Wirestock's AI/ML Image Training Data, 4.5M Files with Metadata: This data product is a unique offering in the realm of AI/ML training data. What sets it apart is the sheer volume and diversity of the dataset, which includes 4.5 million files spanning across 20 different categories. These categories range from Animals/Wildlife and The Arts to Technology and Transportation, providing a rich and varied dataset for AI/ML applications.
The data is sourced from Wirestock's platform, where creators upload and sell their photos, videos, and AI art online. This means that the data is not only vast but also constantly updated, ensuring a fresh and relevant dataset for your AI/ML needs. The data is collected in a GDPR-compliant manner, ensuring the privacy and rights of the creators are respected.
The primary use-cases for this data product are numerous. It is ideal for training machine learning models for image recognition, improving computer vision algorithms, and enhancing AI applications in various industries such as retail, healthcare, and transportation. The diversity of the dataset also means it can be used for more niche applications, such as training AI to recognize specific objects or scenes.
This data product fits into Wirestock's broader data offering as a key resource for AI/ML training. Wirestock is a platform for creators to sell their work, and this dataset is a collection of that work. It represents the breadth and depth of content available on Wirestock, making it a valuable resource for any company working with AI/ML.
The core benefits of this dataset are its volume, diversity, and quality. With 4.5 million files, it provides a vast resource for AI training. The diversity of the dataset, spanning 20 categories, ensures a wide range of images for training purposes. The quality of the images is also high, as they are sourced from creators selling their work on Wirestock.
In terms of how the data is collected, creators upload their work to Wirestock, where it is then sold on various marketplaces. This means the data is sourced directly from creators, ensuring a diverse and unique dataset. The data includes both the images themselves and associated metadata, providing additional context for each image.
The different image categories included in this dataset are Animals/Wildlife, The Arts, Backgrounds/Textures, Beauty/Fashion, Buildings/Landmarks, Business/Finance, Celebrities, Education, Emotions, Food Drinks, Holidays, Industrial, Interiors, Nature Parks/Outdoor, People, Religion, Science, Signs/Symbols, Sports/Recreation, Technology, Transportation, Vintage, Healthcare/Medical, Objects, and Miscellaneous. This wide range of categories ensures a diverse dataset that can cater to a variety of AI/ML applications.
https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Ai Training Data market size is USD 1865.2 million in 2023 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.50% from 2023 to 2030.
The demand for Ai Training Data is rising due to the rising demand for labelled data and diversification of AI applications.
Demand for Image/Video remains higher in the Ai Training Data market.
The Healthcare category held the highest Ai Training Data market revenue share in 2023.
North American Ai Training Data will continue to lead, whereas the Asia-Pacific Ai Training Data market will experience the most substantial growth until 2030.
Market Dynamics of AI Training Data Market
Key Drivers of AI Training Data Market
Rising Demand for Industry-Specific Datasets to Provide Viable Market Output
A key driver in the AI Training Data market is the escalating demand for industry-specific datasets. As businesses across sectors increasingly adopt AI applications, the need for highly specialized and domain-specific training data becomes critical. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and automotive require datasets that reflect the nuances and complexities unique to their domains. This demand fuels the growth of providers offering curated datasets tailored to specific industries, ensuring that AI models are trained with relevant and representative data, leading to enhanced performance and accuracy in diverse applications.
In July 2021, Amazon and Hugging Face, a provider of open-source natural language processing (NLP) technologies, have collaborated. The objective of this partnership was to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated NLP capabilities while making it easier for businesses to use cutting-edge machine-learning models. Following this partnership, Hugging Face will suggest Amazon Web Services as a cloud service provider for its clients.
(Source: about:blank)
Advancements in Data Labelling Technologies to Propel Market Growth
The continuous advancements in data labelling technologies serve as another significant driver for the AI Training Data market. Efficient and accurate labelling is essential for training robust AI models. Innovations in automated and semi-automated labelling tools, leveraging techniques like computer vision and natural language processing, streamline the data annotation process. These technologies not only improve the speed and scalability of dataset preparation but also contribute to the overall quality and consistency of labelled data. The adoption of advanced labelling solutions addresses industry challenges related to data annotation, driving the market forward amidst the increasing demand for high-quality training data.
