100+ datasets found
  1. California Land Ownership

    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +8more
    Updated Sep 14, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2019). California Land Ownership [Dataset]. https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::california-land-ownership
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 14, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Forestry and Fire Protectionhttp://calfire.ca.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset was updated May, 2025.This ownership dataset was generated primarily from CPAD data, which already tracks the majority of ownership information in California. CPAD is utilized without any snapping or clipping to FRA/SRA/LRA. CPAD has some important data gaps, so additional data sources are used to supplement the CPAD data. Currently this includes the most currently available data from BIA, DOD, and FWS. Additional sources may be added in subsequent versions. Decision rules were developed to identify priority layers in areas of overlap.Starting in 2022, the ownership dataset was compiled using a new methodology. Previous versions attempted to match federal ownership boundaries to the FRA footprint, and used a manual process for checking and tracking Federal ownership changes within the FRA, with CPAD ownership information only being used for SRA and LRA lands. The manual portion of that process was proving difficult to maintain, and the new method (described below) was developed in order to decrease the manual workload, and increase accountability by using an automated process by which any final ownership designation could be traced back to a specific dataset.The current process for compiling the data sources includes:* Clipping input datasets to the California boundary* Filtering the FWS data on the Primary Interest field to exclude lands that are managed by but not owned by FWS (ex: Leases, Easements, etc)* Supplementing the BIA Pacific Region Surface Trust lands data with the Western Region portion of the LAR dataset which extends into California.* Filtering the BIA data on the Trust Status field to exclude areas that represent mineral rights only.* Filtering the CPAD data on the Ownership Level field to exclude areas that are Privately owned (ex: HOAs)* In the case of overlap, sources were prioritized as follows: FWS > BIA > CPAD > DOD* As an exception to the above, DOD lands on FRA which overlapped with CPAD lands that were incorrectly coded as non-Federal were treated as an override, such that the DOD designation could win out over CPAD.In addition to this ownership dataset, a supplemental _source dataset is available which designates the source that was used to determine the ownership in this dataset. Data Sources:* GreenInfo Network's California Protected Areas Database (CPAD2023a). https://www.calands.org/cpad/; https://www.calands.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CPAD-2023a-Database-Manual.pdf* US Fish and Wildlife Service FWSInterest dataset (updated December, 2023). https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/9c49bd03b8dc4b9188a8c84062792cff_0/explore* Department of Defense Military Bases dataset (updated September 2023) https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/military-bases* Bureau of Indian Affairs, Pacific Region, Surface Trust and Pacific Region Office (PRO) land boundaries data (2023) via John Mosley John.Mosley@bia.gov* Bureau of Indian Affairs, Land Area Representations (LAR) and BIA Regions datasets (updated Oct 2019) https://biamaps.doi.gov/bogs/datadownload.html Data Gaps & Changes:Known gaps include several BOR, ACE and Navy lands which were not included in CPAD nor the DOD MIRTA dataset. Our hope for future versions is to refine the process by pulling in additional data sources to fill in some of those data gaps. Additionally, any feedback received about missing or inaccurate data can be taken back to the appropriate source data where appropriate, so fixes can occur in the source data, instead of just in this dataset.25_1: The CPAD Input dataset was amended to merge large gaps in certain areas of the state known to be erroneous, such as Yosemite National Park, and to eliminate overlaps from the original input. The FWS input dataset was updated in February of 2025, and the DOD input dataset was updated in October of 2024. The BIA input dataset was the same as was used for the previous ownership version.24_1: Input datasets this year included numerous changes since the previous version, particularly the CPAD and DOD inputs. Of particular note was the re-addition of Camp Pendleton to the DOD input dataset, which is reflected in this version of the ownership dataset. We were unable to obtain an updated input for tribral data, so the previous inputs was used for this version.23_1: A few discrepancies were discovered between data changes that occurred in CPAD when compared with parcel data. These issues will be taken to CPAD for clarification for future updates, but for ownership23_1 it reflects the data as it was coded in CPAD at the time. In addition, there was a change in the DOD input data between last year and this year, with the removal of Camp Pendleton. An inquiry was sent for clarification on this change, but for ownership23_1 it reflects the data per the DOD input dataset.22_1 : represents an initial version of ownership with a new methodology which was developed under a short timeframe. A comparison with previous versions of ownership highlighted the some data gaps with the current version. Some of these known gaps include several BOR, ACE and Navy lands which were not included in CPAD nor the DOD MIRTA dataset. Our hope for future versions is to refine the process by pulling in additional data sources to fill in some of those data gaps. In addition, any topological errors (like overlaps or gaps) that exist in the input datasets may thus carry over to the ownership dataset. Ideally, any feedback received about missing or inaccurate data can be taken back to the relevant source data where appropriate, so fixes can occur in the source data, instead of just in this dataset.

