This dataset provides values for JOB OFFERS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

As of June 2021, the United States had the most job vacancies among the listed countries, with 6.89 million unoccupied positions. Russia ranked second, with 2.57 open job positions.

PredictLeads Job Openings Data provides high-quality hiring insights sourced directly from company websites - not job boards. Using advanced web scraping technology, our dataset offers real-time access to job trends, salaries, and skills demand, making it a valuable resource for B2B sales, recruiting, investment analysis, and competitive intelligence.

Key Features:

✅214M+ Job Postings Tracked – Data sourced from 92 Million company websites worldwide. ✅7,1M+ Active Job Openings – Updated in real-time to reflect hiring demand. ✅Salary & Compensation Insights – Extract salary ranges, contract types, and job seniority levels. ✅Technology & Skill Tracking – Identify emerging tech trends and industry demands. ✅Company Data Enrichment – Link job postings to employer domains, firmographics, and growth signals. ✅Web Scraping Precision – Directly sourced from employer websites for unmatched accuracy.

Primary Attributes:

• id (string, UUID) – Unique identifier for the job posting.
• type (string, constant: "job_opening") – Object type.
• title (string) – Job title.
• description (string) – Full job description, extracted from the job listing.
• url (string, URL) – Direct link to the job posting.
• first_seen_at – Timestamp when the job was first detected.
• last_seen_at – Timestamp when the job was last detected.
• last_processed_at – Timestamp when the job data was last processed.

Job Metadata:

• contract_types (array of strings) – Type of employment (e.g., "full time", "part time", "contract").
• categories (array of strings) – Job categories (e.g., "engineering", "marketing").
• seniority (string) – Seniority level of the job (e.g., "manager", "non_manager").
• status (string) – Job status (e.g., "open", "closed").
• language (string) – Language of the job posting.
• location (string) – Full location details as listed in the job description.
• Location Data (location_data) (array of objects)
• city (string, nullable) – City where the job is located.
• state (string, nullable) – State or region of the job location.
• zip_code (string, nullable) – Postal/ZIP code.
• country (string, nullable) – Country where the job is located.
• region (string, nullable) – Broader geographical region.
• continent (string, nullable) – Continent name.
• fuzzy_match (boolean) – Indicates whether the location was inferred.

Salary Data (salary_data)

• salary (string) – Salary range extracted from the job listing.
• salary_low (float, nullable) – Minimum salary in original currency.
• salary_high (float, nullable) – Maximum salary in original currency.
• salary_currency (string, nullable) – Currency of the salary (e.g., "USD", "EUR").
• salary_low_usd (float, nullable) – Converted minimum salary in USD.
• salary_high_usd (float, nullable) – Converted maximum salary in USD.
• salary_time_unit (string, nullable) – Time unit for the salary (e.g., "year", "month", "hour").

Occupational Data (onet_data) (object, nullable)

• code (string, nullable) – ONET occupation code.
• family (string, nullable) – Broad occupational family (e.g., "Computer and Mathematical").
• occupation_name (string, nullable) – Official ONET occupation title.

Additional Attributes:

• tags (array of strings, nullable) – Extracted skills and keywords (e.g., "Python", "JavaScript").

📌 Trusted by enterprises, recruiters, and investors for high-precision job market insights.

PredictLeads Dataset: https://docs.predictleads.com/v3/guide/job_openings_dataset

This dataset provides values for EMPLOYMENT CHANGE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

MT 6.6.11 Population by location of place of work, country of birth, age and sex

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Peru or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Peru, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Peru. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Peru perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Peru regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Peru; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Peru; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Peru; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Peru. - Use data to help inform Peru country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

Metropolitan Lima Area, Outside of Metropolitan Lima Area

Analysis unit

Stakeholders in Peru

Universe

Stakeholders in Peru

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In February-April 2014, 465 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Peru were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; the office of the Prime Minister; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of following sections:

A. General Issues Facing Peru: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Peru is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Peru, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in Peru, WBG staff preparedness to help Peru solve its development challenges, WBG's local presence, WBG's capacity building in Peru, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Peru, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Peru, the extent to which the WBG meets Peru's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in thirty one development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across these areas, such as education, public sector governance/reform, water and sanitation, and transport.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the WBG reports, including which of them are the most useful, whether they raised substantive new information, and whether they provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, and disbursing funds promptly.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Peru: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Peru, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in Peru.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Peru, which WBG agencies they work with, whether IFC and the Bank work well together, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 197 stakeholders participated in the survey (42% response rate).