In June 2021, Scale AI and MIT Media Lab, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology research centre, began working together. To help doctors treat patients more effectively, this cooperation attempted to utilize ML in healthcare.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325854/
Restraint Factors Of AI Training Data Market
Data Privacy and Security Concerns to Restrict Market Growth
A significant restraint in the AI Training Data market is the growing concern over data privacy and security. As the demand for diverse and expansive datasets rises, so does the need for sensitive information. However, the collection and utilization of personal or proprietary data raise ethical and privacy issues. Companies and data providers face challenges in ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding against unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. Addressing these concerns becomes imperative to gain user trust and navigate the evolving landscape of data protection laws, which, in turn, poses a restraint on the smooth progression of the AI Training Data market.
How did COVID–19 impact the Ai Training Data market?
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a multifaceted impact on the AI Training Data market. While the demand for AI solutions has accelerated across industries, the availability and collection of training data faced challenges. The pandemic disrupted traditional data collection methods, leading to a slowdown in the generation of labeled datasets due to restrictions on physical operations. Simultaneously, the surge in remote work and the increased reliance on AI-driven technologies for various applications fueled the need for diverse and relevant training data. This duali...
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The U.S. AI Training Dataset Market size was valued at USD 590.4 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 1880.70 million by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 18.0 % during the forecasts period. The U. S. AI training dataset market deals with the generation, selection, and organization of datasets used in training artificial intelligence. These datasets contain the requisite information that the machine learning algorithms need to infer and learn from. Conducts include the advancement and improvement of AI solutions in different fields of business like transport, medical analysis, computing language, and money related measurements. The applications include training the models for activities such as image classification, predictive modeling, and natural language interface. Other emerging trends are the change in direction of more and better-quality, various and annotated data for the improvement of model efficiency, synthetic data generation for data shortage, and data confidentiality and ethical issues in dataset management. Furthermore, due to arising technologies in artificial intelligence and machine learning, there is a noticeable development in building and using the datasets. Recent developments include: In February 2024, Google struck a deal worth USD 60 million per year with Reddit that will give the former real-time access to the latter’s data and use Google AI to enhance Reddit’s search capabilities. , In February 2024, Microsoft announced around USD 2.1 billion investment in Mistral AI to expedite the growth and deployment of large language models. The U.S. giant is expected to underpin Mistral AI with Azure AI supercomputing infrastructure to provide top-notch scale and performance for AI training and inference workloads. .
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Deep learning (DL) models of code have recently reported great progress for vulnerability detection. In some cases, DL-based models have outperformed static analysis tools. Although many great models have been proposed, we do not yet have a good understanding of these models. This limits the further advancement of model robustness, debugging, and deployment for the vulnerability detection. In this paper, we surveyed and reproduced 9 state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep learning models on 2 widely used vulnerability detection datasets: Devign and MSR. We investigated 6 research questions in three areas, namely model capabilities, training data, and model interpretation. We experimentally demonstrated the variability between different runs of a model and the low agreement among different models’ outputs. We investigated models trained for specific types of vulnerabilities compared to a model that is trained on all the vulnerabilities at once. We explored the types of programs DL may consider ”hard” to handle. We investigated the relations of training data sizes and training data composition with model performance. Finally, we studied model interpretations and analyzed important features that the models used to make predictions. We believe that our findings can help better understand model results, provide guidance on preparing training data, and improve the robustness of the models.
Round 2 Training DatasetThe data being generated and disseminated is the training data used to construct trojan detection software solutions. This data, generated at NIST, consists of human level AIs trained to perform image classification. A known percentage of these trained AI models have been poisoned with a known trigger which induces incorrect behavior. This data will be used to develop software solutions for detecting which trained AI models have been poisoned via embedded triggers. This dataset consists of 1104 trained, human level, image classification AI models using a variety of model architectures. The models were trained on synthetically created image data of non-real traffic signs superimposed on road background scenes. Half (50%) of the models have been poisoned with an embedded trigger which causes misclassification of the images when the trigger is present.
