As of February 2025, El Salvador had the highest prisoner rate worldwide, with over 1,600 prisoners per 100,000 of the national population. Cuba, Rwanda, Turkmenistan, and the United States, rounded out the top five countries with the highest rate of incarceration. Homicides in El Salvador Interestingly, El Salvador, which long had the highest global homicide rates, has dropped out of the top 20 after a high number of gang members have been incarcerated. A high number of the countries with the highest homicide rate are located in Latin America. Prisoners in the United StatesThe United States is home to the largest number of prisoners worldwide. More than 1.8 million people were incarcerated in the U.S. at the beginning of 2025. In China, the estimated prison population totaled 1.69 million people that year. Other nations had far fewer prisoners. The largest share of the U.S. prisoners in federal correctional facilities were of African-American origin. As of 2020, there were 345,500 black, non-Hispanic prisoners, compared to 327,300 white, non-Hispanic inmates. The U.S. states with the largest number of prisoners in 2022 were Texas, California, and Florida. Over 160,000 prisoners in state facilities were sentenced for rape or sexual assault, which was the most common cause of imprisonment. The second most common was murder, followed by aggravated or simple assault.

In 2024, there were approximately ****** white prisoners in England and Wales, compared with ****** Black prisoners, and ***** Asian prisoners.

In 2024, there were 87,869 men and 3,635 women in prisons in England and Wales. Compared with the previous year, this represented an increase for both men and women. This represented a peak in the number of prisoners during this provided time period, and was also the peak for the United Kingdom as a whole.
Demographics of prisoners There were 29,339 prisoners in their 30s in England and Wales in 2024, the most of any age group. In this year, there were also 3,354 prisoners who were aged between 15 and 20, with a further 21,381 prisoners who were in their 20s. In terms of the ethnicity of prisoners in England and Wales, 63,103 people in jail were White, 10,624 were Black, and 7,067were Asian. As of the same year, the most common religious faith of prisoners was Christianity, at 39,068 inmates, followed by 27,122 who identified as having no religion, with a further 15,909 who were Muslims. Increase in prison officers since 2017 The 23,614 prison officers working in England and Wales in 2024 was almost as high as 2011 when there were 24,369 officers. From 2010 onwards, the number of prison officers fell from 24,830 to 18,251 by 2014, and stayed at comparably low levels until 2018. Low government expenditure on Prisons during the same time period suggests this was a result of the austerity policies implemented by the UK government at that time. The government has steadily increased spending on prisons since 2019/20, with spending on prisons reaching 6.09 billion in 2022/23. This has however not been enough to avert a possible overcrowding crisis in England and Wales, which had just 768 spare prison places in September 2023.

In 2021, a total number of ** people were admitted to prison in the United States awaiting execution. Of these, ** prisoners admitted to prison on death row were white. In the United States, ** states and the federal government authorize the death penalty.

Between 2012 and 2020, the number of self-inflicted deaths among White prisoners in public prisons in England and Wales went up from 49 to 57.

In 2019, 2,144 white state prison inmates died in the United States. A further 1,174 Black or African American inmates died in that same year. In total, 3,853 United States state prison inmates died in 2019.

The purpose of this study was to examine the crime of identity theft from the offenders' perspectives. The study employed a purposive sampling strategy. Researchers identified potential interview subjects by examining newspapers (using Lexis-Nexis), legal documents (using Lexis-Nexis and Westlaw), and United States Attorneys' Web sites for individuals charged with, indicted, and/or sentenced to prison for identity theft. Once this list was generated, researchers used the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Inmate Locator to determine if the individuals were currently housed in federal facilities. Researchers visited the facilities that housed the largest number of inmates on the list in each of the six regions in the United States as defined by the BOP (Western, North Central, South Central, North Eastern, Mid-Atlantic, and South Eastern) and solicited the inmates housed in these prisons. A total of 14 correctional facilities were visited and 65 individuals incarcerated for identity theft or identity theft related crimes were interviewed between March 2006 and February 2007. Researchers used semi-structured interviews to explore the offenders' decision-making processes. When possible, interviews were audio recorded and then transcribed verbatim. Part 1 (Quantitative Data) includes the demographic variables age, race, gender, number of children, highest level of education, and socioeconomic class while growing up. Other variables include prior arrests or convictions and offense type, prior drug use and if drug use contributed to identity theft, if employment facilitated identity theft, if they went to trial or plead to charges, and sentence length. Part 2 (Qualitative Data), includes demographic questions such as family situation while growing up, highest level of education, marital status, number of children, and employment status while committing identity theft crimes. Subjects were asked about prior criminal activity and drug use. Questions specific to identity theft include the age at which the person became involved in identity theft, how many identities he or she had stolen, if they had worked with other people to steal identities, why they had become involved in identity theft, the skills necessary to steal identities, and the perceived risks involved in identity theft.

