The benchmark interest rate in the United States was last recorded at 4.50 percent. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Fed Funds Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

In the Annual Budget Document, the Budget Office presents information about the annual cost of various city services/fees for the typical ratepayer. These services and fees include Austin Energy, Austin Water, Austin Resource Recovery, the Clean Community Fee, the Transportation User Fee, the Drainage Utility Fee, and the Property Tax Bill. This dataset supports the SD23 measure, "Dollar amount and percentage increase of major rates and fees for a range of customer types" (EOA.C.5.c). It contains the approved and amended rates for the typical ratepayer, the annual dollar change, and the annual percent change for each service/fee. This dataset can be used to help understand the cost of city services over time. View more details and insights related to this dataset on the story page: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Dollar-Amount-and-Percentage-Increase-of-Major-Rat/56uv-46qi/

Dataset

This dataset was created by @data is life

Released under Apache 2.0

Contents

Household Saving Rate in the United States decreased to 4.50 percent in May from 4.90 percent in April of 2025. This dataset provides - United States Personal Savings Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Fixed 30-year mortgage rates in the United States averaged 6.77 percent in the week ending July 4 of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States MBA 30-Yr Mortgage Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Analysis of ‘Strategic Measure_Dollar Amount and Percentage Increase of Major Rates and Fees’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/40bb1a45-b164-46ef-aa37-c696a74bd962 on 26 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

In the Annual Budget Document, the Budget Office presents information about the annual cost of various city services/fees for the typical ratepayer. These services and fees include Austin Energy, Austin Water, Austin Resource Recovery, the Clean Community Fee, the Transportation User Fee, the Drainage Utility Fee, and the Property Tax Bill.

This dataset supports the SD23 measure, "Dollar amount and percentage increase of major rates and fees for a range of customer types" (EOA.C.5.c). It contains the approved and amended rates for the typical ratepayer, the annual dollar change, and the annual percent change for each service/fee. This dataset can be used to help understand the cost of city services over time.

View more details and insights related to this dataset on the story page: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/Dollar-Amount-and-Percentage-Increase-of-Major-Rat/56uv-46qi/

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

AI Training Dataset Market Outlook

The global AI training dataset market size was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.5% from 2024 to 2032. This substantial growth is driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence across various industries, the necessity for large-scale and high-quality datasets to train AI models, and the ongoing advancements in AI and machine learning technologies.

One of the primary growth factors in the AI training dataset market is the exponential increase in data generation across multiple sectors. With the proliferation of internet usage, the expansion of IoT devices, and the digitalization of industries, there is an unprecedented volume of data being generated daily. This data is invaluable for training AI models, enabling them to learn and make more accurate predictions and decisions. Moreover, the need for diverse and comprehensive datasets to improve AI accuracy and reliability is further propelling market growth.

Another significant factor driving the market is the rising investment in AI and machine learning by both public and private sectors. Governments around the world are recognizing the potential of AI to transform economies and improve public services, leading to increased funding for AI research and development. Simultaneously, private enterprises are investing heavily in AI technologies to gain a competitive edge, enhance operational efficiency, and innovate new products and services. These investments necessitate high-quality training datasets, thereby boosting the market.

The proliferation of AI applications in various industries, such as healthcare, automotive, retail, and finance, is also a major contributor to the growth of the AI training dataset market. In healthcare, AI is being used for predictive analytics, personalized medicine, and diagnostic automation, all of which require extensive datasets for training. The automotive industry leverages AI for autonomous driving and vehicle safety systems, while the retail sector uses AI for personalized shopping experiences and inventory management. In finance, AI assists in fraud detection and risk management. The diverse applications across these sectors underline the critical need for robust AI training datasets.

As the demand for AI applications continues to grow, the role of Ai Data Resource Service becomes increasingly vital. These services provide the necessary infrastructure and tools to manage, curate, and distribute datasets efficiently. By leveraging Ai Data Resource Service, organizations can ensure that their AI models are trained on high-quality and relevant data, which is crucial for achieving accurate and reliable outcomes. The service acts as a bridge between raw data and AI applications, streamlining the process of data acquisition, annotation, and validation. This not only enhances the performance of AI systems but also accelerates the development cycle, enabling faster deployment of AI-driven solutions across various sectors.

Regionally, North America currently dominates the AI training dataset market due to the presence of major technology companies and extensive R&D activities in the region. However, Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by rapid technological advancements, increasing investments in AI, and the growing adoption of AI technologies across various industries in countries like China, India, and Japan. Europe and Latin America are also anticipated to experience significant growth, supported by favorable government policies and the increasing use of AI in various sectors.