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Costa Rica or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Costa Rica, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Costa Rica. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Costa Rica perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Costa Rica regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Costa Rica; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Costa Rica; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Costa Rica; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Costa Rica. - Use data to help inform Costa Rica country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

Greater Metropolitan Area North South

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In April - June 2014, 310 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; the judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of 8 sections:

A. General Issues Facing Costa Rica: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Costa Rica is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Costa Rica, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in Costa Rica, WBG staff preparedness to help Costa Rica solve its development challenges, WBG's local presence, WBG's capacity building in Costa Rica, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Costa Rica, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Costa Rica, the extent to which the WBG meets Costa Rica's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in twenty nine development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across twenty one of these areas, such as transport, economic growth, public sector governance/reform, poverty reduction, and trade and exports.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the WBG reports, including which of them are the most useful, whether they raised substantive new information, and whether they provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the WBG's speed in disbursing funds, and whether the WBG is risk-averse.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Costa Rica, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in Costa Rica.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Costa Rica, which WBG agencies they work with, whether IFC and the Bank work well together, and their geographic location.

Questionnaires were in English and Spanish.

Response rate

A total of 127 stakeholders participated in the survey (41% response rate).

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Colombia or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the World Bank Group's team that works in Colombia, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank Group hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in Colombia. The World Bank Group commissioned an independent firm to oversee the logistics of this effort in Colombia.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives:

• Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Colombia perceive the Bank;

• Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Colombia regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Colombia; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Colombia; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge and convening services, and communication and information sharing in Colombia; and · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Colombia.

• Use data to help inform Colombia country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Stakeholders of the World Bank in Colombia

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In May and June 2013, 665 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Colombia were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among the office of the President; the office of a Minister; the office of a Parliamentarian; employees of a ministry, ministerial department, or implementation agency; consultants/contractors working on World Bank Group-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff; bilateral agencies; multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community-based organizations (CBOs); the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; and the judiciary branch.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of 9 Sections:

A. General Issues Facing Colombia: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Colombia is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty in Colombia, and how to best achieve "shared prosperity".

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and the IFC, the WBG's effectiveness in Colombia, the effectiveness of the WBG's collaboration, the WBG's staff preparedness to help Colombia solve its development challenges, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner and the WBG's services meet the national development needs of Colombia. Respondents were also asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the WBG to focus its resources, the WBG's greatest weaknesses in its work, with which stakeholder groups the WBG should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.

C. World Bank Group Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Colombia, the extent to which the WBG meets Colombia's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across nine aspects of Colombia's national development plan.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge and Convening Services: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they interact with the WBG on knowledge and convening services and to rate the quality of the WBG's knowledge and convening services, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked if they consulted the most recent LAC Flagship Report and if so, to evaluate it.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as working with the World Bank Group increasing Colombia's institutional capacity.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Colombia: Respondents were asked to rate to what extent the World Bank has moved in the right direction in the last three years, how significant a role the WBG and international development corporation should play in Colombia's development in the near future, and how significant a role the IFC should play in helping Colombia achieve its goals in the future. Respondents were also asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Colombia and which services the WBG should offer more of in Colombia.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's website. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, past information requests, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the WBG than a few years ago. Respondents were also asked about their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the WBG and that the WBG is responsive to information requests.

H. Development Organizations in the Region: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity and impressions of effectiveness with the Inter-American Development Bank and Latin American Development Bank.

I. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, whether they are an IFC client, their exposure to the WBG in Colombia, which WBG agencies they work with, and geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 271 stakeholders participated in the country survey (41% response rate).

Introduction

The Job Market Insights Dataset offers a comprehensive view of job postings worldwide, providing critical data on job roles, salaries, qualifications, locations, and company profiles. This dataset serves as a valuable resource for understanding global employment trends and patterns in various industries.

