (Byelarus). In addition, more recent and more detailed regional soil information exists on the Russian Federation and on China.

Soil and Physiographic Database for North and Central Eurasia at 1:5 Million Scale is provided on CD-ROM by the FAO, Land and Water Digital Media Series (Number 7). The CD-ROM can be purchased (Price: US$40) from FAO, Sales and Marketing Group, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 0100 Rome, Italy (Fax: +39-06-5705-3360 E-mail: publications-sales@fao.org).

Abstract

Gallup Worldwide Research continually surveys residents in more than 150 countries, representing more than 98% of the world's adult population, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. Gallup typically surveys 1,000 individuals in each country, using a standard set of core questions that has been translated into the major languages of the respective country. In some regions, supplemental questions are asked in addition to core questions. Face-to-face interviews are approximately 1 hour, while telephone interviews are about 30 minutes. In many countries, the survey is conducted once per year, and fieldwork is generally completed in two to four weeks. The Country Dataset Details spreadsheet displays each country's sample size, month/year of the data collection, mode of interviewing, languages employed, design effect, margin of error, and details about sample coverage.

Gallup is entirely responsible for the management, design, and control of Gallup Worldwide Research. For the past 70 years, Gallup has been committed to the principle that accurately collecting and disseminating the opinions and aspirations of people around the globe is vital to understanding our world. Gallup's mission is to provide information in an objective, reliable, and scientifically grounded manner. Gallup is not associated with any political orientation, party, or advocacy group and does not accept partisan entities as clients. Any individual, institution, or governmental agency may access the Gallup Worldwide Research regardless of nationality. The identities of clients and all surveyed respondents will remain confidential.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

SAMPLING AND DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident population aged 15 and older. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population of the entire country. Exceptions include areas where the safety of interviewing staff is threatened, scarcely populated islands in some countries, and areas that interviewers can reach only by foot, animal, or small boat.

Telephone surveys are used in countries where telephone coverage represents at least 80% of the population or is the customary survey methodology (see the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country). In Central and Eastern Europe, as well as in the developing world, including much of Latin America, the former Soviet Union countries, nearly all of Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, an area frame design is used for face-to-face interviewing.

The typical Gallup Worldwide Research survey includes at least 1,000 surveys of individuals. In some countries, oversamples are collected in major cities or areas of special interest. Additionally, in some large countries, such as China and Russia, sample sizes of at least 2,000 are collected. Although rare, in some instances the sample size is between 500 and 1,000. See the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country.

FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY DESIGN

FIRST STAGE In countries where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of 100 to 135 ultimate clusters (Sampling Units), consisting of clusters of households. Sampling units are stratified by population size and or geography and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size, otherwise simple random sampling is used. Samples are drawn independent of any samples drawn for surveys conducted in previous years.

There are two methods for sample stratification:

METHOD 1: The sample is stratified into 100 to 125 ultimate clusters drawn proportional to the national population, using the following strata: 1) Areas with population of at least 1 million 2) Areas 500,000-999,999 3) Areas 100,000-499,999 4) Areas 50,000-99,999 5) Areas 10,000-49,999 6) Areas with less than 10,000

The strata could include additional stratum to reflect populations that exceed 1 million as well as areas with populations less than 10,000. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 8

METHOD 2:

A multi-stage design is used. The country is first stratified by large geographic units, and then by smaller units within geography. A minimum of 33 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), which are first stage sampling units, are selected. The sample design results in 100 to 125 ultimate clusters.

SECOND STAGE

Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day, and where possible, on different days. If an interviewer cannot obtain an interview at the initial sampled household, he or she uses a simple substitution method. Refer to Appendix C for a more in-depth description of random route procedures.

THIRD STAGE

Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Interviewers list all eligible household members and their ages or birthdays. The respondent is selected by means of the Kish grid (refer to Appendix C) in countries where face-to-face interviewing is used. The interview does not inform the person who answers the door of the selection criteria until after the respondent has been identified. In a few Middle East and Asian countries where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected using the Kish grid from among all eligible adults of the matching gender.

TELEPHONE SURVEY DESIGN

In countries where telephone interviewing is employed, random-digit-dial (RDD) or a nationally representative list of phone numbers is used. In select countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day. Appointments for callbacks that fall within the survey data collection period are made.