This statistical data set includes information on education and training participation and achievements broken down into a number of reports including sector subject areas, participation by gender, age, ethnicity, disability participation.
It also includes data on offender learning.
If you need help finding data please refer to the table finder tool to search for specific breakdowns available for FE statistics.
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata"><span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute">MS Excel Spreadsheet</span>, <span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute">33 MB</span></p>
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata">This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.</p>
<details class="gem-c-details govuk-details govuk-!-margin-bottom-3" data-module="govuk-details gem-details ga4-event-tracker">
Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email <a href="mailto:alternative.formats@education.gov.uk" target="_blank" class="govuk-link">alternative.formats@education.gov.uk</a>. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Accurate methods to predict solubility from molecular structure are highly sought after in the chemical sciences. To assess the state of the art, the American Chemical Society organized a “Second Solubility Challenge” in 2019, in which competitors were invited to submit blinded predictions of the solubilities of 132 drug-like molecules. In the first part of this article, we describe the development of two models that were submitted to the Blind Challenge in 2019 but which have not previously been reported. These models were based on computationally inexpensive molecular descriptors and traditional machine learning algorithms and were trained on a relatively small data set of 300 molecules. In the second part of the article, to test the hypothesis that predictions would improve with more advanced algorithms and higher volumes of training data, we compare these original predictions with those made after the deadline using deep learning models trained on larger solubility data sets consisting of 2999 and 5697 molecules. The results show that there are several algorithms that are able to obtain near state-of-the-art performance on the solubility challenge data sets, with the best model, a graph convolutional neural network, resulting in an RMSE of 0.86 log units. Critical analysis of the models reveals systematic differences between the performance of models using certain feature sets and training data sets. The results suggest that careful selection of high quality training data from relevant regions of chemical space is critical for prediction accuracy but that other methodological issues remain problematic for machine learning solubility models, such as the difficulty in modeling complex chemical spaces from sparse training data sets.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global Artificial Intelligence (AI) Training Dataset market is projected to reach $1605.2 million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 9.4% from 2025 to 2033. The surge in demand for AI training datasets is driven by the increasing adoption of AI and machine learning technologies in various industries such as healthcare, financial services, and manufacturing. Moreover, the growing need for reliable and high-quality data for training AI models is further fueling the market growth. Key market trends include the increasing adoption of cloud-based AI training datasets, the emergence of synthetic data generation, and the growing focus on data privacy and security. The market is segmented by type (image classification dataset, voice recognition dataset, natural language processing dataset, object detection dataset, and others) and application (smart campus, smart medical, autopilot, smart home, and others). North America is the largest regional market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. Key companies operating in the market include Appen, Speechocean, TELUS International, Summa Linguae Technologies, and Scale AI. Artificial Intelligence (AI) training datasets are critical for developing and deploying AI models. These datasets provide the data that AI models need to learn, and the quality of the data directly impacts the performance of the model. The AI training dataset market landscape is complex, with many different providers offering datasets for a variety of applications. The market is also rapidly evolving, as new technologies and techniques are developed for collecting, labeling, and managing AI training data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
You have been assigned a new project, which you have researched, and you have identified the data that you need.The next step is to gather, organize, and potentially create the data that you need for your project analysis.In this course, you will learn how to gather and organize data using ArcGIS Pro. You will also create a file geodatabase where you will store the data that you import and create.After completing this course, you will be able to perform the following tasks:Create a geodatabase in ArcGIS Pro.Create feature classes in ArcGIS Pro by exporting and importing data.Create a new, empty feature class in ArcGIS Pro.
As of November 2019, application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC) are forecast to have a growing share of the training phase artificial intelligence (AI) applications in data centers, making up for a projected 50 percent of it by 2025. Comparatively, graphics processing units (GPUs) will lose their presence by that time, dropping from 97 percent down to 40 percent.
AI chips
In order to provide greater security and efficiency, many data centers are overseeing the widespread implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in their processes and systems. AI technologies and tasks require specialized AI chips that are more powerful and optimized for advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms, owning to an overall growth in data center chip revenues.
