100+ datasets found
  1. Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/809750/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of *******; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

  2. Most popular relational database management systems worldwide 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most popular relational database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131568/worldwide-popularity-ranking-relational-database-management-systems/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of June 2024, the most popular relational database management system (RDBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of 1244.08. Oracle was also the most popular DBMS overall. MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three.

  3. Most popular open source database management systems worldwide 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 12, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Most popular open source database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131602/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems-open-source/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of June 2024, the most popular open-source database management system (DBMS) in the world was MySQL, with a ranking score of 1061. Oracle was the most popular commercial DBMS at that time, with a ranking score of 1244.

  4. Most commonly used database technologies among developers worldwide 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Most commonly used database technologies among developers worldwide 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/794187/united-states-developer-survey-most-wanted-used-database-technologies/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    May 8, 2023 - May 19, 2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2023, over ** percent of surveyed software developers worldwide reported using PostgreSQL, the highest share of any database technology. Other popular database tools among developers included MySQL and SQLite.

  5. Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2024, by...

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2024, by model [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131595/worldwide-popularity-database-management-systems-category/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of December 2022, relational database management systems (RDBMS) were the most popular type of DBMS, accounting for a 72 percent popularity share. The most popular RDBMS in the world has been reported as Oracle, while MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three.

  6. Top SQL databases in software development globally 2015

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Aug 15, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2015). Top SQL databases in software development globally 2015 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/627698/worldwide-software-developer-survey-databases-used/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 2015
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The statistic displays the most popular SQL databases used by software developers worldwide, as of April 2015. According to the survey, 64 percent of software developers were using MySQL, an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS).

  7. Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2023, by...

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Popularity distribution of database management systems worldwide 2023, by license [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131575/worldwide-popularity-database-management-systems-license/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Nov 2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of November 2023, commercial database management systems (DBMSs) are slightly less popular than open source DBMSs, however, both have accumulated similar amounts of ranking scores. The most popular DBMS in the world was Oracle, a commercial system; open source system MySQL and Microsoft SQL server, another commercial system, rounded out the top three.

  8. Database management system market size worldwide 2017-2021

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Database management system market size worldwide 2017-2021 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/724611/worldwide-database-market/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The global database management system (DBMS) market revenue grew to 80 billion U.S. dollars in 2020. Cloud DBMS accounted for the majority of the overall market growth, as database systems are migrating to cloud platforms.

    Database market

    The database market consists of paid database software such as Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server, as well as free, open-source software options like PostgreSQL and MongolDB. Database Management Systems (DBMSs) provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases, with products like Oracle, MySQL, and Microsoft SQL Server being the most widely used in the market.

    Database management software

    Knowledge of the programming languages related to these databases is becoming an increasingly important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills such as MongoDB and Elasticsearch are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

  9. w

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Afghanistan,...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Oct 26, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria...and 136 more [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/4607
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2023
    Area covered
    Algeria
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    Individual

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender..

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  10. Public cloud services used worldwide 2025

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jul 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Public cloud services used worldwide 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1231134/public-cloud-services-usage/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2025, the survey underscores the continued dominance of data warehouses within cloud storage solutions. With ** percent of respondents utilizing them, it is evident that businesses value the extensive analytical capabilities and structured data organization that data warehouses provide. This trend signals a persistent need for centralized repositories for data storage and analytics to support strategic decision-making. DBaaS relational databases gain traction The survey reveals a rising preference for database-as-a-service (DBaaS) relational databases. This shift suggests that organizations are increasingly seeking the scalability, ease of maintenance, and reduced administrative overhead that DBaaS solutions provide. People are using DBaaS more because they want to make databases easier and spend more time on important things. Oracle leads this segment among the database management systems providers. PaaS adoption accelerates A key finding from the survey is the marked increase in the adoption of cloud providers' platform-as-a-service (PaaS) offerings. This trend speaks volumes about a broader transformation; companies are decisively moving towards cloud-based platforms for their data needs. PaaS provides convenient building blocks for application development and deployment, accelerating innovation and time-to-market.

  11. i

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Guatemala

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Guatemala [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/11349
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Guatemala
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Sample size for Guatemala is 1000.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  12. Oracle employees 2007-2024

    • ai-chatbox.pro
    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Oracle employees 2007-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.ai-chatbox.pro/?_=%2Fstatistics%2F236999%2Fnumber-of-employees-at-oracle-worldwide%2F%23XgboD02vawLKoDs%2BT%2BQLIV8B6B4Q9itA
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States, Worldwide
    Description

    Between fiscal year 2008 and 2024, Oracle’s total employee number had grown substantially, increasing from around 84,000 to 159,000. Oracle's annual revenues, on the other hand, has reached a record high in FY2023. Oracle Corporation Founded in 1977 by Larry Ellison, the small database start-up has grown into one of the biggest names in the database market around the world. For years, the company’s database products have been some of the most successful and widely used platforms in the industry. Massive growth in the tech industry and increased need for big data storage and analysis tools have transformed the small California start-up into one of the largest companies in the world in terms of market value. Oracle has shown great ability to adapt to the changing tech environment, quickly establishing itself in the cloud services business and constantly improving its database products. Despite the growing presence of free, open-source database software, Oracle’s quality and reputation within the industry has ensured that it remains one of the most popular platforms in the market. The fiscal year end of the company is May, 31st.