PANEL SURVEY DESIGN

Prior to 2009, United States data were collected using The Gallup Panel. The Gallup Panel is a probability-based, nationally representative panel, for which all members are recruited via random-digit-dial methodology and is only used in the United States. Participants who elect to join the panel are committing to the completion of two to three surveys per month, with the typical survey lasting 10 to 15 minutes. The Gallup Worldwide Research panel survey is conducted over the telephone and takes approximately 30 minutes. No incentives are given to panel participants. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 9

Research instrument

QUESTION DESIGN

Many of the Worldwide Research questions are items that Gallup has used for years. When developing additional questions, Gallup employed its worldwide network of research and political scientists1 to better understand key issues with regard to question development and construction and data gathering. Hundreds of items were developed, tested, piloted, and finalized. The best questions were retained for the core questionnaire and organized into indexes. Most items have a simple dichotomous ("yes or no") response set to minimize contamination of data because of cultural differences in response styles and to facilitate cross-cultural comparisons.

The Gallup Worldwide Research measures key indicators such as Law and Order, Food and Shelter, Job Creation, Migration, Financial Wellbeing, Personal Health, Civic Engagement, and Evaluative Wellbeing and demonstrates their correlations with world development indicators such as GDP and Brain Gain. These indicators assist leaders in understanding the broad context of national interests and establishing organization-specific correlations between leading indexes and lagging economic outcomes.

Gallup organizes its core group of indicators into the Gallup World Path. The Path is an organizational conceptualization of the seven indexes and is not to be construed as a causal model. The individual indexes have many properties of a strong theoretical framework. A more in-depth description of the questions and Gallup indexes is included in the indexes section of this document. In addition to World Path indexes, Gallup Worldwide Research questions also measure opinions about national institutions, corruption, youth development, community basics, diversity, optimism, communications, religiosity, and numerous other topics. For many regions of the world, additional questions that are specific to that region or country are included in surveys. Region-specific questions have been developed for predominantly Muslim nations, former Soviet Union countries, the Balkans, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, China and India, South Asia, and Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

The questionnaire is translated into the major conversational languages of each country. The translation process starts with an English, French, or Spanish version, depending on the region. One of two translation methods may be used.

METHOD 1: Two independent translations are completed. An independent third party, with some knowledge of survey research methods, adjudicates the differences. A professional translator translates the final version back into the source language.

METHOD 2: A translator

Please find my Tableau viz for this dataset here: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/jamie.collins5558/viz/CentralBankReserves/Dashboard1 Feel free to copy, or use as a template/inspiration for your own visualisations.

This dataset provides a comprehensive snapshot of central bank reserves, including foreign exchange (FX) reserves, total reserves, and gold holdings, for 165 countries. It includes detailed metrics such as gold reserves in tonnes and millions (USD), the percentage of total reserves held in gold, and the 20-year change in gold holdings. The dataset also categorises countries by region and economic grouping (e.g., high income, upper middle income, lower middle income, low income), offering a valuable resource for analysing global financial trends, reserve management strategies, and the role of gold in national economies.

• Country: The name of the country (e.g., Afghanistan, United States of America).
• Region: The geographical region of the country (e.g., Central Asia, Western Europe, Latin America & Caribbean).
• Economic grouping: The World Bank income classification of the country (e.g., High income, Upper middle income, - - -- Lower middle income, Low income).
• FX Reserves: Foreign exchange reserves in millions of USD (e.g., 68448.33 for Algeria). Some values are marked as "AWAITED" where data is unavailable.
• Total Reserves: Total reserves (including FX and gold) in millions of USD (e.g., 83007.11 for Algeria). Some values are marked as "AWAITED."
• Gold Reserves Tonnes: Gold reserves held by the central bank in metric tonnes (e.g., 173.56 for Algeria). Some values are marked as "AWAITED."
• Gold Reserves Millions: The value of gold reserves in millions of USD (e.g., 14558.78 for Algeria). Some values are marked as "AWAITED."
• Holdings %: The percentage of total reserves held in gold (e.g., 17.54 for Algeria). Some values are marked as "AWAITED."
• 20yr change: The change in gold holdings (in tonnes) over the past 20 years (e.g., -0.09 for Algeria). Positive values indicate an increase, while negative values indicate a decrease.

