The Canadian Wind Turbine Database contains the geographic location and key technology details for wind turbines installed in Canada. This dataset was jointly compiled by researchers at CanmetENERGY-Ottawa and by the Centre for Applied Business Research in Energy and the Environment at the University of Alberta, under contract from Natural Resources Canada. Additional contributions were made by the Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering at the University of Toronto. Note that total project capacity was sourced from publicly available information, and may not match the sum of individual turbine rated capacity due to de-rating and other factors. The turbine numbering scheme adopted for this database is not intended to match the developer’s asset numbering. This database will be updated in the future. If you are aware of any errors, and would like to provide additional information, or for general inquiries, please use the contact email address listed on this page.

The 2023 National Offshore Wind data set (NOW-23) is the latest wind resource data set for offshore regions in the United States, which supersedes, for its offshore component, the Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, which was published about a decade ago and is currently one of the primary resources for stakeholders conducting wind resource assessments in the continental United States.

The NOW-23 data set was produced using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) version 4.2.1. A regional approach was used: for each offshore region, the WRF setup was selected based on validation against available observations. The WRF model was initialized with the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts 5 Reanalysis (ERA-5) data set, using a 6-hour refresh rate. The model is configured with an initial horizontal grid spacing of 6 km and an internal nested domain that refined the spatial resolution to 2 km. The model is run with 61 vertical levels, with 12 levels in the lower 300m of the atmosphere, stretching from 5 m to 45 m in height. The MYNN planetary boundary layer and surface layer schemes were used the North Atlantic, Mid Atlantic, Great Lakes, Hawaii, and North Pacific regions. On the other hand, using the YSU planetary boundary layer and MM5 surface layer schemes resulted in a better skill in the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and South Pacific regions. A more detailed description of the WRF model setup can be found in the WRF namelist files linked at the bottom of this page.

For all regions, the NOW-23 data set coverage starts on January 1, 2000. For Hawaii and the North Pacific regions, NOW-23 goes until December 31, 2019. For the South Pacific region, the model goes until 31 December, 2022. For all other regions, the model covers until December 31, 2020. Outputs are available at 5 minute resolution, and for all regions we have also included output files at hourly resolution. The NOW-23 data are provided here as HDF5 files. Examples of how to use the HSDS Service to Access the NOW-23 files are linked below. A list of the variables included in the NOW-23 files is also linked below.

No filters have been applied to the raw WRF output.

This dataset provides locations and technical specifications of wind turbines in the United States, almost all of which are utility-scale. Utility-scale turbines are ones that generate power and feed it into the grid, supplying a utility with energy. They are usually much larger than turbines that would feed a house or business. The regularly updated database contains wind turbine records that have been collected, digitized, and locationally verified. Turbine data were gathered from the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Digital Obstacle File (DOF) and Obstruction Evaluation Airport Airspace Analysis (OE-AAA), American Clean Power (ACP) Association (formerly American Wind Energy Association (AWEA)), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and were merged and collapsed into a single dataset. Verification of the turbine positions was done by visual interpretation using high-resolution aerial imagery in ESRI ArcGIS Desktop. A locational error of plus or minus 10 meters for turbine locations was tolerated. Technical specifications for turbines were assigned based on the wind turbine make and models as provided by manufacturers and project developers directly, and via FAA datasets, information on the wind project developer or turbine manufacturer websites, or other online sources. Some facility and turbine information on make and model did not exist or was difficult to obtain. Thus, uncertainty may exist for certain turbine specifications. Similarly, some turbines were not yet built, not built at all, or for other reasons cannot be verified visually. Location and turbine specifications data quality are rated, and a confidence level (1 to 3) is recorded for both. None of the data are field verified.

A machine readable collection of documented wind siting ordinances at the state and local (e.g., county, township) level throughout the United States. The data were compiled from several sources including, DOE's Wind Exchange Ordinance Database (Linked in the submission), National Conference of State and Legislatures Wind Energy Siting (also linked in the submission), and scholarly legal articles. The citations for each ordinance are included in the Wind Ordinances spreadsheet resource below.

