This paper investigates the long-run and short-run relationship between money supply and inflation in Pakistan, utilizing annual data spanning from 1981 to 2021. The key objective is to assess the impact of monetary policy, specifically money supply, on inflation dynamics in the country. To achieve this, the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach is employed, which is suitable for analyzing cointegration among variables with mixed integration orders. The results reveal both short and long-run cointegration between inflation, money supply, unemployment, and interest rates. Notably, unemployment demonstrates a negative correlation with inflation, while money supply and interest rates exhibit a positive relationship. These findings underscore the importance of dedicated policy measures to manage inflation effectively. The paper concludes by recommending the establishment of a policy implementation body and collaboration between the government and the central bank to ensure financial stability and control inflation through well-calibrated monetary and fiscal policies.

A central bank is the term used to describe the authority responsible for policies that affect a country’s supply of money and credit. More specifically, a central bank uses its tools of monetary policy—open market operations, discount window lending, changes in reserve requirements—to affect short-term interest rates and the monetary base (currency held by the public plus bank reserves) and to achieve important policy goals.

Money Supply M0 in India decreased to 48334.84 INR Billion in October from 48719.55 INR Billion in September of 2025. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for India Money Supply M0.

The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) influences market interest rates by changing the administered rates that it controls, such as the interest rates on overnight repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. This requires an ample level of bank reserves. Quantitative tightening (QT) reduces the level of reserves. To guard against supply and demand shocks that drive reserves too low, the FOMC may need to hold a buffer above the point at which reserves become scarce. In this Economic Commentary , I present evidence based on inventory theory that the estimated buffer might be relatively small, though the true number is uncertain. Treating the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet as inventory helps to estimate the level of reserves needed to stay above the scarce threshold.

On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the currency reform and of the introduction of the German D-mark on 20th June 1948, the German Bundesbank – in its function as central bank and bank of issue of the Federal Republic of Germany – presented long series of monetary statistics in 1998. In approximately 1,400 data charts, extensive information about the development of the German finance and banking industry, the capital market, and the foreign trade relations are given.

In total, approximately 25,000 time series about the following core subjects were collected: general overviews of banking statistics, bank of issue, credit institutions, minimum reserves, interest rates, statistics of exchange rates, capital market, public finances, foreign trade, macroeconomic capital finance accounts and annual accounts of West German companies.

Factual classification of the tables in HISTAT: A. Selected data regarding the economic development A.1 Monetary development A.2 Population and labour market A.3 Macroeconomic production and demand A.4 Prices and wages A.5 Distribution of the national income and incomes of the private households

B. Foreign trade (currently not completed in HISTAT; access to the subjects B2, B3, B4, B7 see below) B1. Foreign debts and liabilities of domestic companies B.2 Foreign debts and liabilities of the credit institutions B.3 Foreign cross ownerships of German companies B.4 Regional balances of payment B.5 State of assets compared to other countries B.6 Balance of payments B.7 Additional specifications regarding the balance of payments B.8 Foreign payments by the German Bundesbank Any data including a differentiation of countries (EU countries, other industrialised countries, some developing countries, countries of the off-shore finance centres, OPEC countries, reform countries) are currently only available by placing an order with the ZHSF Data Service (ordering address see below)

C. General overviews of bank statistics C.1 Consolidated balance of the banking system, assets C.2 Consolidated balance of the banking system, liabilities C.3 Cash circulation C.4 Development of money supply in connection with the balance C.5 Money demand of the Central Bank

D. Exchange rate statistics D.1 External value indeces D.2 Exchange rates at the Frankfurt stock exchange D.3 Values of the ECU D.4 Values of the extra educational law

E. Macroeconomic capital finance account E1. Domestic financial sectors E2. Domestic non-financial sectors E3. Other countries

F. Annual accounts of West German companies F.1 All German companies F.2 Building industry F.3 Clothing trade F.4 Chemical industry F.5 Retail industry (incl. automobile trade and service stations) F.6 Electrical engineering F.7 Power and water supply F.8 Food industry F.9 Glas industry, ceramics, processing of stones and earths F.10 Wholesale trade and trade negotiations F.11 Production of rubber and plastic goods F.12 Production of automobiles and automobile parts F.13 Production of metal goods F.14 Timber industry F.15 Engineering F.16 Medical, measurement, driving and control technology F.17 Metal production and metal working F.18 Paper industry F.19 Textile industry F.20 Manufacturing industry F.21 Transportation (without rail) F.22 Publishing and printing