Objective

The primary objective of analyzing this dataset is to gain actionable insights into job market dynamics, including in-demand skills, salary ranges by role, preferred qualifications, and geographical job distributions. This analysis can empower job seekers, recruiters, and businesses to make informed decisions.

Key Features

1. Diverse Job Roles: Includes details for various professions like Network Engineers, Software Testers, UX/UI Designers, and more.
2. Global Scope: Covers jobs from diverse locations, spanning countries and industries worldwide.
3. Comprehensive Data Points: Provides salary ranges, qualifications, job types, company profiles, and benefits offered.
4. Temporal Data: Captures job posting dates to understand trends over time.
5. Skills and Responsibilities: Details required skills and responsibilities, aiding in understanding role-specific requirements.

Benefits for Data Science

• Predictive Modeling: Build models to predict salaries, skill demands, or the probability of job fulfillment.
• Trend Analysis: Identify trends in job roles, qualifications, and compensation.
• Geospatial Analysis: Map job distributions to uncover opportunities in specific regions.
• Clustering & Segmentation: Segment jobs by industry, role, or qualifications for targeted insights.
• Skill Gap Identification: Analyze skill requirements to identify gaps between current offerings and market demands.

This dataset is a goldmine for extracting insights that can optimize recruitment strategies, guide career planning, and inform educational initiatives.

Abstract

In an environment where the Bank must demonstrate its impact and value, it is critical that the institution collects and tracks empirical data on how its work is perceived by clients, partners and other stakeholders in our client countries.

In FY 2013, the Country Opinion Survey Program was scaled up in order to: - Annually assess perceptions of the World Bank among key stakeholders in a representative sample of client countries; - Track these opinions over time, representative of: regions, stakeholders, country lending levels, country income/size levels, etc. - Inform strategy and decision making: apply findings to challenges to ensure real time response at several levels: corporate, regional, country - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders regarding: - The general environment in their country; - Value of the World Bank in their country; - World Bank's presence (work, relationships, etc.); - World Bank's future role in their country. - Create a feedback loop that allows data to be shared with stakeholders.

Geographic coverage

The data from the 41 country surveys were combined in this review. Although individual countries are not specified, each country was designated as part of a particular region: Africa (AFR), East Asia (EAP), Europe/Central Asia (ECA), Latin America (LAC), Middle East/North Africa (MNA), and South Asia (SAR).

Analysis unit

Client Country

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In FY 2013 (July 2012 to July 1, 2013), 26,014 stakeholders of the World Bank in 41 different countries were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in these surveys were drawn from among senior government officials (from the office of the Prime Minister, President, Minister, Parliamentarian; i.e., elected officials), staff of ministries (employees of ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies, and government officials; i.e., non-elected government officials, and those attached to agencies implementing Bank-supported projects), consultants/contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff, bilateral and multilateral agency staff, private sector organizations, private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; non-government organizations (NGOs, including CBOs), the media, independent government institutions (e.g., regulatory agencies, central banks), trade unions, faith-based groups, members of academia or research institutes, and members of the judiciary.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of the following sections:

A. General Issues facing a country: Respondents were asked to indicate whether the country is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, and which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in the country.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's effectiveness in the country, the extent to which the Bank meets the country's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the extent to which the Bank should seek or does seek to influence the global development agenda. Respondents were also asked to rate their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Furthermore, respondents were asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most and least effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in the country, with which groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.

C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve sustainable development results in the country, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across thirty-five development areas, such as economic growth, public sector governance, basic infrastructure, social protection, and others.

D. The World Bank's Knowledge: Respondents were asked to indicate the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge/research, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results, its technical quality, and the Bank's effectiveness at providing linkage to non-Bank expertise.

E. Working with the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, and increasing the country's institutional capacity.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank in the country: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in the country's development in the near future, and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value in the country.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate where they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, their access to the Internet, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked to indicate their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in the country, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 9,279 stakeholders (36% response rate) participated and are part of this review.