  2. H

    Government Land Ownership

    • opendata.hawaii.gov
    • geoportal.hawaii.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 15, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of Planning (2022). Government Land Ownership [Dataset]. https://opendata.hawaii.gov/dataset/government-land-ownership
    Explore at:
    pdf, arcgis geoservices rest api, kml, csv, zip, geojson, ogc wms, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Hawaii Statewide GIS Program
    Authors
    Office of Planning
    Description
    [Metadata] Description: Government Landownership in the State of Hawaii as of 2022: County, Federal, State, and State DHHL Lands
    Sources: County of Kauai, April, 2022; City & County of Honolulu, April 27, 2022; County of Maui, April, 2022; County of Hawaii, April, 2022; State Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, October, 2022.

    This dataset was created using ownership information provided by the counties via tax map key parcel layers and ownership tables. Parcels were queried using the "Owner" field for state, county, and federal agency names. State GIS staff verified land ownership using the online service QPublic, the 2022 Department of Hawaiian Home Lands layer and other GIS layers and resources. Where ownership was still unclear, State GIS personnel reached out to appropriate agencies for clarification. Summary fields “majorowner” and “type” were created using additional filters, queries and analysis tools to summarize the data based upon government ownership sector and type. Also see detailed government ownership layer (gov_own_detailed) which is comprised of government land ownership by TMK parcel.

    The parcel boundaries are intended to provide a visual reference only and do not represent legal or survey level accuracy. Attributes are for assessment purposes only and are subject to change at any time.

    For additional information, please refer to metadata at https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/gis/data/gov_own.pdf or contact the Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, State of Hawaii; PO Box 2359, Honolulu, Hi. 96804; (808) 587-2846; email: gis@hawaii.gov; Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov/gis.
  3. b

    Real Property

    • data.bellevuewa.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 27, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Bellevue (2023). Real Property [Dataset]. https://data.bellevuewa.gov/datasets/cobgis::real-property/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Bellevue
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset contains boundaries of city-owned properties in Bellevue, along with information about the responsible maintenance and ownership entities. The dataset is useful for managing public land, understanding city assets, and facilitating the coordination of maintenance efforts among various city departments and agencies.

  4. Parcels and Land Ownership, ParcelView-The data set is a view of the parcel...

    • data.wu.ac.at
    Updated Aug 19, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NSGIC Local Govt | GIS Inventory (2017). Parcels and Land Ownership, ParcelView-The data set is a view of the parcel polygon consisting of more than 93,000 tax parcel boundaries in Davis County. This Davis County Recorder compiled the parcel layer using GeoMeida Professional and GeoMedia Parcel Manager., Published in 2005, Davis County Government. [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov/N2EyMDZkNjYtNjFkZC00Nzk2LWFjZjQtODE1NzM4MTI3MjI2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 19, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    National States Geographic Information Council
    Area covered
    Davis County, c5b293615a5b0f92a5991c5bd036a55e06f09ddc
    Description

    Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of 2005. ParcelView-The data set is a view of the parcel polygon consisting of more than 93,000 tax parcel boundaries in Davis County. This Davis County Recorder compiled the parcel layer using GeoMeida Professional and GeoMedia Parcel Manager..

  5. Forest ownership in the conterminous United States: ForestOwn_v1 geospatial...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Nov 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mark D. Nelson; Greg C. Liknes; Brett J. Butler (2025). Forest ownership in the conterminous United States: ForestOwn_v1 geospatial dataset [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2010-0002
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    Mark D. Nelson; Greg C. Liknes; Brett J. Butler
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Contiguous United States, United States
    Description

    ForestOwn_v1 is a 250-meter spatial resolution raster geospatial dataset of forest ownership of the conterminous United States (CONUS). The dataset was prepared by the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, Northern Research Station, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and differentiates forest from non-forest land and water, public and private ownership, and the percent of private forest land in corporate ownership. The forest/non-forest land/water classification is derived from the USDA Forest Service's CONUS Forest/Nonforest dataset. Public and private land ownership class is derived from the Protected Areas Database of the United States, Version 1.1 (CBI Edition). Corporate ownership of private forest land is derived from the Forest Service's 2007 Resources Planning Act (RPA) dataset, summarized over the Environmental Protection Agency's Original Environmental Monitoring & Assessment Program (EMAP) grid 648 square kilometer hexagon dataset.The ForestOwn_v1 dataset is designed for conducting geospatial analyses and for producing cartographic products over regional to national geographic extents.A corresponding Research Map (RMAP) has been produced to cartographically portray this dataset.