As of June 2022, there were a total of 56,557 people in prison in Germany. The majority of people, 40,199, were serving a prison sentence. Almost 3,000 inmates were in juvenile detention centers. Crime solving rates The procedure that follows solving a crime is usually offering a deal to the perpetrator or taking them to court, where, if found guilty, they can be imprisoned. The police in Germany have a clearance rate of around 58 percent, and the share of solved cases has generally increased since 2013. When it comes to white collar crime, however, there is a much higher clearance rate, almost 92 percent. A contributing factor to this could be that white-collar crime often has a paper trail, which helps investigators trace the crime to a specific person. In contrast, property damage has quite a low clearance rate, since 2013 it has been consistently under 30 percent. This is likely because there is often no victim to recount what happened, and so it is harder to find the perpetrators. Which crimes are the most common? The most common crimes committed in Germany are either theft or aggravated theft. Out of all crimes committed in Germany, the former offense accounted for almost a fifth of all crimes and the latter for around 14 percent. The least frequently committed crimes were sexual offenses, as well as offenses that included an attempt to take someone’s life or taking their life. Since 2021, there has been a steady increase in the number of violent crimes in Germany. This is of course a worrying trend. However, it is still unclear whether this increase is a short-term post pandemic trend or if violent crime is on the rise more permanently.

Abstract To estimate the prevalence of leprosy among Brazilian female prisoners and identify factors associated with the disease. Cross-sectional study conducted between 2014 and 2015 in 15 Brazilian female prisons. The data of 1,327 women were collected using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing and dermatological and neurological examination to identify suspicious lesions of leprosy. The average age was 33.4 years. Suspicion of leprosy was identified in 5.1% of women in prison, and lifetime self-reported prevalence was 7.5%. The variables that were associated with lifetime self-reported leprosy were: women in prison once being twice as likely to have leprosy; white women were 1.4 time more likely to have leprosy than non-white women; women who knew someone with leprosy was 1.9 time more likely to have leprosy; and women who shared a cell with 11 or more women were 2.5 times more likely to have leprosy than women who shared a cell with two or fewer people. The leprosy prevalence among female prisoners in Brazil were greater than that found in a Brazilian woman of the general population and show the extremely high vulnerability of this population generated through pre-incarceration poverty, as well as potential transmission in prison.

Mortality rates (per 10,000 prisoners) and the relative percentage change in prisoner mortality for forty-four states reporting to the NCRP, 2000–2014.

Context

COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) is a popular commercial algorithm used by judges and parole officers for scoring criminal defendant’s likelihood of reoffending (recidivism). It has been shown that the algorithm is biased in favor of white defendants, and against black inmates, based on a 2 year follow up study (i.e who actually committed crimes or violent crimes after 2 years). The pattern of mistakes, as measured by precision/sensitivity is notable.

Quoting from ProPublica: "

Black defendants were often predicted to be at a higher risk of recidivism than they actually were. Our analysis found that black defendants who did not recidivate over a two-year period were nearly twice as likely to be misclassified as higher risk compared to their white counterparts (45 percent vs. 23 percent). White defendants were often predicted to be less risky than they were. Our analysis found that white defendants who re-offended within the next two years were mistakenly labeled low risk almost twice as often as black re-offenders (48 percent vs. 28 percent). The analysis also showed that even when controlling for prior crimes, future recidivism, age, and gender, black defendants were 45 percent more likely to be assigned higher risk scores than white defendants.

• Black defendants were also twice as likely as white defendants to be misclassified as being a higher risk of violent recidivism. And white violent recidivists were 63 percent more likely to have been misclassified as a low risk of violent recidivism, compared with black violent recidivists.
• The violent recidivism analysis also showed that even when controlling for prior crimes, future recidivism, age, and gender, black defendants were 77 percent more likely to be assigned higher risk scores than white defendants. "

Content

Data contains variables used by the COMPAS algorithm in scoring defendants, along with their outcomes within 2 years of the decision, for over 10,000 criminal defendants in Broward County, Florida. 3 subsets of the data are provided, including a subset of only violent recividism (as opposed to, e.g. being reincarcerated for non violent offenses such as vagrancy or Marijuana).