The edge
An interesting development for the data center industry is the rise of the edge computing. IT infrastructure is moved into edge data centers, specialized facilities that are located nearer to end-users. The global edge data center market size is expected to reach 13.5 billion U.S. dollars in 2024, twice the size of the market in 2020, with experts suggesting that the growth of emerging technologies like 5G and IoT will contribute to this growth.
Coconuts and coconut products are an important commodity in the Tongan economy. Plantations, such as the one in the town of Kolovai, have thousands of trees. Inventorying each of these trees by hand would require lots of time and manpower. Alternatively, tree health and location can be surveyed using remote sensing and deep learning. In this lesson, you'll use the Deep Learning tools in ArcGIS Pro to create training samples and run a deep learning model to identify the trees on the plantation. Then, you'll estimate tree health using a Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI) calculation to determine which trees may need inspection or maintenance.
To detect palm trees and calculate vegetation health, you only need ArcGIS Pro with the Image Analyst extension. To publish the palm tree health data as a feature service, you need ArcGIS Online and the Spatial Analyst extension.
In this lesson you will build skills in these areas:
Learn ArcGIS is a hands-on, problem-based learning website using real-world scenarios. Our mission is to encourage critical thinking, and to develop resources that support STEM education.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
website | paper
AceMath RM Training Data Card
We release the AceMath RM Training data that is used to train the AceMath-7/72B-RM for math outcome reward modeling. Below is the data statistics:
number of unique math questions: 356,058 number of examples: 2,136,348 (each questions have 6 different responses)
Benchmark Results (AceMath-Instruct + AceMath-72B-RM)
We compare AceMath to leading proprietary and open-access math models in above Table. Our… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/AceMath-RM-Training-Data.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global Data Labeling Solution and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $70 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by the burgeoning need for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI models. Key growth drivers include the expanding application of AI in various industries like automotive (autonomous vehicles), healthcare (medical image analysis), and financial services (fraud detection). The increasing availability of diverse data types (text, image/video, audio) further contributes to market growth. However, challenges such as the high cost of data labeling, data privacy concerns, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and execute labeling projects pose certain restraints on market expansion. Segmentation by application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, others) and data type (text, image/video, audio) reveals distinct growth trajectories within the market. The automotive and healthcare sectors currently dominate, but the government and financial services segments are showing promising growth potential. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk, Appen, and Labelbox are leading the market, leveraging their expertise in crowdsourcing, automation, and specialized data labeling solutions. However, the market shows strong potential for innovation, particularly in the development of automated data labeling tools and the expansion of services into niche areas. Regional analysis indicates strong market penetration in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and robust research and development efforts. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years fueled by rapid technological advancements and a rising demand for AI solutions. Further investment in R&D focused on automation, improved data security, and the development of more effective data labeling methodologies will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of this rapidly expanding market.
According to a survey conducted in 2022 in the public sector in South Korea, more than 56 percent answered to use non-customer in-house data for training artificial intelligence (AI) models. More than a third of the surveyed public organizations were using public data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Boat Detection Training is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Boats annotations for 6,135 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
PromptCloud emerges as a pivotal player in the realm of AI and ML training, offering bespoke web data extraction services. Our expertise lies in delivering custom datasets specifically tailored for AI and ML applications, ensuring that businesses and researchers have access to the most relevant and high-quality data for their unique needs.
Our services extend beyond mere data collection. We provide a comprehensive suite of web data extraction solutions, ranging from scraping e-commerce sites for product data, prices, and customer reviews, to extracting complex datasets from a multitude of web sources. This is particularly crucial for training sophisticated AI and ML algorithms, where the quality and specificity of data can significantly influence the outcome.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI and ML, the need for custom-tailored data is paramount. PromptCloud recognizes this necessity and offers customizable web data solutions. Clients can specify their data requirements, including source websites, data collection frequencies, and specific data points, making our service highly adaptable to diverse industry needs.