G. Capital market (currently not in HISTAT; access see below) G1. Shares of domestic issuers G2. General overviews G3. Exchange transactions, option and future business G4. Domestic capital investment companies G5. Bonds of foreign issuers G6. Bonds of domestic issuers

H. Credit institutions (currently not in HISTAT; access see below) H1. Assets H2. Liabilities H3. Assets and liabilities of the foreign branches and foreign subsidiaries of domestic banks H4. Building associations H5. Deposit statistics H6. Deposits and loans H7. profit situation of the banks H8. domestic and foreign debts and liabilities H9. Circulating bearer bonds according to their terms and bank group H10. Loans H11. Savings deposits and savings certificates H12. Savings business turnover according to bank group and endorsed disposals of non-bank financial companies H13. equity stocks and shares

I. Minimum reserves (currently not registered in HISTAT; access see below) I.1 Overview I.2 Itemisation according to steps of progression (from March 1977) I3. Itemisation according to reserve classes (until February 1977) I1.1 Reserve stockpiles according to bank group, obligatory reserve liabilities I1.2. Reserve stockpiles according to bank group, Reserve debits I.2 Reserve ratios

J. Central bank (currently not registered in HISTAT; access see below) J.1 Assets J.2 Liabilities

K. Public finances K.1 Financial development of the public budgeting K1. Public debts

L. Interest rates L.1 Money market rates L1. Bank interest rates (currently not registered in HISTAT; access see below).

The U.S. federal funds rate peaked in 2023 at its highest level since the 2007-08 financial crisis, reaching 5.33 percent by December 2023. A significant shift in monetary policy occurred in the second half of 2024, with the Federal Reserve implementing regular rate cuts. By December 2024, the rate had declined to 4.48 percent. What is a central bank rate? The federal funds rate determines the cost of overnight borrowing between banks, allowing them to maintain necessary cash reserves and ensure financial system liquidity. When this rate rises, banks become more inclined to hold rather than lend money, reducing the money supply. While this decreased lending slows economic activity, it helps control inflation by limiting the circulation of money in the economy. Historic perspective The federal funds rate historically follows cyclical patterns, falling during recessions and gradually rising during economic recoveries. Some central banks, notably the European Central Bank, went beyond traditional monetary policy by implementing both aggressive asset purchases and negative interest rates.

View data of the frequency at which one unit of currency purchases domestically produced goods and services within a given time period.

This dataset supports the research exploring the impact of monetary policy instruments on the Colombian economy, focusing on the classical dichotomy and monetary neutrality. The analysis delves into how monetary policy, including instruments such as interest rates and money supply, influences both nominal and real variables in the economy. It also highlights the relationship between monetary policy and economic stability, particularly how central banks manage inflation and economic growth. Key sections explore the separation between nominal and real variables as explained by the classical dichotomy, and the principle of monetary neutrality, which argues that changes in money supply affect nominal variables without impacting real economic factors.

The dataset is structured around a combination of theoretical insights and simulations that analyze the effectiveness of monetary neutrality in the Colombian context, given both domestic and international economic challenges such as the war in Ukraine and agricultural sector disruptions. Through simulations, the dataset demonstrates the effects of monetary expansion on variables like inflation, production, and employment, providing a framework for understanding current economic trends and proposing solutions to socio-economic challenges in Colombia.

This statistic depicts the average number of Point of Sale (POS) transactions before and after demonetization across India from October to November 2016. In November 2016, the average number of POS transactions increased to around **** million after demonetization in India, compared to **** million transactions in October before demonetization.

📂 Dataset Overview - Rows (Entries): 110 - Columns (Features): 6

Columns Description 1. Date - Format: MMM-YYYY (e.g., Jul-2025) - Monthly observations 1. Inflation_YoY (Year-on-Year Inflation %) - Inflation rate in percentage (YoY basis) - Range: 0.3% – 38% - Average: 11.6% - Can be treated as the dependent variable

1. Oil_Price_USD_Barrel
2. Global crude oil price (USD per barrel)
3. Range: 15.18 – 113.77

4. Average: 62.75

5. Exchange_Rate_PKR_USD

• Pakistani Rupee per US Dollar exchange rate
• Range: 104.6 – 304.8
• Average: 185.0

1. Interest_Rate

• State Bank of Pakistan policy rate (%)
• Range: 6.8% – 21.46%
• Average: 11.8%

1. Money_Supply_M2_Billion
2. Broad Money Supply (M2) in billion PKR
3. Range: 12,486 – 41,786
4. Average: 23,124

📊 Statistical Insights

Inflation Trends: High volatility observed between 2019–2023 (peaking at 38%), while in 2025 inflation dropped to ~3–4%.