This data is an updated to a previously developed database of wind ordinances found in OEDI Submission 1932: "U.S. Wind Siting Regulation and Zoning Ordinances"

** NOTE **: a newer version of this data can be found at the "U.S. Wind Siting Regulation and Zoning Ordinances 2025" link below.

Wind resource data for North America was produced using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF). The WRF model was initialized with the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts Interim Reanalysis (ERA-Interm) data set with an initial grid spacing of 54 km. Three internal nested domains were used to refine the spatial resolution to 18, 6, and finally 2 km. The WRF model was run for years 2007 to 2014. While outputs were extracted from WRF at 5 minute time-steps, due to storage limitations instantaneous hourly time-step are provided for all variables while full 5 min resolution data is provided for wind speed and wind direction only.

The following variables were extracted from the WRF model data: - Wind Speed at 10, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 200 m - Wind Direction at 10, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 200 m - Temperature at 2, 10, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 140, 160, 200 m - Pressure at 0, 100, 200 m - Surface Precipitation Rate - Surface Relative Humidity - Inverse Monin Obukhov Length

The United States Wind Turbine Database (USWTDB) provides the locations of land-based and offshore wind turbines in the United States, corresponding wind project information, and turbine technical specifications. Wind turbine records are collected and compiled from various public and private sources, digitized and position-verified from aerial imagery, and quality checked.

The U.S. Wind Turbine Database provides locations and technical specifications of wind turbines in the United States, almost all of which are utility-scale. Utility-scale turbines are ones that generate power and feed it into the grid, supplying a utility with energy. They are usually much larger than turbines that would feed a homeowner or business. The regularly updated database has wind turbine records that have been collected, digitized, and locationally verified. Turbine data were gathered from the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Digital Obstacle File (DOF) and Obstruction Evaluation Airport Airspace Analysis (OE-AAA), the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and were merged and collapsed into a single data set. Verification of the turbine positions was done by visual interpretation using high-resolution aerial imagery in ESRI ArcGIS Desktop. A locational error of plus or minus 10 meters for turbine locations was tolerated. Technical specifications for turbines were assigned based on the wind turbine make and models as provided by manufacturers and project developers directly, and via FAA datasets, information on the wind project developer or turbine manufacturer websites, or other online sources. Some facility and turbine information on make and model did not exist or was difficult to obtain. Thus, uncertainty may exist for certain turbine specifications. Similarly, some turbines were not yet built, not built at all, or for other reasons cannot be verified visually. Location and turbine specifications data quality are rated and a confidence is recorded for both.

This dataset contains global onshore and offshore wind supply curves based on a resource assessment performed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) based on the National Center for Atmospheric Research's (NCAR) Climate Four Dimensional Data Assimilation (CFDDA) mesoscale climate database. This overview is intended to provide a brief description of the origin of the tables in this workbook, not to fully explain the assumptions and calculations involved. The paper linked below includes full detail of sources and assumptions.

The supply curves are defined by country and resource quality. Onshore supply curves are further differentiated by distance to nearest large load or power plant, and offshore by distance to shore and water depth.

The CFDDA database contains hourly wind velocity vectors at a 40km grid, at multiple heights above ground level. For each grid cell, we create hourly wind speed distributions at 90m hub heights, and we compute gross capacity factor through convolution with a representative power curve. Output is derated for outages and wake losses to obtain net capacity factor. Onshore, we assumed a composite IEC Class II turbine; offshore, an IEC Class I turbine. We assumed a wind turbine density of 5 MW/km.

Land and sea area are characterized by country (or country-like object, e.g, Alaska), land use/land cover, elevation, and protection status. Protected, urban, and high-elevation areas are fully excluded, and certain land cover types are fractionally excluded. Offshore, area within 5 nautical miles of or farther than 100 nautical miles from shore are excluded, as are protected marine areas. Marine areas are assigned to country based on exclusive economic zones; unassigned or disputed areas are excluded.

As alluded to previously, in this workbook, "United States of America" refers only to the continental U.S. Alaska and Hawaii are counted separately because of their remoteness. Unassigned "countries" comprise relatively remote, unpopulated areas (Alaska, Greenland, remote islands); and disputed marine areas. We recommend that their resource remain unassigned rather than grouped into larger IAM regions.