  13. Data from: World Database on Protected Areas

    • kiribati-data.sprep.org
    • pacificdata.org
    • +13more
    jpg, pdf
    Updated Feb 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (2025). World Database on Protected Areas [Dataset]. https://kiribati-data.sprep.org/dataset/world-database-protected-areas-0
    Explore at:
    jpg(577876), pdf(2100272)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Pacific Regional Environment Programmehttps://www.sprep.org/
    License

    Public Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    POLYGON ((205.20703554153 -28.505385171432, 129.26953554153 1.4588219018416, 141.3632941246 -0.22851555560937, 167.23828554153 25.085596467854, 204.92578983307 6.2279312638895)), 129.26953554153 27.605668449605, 160.20703554153 -29.489341672009, 141.92578554153 -11.126668087769, Pacific Region
    Description

    The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) is the most comprehensive global database of marine and terrestrial protected areas, updated on a monthly basis, and is one of the key global biodiversity data sets being widely used by scientists, businesses, governments, International secretariats and others to inform planning, policy decisions and management. The WDPA is a joint project between UN Environment and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The compilation and management of the WDPA is carried out by UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), in collaboration with governments, non-governmental organisations, academia and industry. There are monthly updates of the data which are made available online through the Protected Planet website where the data is both viewable and downloadable. Data and information on the world's protected areas compiled in the WDPA are used for reporting to the Convention on Biological Diversity on progress towards reaching the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (particularly Target 11), to the UN to track progress towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, to some of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) core indicators, and other international assessments and reports including the Global Biodiversity Outlook, as well as for the publication of the United Nations List of Protected Areas. Every two years, UNEP-WCMC releases the Protected Planet Report on the status of the world's protected areas and recommendations on how to meet international goals and targets. Many platforms are incorporating the WDPA to provide integrated information to diverse users, including businesses and governments, in a range of sectors including mining, oil and gas, and finance. For example, the WDPA is included in the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool, an innovative decision support tool that gives users easy access to up-to-date information that allows them to identify biodiversity risks and opportunities within a project boundary. The reach of the WDPA is further enhanced in services developed by other parties, such as the Global Forest Watch and the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas, which provide decision makers with access to monitoring and alert systems that allow whole landscapes to be managed better. Together, these applications of the WDPA demonstrate the growing value and significance of the Protected Planet initiative.

  14. w

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Chad

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Jun 8, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Chad [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/5849
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Chad
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    Because of security issues and difficult terrain, seven regions are excluded from the sampling: Lac, Ouaddaï, Wadi Fira, Bourkou, Ennedi, Tibesti, Salamat. In addition, the North Kanem and Bahr El Gazal North districts were excluded due to accessibility issues. Quartiers/villages with less than 50 inhabitants are also excluded from sampling. The excluded areas represent 23% of the population.

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Sample size for Chad is 1000.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  15. i

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2017 - Russian...

    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • microdata.worldbank.org
    Updated Mar 29, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2019). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2017 - Russian Federation [Dataset]. https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/catalog/7841
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2017
    Area covered
    Russia
    Description

    Abstract

    Financial inclusion is critical in reducing poverty and achieving inclusive economic growth. When people can participate in the financial system, they are better able to start and expand businesses, invest in their children’s education, and absorb financial shocks. Yet prior to 2011, little was known about the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and rural residents were excluded from formal financial systems.

    By collecting detailed indicators about how adults around the world manage their day-to-day finances, the Global Findex allows policy makers, researchers, businesses, and development practitioners to track how the use of financial services has changed over time. The database can also be used to identify gaps in access to the formal financial system and design policies to expand financial inclusion.

    Geographic coverage

    Sample excludes remote or difficult-to-access areas in the Far North, North Caucasus, and Far East (Nenets autonomous region, Yamalo-Nenetsautonomous region, Chukotsk region) as well as other remote or difficult-to-access districts. The excluded areas represent about 20% of the population.

    Analysis unit

    Individuals

    Universe

    The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above.