Data Type Analysis

The data type segment of the AI training dataset market encompasses text, image, audio, video, and others. Each data type plays a crucial role in training different types of AI models, and the demand for specific data types varies based on the application. Text data is extensively used in natural language processing (NLP) applications such as chatbots, sentiment analysis, and language translation. As the use of NLP is becoming more widespread, the demand for high-quality text datasets is continually rising. Companies are investing in curated text datasets that encompass diverse languages and dialects to improve the accuracy and efficiency of NLP models.

Image data is critical for computer vision application

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Rising Sun population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Rising Sun across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Rising Sun was 2,228, a 1.85% decrease year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Rising Sun population was 2,270, an increase of 1.02% compared to a population of 2,247 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Rising Sun decreased by 195. In this period, the peak population was 2,423 in the year 2000. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Rising Sun is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Rising Sun population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Rising Sun Population by Year. You can refer the same here

The benchmark interest rate In the Euro Area was last recorded at 2.15 percent. This dataset provides - Euro Area Interest Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Graph and download economic data for Personal Saving Rate (PSAVERT) from Jan 1959 to May 2025 about savings, personal, rate, and USA.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Rising Star population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Rising Star across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Rising Star was 771, a 0.52% increase year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Rising Star population was 767, an increase of 1.46% compared to a population of 756 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Rising Star decreased by 71. In this period, the peak population was 853 in the year 2002. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Rising Star is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Rising Star population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Rising Star Population by Year. You can refer the same here

Delta flights usually get more expensive near the travel date, especially during peak seasons +1-844-(213)-(8648). But last-minute deals can still pop up. For real-time pricing, call +1-844-(213)-(8648) (USA).

Note: Find data at source. ・ Federal and state decarbonization goals have led to numerous financial incentives and policies designed to increase access and adoption of renewable energy systems. In combination with the declining cost of both solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems and rising electric utility rates, residential renewable adoption has become more favorable than ever. However, not all states provide the same opportunity for cost recovery, and the complicated and changing policy and utility landscape can make it difficult for households to make an informed decision on whether to install a renewable system. This paper is intended to provide a guide to households considering renewable adoption by introducing relevant factors that influence renewable system performance and payback, summarized in a state lookup table for quick reference. Five states are chosen as case studies to perform economic optimizations based on net metering policy, utility rate structure, and average electric utility price; these states are selected to be representative of the possible combinations of factors to aid in the decision-making process for customers in all states. The results of this analysis highlight the dual importance of both state support for renewables and price signals, as the benefits of residential renewable systems are best realized in states with net metering policies facing the challenge of above-average electric utility rates.This dataset is intended to allow readers to reproduce and customize the analysis performed in this work to their benefit. Suggested modifications include: location, household load profile, rate tariff structure, and renewable energy system design.

This dataset contains data on natural increase rate of population (per 1000 population) in Latvia in 1919-1939. Data in the cells (year by administrative region) were computed by multiplying the number of natural increase of population by 1000 and dividing by number of the mid-year population. For sources of the data see metadata field Origin of Sources below. Dataset "Rate of Natural Increase of Population (per 1000 Population) in Latvia, 1919-1939" was published implementing project "Historical Sociology of Modern Restorations: a Cross-Time Comparative Study of Post-Communist Transformation in the Baltic States" from 2018 to 2022. Project leader is prof. Zenonas Norkus. Project is funded by the European Social Fund according to the activity "Improvement of researchers' qualification by implementing world-class R&D projects' of Measure No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712".

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Rising City, NE population pyramid, which represents the Rising City population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Rising City, NE, is 21.5.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Rising City, NE, is 27.6.
• Total dependency ratio for Rising City, NE is 49.2.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Rising City, NE is 3.6.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Rising City population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Rising City for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Rising City for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Rising City for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Rising City Population by Age. You can refer the same here

It has long been suspected, given the salience of gasoline prices, that fluctuations in gasoline prices shift households' 1-year inflation expectations. Assessing this view empirically requires the use of dynamic structural models to quantify the cumulative effect of gasoline price shocks on household inflation expectations at each point in time. We find that, on average, gasoline price shocks account for 42% of the variation in these expectations. The cumulative increase in household inflation expectations from early 2009 to early 2013, in particular, is almost entirely explained by unexpectedly rising gasoline prices. However, there is no support for the view that the improved fit of the Phillips curve augmented by household inflation expectations during 2009 2013 is mainly explained by rising gasoline prices.

Updates

• Notice of data discontinuation: Since the start of the pandemic, AP has reported case and death counts from data provided by Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University has announced that they will stop their daily data collection efforts after March 10. As Johns Hopkins stops providing data, the AP will also stop collecting daily numbers for COVID cases and deaths. The HHS and CDC now collect and visualize key metrics for the pandemic. AP advises using those resources when reporting on the pandemic going forward.

