It is a Web App Builder Application:Features: 1)Find nearest WiFI site and direction , 2) Search for wifi site and direction.Widgets : Near Me and DirectionData: CityPublicWifiSites (SDEP)Map Services : https://maps.phoenix.gov/pub/rest/services/Public/CityWiFiSites/MapServer

The global store locator software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to enhance customer experience and improve omnichannel strategies. The market, estimated at $250 million in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the rising adoption of mobile devices and location-based services empowers consumers to easily find nearby stores, increasing demand for user-friendly and feature-rich store locator solutions. Secondly, the expanding e-commerce landscape necessitates seamless integration between online and offline channels. Store locator software plays a crucial role in this integration, enabling businesses to provide accurate location information, store hours, and inventory data, thus improving customer satisfaction and driving sales. Furthermore, advanced features such as real-time inventory updates, route optimization, and integration with other business systems are enhancing the value proposition of these solutions, attracting more businesses of all sizes. However, the market also faces some challenges. The high initial investment cost for sophisticated software can be a barrier to entry for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Competition is also intensifying, with established players and new entrants vying for market share. Data security and privacy concerns related to collecting and utilizing customer location data also represent a significant restraint. Despite these challenges, the long-term growth prospects remain positive, driven by the ongoing digital transformation of retail and the increasing focus on improving customer experience. The market is segmented by software type (cloud-based, on-premise), deployment mode, enterprise size, and geography, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares. Leading players such as Yext, Chatmeter, and Brandify are constantly innovating to enhance their offerings and maintain their competitive edge. This involves incorporating advanced mapping technologies, AI-powered features, and improved integrations to meet the evolving needs of businesses.

• Use the favourite houses layer to add houses you have seen (and loved) for sale. - Use the Schools Near Me widget to find the distance from a specified address and the nearest schools in the area

This dashboard defaults to a presentation of the crash points that will cluster the crash types and determine a predominant crash type. In the case two crash types have the same number of crashes for that type the predominant type will not be colored to either of the crash types. Clicking on the clusters will include a basic analysis of the cluster. These clusters are dynamic and will change as the user zooms in an out of the map. The clustering of crashes is functionality availalble in ArcGIS Online and the popups for the clusters is based on items that include elements configured with the Arcade language. Users interested in learning more about point clustering and the configuration of popups should read through some of the examples of the following ESRI Article (https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/summarize-and-explore-point-clusters-with-arcade-in-popups/) . The dashboard itself does include a map widget that does allow the user to toggle the visibility of layers and/or click on the crashes within the map. The popups for single crashes can be difficult to see unless the map is expanded (click in upper right of map widget). There is a Review Crashes tab that allows for another display of details of a crash that may be easier for users.This dashboard includes selectors in both the header and sidebar. By default the sidebar is collapsed and would need to be expanded. The crash dataset used in the presentation includes columns with a prefix of the unit. The persons information associated to each unit would be based on the Person that was considered the driver. Crash data can be filtered by clicking on items in chart widgets. All chart widgets have been configured to allow multiple selections and these selections will then filter the crash data accordingly. Allowing for data to be filtered by clicking on widgets is an alternative approach to setting up individual selectors. Selectors can take up a lot of space in the header and sidebar and clicking on the widget items can allow you to explore different scenarios which may ultimately be setup as selectors in the future. The Dashboard has many widgets that are stacked atop each other and underneath these stacked widgets are controls or tabs that allow the user to toggle between different visualizations. The downside to allowing a user to filter based on the output of a widget is the need for the end user to keep track of what has been clicked and the need to go back through and unclick.Many of the Crash Data Elements are based on lookups that have a fairly large range of values to select. This can be difficult sometimes with charts and the fact that a user may be overwhelmed by the number of items be plotted. Some of these values could potentially benefit by grouping similar values. The crash data being used in this dashboard hasn't been post processed to simplify some of the groupings of data and represent the value as it would appear in the Crash System. This dashboard was put together to continue the discussion on what data elements should be included in the GIS Crash Dataset. At the moment there is currently one primary dataset that is used to present crash data in Map Services. There is lots of potential to extend this dataset to include additional elements or it might be beneficial to create different versions of the crash data. Having an examples like this one will hopefully help with the discussion. Workable examples of what works and doesn't work. There are lots of data elements in the Crash System that could allow for an even more detailed safety analysis. Some of the unit items included in the example for Minot Ave in Auburn are the following. This information is included for the first three units associated to any crash.Most Damaged AreaExtent of DamageUnit TypeDirection of Travel (Northbound, Southbound, Eastbound, Westbound)Pre-Crash ActionsSequence of Events 1-4Most Harmful Event Some of the persons items included in the example for Minot Ave in Auburn are the following. This information is included for the first three units associated to any crash and the person would be based on the driver.Condition at Time of CrashDriver Action 1Driver Action 2Driver DistractedAgeSexPerson Type (Driver/Owner(6), Driver(1))In addition to the Units and Persons information included above each crash includes the standard crash data elements which includesDate, Time, Day of Week, Year, Month, HourInjury Level (K,A,B,C,PD)Type of CrashTownname, County, MDOT RegionWeather ConditionsLight ConditionsRoad Surface ConditionsRoad GradeSchool Bus RelatedTraffic Control DeviceType of LocationWork Zone ItemsLocation Type (NODE, ELEMENT) used for LRS# of K, # of A, # of B, # of C, # of PD InjuriesTotal # of UnitsTotal # of PersonsFactored AADT (Only currently applicable for crashes along the roadway (ELEMENT)).Location of First Harmful EventTotal Injury Count for the CrashBoolean Y/N if Pedestrian or Bicycles are InvolvedContributing EnvironmentsContributing RoadRoute Number, Milepoint, Element ID, Node ID