In 2023, the United States had the highest gross household disposable income per capita in OECD countries adjusted for purchasing power parity. Their disposable income per capita was over ****** U.S. dollars. Luxembourg followed in second with around ****** U.S. dollars, with Switzerland in third.

Graph and download economic data for Real Disposable Personal Income (DSPIC96) from Jan 1959 to Aug 2025 about disposable, personal income, personal, income, real, and USA.

Disposable Personal Income in the United States increased to 23033.50 USD Billion in August from 22947.50 USD Billion in July of 2025. This dataset provides - United States Disposable Personal Income - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Graph and download economic data for Real Disposable Personal Income: Per Capita (A229RX0) from Jan 1959 to Aug 2025 about disposable, personal income, per capita, personal, income, real, and USA.

In 2022/23 the median annual household disposable income in the United Kingdom amounted to approximately ****** British pounds. Between 1994/95 and 2007/08 the average household disposable income showed year-on-year increases, but after this point, income levels began to stagnate and even decline in some years. Although average household disposable resumed a steady growth pattern between 2012/13 and 2016/17, it has fluctuated in more recent years, and declined in the most recent two years. Economic shocks and disposable income The steady growth of disposable income from 1994 to 2008 reflected the generally healthy UK economy in that period. After the global financial crisis, however, the UK economy was plunged into a deep recession that is mirrored by a decline in disposable income. Although there was a period of recovery between 2013 and 2016, the UK economy has suffered a series of economic shocks since that point. The Brexit Referendum of 2016, and the subsequent economic and political fallout, was followed by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and in more recent years by the Inflation Crisis and Ukraine War. Living costs putting UK households under pressure Between January and April 2022, the share of people reporting an increase in their living costs compared with the previous month rose from ** percent to ** percent. This corresponded with significant price increases at that time, with CPI inflation surging from *** percent in February 2021 to a **-year-high of **** percent by October 2022. Although inflation did gradually start to decline in the following months, it wasn't until July 2023 that wages caught up with inflation. The surge in energy and food prices that caused this high inflation, was devastating for UK households, leading to the worst Cost of Living Crisis for decades.

The OECD Income Distribution database (IDD) has been developed to benchmark and monitor countries' performance in the field of income inequality and poverty. It contains a number of standardised indicators based on the central concept of "equivalised household disposable income", i.e. the total income received by the households less the current taxes and transfers they pay, adjusted for household size with an equivalence scale. While household income is only one of the factors shaping people's economic well-being, it is also the one for which comparable data for all OECD countries are most common. Income distribution has a long-standing tradition among household-level statistics, with regular data collections going back to the 1980s (and sometimes earlier) in many OECD countries.

Achieving comparability in this field is a challenge, as national practices differ widely in terms of concepts, measures, and statistical sources. In order to maximise international comparability as well as inter-temporal consistency of data, the IDD data collection and compilation process is based on a common set of statistical conventions (e.g. on income concepts and components). The information obtained by the OECD through a network of national data providers, via a standardized questionnaire, is based on national sources that are deemed to be most representative for each country.

Small changes in estimates between years should be treated with caution as they may not be statistically significant.

Fore more details, please refer to: https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/IDD-Metadata.pdf and https://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm

China Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Highest Income data was reported at 63,824.150 RMB in 2012. This records an increase from the previous number of 58,841.870 RMB for 2011. China Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Highest Income data is updated yearly, averaging 11,522.975 RMB from Dec 1985 (Median) to 2012, with 28 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 63,824.150 RMB in 2012 and a record low of 1,276.200 RMB in 1985. China Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Highest Income data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table CN.HD: Income and Expenditure by Income Level: Urban.

Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Guangdong: Shenzhen data was reported at 76,910.000 RMB in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 72,718.228 RMB for 2022. Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Guangdong: Shenzhen data is updated yearly, averaging 25,438.260 RMB from Dec 1988 (Median) to 2023, with 36 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 76,910.000 RMB in 2023 and a record low of 2,569.200 RMB in 1988. Disposable Income per Capita: Urban: Guangdong: Shenzhen data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under China Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table CN.HF: Disposable Income per Capita: Prefecture Level City: Urban.