    Original metadata date was 02/09/2011. Minor metadata updates were made on 05/10/2013, 04/16/2014, 12/21/2016, and 02/06/2017. Additional minor metadata updates were made on 04/20/2023.

    On 07/23/2020 a newer version of these data became available (Sass et al. 2020).

  6. g

    California Land Ownership

    • gimi9.com
    • data.ca.gov
    • +5more
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Land Ownership [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/data-gov_california-land-ownership-8a515/
    Explore at:
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    California
    Description

    This dataset is intended to provide a statewide depiction of land ownership in California. It includes lands owned by each federal agency, state agency, local government entities, conservation organizations, and special districts. It does not include lands that are in private ownership. Ownership is derived from CAL FIRE's State Responsibility Area (SRA) dataset and GreenInfo Network's California Protected Areas Database (CPAD). CAL FIRE tracks lands owned by federal agencies as part of our efforts to maintain fire protection responsibility boundaries, captured as part of our State Responsibility Areas (SRA) dataset. This effort draws on data provided by various federal agencies including USDA Forest Service, BLM, National Park Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Indian Affairs. Since SRA lands are matched to county parcel data where appropriate, often federal land boundaries are also adjusted to match parcels, and may not always exactly match the source federal data. Federal lands from the SRA dataset are combined with ownership data for non-federal lands from CPAD, in order to capture lands owned by various state and local agencies, special districts, and conservation organizations. Data from CPAD are imported directly and not adjusted to match parcels or other features. However, CPAD features may be trimmed if they overlap federal lands from the SRA dataset. This service represents the latest release of the dataset by FRAP, and is updated annually. As of November 2018, it represents ownership18_2.

  7. Surface Ownership Parcels (Feature Layer)

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    bin
    Updated Nov 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2025). Surface Ownership Parcels (Feature Layer) [Dataset]. https://agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov/articles/dataset/Surface_Ownership_Parcels_Feature_Layer_/25972516
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    An area depicted as surface ownership parcels dissolved on the same ownership classification. MetadataThis record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService CSV Shapefile GeoJSON KML For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

  8. Allerdale Land Ownership - Dataset - data.gov.uk

    • ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
    Updated Nov 8, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk (2013). Allerdale Land Ownership - Dataset - data.gov.uk [Dataset]. https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/allerdale-land-ownership
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    CKANhttps://ckan.org/
    Area covered
    Allerdale District
    Description

    Land and Property Extents expressed as polygons as recorded through the Allerdale Land Terrier. Extents captured from OS Mastermap from legal title plans

  9. Central and Local Government Unregistered Land

    • data.gov.uk
    csv, xls
    Updated Aug 6, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2020). Central and Local Government Unregistered Land [Dataset]. https://data.gov.uk/dataset/4f5ed3a2-1dbc-41bc-ba1b-bf840e781e08/central-and-local-government-unregistered-land
    Explore at:
    csv, xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 6, 2020
    Authors
    Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
    License

    https://data.gov.uk/dataset/4f5ed3a2-1dbc-41bc-ba1b-bf840e781e08/central-and-local-government-unregistered-land#licence-infohttps://data.gov.uk/dataset/4f5ed3a2-1dbc-41bc-ba1b-bf840e781e08/central-and-local-government-unregistered-land#licence-info

    Description

    A list of central and local government land in England, which may not be registered with HM Land Registry (HMLR).

    HMLR has created this dataset for the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) by combining HMLR freehold polygon data with the public sector ownership data currently openly available from the Office of Government Property.

    The dataset is not definitive or complete as not all central and local government data is captured, and/or available, and the two datasets are not held in the same format. The list is therefore indicative rather than definitive.

    Intellectual Property Rights

    The dataset includes address data processed against Ordnance Survey’s AddressBase Premium product and incorporates Royal Mail’s PAF® database (Address Data). Royal Mail and Ordnance Survey permit your use of Address Data:

    • for personal and/or non-commercial use
    • in relation to the analysis of public sector land and property.

    If you want to use the Address Data in any other way, you must contact Royal Mail. Email

    Address data

    The following fields comprise the address data included in the dataset

    • Property Name
    • Street No
    • Road
    • Town
    • Postcode
  10. n

    Ownership - USFS - Dataset - CKAN

    • nationaldataplatform.org
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Ownership - USFS - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://nationaldataplatform.org/catalog/dataset/oper-ownership-usfs
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Ownership is a commonly used base layer used in a wide range of business functions and these data are intended to provide a depiction of the land ownership within the CLM project area. FS_BasicOwnership_2023.shp - an area depicted as surface ownership parcels dissolved on the same ownership classification administered by the USDA Forest Service (USFS). It does not include lands of private ownership.