Oil Price Relation: Fluctuations in crude oil prices appear linked with inflation movements.

Exchange Rate Impact: The depreciation of PKR from ~104 to 300+ significantly impacted inflation and interest rates.

Interest Rate Policy: Mostly ranged between 7–15%, but spiked to ~21% during currency crisis.

Money Supply Growth: Broad money consistently increased, adding long-term inflationary pressure.

📈**Possible Analyses for Kaggle**

1. Trend Analysis

2. Monthly inflation, oil price, exchange rate visualization.

3. Correlation Study

4. Inflation vs Oil Prices

5. Inflation vs Exchange Rate

6. Inflation vs Interest Rate

7. Forecasting Models

8. Time-Series forecasting (ARIMA, Prophet)

9. Regression models using oil prices, exchange rate, and money supply as predictors

10. Economic Insights

• Impact of global oil shocks on Pakistan’s inflation
• Role of monetary policy in inflation control
• Currency depreciation vs domestic inflation

Term Repurchase Agreements Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global term repurchase agreements market size reached USD 17.8 trillion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.2% from 2025 to 2033. The market is projected to expand significantly, attaining a value of USD 35.2 trillion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for short-term liquidity solutions among financial institutions and the rising use of term repos as an effective monetary policy tool by central banks worldwide. As per our latest research, the market’s expansion is further fueled by evolving regulatory frameworks and the proliferation of digital trading platforms, which enhance transparency and efficiency in repo transactions.

One of the major growth factors for the term repurchase agreements market is the heightened need for liquidity management across global banking and financial systems. In the aftermath of recent economic disruptions and ongoing volatility in capital markets, financial institutions are increasingly turning to term repos to manage their balance sheets efficiently. The flexibility of term repurchase agreements allows institutions to obtain short- to medium-term funding without the need to liquidate assets, thereby minimizing market impact and supporting overall financial stability. Additionally, the growing complexity of banking regulations, such as Basel III and other liquidity coverage requirements, has compelled banks to adopt more sophisticated liquidity management tools, further propelling the adoption of term repos.

Another significant driver is the rapid digital transformation within the financial sector, which has revolutionized the execution and settlement of repurchase agreements. The integration of advanced technologies, such as blockchain and automated trading platforms, has streamlined repo transactions, reduced operational risks, and improved transparency. This technological evolution has attracted new participants to the market, including non-traditional financial entities and fintech companies, thereby expanding the market’s reach. Furthermore, the advent of electronic trading platforms has facilitated cross-border repo transactions, enabling greater participation from international investors and contributing to market growth.

The increasing involvement of central banks in the term repurchase agreements market is also a key growth catalyst. Central banks in major economies, such as the Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and the People’s Bank of China, have frequently used term repos as a tool for open market operations to regulate money supply and stabilize interest rates. This active engagement not only supports liquidity in the banking system but also instills confidence among market participants. Moreover, the growing issuance of government securities and high-quality collateral has provided a robust foundation for the repo market, enhancing its attractiveness as a low-risk investment vehicle.

From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the global term repurchase agreements market, accounting for the largest share due to its highly developed financial infrastructure and the presence of major institutional investors. Europe follows closely, supported by stringent regulatory standards and active participation by central banks. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, driven by the rapid expansion of financial markets in China, India, and Southeast Asia. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, although still emerging, are showing increasing adoption of term repos as financial markets mature and regulatory frameworks evolve. This regional diversification is expected to further enhance the market’s resilience and growth potential in the coming years.

Type Analysis

The term repurchase agreements market is segmented by type into Overnight, Term, and Open repos. Overnight repos, which involve transactions

Estimated long run coefficients using ARDL approach.

Error correction estimation of the ARDL (1, 0, 0, 1) model (selected by Schwarz Bayesian Criterion).

Content

Reverse repurchase agreements are transactions in which securities are sold to a set of counterparties under an agreement to buy them back from the same party on a specified date at the same price plus interest. Reverse repurchase agreements may be conducted with foreign official and international accounts as a service to the holders of these accounts. All other reverse repurchase agreements, including transactions with primary dealers and a set of eligible money market funds, are open market operations intended to manage the supply of reserve balances; reverse repurchase agreements absorb reserve balances from the banking system for the length of the agreement. As with repurchase agreements, the naming convention used here reflects the transaction from the counterparties' perspective; the Federal Reserve receives cash in a reverse repurchase agreement and provides collateral to the counterparties.