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Bolivia or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Bolivia, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Bolivia. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Bolivia perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Bolivia regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Bolivia; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Bolivia; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Bolivia; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Bolivia. - Use data to help inform Bolivia country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

La Paz El Alto Santa Cruz Other city in urban area Rural area

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Stakeholders of the World Bank in Bolivia

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In March-May 2014, 440 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Bolivia were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries/ministerial departments; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; implementation agencies overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of 8 sections:

A. General Issues Facing Bolivia: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Bolivia is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Bolivia, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in Bolivia, WBG staff preparedness to help Bolivia solve its development challenges, WBG's local presence, WBG's capacity building in Bolivia, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Bolivia, and in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services).

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Bolivia, the extent to which the WBG meets Bolivia's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in thirty six development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across these areas, such as poverty reduction and equity, education, economic growth, and natural resource management.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the most recent LAC Flagship Report, including whether it raised substantive new information, and whether it provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, and disbursing funds promptly.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Bolivia: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Bolivia, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in Bolivia.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Bolivia, which WBG agencies they work with, and their geographic location.

Questionnaires were in English and Spanish

Response rate

A total of 210 stakeholders participated in the survey (48% response rate).

Abstract

The World Bank is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in China or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The World Bank Country Assessment Survey is meant to give the Bank's team that works in China, more in-depth insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the Bank uses to assess the views of its critical stakeholders. With this understanding, the World Bank hopes to develop more effective strategies, outreach and programs that support development in China. The World Bank commissioned an independent firm to oversee the logistics of this effort in China.

The survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in China perceive the Bank; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in China regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in China; · Their perceived overall value of the World Bank in China; · Overall impressions of the World Bank as related to programs, poverty reduction, personal relationships, effectiveness, knowledge base, collaboration, and its day-to-day operation; and · Perceptions of the World Bank's communication and outreach in China. - Use data to help inform the China country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Stakeholders of the World Bank in China

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

December 2011 thru March 2012, 518 stakeholders of the World Bank in China were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from among employees of a ministry or ministerial department of central government; local government officials or staff; project management offices at the central and local level; the central bank; financial sector/banks; NGOs; regulatory agencies; state-owned enterprises; bilateral or multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; consultants/contractors working on World Bank supported projects/programs; the media; and academia, research institutes or think tanks.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of 8 Sections: 1. Background Information: The first section asked respondents for their current position; specialization; familiarity, exposure to, and involvement with the Bank; and geographic location.

1. General Issues facing China: Respondents were asked to indicate what they thought were the most important development priorities, which areas would contribute most to poverty reduction and economic growth in China, as well as rating their perspective on the future of the next generation in China.

2. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate the Bank's overall effectiveness in China, the extent to which the Bank's financial instruments meet China's needs, the extent to which the Bank meets China's need for knowledge services, and their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's programs, poverty mission, relationships, and collaborations in China. Respondents were also asked to indicate the areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources and research, what the Bank's level of involvement should be, and what they felt were the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work.

3. The Work of the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of importance and the Bank's level of effectiveness across fifteen areas in which the Bank was involved, such as helping to reduce poverty and encouraging greater transparency in governance.

4. The Way the World Bank does Business: Respondents were asked to rate the Bank's level of effectiveness in the way it does business, including the Bank's knowledge, personal relationships, collaborations, and poverty mission.

5. Project/Program Related Issues: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding the Bank's programs, day-to-day operations, and collaborations in China.

6. The Future of the World Bank in China: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in China's development and to indicate what the Bank could do to make itself of greater value and what the greatest obstacle was to the Bank playing a significant role in China.

7. Communication and Outreach: Respondents were asked to indicate where they get information about development issues and the Bank's development activities in China, as well as how they prefer to receive information from the Bank. Respondents were also asked to indicate their usage of the Bank's website and PICs, and to evaluate these communication and outreach efforts.

Response rate

A total of 207 stakeholders participated in the country survey (40%).

Spain Job Offers Scraped Data

Uncovering Qualifications and Requirements

By [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains valuable web scraping information about job offers located in Spain, and gives details such as the offer name, company, location, and time of offer to potential employers. Having this knowledge is incredibly beneficial for any job seeker looking to target potential employers in Spain, understand the qualifications and requirements needed to be considered for a role and know approximately how long an offer is likely to stay on Linkedin. This dataset can also be extremely useful for recruiters who need a detailed overview of all job offers currently active in the Spanish market in order to filter out relevant vacancies. Lastly, professionals who have an eye on the Spanish job market can especially benefit from this dataset as it provides useful insights that can help optimise their search even more. This dataset consequently makes it easy for users interested in uncovering opportunities within Spain’s labour landscape with access detailed information about current job opportunities at their fingertips

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This guide will help those looking to use this dataset to discover the job market in Spain. The data provided in the dataset can be a great starting point for people who want to optimize their job search and uncover potential opportunities available.

