This data is from mobile devices performing tests of cellular networks in Colorado. The results show latency and signal strength in all tests by carrier and some tests include download and upload performance tests.

By downloading this data you agree to be bound by the terms of the INSPIRE End User License.This dataset shows Sheffield City Council Parks & Countryside Service Sites. Parks & Countryside Sites are sites which are managed and/or maintained and/or owned and/or leased by the Parks & Countryside Service. This information may not be 100% correct and is subject to change. Where possible the site has been mapped to OS Master Map. In some cases site outlines are approximate.

A Dark Sky Park is a place with exceptionally dark night skies, a place where people have committed to keeping those skies dark, by controlling light pollution.

In November 2009, the International Dark-sky Association designated Galloway Forest Park as only the fourth Dark Sky Park in the world and the first in the UK.

But that's not all. The Galloway Park is REALLY dark - a Gold Tier Dark Skies park. Very few people live in the 300 square miles of forest and hills in the park so nights really are black - apart from the stars! Forestry Commission Scotland and the people of the park are committed to keeping it that way.

At the request of the National Park Service (NPS), the Archaeological Research Laboratory (ARL) at the University of Tennessee’s (UT’s) Department of Anthropology has prepared an Archaeological Overview and Assessment (AOA) of the Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (CUGA). The primary purpose of this AOA is to investigate, describe, and assess the known and potential archaeological resources within the CUGA boundaries. An AOA is the first step in creating a comprehensive cultural resource management plan within the park and provides the park a baseline for future archaeological investigations and research.

Conservation objectives for Natura 2000 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Special Protection Areas (SPAs) have to be set for the habitats and species for which the sites are selected. These objectives are used when carrying out appropriate assessments for plans and projects that might impact on these sites. Site-specific conservation objectives outline attributes with targets, which define favourable condition for a habitat or species at a particular site. They are used for appropriate assessment of plans or projects. In addition, they can provide useful information for conservation management planning. The maintenance of habitats and species within Natura 2000 sites at favourable conservation condition will contribute to the overall maintenance of favourable conservation status of those habitats and species at a national level. This is a national dataset. Site-specific conservation objectives aim to define favourable conservation condition for Habitats Directive Annex I habitats and Annex II species at a site level. This project relates to the following Annex I habitat at specific sites:

• Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time (1110),
• Estuaries (1130),
• Mudflats and sandflats not covered by sea water at low tide (1140),
• Coastal lagoons (1150),
• Large shallow inlets and bays (1160),
• Reefs (1170),
• Turloughs (3180),
• European dry heaths (4030),
• Juniperus communis formations on heaths or calcareous grasslands (5130),
• Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud and sand (1310),
• Atlantic salt meadows (Glauco-Puccinellietalia maritimae) (1330),
• Mediterranean salt meadows (Juncetalia maritimae) (1410),
• Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic halophilous scrubs (Sarcocornetea fruticosi) (1420),
• Annual vegetation of drift lines (1210),
• Perennial vegetation of stony banks (1220),
• Embryonic shifting dunes (2110),
• Shifting dunes along the shoreline with Ammophila arenaria ('white dunes') (2120),
• *Fixed coastal dunes with herbaceous vegetation ('grey dunes') (2130),
• *Decalcified fixed dunes with Empetrum nigrum (2140),
• *Atlantic decalcified fixed dunes (Calluno-Ulicetea) (2150),
• Dunes with Salix repens ssp. argentea (Salicion arenariae) (2170),
• Humid dune slacks (2190),
• Machairs (* in Ireland) (21A0),
• Old sessile oak woods with Ilex and Blechnum in the British Isles (91A0),
• Bog woodland (91D0),
• Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) (91E0),
• Taxus baccata woods of the British Isles (91J0), -Marine Community Types

Favourable conservation condition of a habitat is achieved when: - its natural range, and area it covers within that range, is stable or increasing, and - the ecological factors that are necessary for its long-term maintenance exist and are likely to continue to exist for the foreseeable future, and - the conservation condition of its typical species is favourable Habitat mapping is used to help define the area and range parameters for conservation objectives