  11. a

    Maryland Property Data - Parcel Points

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • data.imap.maryland.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Sep 18, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ArcGIS Online for Maryland (2021). Maryland Property Data - Parcel Points [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/maryland::maryland-property-data-parcel-points
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ArcGIS Online for Maryland
    Area covered
    Description

    This is a comprehensive point theme that incorporates parcel ownership and address information, parcel valuation information and basic information about the land and structure(s) associated with a given tax assessment account. Data for the Parcel point theme are obtained from the State Department of Assessments and Taxation with added data from Maryland Department of Planning. The date the point was most recently published in Planning's data products MdProperty View and FINDER Quantum is contained in the mdpvdate field. The date of the most recent Assessments data linkage to MdProperty View/FINDER Quantum points is contained in the sdatdate field. Accounts deleted between those two dates are no longer represented as points. For more information on the attribute definitions please see the MdProperty View User's Guide, available for download at https://planning.maryland.gov/Pages/OurProducts/DownloadFiles.aspx . Please Note: Due to the extensive size of the parcel points file, download is recommended from the REST endpoint (https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/PlanningCadastre/MD_PropertyData/MapServer/exts/MDiMapDataDownload/customLayers/0)This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Layer Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/PlanningCadastre/MD_PropertyData/MapServer/0**Please note, due to the size of this dataset, you may receive an error message when trying to download the dataset. You can download this dataset directly from MD iMAP Services at: https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/PlanningCadastre/MD_PropertyData/MapServer/exts/MDiMAPDataDownload/customLayers/0**

  12. a

    Data from: Existing Land Use

    • private-demo-dcdev.opendata.arcgis.com
    • opendata.dc.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Aug 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Washington, DC (2023). Existing Land Use [Dataset]. https://private-demo-dcdev.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/DCGIS::existing-land-use
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Washington, DC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    A generalized dataset of existing land use in the District of Columbia as existed during its most recent extract of the common ownership lots. This dataset is different from the Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, which shows land use as envisioned in the latest version of DC’s Comprehensive Plan. The primary land use categories used in this dataset are similar, but not identical. The Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) compared two datasets to create this generalized existing land use data. The data source identifying property use is the Property Use Code Lookup from the Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR). An index provided by the Office of Planning assigns each OTR property use code with a “primary land use” designation. Through an automated process, the common ownership lots were then joined with this index to create the Existing Land Use. Only properties with an assigned use code from OTR are categorized. Other properties without a use code were left as NULL. Many of these tend to be public lands such as national parks. Refer to https://opendata.dc.gov/pages/public-lands.This dataset has no legal status and is intended primarily as a resource and informational tool. The Office of the Chief Technology Officer anticipates replicating this work annually.

  13. Digital Property Maps

    • open.canada.ca
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    html
    Updated Jan 9, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of New Brunswick (2025). Digital Property Maps [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/56f75efc-3681-34ce-6440-c2c8a8457332
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Government of New Brunswickhttps://www.gnb.ca/
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Approximate boundaries for all land parcels in New Brunswick. The boundaries are structured as Polygons. The Property Identifier number or PID is included for each parcel.

  14. The Government Property Estate including Buildings and Land

    • data.europa.eu
    excel xls, html
    Updated Jul 30, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cabinet Office (2025). The Government Property Estate including Buildings and Land [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/the-government-property-estate-including-buildings-and-land?locale=et
    Explore at:
    html, excel xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Cabinet Officehttps://www.gov.uk/
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These datasets are published as part of the requirements on data transparency and are refreshed on the first of the month.

    This dataset provides information on the government estate, including various property related characteristics such as: location, ownership, size, tenure and type of property.

    The scope of the data includes land and property information for UK central government departments and their arms length bodies including non-ministerial departments, executive agencies, non-departmental public bodies and special health authorities. Whilst these assets are primarily located in the UK,some are located overseas.

    Some properties may have more than one entry in the data extract as the government has more than one ‘interest’ in that property. For example, there may be two or more government occupiers in the same property. It also provides information about the ‘holding’ government department and, if relevant, the arm’s length body of the department responsible for the property. This dataset contains non sensitive information on the government estate e.g. commercially sensitive contract data is not published. The dataset also excludes property records that are classed as sensitive e.g. for national security purposes.

    All data provided via these data sets are as reported to the Cabinet Office by the holding departments.

    Property and Contracts

    This dataset covers properties and their associated contracts. A property may have more than one contract associated with it. This data set includes information such as Ownership, Location, Size, Usage, Asset type (Building or Land), Contract Name and Contracted Organisation.