• Understand What Is Being Measured:The dataset contains details such as a job offer name, company, and location along with other factors such as time of offer and type of schedule asked. It is important to understand what each column represents before using the data set.
• Number of Job Offers Available:This dataset provides an insight on how many job offers are available throughout Spain by showing which areas have a high number of jobs listed and what types of jobs are needed in certain areas or businesses. This information could be used for expanding your career or for searching for specific jobs within different regions in Spain that match your skillset or desired salary range .
• Required Qualifications & Skill Set:The type of schedule being asked by businesses is also mentioned, allowing users to understand if certain employers require multiple shifts, weekend work or hours outside the normal 9 - 5 depending on positions needed within companies located throughout the country . Additionally, understanding what skills sets are required not only quality you prioritize when learning new technologies or gaining qualifications but can give you an idea about what other soft skills may be required by businesses like team work , communication etc..
• Location Opportunities:This web scraping list allows users to gain access into potential companies located throughout Spain such as Madrid , Barcelona , Valencia etc.. By understanding where business demand exists across different regions one could look at taking up new roles with higher remuneration , specialize more closely in recruitments/searches tailored specifically towards various regions around Spain .

By following this guide, you should now have a robust understanding about how best utilize this dataset obtained from UOC along with an increased knowledge on identifying job opportunities available through webscraping for those seeking work experience/positions across multiple regions within the country

Research Ideas

• Analyzing the job market in Spain - Companies offering jobs can be compared and contrasted using this dataset, such as locations of where they are looking to hire, types of schedules they offer, length of job postings, etc. This information can let users to target potential employers instead of wasting time randomly applying for jobs online.
• Optimizing a Job Search- Web scraping allows users to quickly gather job postings from all sources on a daily basis and view relevant qualifications and requirements needed for each post in order to better optimize their job search process.
• Leveraging data insights – Insights collected by analyzing this web scraping dataset can be used for strategic advantage when creating LinkedIn or recruitment campaigns targeting Spanish markets based on the available applicants’ preferences – such as hours per week or area/position within particular companies typically offered in the datas set available from UOC

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

L...

Context

This dataset is an excerpt of our web scraping activities at Techmap.io and contains a sample of 33k Job Postings from the USA on May 5th 2023.

Techmap is a workplace search engine to help job-seekers find companies using specific technologies in their neighborhood. To identify the technologies used in companies we've collected and filtered job postings from all over the world and identified relevant technologies and workplace characteristics. In the process, we've charted technologies used in companies from different sources and built an extensive technology knowledge graph.

More job posting data exports starting from January 2020 can be bought from us as monthly, weekly, or daily exports.

We created this dataset by scraping multiple international sources and exporting all job ads from our MongoDB database using mongoexport. By default mongoexport writes data using one JSON document for every MongoDB document.

Inspiration

This dataset was created to help data scientists and researchers across the world.

License

This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International)

Content

Total Records Count: 33064 Sources: 29 job boards (174 with country-portals) such as CareerBuilder, EURES, Monster, or Linkedin Date Range: 5. May 2023 - 5. May 2023 File Extension: JSON

Available Fields

(as generated by variety.js)