Last update: April 4, 2023Added the Mammoth address system in Juab county. Additional minor edits to account for annexations in Utah (Springville, Lehi) and Box Elder (Willard, Garland) counties, April 2023.Added several address grids in Beaver county (Elk Meadows, Ponderosa, Greenville, Adamsville, Sulphurdale). Made major updates to grids in Utah, Cache, Tooele, and Box Elder Counties. Renamed 'NSL' to 'North Salt Lake' and 'East Carbon City' to 'East Carbon', December 2022. Minor adjustment to quadrants in Bluff.Added Rocky Ridge address grid in northern Juab county, August 2022.Updates were made near Elsinore/Central Valley/Monroe corners due to recent Elsinore annexation and inputs from Sevier County, September 2021.Improvements were made to Brigham City, Millville, Logan, and Providence, February 2016.Improvements were made to the Heber, Hyde Park, Logan, and Woodland address system boundaries; updated the American Fork, Fielding, Payson, and Saratoga Springs address system boundaries to reflect recent annexations, January 2016Improvements were made to the Hyde Park and Logan address system boundary, November 2015Improvements were made to the Hyrum and Logan address system boundary, November 2015Updated the American Fork address system boundary to reflect recent annexations, October 2015Improvements were made to the Brigham City, Fishlake, Fremont, Garland, Loa, Lyman, Mantua, Tremonton, and Willard address system boundaries; updated the Lehi and Santa Clara address system boundaries to reflect recent annexations, August 2015Improvements were made to the Price and Wellington address system boundaries; updated the Lehi and Provo address system boundaries to reflect recent annexations, July 2015Improvements were made to the Layton and HAFB address system boundaries; updated the Provo and Spanish Fork address system boundaries to reflect recent annexations, June 2015Updated address system boundaries to reflect annexations in Lehi, Lewiston, and Snowville, May 2015Improvements were made to the Orderville address system boundary to match the municipal boundary, February 2015Updated address system boundaries to match annexations in American Fork, Farmington, Elk Ridge, Grantsville, Lehi, Mendon, Mount Pleasant, Payson, Provo, Spanish Fork, and Washington, January 2015 Improvements were made to the Elmo and Cleveland address system boundaries, December 2014Improvements were made to the Wellington address system boundaries, July 2014Improvements were made to the NSL (North Salt Lake) and Bountiful address system boundaries, June 2014.Changed address system name East Carbon-Sunnyside to East Carbon City, May 2014Updated address system boundaries to match annexations in northern Utah County; misc improvements in Davis County; adjusted Laketown/Garden City boundary, April 2014Merged East Carbon and Sunnyside to create the East Carbon-Sunnyside address system, February 2014.Improvements were made to the Iron County address system quadrant boundaries and topological errors were corrected statewide, January 2014. Improvements were made to Garfield County and Washington County address system quadrant boundaries, August 2013.More information can be found on the UGRC data page for this layer:https://gis.utah.gov/data/location/address-data/

The Woodlands In and Around Towns (WIAT) programme provided the focus for Forestry Commission Scotland's work on improving quality of life in towns and cities. This dataset relates to the second phase of the WIAT programme which started in April 2008.

This dataset contains the Car Parks of approved WIAT applications. Additionally there are datasets which show the location of the boundary and footpaths of WIAT applications.

For more detailed information please see the metadata record on Scotland's SpatialData.gov.scot Metadata Portal.

Woodland Trust, South Downs National Park and the Sussex Nature Partnership have developed a ‘Woodland Opportunity Map’ for Sussex and the area of the South Downs National Park which sits outside Sussex, in Hampshire.
This data has not been produced in order to identify areas where these organisations would like to plant trees. Rather, it brings together a range of datasets that can help others interested in creating new woodland in Sussex to identify: • Where woodland creation would not be suitable due to a set of particular factors • Where there are opportunities for woodland creation - provided its design and location takes account of the sensitivity of the local environment and setting and other constraints which may be present. Opportunity categories have been categorised by the tool into different levels: o Highly sensitive/ highest level of constraint o Sensitive/ medium level of constraint o Less sensitive/ lowest level of constraint In principle, the greater the sensitivity of a place to woodland creation and/or the higher level of constraints present, the more care should be taken to understand the place and design the woodland creation project to take consideration of these factors. This map has been based on best available information but it has limitations and by its very nature cannot accurately represent all the various characteristics of a place at the site level. Therefore, it should be thought of only as a ‘high level’ decision-making tool, designed to replicate some of the expert judgement involved in flagging the need to investigate a site further and collate more information and data about the site.

This version of the Forest Resource Inventory complies with the Forest Information Manual 2007 (v.2) Technical Specifications. The inventory's extent is for the entire unit, and is the standard accepted FRI deliverable provided to clients since 2004. The term '2D' indicates that this version does not store z-values required to view the forest data in 3D. With the exception of not displaying the FRI data in 3D, the spatial layout and attributes for the 2D version are identical to the 3D inventory.

Note: The 2D version of the FRI is used to populate the structured Forest Cover data class (provincial extent) in the Land Information Ontario database.

Additional Time Period Information: New inventories are loaded as they are completed and archived.

Product Packages

Abitibi River Forest: Download 2D zip
Algoma Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Algonquin Park Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Bancroft-Minden Forest: Download 2D zip
Big Pic Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Black Spruce Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Caribou Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Crossroute Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Dog River-Matawin Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Dryden Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip 


English River Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


French-Severn Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Gordon Cosens Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Hearst Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Kenora Forest: Download 2D zip


Lac Seul Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Lake Nipigon Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Lake Superior Provincial Park: Download 2D zip
Lakehead Forest: Download 2D zip


Magpie Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Martel Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Mazinaw-Lanark Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Nagagami Forest: Download 2D zip  
Nipissing Forest: Download 3D zip
North Shore Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Ogoki Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Pic River Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Pineland Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Pukaskwa Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Quetico Provincial Park: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Red Lake Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Sapawe Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Spanish Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Sudbury Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Temagami Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Timiskaming Forest: Download 2D zip     
Trout Lake Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip


Wabakimi Provincial Park: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Wabigoon Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Whiskey Jack Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
White River Forest: Download 2D zip | 3D zip
Woodland Caribou Provincial Park: Download 2D zip

Status

On going: data is being continually updated

Maintenance and Update Frequency

As needed: data is updated as deemed necessary

Contact

Ken Smith, GIS Officer, Science and Research Branch, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, ken.smith@ontario.ca