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    The indicators in the 2017 Global Findex database are drawn from survey data covering almost 150,000 people in 144 economies-representing more than 97 percent of the world's population (see Table A.1 of the Global Findex Database 2017 Report for a list of the economies included). The survey was carried out over the 2017 calendar year by Gallup, Inc., as part of its Gallup World Poll, which since 2005 has annually conducted surveys of approximately 1,000 people in each of more than 160 economies and in over 150 languages, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The target population is the entire civilian, noninstitutionalized population age 15 and above. Interview procedure Surveys are conducted face to face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where this is the customary methodology. In most economies the fieldwork is completed in two to four weeks.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used.

    Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed and the handheld survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In economies where telephone interviewing is employed, random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers is used. In most economies where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    The sample size was 2000.

    Mode of data collection

    Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in multiple countries, using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in more than 140 languages upon request.

    Questions on cash on delivery, saving using an informal savings club or person outside the family, domestic remittances, and agricultural payments are only asked in developing economies and few other selected countries. The question on mobile money accounts was only asked in economies that were part of the Mobile Money for the Unbanked (MMU) database of the GSMA at the time the interviews were being held.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar, and Jake Hess. 2018. The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. Washington, DC: World Bank

  16. w

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2014 - Afghanistan,...

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    Updated Oct 26, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2014 - Afghanistan, Angola, Angola...and 151 more [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2512
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2014
    Area covered
    Angola...and 151 more, Afghanistan, Angola
    Description

    Abstract

    Financial inclusion is critical in reducing poverty and achieving inclusive economic growth. When people can participate in the financial system, they are better able to start and expand businesses, invest in their children’s education, and absorb financial shocks. Yet prior to 2011, little was known about the extent of financial inclusion and the degree to which such groups as the poor, women, and rural residents were excluded from formal financial systems.

    By collecting detailed indicators about how adults around the world manage their day-to-day finances, the Global Findex allows policy makers, researchers, businesses, and development practitioners to track how the use of financial services has changed over time. The database can also be used to identify gaps in access to the formal financial system and design policies to expand financial inclusion.

    Geographic coverage

    The 2014 Global Findex Database covers around 150,000 adults in more than 140 economies and representing about 97 percent of the world's population. See Methodology document for country-specific geographic coverage details.

    Analysis unit

    Individual

    Universe

    The target population is the civilian, non-institutionalized population 15 years and above.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Frequency of data collection

    Triennial

    Sampling procedure

    As in the first edition, the indicators in the 2014 Global Findex are drawn from survey data covering almost 150,000 people in more than 140 economies-representing more than 97 percent of the world's population. The survey was carried out over the 2014 calendar year by Gallup, Inc. as part of its Gallup World Poll, which since 2005 has continually conducted surveys of approximately 1,000 people in each of more than 160 economies and in over 140 languages, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. The target population is the entire civilian, noninstitutionalized population age 15 and above. The set of indicators will be collected again in 2017.

    Surveys are conducted face to face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or is the customary methodology. In most economies the fieldwork is completed in two to four weeks. In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households by means of the Kish grid. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected through the Kish grid from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In economies where telephone interviewing is employed, random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers is used. In most economies where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Mode of data collection

    Other [oth]

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire was designed by the World Bank, in conjunction with a Technical Advisory Board composed of leading academics, practitioners, and policy makers in the field of financial inclusion. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Gallup Inc. also provided valuable input. The questionnaire was piloted in multiple countries, using focus groups, cognitive interviews, and field testing. The questionnaire is available in 142 languages upon request.

    Questions on cash withdrawals, saving using an informal savings club or person outside the family, domestic remittances, school fees, and agricultural payments are only asked in developing economies and few other selected countries. The question on mobile money accounts was only asked in economies that were part of the Mobile Money for the Unbanked (MMU) database of the GSMA at the time the interviews were being held.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Asli Demirguc-Kunt, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, and Peter Van Oudheusden, “The Global Findex Database 2014: Measuring Financial Inclusion around the World.” Policy Research Working Paper 7255, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

  17. e

    CoRRE Trait Database: A collection of 17 categorical and continuous traits...