+----------------------------------------------------
| key           | types   | Explanation
| ------------------------| ----------| -------------
| _id           | ObjectId | Unique ID from the MongoDB
| companyID        | ObjectId | ID to a company document in our MongoDB (unique for company but not unique for jobs)
| contact         | Object  | Map/Object with contact info from the JSON, HTML or extracted from job posting
| contact.email      | String  | Corporate email address mentioned from JSON or job posting
| contact.phone      | String  | Corporate phone address extracted from JSON or job posting
| dateCreated       | Date   | Date the job posting was created (or date scraped if creation date is not available)
| dateExpired       | Date   | Date the job posting expires
| dateScraped       | Date   | Date the job posting was scraped
| html          | String  | The raw HTML of the job description (can be plain text for some sources)
| idInSource       | String  | An id used in the source portal (unique for the source)
| json          | Object  | JSON found in the HTML page (schemaOrg contains a schem.org JobPosting and pageData1-3 source-specific json)
| locale         | String  | Locale extracted from the JSON or job posting (e.g., "en_US")
| locationID       | ObjectId | ID to a location document in our MongoDB (unique for company but not unique for jobs)
| name          | String  | Title or Name of the job posting
| orgAddress       | Object  | Original address data extracted from the job posting
| orgAddress.addressLine | String  | Raw address line - mostly just a city name
| orgAddress.city     | String  | City name from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.companyName | String  | Company name from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.country   | String  | Country name from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.countryCode | String  | ISO 3166 (2 letter) country code from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.county    | String  | County name from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.district   | String  | (City) District name from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.formatted  | String  | Formatted address data extracted from the job posting
| orgAddress.geoPoint   | Object  | Map of geo coordinate if stated in the JSON or job posting
| orgAddress.geoPoint.lat | Number  | Latitude of geo coordinate if stated in the JSON or job posting
| orgAddress.geoPoint.lng | Number  | Longitude of geo coordinate if stated in the JSON or job posting
| orgAddress.houseNumber | String  | House number extracted from the street or from JSON, HTML or extracted from addressLine
| orgAddress.level    | Number  | Granularity of address (Street-level: 2, PostCode-Level: 3, City-Level: 4, ...)
| orgAddress.postCode   | String  | Postal code / zip code extracted from JSON, HTML or addressLine
| orgAddress.quarter   | String  | (City) Quarter name from JSON, HTML or extracted fro...

Overview This dataset provides insights into salary distributions across various job classifications, enabling a deeper understanding of compensation trends across industries, experience levels, and geographical locations. It serves as a valuable resource for HR professionals, job seekers, researchers, and policymakers aiming to analyze pay scales, wage gaps, and salary progression trends.

Data Sources The data is aggregated from multiple employment and compensation reports, salary surveys, and publicly available job postings. It has been cleaned, standardized, and structured to ensure consistency and usability for analytical purposes.

Features Job Title: Specific title of the job (e.g., Data Analyst, Software Engineer, Marketing Manager).

Job Classification: Broad category of jobs (e.g., IT, Finance, Healthcare, Education).

Industry: The sector in which the job belongs (e.g., Technology, Banking, Retail).

Experience Level: Categorized as Entry-level, Mid-level, or Senior-level.

Education Requirement: Minimum qualification required for the job role.

Average Salary (INR/USD/Other Currency): The median or mean salary for a particular job classification.

Salary Range: The minimum and maximum salary offered for a role.

Location: Country or region where the job is based.

Employment Type: Full-time, Part-time, Contract, or Remote.

Company Size: Small, Medium, or Large enterprises.

Potential Use Cases Salary Benchmarking: Compare salary expectations across industries and job roles.

Career Planning: Identify lucrative career paths based on salary trends.

Wage Gap Analysis: Examine salary disparities by gender, location, or experience level.

Cost of Living Adjustments: Assess salaries relative to regional economic conditions.

HR and Recruitment Strategies: Optimize compensation packages to attract top talent.

Acknowledgments The dataset is compiled from various salary reports and job market research sources. Special thanks to contributors and organizations providing employment data for analysis.

License This dataset is shared for educational, research, and analytical purposes. Please ensure compliance with relevant data usage policies before any commercial applications.

Get Started The dataset can be explored using Python (Pandas), R, SQL, or visualization tools like Tableau and Power BI. Sample notebooks and analyses are available in the Kaggle notebook section.

This dataset provides values for FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

This dataset provides a comprehensive collection of salary information from various industries and regions across the globe. Sourced from reputable employment websites and surveys, it includes details on job titles, salaries, job sectors, geographic locations, and more. Analyze this data to gain insights into job market trends, compare compensation across different professions, and make informed decisions about your career or hiring strategies. The dataset is cleaned and preprocessed for ease of analysis and is available under an open license for research and data analysis purposes.