  • CDC Weekly case and death counts (national and state level)
  • CDC County level cases and deaths
  • HHS New hospital admissions
  • CDC NowCast COVID variant proportions (national and regional level)

• April 9, 2020

  • The population estimate data for New York County, NY has been updated to include all five New York City counties (Kings County, Queens County, Bronx County, Richmond County and New York County). This has been done to match the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 data, which aggregates counts for the five New York City counties to New York County.

• April 20, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins death totals in the US now include confirmed and probable deaths in accordance with CDC guidelines as of April 14. One significant result of this change was an increase of more than 3,700 deaths in the New York City count. This change will likely result in increases for death counts elsewhere as well. The AP does not alter the Johns Hopkins source data, so probable deaths are included in this dataset as well.

• April 29, 2020

  • The AP is now providing timeseries data for counts of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The raw counts are provided here unaltered, along with a population column with Census ACS-5 estimates and calculated daily case and death rates per 100,000 people. Please read the updated caveats section for more information.

• September 1st, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins is now providing counts for the five New York City counties individually.

• February 12, 2021

  • The Ohio Department of Health recently announced that as many as 4,000 COVID-19 deaths may have been underreported through the state’s reporting system, and that the "daily reported death counts will be high for a two to three-day period."
  • Because deaths data will be anomalous for consecutive days, we have chosen to freeze Ohio's rolling average for daily deaths at the last valid measure until Johns Hopkins is able to back-distribute the data. The raw daily death counts, as reported by Johns Hopkins and including the backlogged death data, will still be present in the new_deaths column.

• February 16, 2021

  - Johns Hopkins has reconciled Ohio's historical deaths data with the state.

  Overview

The AP is using data collected by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering as our source for outbreak caseloads and death counts for the United States and globally.

The Hopkins data is available at the county level in the United States. The AP has paired this data with population figures and county rural/urban designations, and has calculated caseload and death rates per 100,000 people. Be aware that caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.

This data is from the Hopkins dashboard that is updated regularly throughout the day. Like all organizations dealing with data, Hopkins is constantly refining and cleaning up their feed, so there may be brief moments where data does not appear correctly. At this link, you’ll find the Hopkins daily data reports, and a clean version of their feed.

The AP is updating this dataset hourly at 45 minutes past the hour.

To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

Queries

Use AP's queries to filter the data or to join to other datasets we've made available to help cover the coronavirus pandemic

• Filter cases by state here

• Rank states by their status as current hotspots. Calculates the 7-day rolling average of new cases per capita in each state: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=481e82a4-1b2f-41c2-9ea1-d91aa4b3b1ac

• Find recent hotspots within your state by running a query to calculate the 7-day rolling average of new cases by capita in each county: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=b566f1db-3231-40fe-8099-311909b7b687&showTemplatePreview=true

• Join county-level case data to an earlier dataset released by AP on local hospital capacity here. To find out more about the hospital capacity dataset, see the full details.

• Pull the 100 counties with the highest per-capita confirmed cases here

• Rank all the counties by the highest per-capita rate of new cases in the past 7 days here. Be aware that because this ranks per-capita caseloads, very small counties may rise to the very top, so take into account raw caseload figures as well.

Interactive

The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 cases reported by Johns Hopkins.

@(https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/15/)

Interactive Embed Code

<iframe title="USA counties (2018) choropleth map Mapping COVID-19 cases by county" aria-describedby="" id="datawrapper-chart-nRyaf" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/10/" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="400"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">(function() {'use strict';window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {if (typeof event.data['datawrapper-height'] !== 'undefined') {for (var chartId in event.data['datawrapper-height']) {var iframe = document.getElementById('datawrapper-chart-' + chartId) || document.querySelector("iframe[src*='" + chartId + "']");if (!iframe) {continue;}iframe.style.height = event.data['datawrapper-height'][chartId] + 'px';}}});})();</script>

Caveats

• This data represents the number of cases and deaths reported by each state and has been collected by Johns Hopkins from a number of sources cited on their website.
• In some cases, deaths or cases of people who've crossed state lines -- either to receive treatment or because they became sick and couldn't return home while traveling -- are reported in a state they aren't currently in, because of state reporting rules.
• In some states, there are a number of cases not assigned to a specific county -- for those cases, the county name is "unassigned to a single county"
• This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking project. The AP is simply making it available here for ease of use for reporters and members.
• Caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.
• Population estimates at the county level are drawn from 2014-18 5-year estimates from the American Community Survey.
• The Urban/Rural classification scheme is from the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's National Center for Health Statistics. It puts each county into one of six categories -- from Large Central Metro to Non-Core -- according to population and other characteristics. More details about the classifications can be found here.