Indepth analysis by ProPublica can be found in their data methodology article.

Acknowledgements

Data & original analysis gathered by ProPublica. Original Data methodology article: https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm

Original Article: https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

Original data from ProPublica: https://github.com/propublica/compas-analysis

Additional "simple" subset provided by FairML, based on the proPublica data:

http://blog.fastforwardlabs.com/2017/03/09/fairml-auditing-black-box-predictive-models.html

Inspiration

Ideas:

• Feature importance when predicting the COMPASS score itself, or recividism/crime risks.
• Reweighting data to compensate for bias, e.g. subsetting for the violent offenders, or adjusting better for base risk.
• Feature selection based on "legal usage"/fairness (E.g. exclude race and see how well your model works. It worked for me).

Absolute changes in life expectancy at age 20 among people in prisons, by race & sex across periods, 2000–2014.

【リソース】WHITE PAPER ON CRIME 2016 / / NOTES / Section 1 Overview_1 / 1 Theft / 2 Non-traffic Penal Code offenses excluding theft / 3 Special fraud / Section 1 Overview_2 / Section 2 Special Acts Offenses in Categories / Chapter 1 Overview / 1 Prosecution_1 / 2 Courts / 3 Institutional corrections / 4 Rehabilitation services / 5 Suspending the execution of a part of the sentence / Chapter 2 Prosecution_1 / Section 1 Receptions / Section 2 Dispositions / Chapter 3 Courts / Section 1 Finalized Judgment / 1 Dispositions / 2 Sentences / 3 Saiban-in Trials / Section 3 Appeals / Chapter 4 Institutional Corrections of Adult Offenders / 1 Number of inmates in penal institutions / 2 Number of new inmates / 3 Characteristics of new inmates / Section 2 Treatment of Inmates / 1 Treatment codes and treatment guidelines / 2 Special guidance for reform / Chapter 5 Rehabilitation Services / Section 1 Parole / 1 Parole examinations / 2 Number of parolees / 3 Ratio of served term of imprisonment / Section 2 Probation and Parole Supervision / 1 Probationers and parolees / 2 Treatments during probation/parole / 1 Volunteer probation officers / 2 Halfway houses / Chapter 1 Trends in Juvenile Delinquencies / 1 Number of juveniles cleared / 2 Trends by types of delinquency / Section 2 Special Acts Offenses Committed by Juveniles / Section 3 Pre-Delinquents / Section 1 Overview_3 / 1 Procedure before the referral to family courts / 2 Procedure in family courts / 3 Procedure for protective measures / 1 Investigation by public prosecutors (before the referral to family courts) / 2 Family courts / 1 Overview of Juvenile Classification Homes Act / 2 Juveniles newly committed to juvenile classification homes / 1 Juveniles newly committed to juvenile training schools / 2 Treatments provided in juvenile training schools / Section 5 Probation and Parole Supervision for Juveniles / 1 Juvenile probationers and parolees / 2 Categorized treatment / Chapter 3 Criminal Procedure for Juveniles / Section 1 Occurrence of Traffic Accident / Section 2 Traffic Related Cases / 1 Stimulants Control Act violations / 2 Other drug-related offenses / 1 Prosecution / Courts / 2 Corrections_1 / Section 1 Trends in Organized Crime Groups / Section 2 Trends in Offenses / Section 1 Tax-Related Offenses / Section 2 Economic Offenses / Section 3 Intellectual Property-Related Offenses / Chapter 5 Cybercrime / Chapter 6 Offenses and Delinquencies by Women and Girls / Section 1 Trends in Offenses_1 / Section 2 Imprisonment of Elderly Offenders / 1 Penal Code offenses / 2 Special Acts offenses / 1 Prosecution_2 / 2 Corrections_2 / 3 Probation and parole supervision / Section 1 Trends in Offenses_2 / Section 2 Medical Care and Treatment System for Mentally Ill / Chapter 10 Offenses by Public Officials / Chapter 1 Cleared offenders / Chapter 2 Prosecution_2 / Section 1 Reimprisoned inmate / Section 2 Reimprisonment of released inmates / Section 1 Probationers and parolees with previous convictions / Section 2 Violations of conditions for probation / parole / Section 1 Number of Cases Involving Human Victims / Section 2 Relationship between Victims and Suspects / Section 3 Child Victims / Chapter 2 Victims in Criminal Justice Process【キーワード】司法 / 安全 / 犯罪 / 犯罪と司法 / 白書_年次報告 / 白書_年次報告書等 / 研究 / 統計 / 裁判