    Building

    Properties can be made up of one or more buildings and are linked to the property via a property reference. Characteristics such as Building Ownership, Location, Floor Area, Usage, Size and Construction Date are recorded and this entity is linked to the property via the property reference.

    Land

    Whilst properties can be made up of Building(s) and Land they can also refer exclusively to Land only. Land records include information on Ownership, Location, Size and Usage and this entity is linked to the property via the property reference.

    Occupation

    Occupations highlight which organisations reside within a given property. The following types of information about occupying organisations is recorded: organisation, location, asset type(e.g. Land, Building), size of the occupation (floor area), type of agreement (e.g. sub-let) and the usage (e.g. Office, Court).

    Surplus Property

    When a property is no longer required for the purposes of the organisation that currently holds the asset, it is then designated as being Surplus. These can then be made available for disposal which involves the transfer of a freehold or leasehold by way of sale or other agreement. Data such as Ownership, Location, Size, Usage and Contact Information is recorded for surplus property.

    Vacant Space

    To facilitate better utilisation of the estate; where space is available in properties these can be marked as such and made available to other government departments for co-location purposes. This data set contains Ownership, Location, Size, Information about the Space, and Contact Details.

  15. W

    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Land Ownership

    • wifire-data.sdsc.edu
    • maps-cadoc.opendata.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    csv, esri rest +5
    Updated May 22, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services (2019). California Department of Fish and Wildlife Land Ownership [Dataset]. https://wifire-data.sdsc.edu/dataset/california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife-land-ownership
    Explore at:
    ogc wms, kml, esri rest, geojson, zip, html, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    CA Governor's Office of Emergency Services
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    California
    Description

    The CDFW Owned and Operated Lands and Conservation Easements dataset is a subset of the CDFW Lands dataset. It contains lands owned (fee title), some operated (wildlife areas, ecological reserves, and public/fishing access properties that are leases/agreements with other agencies that may be publicly accessible) and conservation easements held by CDFW. CDFW Owned and Operated Lands and Conservation Easements replaces the prior dataset, DFG Owned and Operated Lands, which included only fee title lands and some operated lands (wildlife areas, ecological reserves, and public/fishing access properties that are leases/agreements with other agencies and that may be publicly accessible). This is a generalized version dataset that has a shorter attribute table than the original and also has been dissolved based on the fields included. Please note that some lands may not be accessible due to the protection of resources and habitat. It is recommended that users contact the appropriate regional office for access information and consult regulations for CDFW lands in Sections 550, 550.1, 551, 552, 630 and 702. The CDFW Lands dataset is a digitized geographical inventory of selected lands owned and/or administered by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Properties such as ecological reserves, wildlife areas, undesignated lands containing biological resource values, public and fishing access lands, and CDFW fish hatcheries are among those lands included in this inventory. Types of properties owned or administered by CDFW which may not be included in this dataset are parcels less than 1 acre in size, such as fishing piers, fish spawning grounds, fish barriers, and other minor parcels. Physical boundaries of individual parcels are determined by the descriptions contained in legal documents and assessor parcel maps relating to that parcel. The approximate parcel boundaries are drawn onto U.S. Geological Survey 7.5'-series topographic maps, then digitized and attributed before being added to the dataset. In some cases, assessor parcel or best available datasets are used to digitize the boundary. Using parcel data to adjust the boundaries is a work in progress and will be incorporated in the future. Township, range, and section lines were based on the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5' series topographic maps (1:24,000 - scale). In some areas, the boundaries will not align with the Bureau of Land Management's Public Lands Survey System (PLSS). See the "SOURCE" field for data used to digitize boundary.


    This dataset is intended to provide information on the location of lands owned and/or administered by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and for general conservation planning within the state. This dataset is not intended for navigational use. Users should contact the CDFW, Wildlife Branch, Lands Program or CDFW Regional offices for access information to a particular property. These datasets do not provide legal determination of parcel acreages or boundaries. Legal parcel acreages are based on County Assessor records. Users should contact the Wildlife Branch, Lands Program for this information and related data. When labeling or displaying properties on any map, use the provided field named "MAPLABEL" or use a generic label such as "conservation lands", "restricted lands", or some other similiar generalized label. All conservation easements are closed to public access.

    This dataset is not a surveyed product and is not a legal record of original survey measurements. They are representations or reproductions of information using various sources, scales, and precision of boundary data. As such, the data do not carry legal authority to determine a boundary, the location of fixed works nor is it suitable for navigational purposes. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall not be held liable for any use or misuse of the data. Users are responsible for ensuring the appropriate use of the data . It is strongly recommended that users acquire this dataset directly from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and not indirectly through other sources which may have outdated or misinterpreted information.