Education Level: 0 : High School 1 : Bachelor Degree 2 : Master Degree 3 : Phd

Currency : US Dollar

Senior : It shows that is this employee has a senior position or no.(Binary)

1) Data Introduction • The Data Science Salaries 2023 Dataset is a global annual salary analysis dataset that summarizes a variety of information in a tabular format, including salary, career, employment type, job, remote work rate, and company location and size for data science jobs as of 2023.

2) Data Utilization (1) Data Science Salaries 2023 Dataset has characteristics that: • Each row contains 11 key characteristics, including year, career level, employment type, job name, annual salary (local currency and USD), employee country of residence, remote work rate, company location, and company size. • Data is organized to reflect different countries, jobs, careers, and work patterns to analyze pay and work environments in data science in three dimensions. (2) Data Science Salaries 2023 Dataset can be used to: • Data Science Salary Analysis and Comparison: Analyzing salary levels and distributions by job, career, country, and company size can be used to understand industry trends and market value. • Establishing Recruitment and Career Strategies: It can be applied to recruitment strategies, career development, global talent attraction, etc. by analyzing the correlation between various working conditions and salaries such as remote work rates, employment types, and company location.

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in El Salvador or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in El Salvador, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in El Salvador. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in El Salvador perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in El Salvador regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in El Salvador; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in El Salvador; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in El Salvador; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in El Salvador. - Use data to help inform El Salvador country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

• Western Zone
• Central Zone
• Eastern Zone

Analysis unit

Stakeholders in El Salvador

Universe

Stakeholders in El Salvador

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In March-April 2014, 135 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in El Salvador were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; the office of the Prime Minister; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of following sections:

A. General Issues Facing El Salvador: Respondents were asked to indicate whether El Salvador is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in El Salvador, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in El Salvador, WBG staff preparedness to help El Salvador solve its development challenges, , their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in El Salvador, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in El Salvador, the extent to which the WBG meets El Salvador's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in thirty one development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across twenty-eight development areas, such as education, crime and violence, public sector governance/reform, poverty reduction, and economic growth.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the WBG reports, including if they read/consulted the most recent LAC Flagship Report, whether they raised substantive new information, and whether they provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, and disbursing funds promptly. They were also asked to indicate whether they thing the World Bank Group takes enough risks.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in El Salvador: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in El Salvador, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in El Salvador.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy. Respondents were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in El Salvador, which WBG agencies they work with, whether IFC and the Bank work well together, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 97 stakeholders participated in the survey (72% response rate).

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Côte d'Ivoire or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Côte d'Ivoire, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Côte d'Ivoire. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Côte d'Ivoire perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Côte d'Ivoire regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Côte d'Ivoire; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Côte d'Ivoire; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Côte d'Ivoire; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Côte d'Ivoire. - Use data to help inform Côte d'Ivoire country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

Urban and rural

Analysis unit

Stakeholders in Côte d'Ivoire

Universe

Stakeholders in Côte d'Ivoire

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

From December 2013 to January 2014, 500 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Côte d'Ivoire were invited to provide their opinions on the World Bank Group's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in the survey were drawn from the office of the President; the office of the Prime Minister; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on World Bank Group-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; youth organizations; the judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of following sections:

A. General Issues Facing Côte d'Ivoire: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Côte d'Ivoire is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Côte d'Ivoire, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved in Côte d'Ivoire.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG, the WBG's effectiveness in Côte d'Ivoire, WBG staff preparedness to help Côte d'Ivoire solve its development challenges, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Côte d'Ivoire, with which stakeholder groups the WBG should collaborate more, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Côte d'Ivoire, the extent to which the WBG meets Côte d'Ivoire's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in thirty five development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across these areas, such as security/stabilization/ reconstruction/reconciliation, public sector governance/reform, poverty reduction, and job creation/employment.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, and disbursing funds promptly.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Côte d'Ivoire: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Côte d'Ivoire, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were also asked to which areas the country will benefit most from WBG playing a leading role as compared to other donors.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the WBG, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the WBG as a result of the WBG's Open Data policy.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Côte d'Ivoire, which WBG agencies they work with, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 288 stakeholders participated in the survey (58% response rate).