Context

Predicting parole violators In many criminal justice systems around the world, inmates deemed not to be a threat to society are released from prison under the parole system prior to completing their sentence. They are still considered to be serving their sentence while on parole, and they can be returned to prison if they violate the terms of their parole.

Parole boards are charged with identifying which inmates are good candidates for release on parole. They seek to release inmates who will not commit additional crimes after release. In this problem, we will build and validate a model that predicts if an inmate will violate the terms of his or her parole. Such a model could be useful to a parole board when deciding to approve or deny an application for parole.

For this prediction task, we will use data from the United States 2004 National Corrections Reporting Program, a nationwide census of parole releases that occurred during 2004. We limited our focus to parolees who served no more than 6 months in prison and whose maximum sentence for all charges did not exceed 18 months. The dataset contains all such parolees who either successfully completed their term of parole during 2004 or those who violated the terms of their parole during that year. The dataset contains the following variables:

Content

male: 1 if the parolee is male, 0 if female race: 1 if the parolee is white, 2 otherwise age: the parolee's age (in years) when he or she was released from prison state: a code for the parolee's state. 2 is Kentucky, 3 is Louisiana, 4 is Virginia, and 1 is any other state. The three states were selected due to having a high representation in the dataset. time.served: the number of months the parolee served in prison (limited by the inclusion criteria to not exceed 6 months). max.sentence: the maximum sentence length for all charges, in months (limited by the inclusion criteria to not exceed 18 months). multiple.offenses: 1 if the parolee was incarcerated for multiple offenses, 0 otherwise. crime: a code for the parolee's main crime leading to incarceration. 2 is larceny, 3 is drug-related crime, 4 is driving-related crime, and 1 is any other crime. violator: 1 if the parolee violated the parole, and 0 if the parolee completed the parole without violation.

We wouldn't be here without the help of others. If you owe any attributions or thanks, include them here along with any citations of past research.