This data provides locations and technical specifications of legacy versions (ver. 1.0 - ver. X.X) of the United States Wind Turbines database. Each release, typically done quarterly, updates the database with newly installed wind turbines, removes wind turbines that have been identified as dismantled, and applies other verifications based on updated imagery and ongoing quality-control. Almost all turbines in this data are utility-scale turbines that generate power and feed it into the grid, supplying a utility with energy. They are usually much larger than turbines that would feed a house or business. The regularly updated database contains wind turbine records that have been collected, digitized, and locationally verified. Turbine data were gathered from the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Digital Obstacle File (DOF) and Obstruction Evaluation Airport Airspace Analysis (OE-AAA), American Clean Power (ACP) Association (formerly American Wind Energy Association (AWEA)), L ...

Data repository for measurements from 12 wind masts in Pakistan. Data transmits daily reports for wind speed, wind direction, air pressure, relative humidity and temperature. Please refer to the country project page for additional outputs and reports, including the installation reports: http://esmap.org/node/3058. For access to maps and GIS layers, please visit the Global Wind Atlas: https://globalwindatlas.info/ Please cite as: [Data/information/map obtained from the] “World Bank via ENERGYDATA.info, under a project funded by the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP).

This is the data set behind the Wind Generation Interactive Query Tool created by the CEC. The visualization tool interactively displays wind generation over different time intervals in three-dimensional space. The viewer can look across the state to understand generation patterns of regions with concentrations of wind power plants. The tool aids in understanding high and low periods of generation. Operation of the electric grid requires that generation and demand are balanced in each period.

This dataset provides locations and technical specifications of wind turbines in the United States, almost all of which are utility-scale. Utility-scale turbines are ones that generate power and feed it into the grid, supplying a utility with energy. They are usually much larger than turbines that would feed a homeowner or business.

The data formats downloadable from the Minnesota Geospatial Commons contain just the Minnesota turbines. Data, maps and services accessed from the USWTDB website provide nationwide turbines.

The regularly updated database has wind turbine records that have been collected, digitized, and locationally verified. Turbine data were gathered from the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Digital Obstacle File (DOF) and Obstruction Evaluation Airport Airspace Analysis (OE-AAA), the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and were merged and collapsed into a single data set.

Verification of the turbine positions was done by visual interpretation using high-resolution aerial imagery in Esri ArcGIS Desktop. A locational error of plus or minus 10 meters for turbine locations was tolerated. Technical specifications for turbines were assigned based on the wind turbine make and models as provided by manufacturers and project developers directly, and via FAA datasets, information on the wind project developer or turbine manufacturer websites, or other online sources. Some facility and turbine information on make and model did not exist or was difficult to obtain. Thus, uncertainty may exist for certain turbine specifications. Similarly, some turbines were not yet built, not built at all, or for other reasons cannot be verified visually. Location and turbine specifications data quality are rated and a confidence is recorded for both. None of the data are field verified.

The U.S. Wind Turbine Database website provides the national data in many different formats: shapefile, CSV, GeoJSON, web services (cached and dynamic), API, and web viewer. See: https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/

The web viewer provides many options to search; filter by attribute, date and location; and customize the map display. For details and screenshots of these options, see: https://eerscmap.usgs.gov/uswtdb/help/

------------
This metadata record was adapted by the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office (MnGeo) from the national version of the metadata. It describes the Minnesota extract of the shapefile data that has been projected from geographic to UTM coordinates and converted to Esri file geodatabase (fgdb) format. There may be more recent updates available on the national website. Accessing the data via the national web services or API will always provide the most recent data.

Herewith we present the extended 1Hz dataset of wind measurements from a Skipheia meteorological station on the island of Frøya on the western coast of Norway, Trondelag.

The data binned in 10 min averages can be find at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2557500

The site represents an exposed coastal wind climate with open sea, land and mixed fetch from various directions. UTM-coordinates of the Met-mast: 8.34251 E and 63.66638 N. See the map for details (NorwegianMapping Authority): https://www.norgeskart.no/#!?project=norgeskart&layers=1003&zoom=3&lat=7035885.49&lon=539601.41&markerLat=7077031.483032227&markerLon=170902.83203125&panel=searchOptionsPanel&sok=Titranveien

Presented data were gathered between years 2009-2016.

Data&hardware summary:

Years 2009-2016: Mast2 equipped with 6 pairs of 2D sonic anemometers at 10, 16, 25, 40, 70, 100 m above the ground, independent temperature measurements at the same heights and near the ground; pressure and relative humidity from local meteostation (Sula, 20 km away).

Years 2014-2016: Mast4 equipped with 2 pairs of 2D sonic anemometers at 40 and 100 m above the ground. The distance between the masts is 79 m.

Data is binned in years and months and stored in a ‘*.txt’ tab-separated values file.

Data column order is described in SkipheiaMast2_header.txt and SkipheiaMast4_header.txt, where WSx is the wind speed (m/s), WDx is the wind direction (360 deg), ATx is the air temperature (deg C) and x designates the instrument number. The instruments are numbered starting from the ground.

Example: For Mast2 (6 pairs of anemometers, ground temperature + 6 temperature sensors on the mast) that means that AT0 is the ground temperature. WS1 and WS2 are wind speed records at 10 m level. WS3 and WS4 are wind speed records at 16 m. For Mast4 (2 pairs of anemometers) that means that WS1 and WS2 are wind speed records at 40 m level. WS3 and WS4 are wind speed records at 100 m.

Detailed site description with wind climate description can be found in attached analysis: Site analysys.pdf.

Additional information and analysis can be found in listed below works, using data from Frøya site:

Bardal, L. M., & Sætran, L. R. (2016, September). Spatial correlation of atmospheric wind at scales relevant for large scale wind turbines. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 753, No. 3, p. 032033). IOP Publishing, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032033, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032033/pdf

Bardal, L. M., & Sætran, L. R. (2016). Wind gust factors in a coastal wind climate. Energy Procedia, 94, 417-424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.207

IEA Wind TCP Task 27 Compendium of IEA Wind TCP Task 27 Case Studies, Technical Report, Prepared by Ignacio Cruz Cruz, CIEMAT, Spain Trudy Forsyth, WAT, United States, October 2018; Chapter 1.8. https://community.ieawind.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=8afc06ec-bb68-0be8-8481-6622e9e95ae7&forceDialog=0

Domagalski, P., Bardal, L. M., & Sætran, L. Vertical Wind Profiles in Non-neutral Conditions-Comparison of Models and Measurements from Froya. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, doi: 10.1115/1.4041816, http://offshoremechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=2711333&resultClick=3

Møller, M., Domagalski, P., & Sætran, L. R. (2019, October). Characteristics of abnormal vertical wind profiles at a coastal site. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1356, No. 1, p. 012030). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1356/1/012030

Møller, M., Domagalski, P., and Sætran, L. R.: Comparing Abnormalities in Onshore and Offshore Vertical Wind Profiles, Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2019-40 , in review, 2019.

This dataset is a unique compilation of field-based meteorological observations and wind power generation data, collected directly from one of our company's operational sites. The dataset represents a detailed hourly record, starting from January 2, 2017. This rich dataset provides real-world insights into the interplay between various weather conditions and wind energy production.

Context and Inspiration: The dataset was conceived out of the necessity to understand the dynamic relationship between meteorological variables and their impact on wind power generation. By collecting data directly from the field and the wind turbine installations, we aim to provide a comprehensive and authentic dataset that can be instrumental for industry-specific research, operational optimization, and academic purposes.

Data Collection: Data was meticulously gathered using state-of-the-art equipment installed at the site. The meteorological instruments measured temperature, humidity, dew point, and wind characteristics at different heights, while power generation data was recorded from the wind turbines' output. This dataset is a unique compilation of field-based meteorological observations and wind power generation data, collected directly from one of our company's operational sites. The dataset represents a detailed hourly record, starting from January 2, 2017. This rich dataset provides real-world insights into the interplay between various weather conditions and wind energy production.

Potential Uses: This dataset is ideal for industry experts, researchers, and data scientists exploring renewable energy, especially wind power. It can aid in developing predictive models for power generation, studying environmental impacts on renewable energy sources, and enhancing operational efficiency in wind farms.

In this dataset the anther's analysis is based on data from NREL about Solar & Wind energy generation by operation areas.

NASA Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources

Solar

Monthly averages for global horizontal radiation over 22-year period (Jul 1983

• Jun 2013)

Wind

Monthly average wind speed at 50m above the surface of earth over a 30-year period (Jan 1984 - Dec 2013)Year: Averaged Over 10 to 15 years

COA = central operating area.

EOA = eastern operating area.

SOA = southern operating area.

WOA = western operating area. Source: NRELSource Link

GIS data for offshore wind speed (meters/second) at a 90 meter height above surface level. The data is specified to Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). The wind resource is based on NOAA Blended Sea Winds and monthly wind speed at 30km resolution from 1987-2005, using a 0.11 wind shear to extrapolate 10m - 90m. Annual average greater than or equal to 10 months of data, no nulls.

The NOAA Blended Sea Winds dataset contains ocean surface vector winds and wind stresses gridded at 0.25 degrees. Multiple time resolutions are available: 6-hour, daily, and monthly. Wind speeds were generated from satellite observations; directions, from a combination of National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Reanalysis and European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data assimilation products.

Hub height is an important determinant of wind resource at a given location. Due to drag close to ground-level, wind speeds fall at lower altitudes. Over rough terrain, that drop can be precipitous, but there is substantial drag even over relatively smooth ocean surfaces. Wind speeds in the Blended Sea Winds database are at 10 m above ground level. To extrapolate them to 90m heights, a power-law wind-shear adjustment using a shear exponent of 0.11 was applied. The exponent value was chosen based on the guidance of Schwartz et al. (2010), who support its use for U.S. marine areas. The coarseness of the escalation assumption is regretful but necessary given this dataset.

There were some missing months in the dataset, especially at polar latitudes. For cells with at least 10 months of data, the 10-month average was considered as the annual average; for cells with fewer than 10 months of data, no resource was given. As those grid cells tended to be at extreme northern latitudes, and the missing months were generally in winter, it is assumed that the gaps are to be ice-caused and likely those sites are too icy for economic wind development.

For more up to date data please visit the "Wind Resource Database" link below.

Overview The SUMR-D CART2 turbine data are recorded by the CART2 wind turbine's supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system for the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) SUMR-D project located at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Flatirons Campus. For the project, the CART2 wind turbine was outfitted with a highly flexible rotor specifically designed and constructed for the project. More details about the project can be found here: https://sumrwind.com/. The data include power, loads, and meteorological information from the turbine during startup, operation, and shutdown, and when it was parked and idle. Data Details Additional files are attached: sumr_d_5-Min_Database.mat - a database file in MATLAB format of this dataset, which can be used to search for desired data files; sumr_d_5-Min_Database.xlsx - a database file in Microsoft Excel format of this dataset, which can be used to search for desired data files; loadcartU.m - this script loads in a CART data file and puts it in your workspace as a Matlab matrix (you can call this script from your own Matlab scripts to do your own analysis); charts.mat - this is a dependency file needed for the other scripts (it allows you to make custom preselections for cartPlotU.m); cartLoadHdrU.m - this script loads in the header file information for the data file (the header is embedded in each data file at the beginning); cartPlotU.m - this is a graphic user interface (GUI) that allows you to interactively look at different channels (to use it, run the script in Matlab, and load in the data file(s) of interest; from there, you can select different channels and plot things against each other; note that this script has issues with later versions of MATLAB; the preferred version to use is R2011b). Data Quality Wind turbine blade loading data were calibrated using blade gravity calibrations prior to data collection and throughout the data collection period. Blade loading was also checked for data quality following data collection as strain gauge measurements drifted throughout the data collection. These drifts in the strain gauge measurements were removed in post processing.

This dataset is a series of wind turbine data collected for the Wind for Schools project. The U.S. Department of Energy funded the Wind for Schools project, which helped develop a future wind energy workforce by encouraging students at higher education institutions to join Wind Application Centers and serve as project consultants for small wind turbine installations at rural elementary and secondary schools. The data are collected from the school wind turbine installations.

The Wind for Schools OpenEI data project was archived at the end of July 2024. The data that was collected up that point is provided here as the resource "Wind For Schools Dataset".

The Global Wind Atlas version 3 data-sets contain microscale wind information at approximately 250m grid point spacing.The data is created by first dynamically down-scaling ERA5 reanalysis data from 2008-2017 to 3km resolution using the WRF mesoscale model.The WRF results are then generalized using DTU's generalization methodology, and then down-scaled using the WAsP model to the final 250m resolution.The data in this directory consist of the entire global tiff at the full 0.0025 degree resolution on the WGS84 map projection. These data also include four sets of overview pyramids to improve the viewing of the data at low resolution.Most of the data are named as follows: gwa_{variable}_{height}.tif, where variable is one of* wind-speed - The mean wind speed at the location for the 10 year period* power-density - The mean power density of the wind, which is related to the cube of the wind speed, and can provide additional information about the strength of the wind not found in the mean wind speed alone.* combined-Weibull-A and combined-Weibull-k - These are the all sector combined Weibull distribution parameters for the wind speed. They can be used to get an estimate of the wind speed and power density at a site. However, caution should be applied when using these in areas with wind speeds that come from multiple directions as the shapes of those individual distributions may be quite different than this combined distribution.* air-density - The air density is found by interpolating the air density from the CFSR reanalysis to the elevation used in the global wind atlas following the approach described in WAsP 12.* RIX - The RIX (Ruggedness IndeX) is a measure of how complex the terrain is. It provides the percent of the area within 10 km of the position that have slopes over 30-degrees. A RIX value greater than 5 suggests that you should use caution when interpreting the results.The files which do not follow the naming convention above are the capacity-factor layers. The capacity factor layers were calculated for 3 distinct wind turbines, with 100m hub height and rotor diameters of 112, 126, and 136m, which fall into three IEC Classes (IEC1, IEC2, and IEC3). Capacity factors can be used to calculate a preliminary estimate of the energy yield of a wind turbine (in the MW range), when placed at a location. This can be done by multiplying the rated power of the wind turbine by the capacity factor for the location (and the number of hours in a year): AEP = Prated*CF*8760 hr/year, where AEP is annual energy production, Prated is rated power, and CF is capacity factor.

An archive of wind fields retrieved from satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) observations over the ocean by the Technical University of Denmark (DTU, https://ror.org/04qtj9h94). The wind fields are instantaneous ocean backscatter measurements converted to ocean winds at 10m above the sea surface, through the implementation of dedicated retrieval algorithms and input wind directions from numerical models. The archive is updated daily and users can browse and download the wind fields though a web interface. The maps are available in .nc and .png format. The archive of wind fields is generated with the SAR Ocean Products System (SAROPS) developed by the Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL, https://ror.org/029pp9z10) and the US National Atmospheric and Oceanographic Administration (NOAA, https://ror.org/02z5nhe81). The system uses input data from the following sources:

Envisat [2002-12] and Copernicus Sentinel-1 [2014-present] satellite SAR data provided by the European Space Agency (ESA, https://ror.org/03wd9za21).

Wind directions [2002-10] from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP, https://ror.org/00ndyev54).

Wind directions [2011-present] from the Global Forecast System (GFS) by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP, https://ror.org/00ndyev54).

Land surface topography data from the Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Geography Database (GSHHG).1

Sea ice data [2002-present] from IMS Daily Northern Hemisphere Snow and Ice Analysis.2

1 Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith, 1996. A Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Shoreline Database, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 8741-8743. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB00104 2 U.S. National Ice Center. 2008, updated daily. IMS Daily Northern Hemisphere Snow and Ice Analysis at 1 km, 4 km, and 24 km Resolutions, Version 1. [2002-present]. Boulder, Colorado USA. NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center. https://doi.org/10.7265/N52R3PMC.