Australia Equivalised Disposable Income: Share: Highest Quintile data was reported at 39.800 % in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 40.400 % for 2018. Australia Equivalised Disposable Income: Share: Highest Quintile data is updated yearly, averaging 38.950 % from Jun 1995 (Median) to 2020, with 16 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 41.000 % in 2008 and a record low of 37.100 % in 1997. Australia Equivalised Disposable Income: Share: Highest Quintile data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Australian Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.H028: Survey of Income and Housing: Equivalized Disposable Household Income.

Taiwan FIES: % Distribution of Disposable Income: Highest 20 % of Household data was reported at 40.290 % in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 40.360 % for 2016. Taiwan FIES: % Distribution of Disposable Income: Highest 20 % of Household data is updated yearly, averaging 39.140 % from Dec 1971 (Median) to 2017, with 47 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 41.370 % in 1972 and a record low of 36.800 % in 1980. Taiwan FIES: % Distribution of Disposable Income: Highest 20 % of Household data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Taiwan – Table TW.H019: Family Income and Expenditure Survey: Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics.

New Zealand Median Annual Household Disposable Income data was reported at 86,257.000 NZD in 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 81,945.000 NZD for 2023. New Zealand Median Annual Household Disposable Income data is updated yearly, averaging 60,369.000 NZD from Jun 2007 (Median) to 2024, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 86,257.000 NZD in 2024 and a record low of 43,113.000 NZD in 2007. New Zealand Median Annual Household Disposable Income data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Stats NZ. The data is categorized under Global Database’s New Zealand – Table NZ.H026: Annual Household Income.

Australia Household Income: Gross Disposable Income data was reported at 421,840.000 AUD mn in Dec 2024. This records a decrease from the previous number of 435,293.000 AUD mn for Sep 2024. Australia Household Income: Gross Disposable Income data is updated quarterly, averaging 72,770.500 AUD mn from Sep 1959 (Median) to Dec 2024, with 262 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 435,293.000 AUD mn in Sep 2024 and a record low of 2,931.000 AUD mn in Jun 1960. Australia Household Income: Gross Disposable Income data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Australian Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.A287: SNA08: Household Saving Ratio and Household Income.

This statistic shows the total disposable personal income in the United States from 2000 to 2023. Americans had a total of ***** trillion chained 2017 dollars in disposable personal income in 2023. Per capita personal disposable personal income was ****** chained 2017 dollars in that same year.

Key information about Japan Household Income per Capita

• Japan Annual Household Income per Capita reached 15,561.853 USD in Dec 2024, compared with the previous value of 16,060.769 USD in Dec 2023.
• Japan Annual Household Income per Capita data is updated yearly, available from Dec 2000 to Dec 2024, with an averaged value of 17,278.293 USD.
• The data reached an all-time high of 22,731.231 USD in Dec 2012 and a record low of 14,845.104 USD in Dec 2002.
• In the latest reports, Retail Sales of Japan grew 5.854 % YoY in May 2023.

CEIC calculates Annual Household Income per Capita from monthly Household Income and monthly Average Household Size and converts it into USD. Statistical Bureau provides Household Income in local currency and Average Household Size. Federal Reserve Board average market exchange rate is used for currency conversions. Household Income covers Workers Households only.