Context

This is a dataset from the Federal Reserve hosted by the Federal Reserve Economic Database (FRED). FRED has a data platform found here and they update their information according to the frequency that the data updates. Explore the Federal Reserve using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the Federal Reserve organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated daily.

• Observation Start: 2002-12-18

• Observation End : 2019-12-18

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using FRED's API and Kaggle's API.

Cover photo by Andrew Pons on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.

Dynamic Working Capital Platforms Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Dynamic Working Capital Platforms market size reached USD 7.2 billion in 2024, with a robust year-over-year growth trajectory. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 13.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a projected value of USD 22.1 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of advanced financial technologies by enterprises seeking to optimize liquidity, streamline cash flows, and improve overall financial resilience in volatile economic conditions.

A primary growth factor for the Dynamic Working Capital Platforms market is the accelerating pace of digital transformation across industries. Organizations are increasingly turning to automated, AI-driven platforms to manage payables, receivables, and supply chain financing with greater transparency and efficiency. This shift is largely motivated by the need to reduce manual interventions, minimize errors, and gain real-time visibility into working capital metrics. As businesses strive to maintain operational agility and respond to dynamic market conditions, the integration of sophisticated working capital solutions has become a strategic imperative. This trend is particularly pronounced among large enterprises, but small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are catching up rapidly due to the availability of scalable, cloud-based solutions.

Another significant driver is the evolving regulatory landscape and the heightened focus on compliance and risk management. Financial institutions and corporates are under increasing pressure to adhere to stringent regulations concerning liquidity, anti-money laundering (AML), and know-your-customer (KYC) protocols. Dynamic Working Capital Platforms are equipped with advanced analytics and automation capabilities that help organizations not only meet these regulatory requirements but also enhance their ability to detect and mitigate financial risks. The platforms’ ability to offer end-to-end visibility and control over financial transactions is further fueling their adoption across sectors such as BFSI, manufacturing, and healthcare.

The proliferation of global supply chains and the growing complexity of trade finance operations are also acting as catalysts for market expansion. As companies expand their international footprint, the need for agile, multi-currency, and cross-border working capital solutions becomes paramount. Dynamic Working Capital Platforms facilitate seamless integration with global banking networks, support diverse financing instruments such as invoice and supply chain finance, and enable real-time collaboration among stakeholders. This is leading to improved cash flow management, reduced days sales outstanding (DSO), and enhanced supplier relationships, all of which are critical for maintaining competitiveness in today’s interconnected economy.

From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Dynamic Working Capital Platforms market, accounting for over 38% of global revenues in 2024. This is attributed to the early adoption of digital financial solutions, the presence of major technology vendors, and a robust ecosystem of fintech startups. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, with a projected CAGR of 15.8% during the forecast period, driven by rapid economic growth, increasing digitalization, and supportive government initiatives aimed at enhancing financial inclusion and business sustainability.

Component Analysis

The Dynamic Working Capital Platforms market is segmented by component into software and services. The software segment holds a dominant share, accounting for approximately 65% of the market in 2024. This is due to the rising demand for integrated platforms that offer end-to-end automation, data analytics, and customizable dashboards for liquidity management. Modern software solutions are designed to seamlessly integrate with existing ERP and financial systems, enabling organizations to gain a holistic view of their working capital cycles. The flexibility and scalability of these platforms make them ideal for both large enterprises and SMEs, allowing users to tailor functionalities according to their specific business needs.

Services, which include consulting, implementation, training, and support, represent the remaining 35% of the market. The i

I develop and estimate a monetary business cycle model with nominal loans and collateral constraints tied to housing values. Demand shocks move housing and nominal prices in the same direction, and are amplified and propagated over time. The financial accelerator is not uniform: nominal debt dampens supply shocks, stabilizing the economy under interest rate control. Structural estimation supports two key model features: collateral effects dramatically improve the response of aggregate demand to housing price shocks; and nominal debt improves the sluggish response of output to inflation surprises. Finally, policy evaluation considers the role of house prices and debt indexation in affecting monetary policy trade-offs.

According to a survey conducted between July 9 and July 11, 2022, ** percent of Americans thought that Joe Biden was highly responsible for the current trend in the inflation rate. This is compared to ** percent of Americans who said President Biden did not have a lot of responsibility for the current inflation rate.

Inflation in the U.S. Global events in 2022 had a significant impact on the United States. Inflation rose from *** percent in January 2021 to *** percent in June 2022. Significantly higher prices of basic goods led to increased concern over the state of the economy, and the ability to cover increasing monthly costs with the same income. Low interest rates, COVID-19-related supply constraints, corporate profiteering, and strong consumer spending had already put pressure on prices before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Despite rising wages on paper, the rapid growth of consumer prices resulted in an overall decline in real hourly earnings in the first half of 2022.

How much control does Joe Biden have over inflation? The bulk of economic performance and the inflation rate is determined by factors outside the President’s direct control, but U.S. presidents are often held accountable for it. Some of those factors are market forces, private business, productivity growth, the state of the global economy, and policies of the Federal Reserve. Although high-spending decisions such as the 2021 COVID-19 relief bill may have contributed to rising inflation rates, the bill has been seen by economists as a necessary intervention for preventing a recession at the time, as well as being of significant importance to low-income workers impacted by the pandemic.

The most important tool for curbing inflation and controlling the U.S. economy is the Federal Reserve. The Reserve has the ability to set, raise, and lower interest rates and determine the wider monetary policy for the United States – something out of the president’s control. In June 2022, the Reserve announced it would raise interest rates **** percent for the second time that year – hoisting the rate to a target range of **** to *** percent – in an attempt to slow consumer demand and balance demand with supply. However, it can often take time before the impacts of interventions by the Federal Reserve are seen in the public’s day-to-day lives. Most economists expect this wave of inflation to pass in a year to 18 months.

Tests for correlation, normality and heteroscedasticity.

Wholesale Banking Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global wholesale banking market size in 2024 is valued at USD 7.83 trillion, reflecting the robust scale and influence of this sector in the global financial landscape. The market is experiencing a steady compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% from 2025 to 2033, driven by digital transformation, evolving client demands, and increased cross-border trade. By 2033, the wholesale banking market is forecasted to reach USD 13.45 trillion, underscoring its critical role in supporting large-scale financial transactions and economic development worldwide. This growth is attributed to the rising adoption of advanced financial technologies and increasing globalization of financial services as per our latest research.

The wholesale banking market is witnessing significant expansion due to the proliferation of digital technologies and the increasing complexity of financial transactions among large enterprises and institutional clients. Wholesale banks are rapidly integrating artificial intelligence, blockchain, and advanced analytics into their service offerings, enabling more efficient risk management, fraud detection, and transaction processing. These technological advancements are not only enhancing operational efficiencies but also improving the customization of financial products to meet the specific needs of corporate clients. The shift towards digitalization has further facilitated the development of new products and services, such as real-time payment solutions and automated cash management systems, which are in high demand among large corporations and government entities. As a result, the sector is experiencing a transformation that is fundamentally reshaping how wholesale banking services are delivered and consumed.

Another significant growth factor for the wholesale banking market is the increasing globalization of trade and investment flows. As multinational corporations expand their operations across borders, the demand for sophisticated financial solutions to manage cross-border transactions, currency risks, and supply chain financing has surged. Wholesale banks play a pivotal role in supporting these global enterprises by providing tailored lending, trade finance, and treasury services. Moreover, regulatory changes and harmonization efforts in various regions have made it easier for banks to operate internationally, further fueling market growth. The expansion of international trade agreements and the rise of emerging markets as key economic players are also contributing to the growing need for wholesale banking services, particularly in regions like Asia Pacific and Latin America, where economic integration is accelerating.

The evolving regulatory landscape is also shaping the growth trajectory of the wholesale banking market. Regulatory bodies worldwide are introducing stricter compliance requirements, particularly concerning anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations. While these measures are aimed at enhancing the security and integrity of financial systems, they are also prompting wholesale banks to invest in advanced compliance technologies and risk management frameworks. This investment is driving innovation in the sector, as banks seek to balance regulatory compliance with the need for operational efficiency and client satisfaction. Additionally, the growing emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria is influencing the development of new financial products and services, as wholesale banks respond to the increasing demand for sustainable finance solutions from their corporate clients.

Regionally, the Asia Pacific market stands out as a major growth engine for wholesale banking, propelled by rapid economic development, expanding trade networks, and a burgeoning middle class. North America and Europe remain mature markets, characterized by high levels of digital adoption and regulatory sophistication, while Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging as attractive destinations for wholesale banking expansion due to their untapped potential and ongoing financial sector reforms. The interplay of these regional dynamics is creating a highly competitive and dynamic global wholesale banking market, with banks continuously adapting their strategies to capitalize on new opportunities and mitigate emerging risks.

Product Type Analysis

<br /&g

The benchmark interest rate in Russia was last recorded at 16.50 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Russia Interest Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.