Key Statistics Countries Covered: 165 - Regions Represented: Includes Central Asia, Western Europe, Latin America & Caribbean, Middle East & North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, South East Asia, East Asia, South Asia, Australasia / Oceania, and North America. - Economic Groupings: High income (e.g., United States, Japan), Upper middle income (e.g., Brazil, China), Lower middle income (e.g., India, Egypt), and Low income (e.g., Afghanistan, Haiti). - Largest Gold Reserves: The United States holds the largest gold reserves at 8,133.46 tonnes, valued at $682,276.85 million, accounting for 74.97% of its total reserves. - Highest Gold Holdings %: Bolivia has the highest percentage of reserves in gold at 95.59%, despite holding only 22.53 tonnes. - Largest 20-Year Increase in Gold: The Russian Federation increased its gold holdings by 1,945.79 tonnes over 20 years, followed by China with a 1,684.55-tonne increase. Potential Use Cases

This dataset is ideal for a variety of analytical and research purposes, including:

• Economic Analysis: Investigate the relationship between a country’s economic grouping and its reserve composition, particularly the reliance on gold versus foreign exchange.
• Financial Stability Studies: Analyse how countries with higher gold holdings percentages (e.g., Bolivia, Uzbekistan) manage financial stability compared to those with lower percentages (e.g., Chile, South Korea).
• Historical Trends: Use the 20-year change in gold holdings to study trends in reserve management strategies, such as China and Russia’s significant increases in gold reserves.
• Geopolitical Insights: Explore how regions like Central Asia (e.g., Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan) or Middle East & North Africa (e.g., Qatar, Saudi Arabia) differ in their reserve strategies, potentially reflecting geopolitical priorities.
• Data Visualisation: Create maps, bar charts, or scatter plots to visualise global gold reserves, regional differences, or the correlation between income levels and gold holdings. Notes for Users
• Missing Data: Some countries have "AWAITED" in place of numerical values for FX reserves, total reserves, gold reserves, and holdings percentages. Users may need to handle these missing values (e.g., by excluding them, imputing values, or sourcing additional data).
• Gold Valuation: The "Gold Reserves Millions" column reflects the value of gold reserves in USD, based on the gold price as of 2024. Users should note that gold prices fluctuate, and historical comparisons may require adjustment for price changes.
• 20-Year Change: The "20yr change" column provides the change in gold holdings in tonnes from 2005 to 2025. Negative values indicate a reduction in gold reserves (e.g., Switzerland reduced by 314.35 tonnes), while positive values indicate an increase (e.g., India increased by 521.31 tonnes).

The current US Census Bureau world population estimate in June 2019 shows that the current global population is 7,577,130,400 people on earth, which far exceeds the world population of 7.2 billion from 2015. Our own estimate based on UN data shows the world's population surpassing 7.7 billion.

China is the most populous country in the world with a population exceeding 1.4 billion. It is one of just two countries with a population of more than 1 billion, with India being the second. As of 2018, India has a population of over 1.355 billion people, and its population growth is expected to continue through at least 2050. By the year 2030, the country of India is expected to become the most populous country in the world. This is because India’s population will grow, while China is projected to see a loss in population.

The next 11 countries that are the most populous in the world each have populations exceeding 100 million. These include the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Russia, Mexico, Japan, Ethiopia, and the Philippines. Of these nations, all are expected to continue to grow except Russia and Japan, which will see their populations drop by 2030 before falling again significantly by 2050.

Many other nations have populations of at least one million, while there are also countries that have just thousands. The smallest population in the world can be found in Vatican City, where only 801 people reside.

In 2018, the world’s population growth rate was 1.12%. Every five years since the 1970s, the population growth rate has continued to fall. The world’s population is expected to continue to grow larger but at a much slower pace. By 2030, the population will exceed 8 billion. In 2040, this number will grow to more than 9 billion. In 2055, the number will rise to over 10 billion, and another billion people won’t be added until near the end of the century. The current annual population growth estimates from the United Nations are in the millions - estimating that over 80 million new lives are added each year.