Purpose and brief description EU-SILC (European Union - Statistics on Income and Living Conditions) is a survey on income and living conditions and an important tool to map poverty and social exclusion at both Belgian and European level. The objective of this survey is to establish a global framework for the production of 'Community' statistical data on income and living conditions (EU-SILC), including both coherent cross-sectional and longitudinal data on income and poverty (level, composition,...) at national and European level. The survey is carried out in Belgium and in the other EU Member States and is coordinated by Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union. In Belgium, the SILC is organised by Statbel. Population Private households in Belgium Data collection method and sample size CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) - CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview). Response rate ± 60% (N= ± 6.000 households) Periodicity Annually. Release calendar First quarter after survey year Forms SILC: individual questionnaire SILC: questionnaire households Definitions Risk of poverty or social exclusion (AROPE) The risk of poverty or social exclusion, abbreviated AROPE, refers to the situation in which individuals are faced with at least one of the 3 following poverty risks: monetary poverty, severe material and social deprivation or living in a household with very low work intensity. The AROPE rate, the share of the total population at risk of poverty or social exclusion, is the main indicator for monitoring the ‘EU 2030’ target on poverty and social exclusion. Poverty risk = Monetary poverty risk (AROP) The at-risk-of-poverty rate (AROP) is the percentage of people with an equivalised disposable income (after social transfer) below the poverty threshold. The indicator does not measure wealth or poverty, but low income in comparison to other residents in that country. This does not necessarily imply a low standard of living. Poverty risk before social transfers: Percentage of people whose equivalised disposable income after deduction of all social transfers falls below the poverty threshold. Poverty risk before social transfers, excluding pensions: Percentage of people whose equivalised disposable income after deduction of social transfers, excluding pensions, falls below the poverty threshold. Material and social deprivation rate (MSD) and severe material and social deprivation (SMSD) The material and social deprivation rate refers to the inability to afford some goods/services considered by most people to be desirable or even necessary to lead an adequate life. The indicator distinguishes between individuals who cannot afford a certain good/service/activity, and those who do not have this good/service/activity for another reason, e.g. because they do not want or do not need it. The EU-SILC survey asks households about their financial (in)ability to: Pay the bills as scheduled Take every year one week’s holiday away from home Eat a meal with meat, chicken, fish or vegetarian equivalent every second day Face unexpected financial expenses Afford a car Keep the home warm Replace damaged or worn-out furniture In addition, people are asked about their individual financial (in)ability to: Replace worn out or old-fashioned clothes by new ones Have two pairs of shoes in good condition Afford an internet connection at home Get together with friends/family (relatives) for a drink/meal at least once a month Participate regularly in a leisure activity Spend a small amount of money each week on yourself The material and social deprivation rate (MSD) is defined as the enforced inability to pay for at least five of the above-mentioned items. The severe material and social deprivation rate (SMSD) is defined as the enforced inability to pay for at least seven of the above-mentioned items. Low work intensity (LWI) The indicator persons living in households with very low work intensity is defined as the number of persons living in a household where the members of working age worked a working time less than 20% of their total work-time potential during the previous 12 months. The work intensity of a household is the ratio of the total number of months that all working-age household members have worked during the income reference year and the total number of months the same household members theoretically could have worked in the same period. An employee of working age is a person aged 18-59, excluding students aged 18-24. Households composed only of children, of students aged less than 25 and/or people aged 60 or more are completely excluded from the indicator calculation. Level of education The level of education is measured using a detailed questionnaire, and the people are then divided into three groups. Low-skilled people are people who list lower secondary education as their highest level of education. Medium-skilled people are people who obtained a diploma of higher secondary education but not of higher