  16. o

    Transfer of ownership of industrial property - Dataset - Open Government...

    • opendata.gov.jo
    Updated Dec 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Transfer of ownership of industrial property - Dataset - Open Government Data Portal [Dataset]. https://opendata.gov.jo/dataset/transfer-of-ownership-of-industrial-property-3453-2024
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 4, 2024
    Description

    Transfer of ownership of industrial property

  17. a

    Parcels and MOD-IV of Hunterdon County, NJ (shp download)

    • share-open-data-njtpa.hub.arcgis.com
    • njogis-newjersey.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 15, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    New Jersey Office of GIS (2025). Parcels and MOD-IV of Hunterdon County, NJ (shp download) [Dataset]. https://share-open-data-njtpa.hub.arcgis.com/documents/d66b1a4ce7d046649f5189e8840a792d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    New Jersey Office of GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    This parcels data set is a spatial representation of municipal tax lots for Hunterdon County, New Jersey that have been extracted from the NJ statewide parcels composite by the NJ Office of Information Technology, Office of GIS (NJOGIS). Parcels at county boundaries have been modified to correspond with the NJ county boundaries and the parcels in adjacent counties.Each parcel contains a field named PAMS_PIN based on a concatenation of the county/municipality code, block number, lot number and qualification code. Using the PAMS_PIN, the dataset can be joined to the MOD-IV database table that contains supplementary attribute information regarding lot ownership and characteristics. Due to irregularities in the data development process, duplicate PAMS_PIN values exist in the parcel records. Users should avoid joining MOD-IV database table records to all parcel records with duplicate PAMS_PINs because of uncertainty regarding whether the MOD-IV records will join to the correct parcel records. There are also parcel records with unique PAMS_PIN values for which there are no corresponding records in the MOD-IV database tables. This is mostly due to the way data are organized in the MOD-IV database.The polygons delineated in the dataset do not represent legal boundaries and should not be used to provide a legal determination of land ownership. Parcels are not survey data and should not be used as such.The MOD-IV (Tax Assessor's) table for the county is packaged together with the parcels as one download. The MOD-IV system provides for uniform preparation, maintenance, presentation and storage of property tax information required by the Constitution of the State of New Jersey, New Jersey Statutes and rules promulgated by the Director of the Division of Taxation. MOD-IV maintains and updates all assessment records and produces all statutorily required tax lists for property tax bills. This list accounts for all parcels of real property as delineated and identified on each municipality's official tax map, as well as taxable values and descriptive data for each parcel. Tax List records were received as raw data from the Taxation Team of NJOIT which collected source information from municipal tax assessors and created the statewide table. This table was subsequently processed for ease of use with NJ tax parcel spatial data and split into an individual table for each county.***NOTE*** For users who incorporate NJOGIS services into web maps and/or web applications, please sign up for the NJ Geospatial Forum discussion listserv for early notification of service changes. Visit https://nj.gov/njgf/about/listserv/ for more information.

  18. Public and Private Forest Ownership Conterminous United States 2020 (Image...

    • data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com
    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • +6more
    Updated Sep 30, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Forest Service (2020). Public and Private Forest Ownership Conterminous United States 2020 (Image Service) [Dataset]. https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/d4ef40c73bb74ac1bccab5e6ac0291ef
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Servicehttp://fs.fed.us/
    Authors
    U.S. Forest Service
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This data product contains raster data depicting the spatial distribution of forest ownership types in the conterminous United States circa 2020. The data are a modeled representation of forest land by ownership type, and include three types of public ownership: federal, state, and local, as well as three types of private: family (includes individuals and families), corporate, and other private (includes conservation and natural resource organizations, unincorporated partnerships and associations, and Native American tribal lands).

  19. D

    OC Land Use 2010

    • detroitdata.org
    • d3-portal-v2-d176b-d3.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 4, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oakland County, Michigan (2024). OC Land Use 2010 [Dataset]. https://detroitdata.org/dataset/oc-land-use-20101
    Explore at:
    kml, arcgis geoservices rest api, geojson, zip, html, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Oakland County, Michigan
    Description
    BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE.
    A spatial representation of land use. The polygons contained in this feature class were derived from the Oakland County Tax Parcel feature class. Each parcel was categorized by its land use. When a parcel has multiple land uses, the dominant land use is shown.

    Assessing records and orthophotography were the main sources used to attribute each tax parcel with land use information. The data was collected in August 2010.

    Key attributes are the land use and key pin (Sidwell number). Land Use stores the Land Use description for each parcel. The Key Pin is the unique Parcel Identification Number (Pin) used to link the parcel to the parcel attributes which are stored and maintained in Oakland County Land Records.