ACKNOWLEGMENT

MITx ANALYTIX

【リソース】WHITE PAPER ON CRIME 2012 / / NOTES / Section 1 Principal Data_1 / 1 Reported cases and crime rate / 2 Persons cleared / 3 Clearance rate / 1 Theft / 2 Non-traffic penal code offenses excluding theft / Section 1 Principal Data_2 / Section 2 Major Special Act Offenses / 1 Public security / 2 Environment/public morals / 3 Child Welfare Act violations, etc. / 4 Anti-Stalking Act violations, etc. / 5 Public Offices Election Act violations / 1 Trends in traffic offenses / 2 Disposition in public prosecutors offices_1 / 3 Disposition in courts / 1 Tax related offenses / 2 Economic offenses / 3 Intellectual property related offenses / 1 Trends in high-technology offenses / 2 Disposition in public prosecutors offices_2 / Chapter 4 Comparison of Crime Trends with Other Countries / Section 1 Major Offenses / Section 2 Homicide / Section 3 Theft / Section 1 Offenses Committed by Japanese Nationals Outside of Japan / Section 2 Offenses Committed against Japanese Nationals Outside of Japan / Chapter 1 Overview / 1 Procedure in public prosecutors offices / 2 Procedure in courts / 3 Treatment in correctional institutions / 4 Treatment under rehabilitation services / Section 1 Reception of Suspected Cases / Section 2 Arrest and Detention of Suspects / Section 3 Disposition in Public Prosecutors Offices / Section 1 Final Judgment / 1 Conclusive disposition / 2 Sentencing / 3 Pretrial arrangement proceeding / 4 Speedy trial procedure / 5 Detention and bail / Section 3 Summary Trial Procedure / Section 4 Appeals / Chapter 4 Correction of Adult Offenders / 1 Number of inmates in penal institutions / 2 Occupancy rate of penal institutions / 3 Number of new inmates / 4 Characteristics of new inmates / 1 Overview of treatment / 2 Work / 3 Correctional guidance / 4 Provision of information regarding the release, etc. of inmates / 1 Penal Institution Visiting Committee / 2 Provision of food, medical care, health guards, etc. / 3 Cooperation with private sectors / 4 Maintenance of discipline and order / 5 Appeal system / Section 4 Treatment of Inmates Awaiting Judgment, etc. / Section 5 Maintenance and Administration of Penal Institutions in Partnership between the Public and Private Sectors / Chapter 5 Rehabilitation Services / Section 1 Parole / 1 Parole examinations / 2 Number of parolees / 3 Rate of served term of imprisonment / 4 Life imprisonment inmates granted release on parole / Section 2 Probation/Parole Supervision / 1 Number of probationers/parolees / 2 Treatment of probationers/parolees / 3 Measures for probationers/parolees / 4 Termination of probation/parole supervision / Section 3 Urgent Aid and Aftercare of Discharged Offenders / Section 4 Pardons / 1 Volunteer probation officers / 2 Halfway houses / 3 Private supporters/support organizations / 4 Crime prevention activities / Section 1 Trends in International Criminal Justice Efforts / 1 Measures against transnational organized crime and terrorism / 2 Measures against drug-related crimes / 3 Measures against money laundering / 4 Measures against crimes against children / 5 Measures against bribery and corruption / 6 Measures against cybercrime / 7 The International Criminal Court / 1 Transnational fugitives from Japan / 2 Extradition of fugitives / 3 Transfer of sentenced persons / 1 Assistance in investigation / 2 Judicial assistance / 1 UNAFEI / 2 Legal system development support / Chapter 1 Trends with Juvenile Delinquencies / 1 Number of juveniles cleared / 2 Trends by attributes / 3 Trends by type of offense / 4 Cases committed in complicity / 1 Number of juveniles referred to public prosecutors / 2 Drug offenses / 3 Traffic offenses / Section 3 Pre-Delinquents / 1 Family violence / 2 School violence / 3 Bullying / Section 1 Overview_1 / 1 Procedure until referral to a family court / 2 Procedure in a family court / 3 Procedure of protective measures / 1 Investigation (until referral to a family court) / 2 Family court / 1 Admission and discharge / 2 Classification activities / 1 Juveniles newly admitted to juvenile training schools / 2 Treatment provided in a juvenile training school / 3 Discharged juveniles / Section 5 Probation/Parole Supervision for Juveniles / 1 Juvenile probationers/parolees / 2 Treatment of juvenile probationers/parolees / 3 Measures for juvenile probationers/parolees / 4 Termination of probation/parole supervision for juveniles / 1 Prosecution and criminal trials / 2 Execution of the sentence / 3 Parole / 1 Disposition in public prosecutors offices / 2 Sentencing in a court of first instance / Section 3 Juvenile Inmates / 1 Repeat delinquencies by juveniles / 2 History of protective measures with juveniles subjected under protective measures / 3 Readmission, etc. of juveniles discharged from juvenile training schools / 4 Redisposition of juvenile probationers/parolees / 1 New foreign national entrants / 2 Foreign nationals illegally overstaying / 3 Deportation / 1 Penal code offenses / 2 Special act offenses / 1 Prosecution_1 /