Our web data extraction services are not only about quantity but also about the quality and reliability of the data provided. We ensure that every dataset undergoes a stringent verification process, guaranteeing accuracy and relevance. This commitment to quality makes PromptCloud an ideal partner for organizations venturing into AI and ML training, where data is not just a requirement but the foundation of innovation and success.
Leveraging our advanced technology and extensive experience, PromptCloud empowers AI and ML endeavors across various sectors, including e-commerce, market research, competitive intelligence, and beyond. Our service is designed to support your AI and ML projects from inception to completion, providing the critical data backbone needed to train intelligent systems and derive actionable insights.
Mobile devices and multimedia content have recently played a central role in conveying information and ideas. In addition, these can also be used effectively for individualized learning situations. Successful mastery of writing and reading skills is considered a key competence for academic and professional success. Particular difficulties in spelling often show a high degree of persistence without appropriate intervention. Based on a BMBF-funded research project, a tablet-based spelling training program with handwritten input and direct feedback on word correctness was developed and applied. The data sets are raw data showing the development of children's spelling skills. They also include the writing movement and pressure of each letter of all children. The data sets indicate that the children's spelling improved as a result of the individualized tablet application., An Android app on a Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 was developed for children in 3 and 4 grades in German elementary school. The app consists of a diagnostic session and training sessions. First, each user (child) starts with the diagnostic session, and analyzed which error categories of writing are weak. The weakest three categories out of 5 categories are considered in training sessions. Training sessions consist of 16 sessions, which are divided into three blocks (5 sessions) and a final session (session no. 16). The training starts with the word lists (35 words) with the weakest category. In the second block (from session no. 6), the second weakest category is considered. In the third block (from session no. 11), the third weakest category is listed. The app considers the user's level. For example, if the user studies over 125 words in the previous block, the number of words in the list increases by 7 words in the next block. If the user studies under 50 words in the previous block, the numb..., Data were collected by an Android app running on Samsung Galaxy Tab S3, Android 8.0.0, made in this lab and named HOT-T. The events were recoded when users push buttons or write letters using the Samsung Spen (stylus pen) on the tablet. Files in the Training folder include pen trajectory data. Each EVENT 'sUp' has PARAM2, which is the trajectory data, but the data is differential values. When you integrate the values to get the position data, you need an initial point. The initial point is in PARAM2 when EVENT is 'sDown'. This calibration information exists in all files in the Lübeck folder. But, not all files in the Hannover folder have the initial point values.
The goal for the Training Data Feed is to securely acquire training data for Federal civilian employees. The collection of training data supports OPM's Government-wide reporting responsibilities and provides valuable input into the evaluation of human capital programs at numerous levels of Government. Agencies are responsible for ensuring that the data reported to OPM via the Training Data Feed is accurate and complete. OPM's authority to require Federal agencies to report training data can be found in Title 5 United States Code, Chapter 4107 and part 410 of Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Federal agencies must report the training data specidied in this guide for each employee and establish a schedule of records to be maintained in accordance with regulations promulgated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and the General Service Administration (GSA). Additional authorities that require Federal agencies to report data can be found in 5 CFR part 293.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Have you ever assessed the quality of your data? Just as you would run spell check before publishing an important document, it is also beneficial to perform a quality control (QC) review before delivering data or map products. This course gives you the opportunity to learn how you can use ArcGIS Data Reviewer to manage and automate the quality control review process. While exploring the fundamental concepts of QC, you will gain hands-on experience configuring and running automated data checks. You will also practice organizing data review and building a comprehensive quality control model. You can easily modify and reuse this QC model over time as your organizational requirements change.After completing this course, you will be able to:Explain the importance of data quality.Select data checks to find specific errors.Apply a workflow to run individual data checks.Build a batch job to run cumulative data checks.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Description
This dataset is the "development dataset" for the DCASE 2023 Challenge Task 2 "First-Shot Unsupervised Anomalous Sound Detection for Machine Condition Monitoring".