    The 2010 version of land use was created using the 2009 version as a primary source. It was assumed that if the Parcel Identification Number and the Use Code were equal in both years, then the land use did not change. Thus, only the parcels where a change occured had to be assigned a land use. To ensure the quality of the land use data, however, several types of use codes were manually checked again for the 2010 update to enusre the assigned use is still accurate. Also, reference data such as the Adult Care, Public Beach, and Recreation Land feature classes the were used to locate misrepresented parcels.

    The development process consists of three basic steps. First, parcels with use codes that are assumed to relate to a single land use are categorized as such. Second, parcels with a use code that is assumed to relate to more than one land use are manually classified using orthophotography and ownership as a reference. Lastly, tax parcels, right-of-way, and hydrography are unioned to create a single land use dataset.

    Assumptions:

    In 2005, Oakland County Equalization and many of the local assessors have changed from using the use codes described below to property class codes. These codes were interpreted to simliar use codes for the purpose of this data. One major change is that tax exempt property is no longer recorded using the "ME, Miscellaneous Exempt" use code, but are instead usually classifed as "RV, Residential Vacant." The "Taxable" field was referenced to locate tax exempt property such as schools, churches, and governemnt-owned property during this land use update.

    Any parcel classified as vacant may be an accessory use to an adjacent, commonly owned, improved parcel. In this event, the vacant parcel is reclassified as the use of the adjacent, commonly owned, improved parcel. It should be noted, however, that parcels with use codes of RV, SV, and LV, that represent a single family vacant use, are exempt from this assumption.

    Parcels with an Equalization use code of RV, SV, or LV may include uses to be reclassified as Vacant or Recreation & Conservation (due to subdivision open space). These parcels are not manually checked. Queries are conducted to search for those parcels that are subdivision open space. The following strings are queried from the Owner1 and Owner2 fields: "*own*" (unknown, homeowner), "ass*" (association, ass'n, etc), and "park."

    The Equalization use code BI, Business Improved includes uses that are reclassified as Commercial/Office. Uses may also fall into Public/Institutional, however, all BI parcels are not manually checked for reclassification.

    The Equalization use code MM, Miscellaneous Business includes uses that are reclassified as Recreation and Conservation, Multiple Family, Commercial/Office, or Mobile Home Park.

    The Equalization use code ME, Miscellaneous Exempt includes uses that are reclassified as Recreation & Conservation, Public/Institutional, Transportation, Utility & Communication, Industrial (municipal landfills), or any Single Family classification.

    The Equalization use code KI, Condominium Improved includes uses that are reclassified as Multiple Family, Single Family, or Commercial/Office.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of FI, Farm Improved or FV, Farm Vacant is considered to be an active agricultural use.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of II, Industrial Improved is considered to be an industrial use.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of FC, Farm Conservation is considered to be a recreational/conservation use.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of AI, Apartment Improved is considered to be a multiple family residential use.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of UI, Utility Improved is considered to be a transportation, utility, or communication related use.

    Parcels with an Equalization use code of DI, Developmental Improved are reclassified as Single Family or Vacant.

    Any parcel with an Equalization use code of DV for Developmental Vacant may be reclassified as Vacant, Recreation & Conservation, (golf courses) or Industrial (mining or extractive).

    Polygons in the ROW region of the parcel coverage will be classified as Recreation and Conservation, and Commercial/Office, Vacant, Road ROW, and Railroad ROW.

    Because of inconsistencies in Use Code data, unique uses, and the goal of creating an accurate coverage that is not limited by its metadata, there may be exceptions from these assumptions.

    Exceptions:

    There are nine isolated cases where the land use would be tremendously overstated if the whole parcel was shown in a single use. In these cases, the polygon was split to show the use of the rest of the parcel vacant. These parcels are listed below:

    01-29-451-001
    01-35-300-014
    04-08-200-002
    04-24-100-004
    07-13-301-006
    14-04-376-002
    18-19-476-015
    21-10-200-001
    21-10-200-002
  20. r

    Historical Property 08

    • redivis.com
    Updated Nov 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stanford University Libraries (2025). Historical Property 08 [Dataset]. https://redivis.com/datasets/e9sx-cn4k3cyva
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Stanford University Libraries
    Description

    The table Historical Property 08 is part of the dataset Cotality Smart Data Platform: Historical Property, available at https://stanford.redivis.com/datasets/e9sx-cn4k3cyva. It contains 149059118 rows across 220 variables.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2019). California Land Ownership [Dataset]. https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::california-land-ownership
Organization logo

California Land Ownership

Explore at:
29 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Sep 14, 2019
Dataset authored and provided by
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protectionhttp://calfire.ca.gov/
Area covered
Description