【リソース】WHITE PAPER ON CRIME 2001 / / PREFACE / NOTES / Overview_1 / Trends in major penal code offenses / Trends of noteworthy penal code offenses / Overview_2 / Trends in major special law offenses / Tax evasion offenses / Economic offenses / Offenses related to bankruptcies / Trends in offenses related to elections / Trends in application of the regulation holding a candidate jointly responsible / Trends in computer-related offenses and disposition by public prosecutors offices and courts / Measures against computer-related offenses / Trends in firearm offenses / Disposition by public prosecutors offices and courts on Firearms and Swords Control Law violations / Trends in organized crime groups / Trends in offenses by organized crime groups / Public Official Offenses / Overview_3 / Public official offenses related to duties of officials engaged in criminal justice / Graft / Others / Offenses by Mentally Disabled Persons / Trends in offenses committed by mentally disabled persons, etc. / Disposition by public prosecutors offices and courts for offenses committed by mentally disabled persons, etc. / Characteristics of mentally disabled offenders---focusing on homicide offenders--- / The mentally disabled in correctional institutions / Guerrilla incidents / Intra-group strife / Arrest of persons involved in the Red Army / Offenses Committed by Offenders with Criminal Histories / Offenses committed by adult offenders / Offenses committed by juvenile offenders / Overview of Treatment / Overview_4 / Reception of Suspected Cases / Arrest and Detention of Suspects / Dispositions of Suspected Cases / Overview_5 / Defendants finally judged by trial / The first instance / Appeals / Death sentence / Imprisonment with labor for life / Imprisonment with or without labor for a limited term / Fines / Suspended sentence / Detention and Bail / Criminal Compensation / State of Trials and Sentencing in Cases Involving Aum Shinrikyo Cult Members / Overview_6 / Trends in the average daily number of inmates, etc. / Trends in the number of new inmates (excluding inmates awaiting trial) / Characteristics of new inmates (excluding inmates awaiting trial) / Reimprisonment / Basic systems for treatment / Prison work / Educational activities / Medical treatment and hygiene / Security / System of grievance / Cooperation from the nongovernmental sector / Imprisonment of members of organized crime groups / Characteristics of designated organized crime group members who were newly imprisoned / Treatment in penal institutions / Treatment of Inmates Awaiting Trial / Treatment in Women's Guidance Homes / Overview_7 / Organizations for the rehabilitation services / Volunteer probation officers and their organizations / Juridical persons for offenders rehabilitation services / Nongovernmental support organizations / Overview of parole / Administration of parole / Other measures_1 / Overview_8 / State of probationary supervision / Other measures_2 / Results of implementation of probationary supervision / Assistance during supervision, urgent aftercare of discharged offenders / Halfway houses / Amnesties / Crime Prevention Activities / Damage Due to Crime as Shown by Statistics / Fatal and bodily damage / Property damage / Damage due to sexual offenses / Relationship between victims and suspects / Overview_9 / Survey results in Japan / Comparison with other countries / Criminal proceedings and victims / Benefit payment systems for crime victims, etc. / Trends in and Characteristics of Juvenile Delinquency / Trends in the number of cleared juveniles and relevant rates / Trends by age group / Trends by category of offenses / Trends in the number of juveniles referred by the police / Drug-related / Traffic offenses / Trends in Status Offenses / Group delinquency / Family and delinquency / School and delinquency / Bullying and delinquency / Overview of amendment to the Juvenile Law / Overview of treatment of juvenile delinquents under the Amended Juvenile Law / Prosecution in juvenile cases / Juvenile hearing / Criminal trial of juveniles / Admission and discharge_1 / Classification activities / Overview_10 / Admission and discharge_2 / Characteristics of newly admitted juveniles / Treatment in juvenile training schools / Overview_11 / Conditions of detention and characteristics of juvenile inmates / Outline of treatment of juvenile inmates / Overview_12 / Trends in probationary supervision cases / Characteristics of juveniles on probationary supervision / Status of treatment in probationary supervision / Various systems / Result of probationary supervision / Increasing General Penal Code Offenses---Focusing on Larceny / Increase in the number of reported penal code offenses and reported cases of larceny / Trends in major types of larceny according to the number of reported cases / Trends in nature of larceny according to the numbers of cleared cases and persons cleared / Clearance rates and number of cleared cases of larceny / Dispositions by pu

This statistic shows the distribution of adults in federal correctional services in Canada in the fiscal year of 2022, by race. 51.8 percent of the adult offender population in federal correctional services in Canada were Caucasian in the fiscal year of 2022.