This population growth will be significantly impacted by nine specific countries which are situated to contribute to the population growth more quickly than other nations. These nations include the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania, and the United States of America. Particularly of interest, India is on track to overtake China's position as the most populous country by the year 2030. Additionally, multiple nations within Africa are expected to double their populations before fertility rates begin to slow entirely.

Global life expectancy has also improved in recent years, increasing the overall population life expectancy at birth to just over 70 years of age. The projected global life expectancy is only expected to continue to improve - reaching nearly 77 years of age by the year 2050. Significant factors impacting the data on life expectancy include the projections of the ability to reduce AIDS/HIV impact, as well as reducing the rates of infectious and non-communicable diseases.

Population aging has a massive impact on the ability of the population to maintain what is called a support ratio. One key finding from 2017 is that the majority of the world is going to face considerable growth in the 60 plus age bracket. This will put enormous strain on the younger age groups as the elderly population is becoming so vast without the number of births to maintain a healthy support ratio.

Although the number given above seems very precise, it is important to remember that it is just an estimate. It simply isn't possible to be sure exactly how many people there are on the earth at any one time, and there are conflicting estimates of the global population in 2016.

Some, including the UN, believe that a population of 7 billion was reached in October 2011. Others, including the US Census Bureau and World Bank, believe that the total population of the world reached 7 billion in 2012, around March or April.

This dataset comprises 348 files, each representing a unique economic indicator for the BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—spanning from 1970 to 2020. The dataset includes a wide array of economic metrics such as government consumption expenditure, GDP growth, adjusted savings, and various other national accounts data. This comprehensive dataset is ideal for economic research, financial analysis, and policy evaluation, offering a robust foundation for exploring economic trends and making data-driven decisions.

Key Features: - Diversity of Indicators: Covers a wide range of economic indicators, including net national income, government expenditure, GDP, and more. - Historical Coverage: Provides data spanning five decades, enabling both historical trend analysis and long-term forecasting. - Country Focus: Specifically tailored to the BRICS nations, offering insights into some of the world’s most influential emerging economies.

Usage

This dataset can be utilized for various purposes, such as: - Economic Analysis: Researchers can use the dataset to study economic trends and performance in BRICS countries. - Machine Learning: Data scientists can train models to predict future economic indicators or identify patterns in the data. - Policy Development: Policymakers can analyze the data to develop informed strategies for economic development.

Example Use Case: Suppose you want to analyze the trend in GDP per capita growth across BRICS nations. You could load the relevant files, clean the data, and use statistical tools or machine learning models to study the trend and make predictions.

System

This dataset is self-contained and can be integrated into broader economic research systems. The data files are in CSV format, making them easy to load and manipulate with standard data analysis tools like Python, R, and Excel.

Integration: While the dataset is standalone, it can be combined with other datasets or models for more complex analyses, such as predicting future economic performance or simulating policy impacts.

Data Provenance

The dataset is sourced from the World Bank’s BRICS Economic Indicators, a trusted and comprehensive source of economic data. The data was compiled, cleaned, and structured to facilitate easy analysis and integration into various analytical workflows.

Source: Kaggle - BRICS World Bank Indicators Dataset Coverage: The dataset includes data from Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, from 1970 to 2020.

Data Preprocessing: Each file was cleaned to remove inconsistencies, and missing values were handled appropriately to ensure the quality and reliability of the data.

Data Overview

The dataset is organized into 348 CSV files, each focusing on a specific economic indicator. Examples include: - GDP per Capita (Constant 2010 US$): Tracks the GDP per capita adjusted for inflation. - Government Final Consumption Expenditure (% of GDP): Measures government spending as a percentage of GDP. - Adjusted Net Savings: Accounts for environmental depletion and degradation in national savings.

Each file contains the following columns: - SeriesName: Describes the economic indicator. - CountryName: The name of the BRICS country. - Year: The year the data was recorded. - Value: The numerical value of the indicator for that year.

This dataset provides a rich resource for anyone looking to delve into the economic history and performance of BRICS countries, offering the data necessary to explore past trends and project future developments.

China Imports from Russia was US$129.88 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China Imports from Russia - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

This dataset provides values for GOLD RESERVES reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.