This dataset was updated May, 2025.This ownership dataset was generated primarily from CPAD data, which already tracks the majority of ownership information in California. CPAD is utilized without any snapping or clipping to FRA/SRA/LRA. CPAD has some important data gaps, so additional data sources are used to supplement the CPAD data. Currently this includes the most currently available data from BIA, DOD, and FWS. Additional sources may be added in subsequent versions. Decision rules were developed to identify priority layers in areas of overlap.Starting in 2022, the ownership dataset was compiled using a new methodology. Previous versions attempted to match federal ownership boundaries to the FRA footprint, and used a manual process for checking and tracking Federal ownership changes within the FRA, with CPAD ownership information only being used for SRA and LRA lands. The manual portion of that process was proving difficult to maintain, and the new method (described below) was developed in order to decrease the manual workload, and increase accountability by using an automated process by which any final ownership designation could be traced back to a specific dataset.The current process for compiling the data sources includes:* Clipping input datasets to the California boundary* Filtering the FWS data on the Primary Interest field to exclude lands that are managed by but not owned by FWS (ex: Leases, Easements, etc)* Supplementing the BIA Pacific Region Surface Trust lands data with the Western Region portion of the LAR dataset which extends into California.* Filtering the BIA data on the Trust Status field to exclude areas that represent mineral rights only.* Filtering the CPAD data on the Ownership Level field to exclude areas that are Privately owned (ex: HOAs)* In the case of overlap, sources were prioritized as follows: FWS > BIA > CPAD > DOD* As an exception to the above, DOD lands on FRA which overlapped with CPAD lands that were incorrectly coded as non-Federal were treated as an override, such that the DOD designation could win out over CPAD.In addition to this ownership dataset, a supplemental _source dataset is available which designates the source that was used to determine the ownership in this dataset. Data Sources:* GreenInfo Network's California Protected Areas Database (CPAD2023a). https://www.calands.org/cpad/; https://www.calands.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CPAD-2023a-Database-Manual.pdf* US Fish and Wildlife Service FWSInterest dataset (updated December, 2023). https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/9c49bd03b8dc4b9188a8c84062792cff_0/explore* Department of Defense Military Bases dataset (updated September 2023) https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/military-bases* Bureau of Indian Affairs, Pacific Region, Surface Trust and Pacific Region Office (PRO) land boundaries data (2023) via John Mosley John.Mosley@bia.gov* Bureau of Indian Affairs, Land Area Representations (LAR) and BIA Regions datasets (updated Oct 2019) https://biamaps.doi.gov/bogs/datadownload.html Data Gaps & Changes:Known gaps include several BOR, ACE and Navy lands which were not included in CPAD nor the DOD MIRTA dataset. Our hope for future versions is to refine the process by pulling in additional data sources to fill in some of those data gaps. Additionally, any feedback received about missing or inaccurate data can be taken back to the appropriate source data where appropriate, so fixes can occur in the source data, instead of just in this dataset.25_1: The CPAD Input dataset was amended to merge large gaps in certain areas of the state known to be erroneous, such as Yosemite National Park, and to eliminate overlaps from the original input. The FWS input dataset was updated in February of 2025, and the DOD input dataset was updated in October of 2024. The BIA input dataset was the same as was used for the previous ownership version.24_1: Input datasets this year included numerous changes since the previous version, particularly the CPAD and DOD inputs. Of particular note was the re-addition of Camp Pendleton to the DOD input dataset, which is reflected in this version of the ownership dataset. We were unable to obtain an updated input for tribral data, so the previous inputs was used for this version.23_1: A few discrepancies were discovered between data changes that occurred in CPAD when compared with parcel data. These issues will be taken to CPAD for clarification for future updates, but for ownership23_1 it reflects the data as it was coded in CPAD at the time. In addition, there was a change in the DOD input data between last year and this year, with the removal of Camp Pendleton. An inquiry was sent for clarification on this change, but for ownership23_1 it reflects the data per the DOD input dataset.22_1 : represents an initial version of ownership with a new methodology which was developed under a short timeframe. A comparison with previous versions of ownership highlighted the some data gaps with the current version. Some of these known gaps include several BOR, ACE and Navy lands which were not included in CPAD nor the DOD MIRTA dataset. Our hope for future versions is to refine the process by pulling in additional data sources to fill in some of those data gaps. In addition, any topological errors (like overlaps or gaps) that exist in the input datasets may thus carry over to the ownership dataset. Ideally, any feedback received about missing or inaccurate data can be taken back to the relevant source data where appropriate, so fixes can occur in the source data, instead of just in this dataset.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu