The Wisconsin Traffic Counts dataset combines traffic count data with GIS mapping technology to display data in a tabular format, on a map, or both. DV_TRADS_AADT_PT is a source of Wisconsin DOT traffic data information for road sections of the State Highways or select Local Federal-Aid roads. Traffic counts are reported as the number of vehicles expected to pass a given location on an average day of the year. This value is called the "annual average daily traffic" or AADT. The AADT is produced for either continuous count sites or short duration count sites. WisDOT collects continuous count data from about 320 permanent data collection locations primarily located on the State Trunk Highway System. Data at continuous count sites are scheduled to be collected in hourly intervals each day of the year. A short duration traffic count usually collects hourly intervals for a 48-hour period, taken at the specific locations throughout the state. Using continuous count data, short duration counts are then adjusted for the variation in traffic volume that occurs throughout the year. Short duration counts are collected over three, six, or ten-year cycles at more than 26,000 rural and urban locations throughout the state. In addition to Wisconsin DOT use for transportation management purposes, Wisconsin DOT is required to collect and report these statistics to the Federal Highway Administration monthly and annually.

Average weekday traffic counts (AWT) are collected at count stations throughout the city and represent the daily average for Monday-Friday traffic volume. Count stations in the eastern section of the city are collected in even numbered years, while those in the city's western section are collected in odd numbered years. Field descriptions/definitions for traffic count data as follows: ObjectID: GIS auto-generated unique identifiermslink: mslink of street segmentsegment_na: street segment nameSTATION: count station numberSOURCE: designates segment with counter or linkedSTATION: volume count station numberSOURCE: volume count station or linked segmentAWT_Count: most recent average weekday traffic countAWT_Yr: year of most recent countShape: GIS geometry typeYear_Txt: year of most recent count (text field)Shape.STLength(): GIS calculated segment length

This statistic shows the total free Wi-Fi data usage in the United States from 2018 to 2023. In 2018, total free Wi-Fi traffic was estimated to amount to about 3,437 million gigabytes. The traffic volume is forecast to grow around threefold by 2023.

This statistic shows the total monthly Wi-Fi data usage per device in the United States from 2016 to 2018. In 2017, laptops generated 2.59 exabytes of monthly Wi-Fi traffic in the United States.

This data set gives hourly pedestrian counts for six locations on upper State Street for the period between August 12, 2018, and August 31, 2020, as reported by the Traffic Engineering department’s pedestrian counters.

Comprehensive dataset of 1 Traffic police stations in Wisconsin, United States as of August, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Conditions are updated every 10 minutes during the winter season (October 15 to April 15) and on an as-needed basis during the non-winter months. Layer and service is maintained by the Iowa DOT GIS team on behalf of the Office of Traffic Operations. This data is provided as is through this value added REST service. All conditions have been remapped to the best of our ability to meet the condition reporting criteria as defined by the Iowa DOT. Some discrepancies may appear. This data service should only be used for reference only. For the most accurate information, please utilize the authoritative state 511 sites below.

State 511 Sites

511 Vendor

Disclaimers

North Dakota

Iteris

The data is provided as is and without liability from the North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT). The NDDOT does not guarantee this data to be free from errors, or inaccuracies, and disclaims any responsibility or liability for interpretations or decisions based on this data. Additional Disclai

South Dakota

Iteris

Disclaimer

Nebraska

Castle Rock

Disclaimer

Kansas

Disclaimer

Missouri

Disclaimer

Illinois

The conditions reported on this page only represent conditions of routes maintained by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Conditions on roads maintained by cities, counties, townships or other entities may be different than what is reported here. The Illinois Department of Transportation and the State of Illinois hereby give notice to all users that these maps and the data included hereon, lack the accuracy required for site-specific uses. Since all boundaries and all data are based on information derived from multiple sources within and outside the Illinois Department of Transportation, the Department of Transportation and the State of Illinois make no representation, guarantee, or warrant, either express or implied, regarding the accuracy of these maps or the data furnished thereon, including, but not limited to, the condition of this product, this product's merchantability, or this product's fitness for any particular purpose or use.

Wisconsin

Access to and use of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) 511wi website is provided subject to these terms and conditions. Please read these terms at WisDOT Legal Notices link.

Minnesota>

Castle Rock

Disclaimer

This data set gives traffic flows for three locations throughout the city, broken out by hour, for a week of each month for a year. The data is mostly for the year 2017, but note that in some cases, 2016 numbers were used instead.

This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Traffic Avenue cross streets in Frederic, WI.

This statistic shows the share of Wi-Fi data traffic over total internet traffic among Android users in the Middle East and North Africa as of May 2016, by selected country. At this time, the share of Wi-Fi traffic accounted for ** percent of Android users' internet traffic in Turkey.

Community Maps provides Wisconsin's law enforcement agencies and county Traffic Safety Commissions with a statewide map of all police reported motor vehicle crashes from 2010 to the current year. Fatal crashes are included from 2001. Crashes are updated on a nightly basis using geo-coded locations from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation DT4000 police crash report. The Community Maps system was designed to support and enhance traffic safety planning, resource allocation, and decision support at the local level, in particular through the regular review of crashes at each of the county quarterly TSC meetings.

Community Maps is hosted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison by the Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory in collaboration with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) Bureau of Transportation Safety (BOTS).

New: For crash data analysis requests, please email the BOTS Program and Policy Unit at CrashDataAnalysis@dot.wi.gov.

For Community Maps technical support, please email community-maps@topslab.wisc.edu.

To request access to Community Maps Advanced features, please use the WisTransPortal online User Account Request Form.

Additional contact information:

Randy Wiessinger Statewide Law Enforcement Liaison Bureau of Transportation Safety (BOTS) Division of State Patrol, WisDOT Email: rpw@wiessinger.com

Steven T. Parker, Ph.D. Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory UW-Madison Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering E-mail: sparker@engr.wisc.edu

May 110, Hsinchu City, iHsinchu Free Wi-Fi Hotspot Traffic Statistics Overview for the Public to Refer to.

Bike counts are collected annually and represent the daily average for Monday-Friday bike volumes during the months of April-October. Field descriptions/definitions for bike count data as follows:ObjectID: GIS auto-generated unique identifierLocation: bike count locationSignal_Typ: type of traffic signal at count location, if applicableConnected: connection to city traffic signal network StationID: internal station IDCount_: most recent average weekday bike count Count_Yr: year of most recent countYear_Txt: year of most recent count (text field)Shape: GIS geometry type

Centerline file used for Bike LTS Network. Has existing streets and bike paths integrated.Clean topology. All connections are end point to end point.Bridges involving bike paths cleaned manually to accommodate bug in Network Analyst connectivity using elevation fields.The Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) system rates or scores streets and paths by calculating an LTS score (1, 2, 3, or 4) for each street or multi-use path segment, intersection approach, and intersection crossing and then assigning the highest of the three scores to the segment. In those cases where the intersection LTS score is higher than the street segment score, the street segment encompassing the first block on either side of the intersection is given the higher intersection score. LTS scores for street segments are based on the posted speed limit, traffic volumes, number of travel lanes, and bicycle lane or bicycle/parking lane dimensions. Multi-use paths are classified as the lowest stress (LTS score of 1). Please refer to the Low-Stress Bicycle Network Report, and updated segment methodology for additional detail. Description of LTS Levels for Street SegmentsLTS 1: Paths and streets with 1 lane per direction, speed limits ≤ 20 mph, and low traffic volumes, or up to 25 mph with bike lanes.LTS 2: Streets with 1 lane per direction, speed limits ≤ 30 mph, and low traffic volumes and/or bike lanes.LTS 3: Streets with 1-2 lanes per direction, speed limits ≤ 35 mph, and moderate traffic volumes and/or bike lanes.LTS 4: Streets with 2+ lanes per direction, with high speed limits and/or high traffic volumes.The LTS score for an intersection approach is based on the intersection configuration. Specifically, the score is based on whether there is a right-turn only lane and, if so, whether there is a “pocket” bike lane to the left of the right-turn lane and other details related to the design of these lanes and the curb radius of the intersection. Description of LTS levels for Intersection ApproachesNo effect: Simple intersection with no right-turn lane, or a single right turn lane of less than 75 feet with slow turning speeds.LTS 2: Intersection with a single right-turn lane of less than 150 feet and a bike lane that continues straight.LTS 3: Intersection with a right-turn lane of 75-150 feet and no bike lane, a bike lane that shifts to the left across a right-turn lane with slow turning speeds, or a bike lane that continues straight alongside a turn lane of more than 150 feet.LTS 4: Other intersection configurations, including multiple right-turn lanes and/or higher turning speeds.The LTS score for an unsignalized intersection crossing is based on the number of travel lanes per direction on the intersecting street to be crossed, the presence of a median (for multi-lane streets), and the speed limit on the intersecting street. Description of LTS Levels for Intersection CrossingsUnsignalized CrossingsLTS 1: Intersecting street has only 1 lane per travel direction and speed limit ≤ 30 mph.LTS 2: Intersecting street has only 1 lane per travel direction and speed limit ≤ 35 mph or 2 lanes but speed limit ≤ 30 mph.LTS 3: Intersecting street has 1 lane per travel direction and a speed limit of 40+ mph, or 2 lanes and a speed limit of 35 mph.LTS 4: Intersecting street has 2 lanes per travel direction and 40+ mph speed limit, or 3+ lanes.In some cases, intersection crossing LTS is reduced below these levels if the intersecting street is one-way only or is equipped with a median refuge. Signalized CrossingsCrossing streets at signalized intersections does not present a significant barrier for bicyclists and thus does not affect the LTS score unless a right turn lane is present.LTS_F (LTS_F) Final Bike LTS (Level of Traffic Stress) score.