Johns Hopkins timeseries data - Johns Hopkins pulls data regularly to update their dashboard. Once a day, around 8pm EDT, Johns Hopkins adds the counts for all areas they cover to the timeseries file. These counts are snapshots of the latest cumulative counts provided by the source on that day. This can lead to inconsistencies if a source updates their historical data for accuracy, either increasing or decreasing the latest cumulative count. - Johns Hopkins periodically edits their historical timeseries data for accuracy. They provide a file documenting all errors in their timeseries files that they have identified and fixed here

Attribution

This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 tracking project

Dataset Description: Predict Cryptocurrency Prices

This dataset contains various attributes that can be used to predict cryptocurrency prices. The data includes a range of features related to market and technical indicators. Each row represents a specific time period with the following columns:

• hp: Health Points at a given time.
• hpperlevel: Increase in health points per level.
• mp: Mana Points at a given time.
• mpperlevel: Increase in mana points per level.
• movespeed: Movement speed.
• armor: Armor value.
• armorperlevel: Increase in armor per level.
• spellblock: Spell blocking capability.
• spellblockperlevel: Increase in spell blocking per level.
• attackrange: Attack range.
• hpregen: Health points regeneration rate.
• hpregenperlevel: Increase in health points regeneration per level.
• mpregen: Mana points regeneration rate.
• mpregenperlevel: Increase in mana points regeneration per level.
• crit: Critical hit rate.
• critperlevel: Increase in critical hit rate per level.
• attackdamage: Attack damage value.
• attackdamageperlevel: Increase in attack damage per level.
• attackspeedperlevel: Increase in attack speed per level.
• attackspeed: Attack speed.
• name: Name of the cryptocurrency.

Potential Uses

This dataset can be used for various predictive modeling tasks, including but not limited to: - Predicting future cryptocurrency prices based on historical data. - Analyzing the impact of different attributes on price changes. - Building machine learning models to forecast market trends.

Acknowledgements

Please provide proper attribution if you use this dataset in your work or research.

This study examined how indirect fire effects (improved forage quality) affect the density of and offtake by grasshoppers at two different times since fire and in unburned plots. Data include total aboveground forage removal inside and outside grasshopper exclosures, crude protein content of aboveground plant material, and grasshopper densities throughout the study period. Both forage offtake and grasshopper density were significantly higher in burned plots compared to unburned plots. Burned plot grasshopper density increased over time, with greater rates of increase in recently burned plots, while density remained constant in unburned locations. These density and offtake patterns appear to be the result of higher crude protein content in burned plots, on account of them having a much higher proportion of recent growth after fire removed aboveground senesced material. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Rangeland fire grasshopper forage data. File Name: RangelandFireGrasshopperForage.xlsxResource Description: Excel file containing plot-level data used in formal analysis.Resource Title: Script. File Name: ScriptSupplement.pdfResource Description: R script used for data wrangling and statistical analysisResource Software Recommended: R 4.0.3,url: https://cran.r-project.org

This Hotel Dataset: Rates, Reviews & Amenities(6k+) dataset includes hotel rates, guest reviews, and available amenities from two popular travel websites, TripAdvisor and Booking.com. The dataset can be used to analyze trends and insights in the hospitality industry, and inform decisions related to pricing, marketing, and customer service. Booking.com: Founded in 1996 in Amsterdam, Booking.com has grown from a small Dutch start-up to one of the world’s leading digital travel companies. Part of Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG), Booking.com’s mission is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world.

By investing in technology that takes the friction out of travel, Booking.com seamlessly connects millions of travelers to memorable experiences, a variety of transportation options, and incredible places to stay – from homes to hotels, and much more. As one of the world’s largest travel marketplaces for both established brands and entrepreneurs of all sizes, Booking.com enables properties around the world to reach a global audience and grow their businesses.

Booking.com is available in 43 languages and offers more than 28 million reported accommodation listings, including over 6.6 million homes, apartments, and other unique places to stay. Wherever you want to go and whatever you want to do, Booking.com makes it easy and supports you with 24/7 customer support. Tripadvisor, the world's largest travel guidance platform*, helps hundreds of millions of people each month** become better travelers, from planning to booking to taking a trip. Travelers across the globe use the Tripadvisor site and app to discover where to stay, what to do and where to eat based on guidance from those who have been there before. With more than 1 billion reviews and opinions of nearly 8 million businesses, travelers turn to Tripadvisor to find deals on accommodations, book experiences, reserve tables at delicious restaurants and discover great places nearby. As a travel guidance company available in 43 markets and 22 languages, Tripadvisor makes planning easy no matter the trip type. The subsidiaries of Tripadvisor, Inc. (Nasdaq: TRIP), own and operate a portfolio of travel media brands and businesses, operating under various websites and apps.