【リソース】White Paper on Crime 2021（ＨＴＭＬ） / / NOTES / Section 1 Overview_1 / 1 Theft / 2 Rape and forcible indecency / 3 Other Penal Code offenses / Section 1 Overview_2 / Section 2 Special Acts Offenses by Category / Chapter 1 Overview / Chapter 2 Prosecution_1 / Section 1 Reception / Section 2 Dispositions / Chapter 3 Courts / Section 1 Finalized Judgment / 1 Dispositions / 2 Sentences / 3 Saiban-in trials / Section 3 Appeals / Chapter 4 Institutional Correction of Adult Offenders / 1 Number of inmates in penal institutions / 2 Number of newly sentenced inmates / 3 Characteristics of newly sentenced inmates / Section 2 Treatment of Sentenced Inmates / 1 Treatment indexes and treatment guidelines / 2 Work / 3 Guidance for reform / 4 Guidance in school courses / 5 Employment support / 6 Welfare support / 1 Penal institution visiting committee / 2 Food supply, medical care and hygiene / 3 Cooperation with private sector / 4 Security and safety / Chapter 5 Rehabilitation Services / Section 1 Parole / 1 Number of parolees / 2 Percentage of sentence served / Section 2 Probation/Parole Supervision / 1 Probationers/parolees / 2 Treatment during probation/parole / 1 Volunteer probation officers / 2 Halfway houses / PART 3 Trends in Juvenile Delinquency and Treatment of Juvenile Delinquents / Section 1 Penal Code Offenses Committed by Juveniles / Section 2 Special Acts Offenses Committed by Juveniles / Section 1 Overview_3 / 1 Procedure before referral to family courts / 2 Procedure in family courts / 3 Procedure for protective measures / 1 Investigation by public prosecutors (before referral to family courts) / 2 Family courts / 1 Overview of juvenile classification homes / 2 Juveniles newly committed to juvenile classification homes / 1 Juveniles newly committed to juvenile training schools / 2 Treatment provided in juvenile training schools / 1 Juvenile probationers and juvenile training school parolees / 2 Treatment for juvenile probationers and juvenile training school parolees / Chapter 3 Criminal Procedure for Juveniles / Section 1 Occurrence of Traffic Accidents / Section 2 Road Traffic-related Violations / 1 Stimulants Control Act violations / 2 Cannabis and other drug-related offenses / 3 Offenses related to new psychoactive substance / Section 2 Treatment of Drug Offenders / Section 1 Trends in Organized Crime Groups / Section 2 Trends in Offenses / Section 1 Tax-related Offenses / Section 2 Economic Offenses / Section 3 Intellectual Property-related Offenses / Chapter 5 Cybercrime / Section 1 Child Abuse / Section 2 Spousal Offenses / Section 3 Stalking-related Crimes / Section 1 Trends in Offenses_1 / Section 2 Treatment_1 / Section 1 Trends in Offenses_2 / Section 2 Treatment_2 / 1 Penal Code offenses / 2 Special Acts offenses / 1 Prosecution / 2 Corrections / Section 1 Trends in Offenses_3 / Section 2 Medical Care and Treatment System for Mentally Ill / Chapter 11 Offenses by Public Officials / Chapter 1 Cleared Offenders / Chapter 2 Prosecution_2 / Section 1 Reimprisoned Inmates / Section 2 Reimprisonment of Released Sentenced Inmates / Section 1 Probationers and Parolees with Previous Convictions / Section 2 Redisposition or Revocation during Probation/Parole Supervision / Section 1 Number of Cases Involving Human Victims / Section 2 Relationship between Victims and Suspects / Chapter 2 Victims in the Criminal Justice Process / Chapter 1 Congress Overview / 1 Kyoto Congress (2021) / 2 Conference during the COVID-19 pandemic / 3 Achievement / Column Various events at the Kyoto Congress / 1 Fraud / 2 Special fraud / 1 Correction / 2 Probation/parole supervision / Section 3 Repeat Offenders / Section 4 Victims of Fraud / 1 Overview of the survey / 2 Characteristics of special fraud offenders (role type) / 3 Motives for special fraud / 4 Background of special fraud offenders' offenses / 5 Term of imprisonment of special fraud offenders / HTML版【キーワード】security / 司法 / 安全 / 犯罪 / 犯罪と司法 / 白書_年次報告 / 白書_年次報告書等 / 研究 / 統計 / 裁判

Petition subject: Support for individuals Original: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:FHCL:13906033 Date of creation: 1688 Petition location: Boston Selected signatures:Anthony MooreThomas WhiteRobart Hullthorp Actions taken on dates: 1688-04-23 Legislative action: [Received on April 23, 1688?] Total signatures: 3 Legislative action summary: [Received?] Legal voter signatures (males not identified as non-legal): 3 Female only signatures: No Identifications of signatories: three poor prosoners, [males of color?] Prayer format was printed vs. manuscript: Manuscript Additional archivist notes: runaway servants, prison, gaol, prisoners, Virginia, Robert Hullthorp, Anthony More Location of the petition at the Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth: Massachusetts Archives volume 128, page 179 Acknowledgements: Supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (PW-5105612), Massachusetts Archives of the Commonwealth, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, Institutional Development Initiative at Harvard University, and Harvard University Library.