The data consists of the normal/anomalous operating sounds of seven types of real/toy machines. Each recording is a single-channel 10-second audio that includes both a machine's operating sound and environmental noise. The following seven types of real/toy machines are used in this task:
ToyCar
ToyTrain
Fan
Gearbox
Bearing
Slide rail
Valve
Overview of the task
Anomalous sound detection (ASD) is the task of identifying whether the sound emitted from a target machine is normal or anomalous. Automatic detection of mechanical failure is an essential technology in the fourth industrial revolution, which involves artificial-intelligence-based factory automation. Prompt detection of machine anomalies by observing sounds is useful for monitoring the condition of machines.
This task is the follow-up from DCASE 2020 Task 2 to DCASE 2022 Task 2. The task this year is to develop an ASD system that meets the following four requirements.
Because anomalies rarely occur and are highly diverse in real-world factories, it can be difficult to collect exhaustive patterns of anomalous sounds. Therefore, the system must detect unknown types of anomalous sounds that are not provided in the training data. This is the same requirement as in the previous tasks.
In real-world cases, the operational states of a machine or the environmental noise can change to cause domain shifts. Domain-generalization techniques can be useful for handling domain shifts that occur frequently or are hard-to-notice. In this task, the system is required to use domain-generalization techniques for handling these domain shifts. This requirement is the same as in DCASE 2022 Task 2.
For a completely new machine type, hyperparameters of the trained model cannot be tuned. Therefore, the system should have the ability to train models without additional hyperparameter tuning.
While sounds from multiple machines of the same machine type can be used to enhance detection performance, it is often the case that sound data from only one machine are available for a machine type. In such a case, the system should be able to train models using only one machine from a machine type.
The last two requirements are newly introduced in DCASE 2023 Task2 as the "first-shot problem".
Definition
We first define key terms in this task: "machine type," "section," "source domain," "target domain," and "attributes.".
"Machine type" indicates the type of machine, which in the development dataset is one of seven: fan, gearbox, bearing, slide rail, valve, ToyCar, and ToyTrain.
A section is defined as a subset of the dataset for calculating performance metrics.
The source domain is the domain under which most of the training data and some of the test data were recorded, and the target domain is a different set of domains under which some of the training data and some of the test data were recorded. There are differences between the source and target domains in terms of operating speed, machine load, viscosity, heating temperature, type of environmental noise, signal-to-noise ratio, etc.
Attributes are parameters that define states of machines or types of noise.
Dataset
This dataset consists of seven machine types. For each machine type, one section is provided, and the section is a complete set of training and test data. For each section, this dataset provides (i) 990 clips of normal sounds in the source domain for training, (ii) ten clips of normal sounds in the target domain for training, and (iii) 100 clips each of normal and anomalous sounds for the test. The source/target domain of each sample is provided. Additionally, the attributes of each sample in the training and test data are provided in the file names and attribute csv files.
File names and attribute csv files
File names and attribute csv files provide reference labels for each clip. The given reference labels for each training/test clip include machine type, section index, normal/anomaly information, and attributes regarding the condition other than normal/anomaly. The machine type is given by the directory name. The section index is given by their respective file names. For the datasets other than the evaluation dataset, the normal/anomaly information and the attributes are given by their respective file names. Attribute csv files are for easy access to attributes that cause domain shifts. In these files, the file names, name of parameters that cause domain shifts (domain shift parameter, dp), and the value or type of these parameters (domain shift value, dv) are listed. Each row takes the following format:
[filename (string)], [d1p (string)], [d1v (int | float | string)], [d2p], [d2v]...
Recording procedure
Normal/anomalous operating sounds of machines and its related equipment are recorded. Anomalous sounds were collected by deliberately damaging target machines. For simplifying the task, we use only the first channel of multi-channel recordings; all recordings are regarded as single-channel recordings of a fixed microphone. We mixed a target machine sound with environmental noise, and only noisy recordings are provided as training/test data. The environmental noise samples were recorded in several real factory environments. We will publish papers on the dataset to explain the details of the recording procedure by the submission deadline.
Directory structure
/dev_data
slider
means "slide rail")Baseline system
The baseline system is available on the Github repository dcase2023_task2_baseline_ae.The baseline systems provide a simple entry-level approach that gives a reasonable performance in the dataset of Task 2. They are good starting points, especially for entry-level researchers who want to get familiar with the anomalous-sound-detection task.