The most common poverty measures, including that used by the OECD, focus on income based approaches. One of the most common measures of income poverty is the proportion of households with income less than half median equivalised disposable household income (which is set as the poverty line); this is a relative income poverty measure as poverty is measured by reference to the income of others rather than in some absolute sense. Australia has one of the highest household disposable incomes in the world, which means that an Australian relative income poverty line is set at a high level of income compared to most other countries. \r \r OECD statistics on Australian poverty 2015-16 (based on ABS Survey of Income and Housing data and applying a poverty line of 50% of median income) determined the Australian poverty rate was over 25% before taxes and transfers, but falls around 12% after taxes and transfers. Though measuring poverty through application of solely an income measure is not considered comprehensive for an Australian context, however, it does demonstrate that the Australian welfare system more than halves the number of Australians that would otherwise be considered as at risk of living in poverty under that measure. \r It is important to consider a range of indicators of persistent disadvantage to understand poverty and hardship and its multidimensional nature. Different indicators point to different dimensions of poverty. \r While transient poverty is a problem, the experience of persistent poverty is of deeper concern, particularly where families experience intergenerational disadvantage and long-term welfare reliance. HILDA data from the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research shows the Distribution of number of years in poverty 2001–2015. The figure focuses on the longer term experience of working age adults and shows that while people do fall into poverty, only a small proportion of people are persistently poor.\r

Disposable Cups and Lids Market Outlook

The global disposable cups and lids market size was valued at approximately USD 14.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 22.1 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% during the forecast period. The increasing demand for convenience, rising fast-food consumption, and the burgeoning foodservice industry are key factors driving this market's growth.

The growth of the disposable cups and lids market is primarily fueled by the expanding foodservice sector, which includes restaurants, cafes, and fast-food chains. As consumers increasingly crave convenience and on-the-go food and beverage options, the need for disposable solutions has surged. Furthermore, the trend of takeout and delivery services, which gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic, continues to bolster the demand for disposable cups and lids. This trend is particularly pronounced in urban areas where the fast-paced lifestyle necessitates quick and easy meal options.

Another significant growth factor is the rising preference for eco-friendly and sustainable products. Environmental concerns are prompting both consumers and manufacturers to shift towards biodegradable and recyclable materials. This shift is driven by stringent government regulations and the growing awareness about the environmental impact of single-use plastics. Companies are increasingly investing in innovative materials and sustainable practices to cater to this demand, thus propelling the market forward. Moreover, advancements in material science and technology are enabling the production of high-quality disposable cups and lids that are both functional and environmentally friendly.

The rapid urbanization and increasing disposable income in developing regions are also contributing to market growth. As more people migrate to urban areas, the demand for convenient and disposable food and beverage packaging solutions rises. Additionally, higher disposable incomes allow consumers to spend more on out-of-home dining experiences, further driving the need for disposable cups and lids. The Asia-Pacific region, in particular, is witnessing significant growth due to these factors, coupled with the expanding foodservice industry in countries like China and India.

The Barrier Food Cups Sales segment is witnessing a notable surge, driven by the growing demand for packaging solutions that offer superior protection against moisture, oxygen, and other external factors. These barrier properties are essential for maintaining the freshness and quality of food and beverages, particularly in the fast-paced foodservice industry. As consumers increasingly prioritize convenience and quality, the need for advanced packaging solutions like barrier food cups is becoming more pronounced. Manufacturers are investing in innovative materials and technologies to enhance the barrier properties of these cups, ensuring that they meet the evolving needs of consumers and businesses alike. This trend is expected to further propel the growth of the disposable cups and lids market, as companies strive to offer products that combine functionality with environmental sustainability.

Regionally, North America and Europe remain key markets for disposable cups and lids, owing to the well-established foodservice sectors and high consumer awareness regarding convenience products. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to exhibit the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid urbanization, increasing disposable incomes, and the expansion of the foodservice industry. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also anticipated to witness moderate growth, supported by improving economic conditions and rising consumer spending on food and beverages.

Material Type Analysis

The material type segment of the disposable cups and lids market includes plastic, paper, foam, and others. Plastic disposable cups and lids dominate the market due to their durability, cost-effectiveness, and versatility. Plastic materials, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, are widely used due to their excellent barrier properties, which help in maintaining the temperature and quality of the contents. However, the environmental concerns associated with plastic waste are pushing manufacturers to explore sustainable alternatives, leading to a gradual shift towards biodegradable plastics and compostable materials.