Condition of use
This dataset was created jointly by Hitachi, Ltd. and NTT Corporation and is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite all the following papers. We will publish a paper on the description of the DCASE 2023 Task 2, so pleasure make sure to cite the paper, too.
Noboru Harada, Daisuke Niizumi, Yasunori Ohishi, Daiki Takeuchi, and Masahiro Yasuda. First-shot anomaly detection for machine condition monitoring: A domain generalization baseline. In arXiv e-prints: 2303.00455, 2023. [URL]
Kota Dohi, Tomoya Nishida, Harsh Purohit, Ryo Tanabe, Takashi Endo, Masaaki Yamamoto, Yuki Nikaido, and Yohei Kawaguchi. MIMII DG: sound dataset for malfunctioning industrial machine investigation and inspection for domain generalization task. In Proceedings of the 7th Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events 2022 Workshop (DCASE2022), 31-35. Nancy, France, November 2022, . [URL]
Noboru Harada, Daisuke Niizumi, Daiki Takeuchi, Yasunori Ohishi, Masahiro Yasuda, and Shoichiro Saito. ToyADMOS2: another dataset of miniature-machine operating sounds for anomalous sound detection under domain shift conditions. In Proceedings of the 6th Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events 2021 Workshop (DCASE2021), 1–5. Barcelona, Spain, November 2021. [URL]
Contact
If there is any problem, please contact us:
Kota Dohi, kota.dohi.gr@hitachi.com
Keisuke Imoto, keisuke.imoto@ieee.org
Noboru Harada, noboru@ieee.org
Daisuke Niizumi, daisuke.niizumi.dt@hco.ntt.co.jp
Yohei Kawaguchi, yohei.kawaguchi.xk@hitachi.com
Wirestock's AI/ML Image Training Data, 4.5M Files with Metadata: This data product is a unique offering in the realm of AI/ML training data. What sets it apart is the sheer volume and diversity of the dataset, which includes 4.5 million files spanning across 20 different categories. These categories range from Animals/Wildlife and The Arts to Technology and Transportation, providing a rich and varied dataset for AI/ML applications.
The data is sourced from Wirestock's platform, where creators upload and sell their photos, videos, and AI art online. This means that the data is not only vast but also constantly updated, ensuring a fresh and relevant dataset for your AI/ML needs. The data is collected in a GDPR-compliant manner, ensuring the privacy and rights of the creators are respected.
The primary use-cases for this data product are numerous. It is ideal for training machine learning models for image recognition, improving computer vision algorithms, and enhancing AI applications in various industries such as retail, healthcare, and transportation. The diversity of the dataset also means it can be used for more niche applications, such as training AI to recognize specific objects or scenes.
This data product fits into Wirestock's broader data offering as a key resource for AI/ML training. Wirestock is a platform for creators to sell their work, and this dataset is a collection of that work. It represents the breadth and depth of content available on Wirestock, making it a valuable resource for any company working with AI/ML.
The core benefits of this dataset are its volume, diversity, and quality. With 4.5 million files, it provides a vast resource for AI training. The diversity of the dataset, spanning 20 categories, ensures a wide range of images for training purposes. The quality of the images is also high, as they are sourced from creators selling their work on Wirestock.
In terms of how the data is collected, creators upload their work to Wirestock, where it is then sold on various marketplaces. This means the data is sourced directly from creators, ensuring a diverse and unique dataset. The data includes both the images themselves and associated metadata, providing additional context for each image.
The different image categories included in this dataset are Animals/Wildlife, The Arts, Backgrounds/Textures, Beauty/Fashion, Buildings/Landmarks, Business/Finance, Celebrities, Education, Emotions, Food Drinks, Holidays, Industrial, Interiors, Nature Parks/Outdoor, People, Religion, Science, Signs/Symbols, Sports/Recreation, Technology, Transportation, Vintage, Healthcare/Medical, Objects, and Miscellaneous. This wide range of categories ensures a diverse dataset that can cater to a variety of AI/ML applications.