Paper

Korea Average: AH: More Than 5 Persons: Disposable Income data was reported at 59,850.000 KRW th in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 58,480.000 KRW th for 2016. Korea Average: AH: More Than 5 Persons: Disposable Income data is updated yearly, averaging 54,480.000 KRW th from Mar 2010 (Median) to 2017, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 59,850.000 KRW th in 2017 and a record low of 44,250.000 KRW th in 2010. Korea Average: AH: More Than 5 Persons: Disposable Income data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statistics Korea. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Korea – Table KR.H076: SHFLC: Household Assets, Liabilities & Income By The Number of Household Members.

This dataset provides values for HOUSEHOLDS DEBT TO INCOME reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Disposable Hot Drink Packaging Sales Market Outlook

The global disposable hot drink packaging market size is expected to grow from USD 12.5 billion in 2023 to USD 19.5 billion by 2032, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8%. This growth is driven by increasing consumer demand for convenience and on-the-go consumption, coupled with rising environmental awareness and the adoption of sustainable packaging solutions. The market is bolstered by the expansion of the food and beverage industry, particularly the rapid growth of coffee shops and quick service restaurants (QSRs) globally.

A significant growth factor for the disposable hot drink packaging market is the rising consumer preference for convenience and quick service. In modern urban environments, consumers are increasingly opting for quick service meals and beverages due to their fast-paced lifestyles. This trend has led to a proliferation of cafes and QSRs, which in turn, has fueled the demand for disposable hot drink packaging. Moreover, the increasing trend of takeaway and delivery services has significantly contributed to the growth of this market segment, as it necessitates the use of disposable packaging solutions.

Another driving factor is the growing environmental consciousness among consumers and businesses alike. There has been a notable shift towards sustainable and eco-friendly packaging solutions, such as biodegradable and recyclable materials. Regulatory policies and consumer pressure are compelling companies to adopt greener alternatives. Innovations in material science are also playing a crucial role, with manufacturers developing compostable and plant-based packaging options. This shift is not only meeting consumer demand but also helping companies align with global sustainability goals, thus driving market growth.

The rapid urbanization and increasing disposable income in emerging economies are also key factors contributing to market growth. As urban populations grow, so does the demand for convenient food and beverage options, which includes hot drinks. Emerging markets, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, are witnessing a surge in the establishment of new cafes and QSRs. This is further amplified by the growing middle-class population and their increasing disposable income, which enables more frequent dining out and consumption of premium beverages.

In the context of sustainable packaging solutions, the Paper Coffee Pouch has emerged as a noteworthy innovation. These pouches offer a biodegradable alternative to traditional plastic packaging, aligning with the growing consumer demand for eco-friendly options. The paper material not only reduces environmental impact but also provides excellent protection and freshness for coffee products. As coffee consumption continues to rise globally, the demand for such sustainable packaging solutions is expected to increase, further driving the growth of the disposable hot drink packaging market. The versatility and adaptability of paper coffee pouches make them an attractive choice for both small-scale coffee roasters and large coffee chains looking to enhance their sustainability credentials.

From a regional perspective, North America and Europe are currently leading the market due to the high density of coffee shops and a well-established quick service restaurant industry. However, the fastest growth is anticipated in the Asia-Pacific region, driven by rapid urbanization, economic growth, and changing consumer lifestyles. Countries like China, India, and Japan are projected to witness substantial growth, with an increasing number of international and domestic coffee chains expanding in these markets. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa also present significant growth opportunities due to their evolving foodservice industries and rising consumer spending on beverages.

Material Type Analysis

The disposable hot drink packaging market is segmented by material type into paper, plastic, foam, and others. The paper segment is expected to dominate the market, driven by the growing environmental concerns and regulatory policies favoring sustainable packaging solutions. Paper-based packaging is highly favored due to its biodegradability and recyclable properties. Moreover, advancements in coating technology have improved the thermal insulation and durability of paper cups and lids, making them more suitable for hot drinks. The shift towards paper materials is also supported by consumer preference for eco-friendly pr