    • portal.edirepository.org
    csv
    Updated Nov 17, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kimberly Komatsu; Meghan Avolio; Josep Padulles Cubino; Franziska Schrodt; Harold Auge; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Adam Clark; Habacuc Flores-Moreno; Emily Grman; W Stanley Harpole; Jens Kattge; Kaitlin Kimmel; Sally Koerner; Lotte Korell; J Adam Langley; Tamara Münkemüller; Timothy Ohlert; Renske Onstein; Christiane Roscher; Nadejda Soudzilovskaia; Benton Taylor; Leho Tedersoo; Rosalie Terry; Kevin Wilcox (2023). CoRRE Trait Database: A collection of 17 categorical and continuous traits for more than 4000 grassland species worldwide [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/31b1c78019b618106a0d13caab154e23
    Explore at:
    csv(3044968 byte), csv(72474339 byte), csv(3524292 byte)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 17, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    EDI
    Authors
    Kimberly Komatsu; Meghan Avolio; Josep Padulles Cubino; Franziska Schrodt; Harold Auge; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Adam Clark; Habacuc Flores-Moreno; Emily Grman; W Stanley Harpole; Jens Kattge; Kaitlin Kimmel; Sally Koerner; Lotte Korell; J Adam Langley; Tamara Münkemüller; Timothy Ohlert; Renske Onstein; Christiane Roscher; Nadejda Soudzilovskaia; Benton Taylor; Leho Tedersoo; Rosalie Terry; Kevin Wilcox
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    genus, trait, family, source, species, DatasetID, Reference, DatabaseID, trait_value, ObservationID, and 4 more
    Description

    In our changing world, it is critical to understand and predict plant community responses to global change drivers. Plant functional traits promise to be a key predictive tool for many ecosystems, including grasslands, however their use requires both complete plant community and functional trait data. Yet, representation of these data in global databases is incredibly sparse, particularly beyond a handful of most used traits and common species. Here we present the CoRRE Trait Database, spanning 17 traits (9 categorical, 8 continuous) anticipated to predict species’ responses to global change for 4,079 vascular plant species across 173 plant families present in 390 grassland experiments from around the world. The database contains complete categorical trait records for all 4,079 plant species, obtained from a comprehensive literature search. Additionally, the database contains nearly complete coverage (99.97%) of species mean values for continuous traits for a subset of 2,927 plant species, predicted from observed trait data drawn from TRY and a variety of other plant trait databases using Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (BHPMF) and multivariate imputation using chained equations (MICE). These data will shed light on mechanisms underlying population, community, and ecosystem responses to global change in grasslands worldwide.

  18. i

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Ethiopia

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Ethiopia [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/11347
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Ethiopia
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    Due to ongoing conflict and security issues, Tigray, Gambella, Harari regions were excluded. The excluded areas represent approximately 7% of the total population of Ethiopia.

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Sample size for Ethiopia is 1000.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  19. u

    Data from: Bibliographic dataset characterizing studies that use online...

    • portalcientifico.unav.edu
    • explore.openaire.eu
    • +1more
    Updated 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ball-Damerow, Joan E.; Brenskelle, Laura; Barve, Narayani; LaFrance, Raphael; Soltis, Pamela S.; Sierwald, Petra; Bieler, Rüdiger; Ariño, Arturo; Guralnick, Robert; Ball-Damerow, Joan E.; Brenskelle, Laura; Barve, Narayani; LaFrance, Raphael; Soltis, Pamela S.; Sierwald, Petra; Bieler, Rüdiger; Ariño, Arturo; Guralnick, Robert (2019). Bibliographic dataset characterizing studies that use online biodiversity databases [Dataset]. https://portalcientifico.unav.edu/documentos/67321cd2aea56d4af0483b6f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    2019
    Authors
    Ball-Damerow, Joan E.; Brenskelle, Laura; Barve, Narayani; LaFrance, Raphael; Soltis, Pamela S.; Sierwald, Petra; Bieler, Rüdiger; Ariño, Arturo; Guralnick, Robert; Ball-Damerow, Joan E.; Brenskelle, Laura; Barve, Narayani; LaFrance, Raphael; Soltis, Pamela S.; Sierwald, Petra; Bieler, Rüdiger; Ariño, Arturo; Guralnick, Robert
    Description

    This dataset includes bibliographic information for 501 papers that were published from 2010-April 2017 (time of search) and use online biodiversity databases for research purposes. Our overarching goal in this study is to determine how research uses of biodiversity data developed during a time of unprecedented growth of online data resources. We also determine uses with the highest number of citations, how online occurrence data are linked to other data types, and if/how data quality is addressed. Specifically, we address the following questions:

    1.) What primary biodiversity databases have been cited in published research, and which

     databases have been cited most often?
    

    2.) Is the biodiversity research community citing databases appropriately, and are

     the cited databases currently accessible online?
    

    3.) What are the most common uses, general taxa addressed, and data linkages, and how

     have they changed over time?
    

    4.) What uses have the highest impact, as measured through the mean number of citations

     per year?
    

    5.) Are certain uses applied more often for plants/invertebrates/vertebrates?

    6.) Are links to specific data types associated more often with particular uses?

    7.) How often are major data quality issues addressed?

    8.) What data quality issues tend to be addressed for the top uses?

    Relevant papers for this analysis include those that use online and openly accessible primary occurrence records, or those that add data to an online database. Google Scholar (GS) provides full-text indexing, which was important to identify data sources that often appear buried in the methods section of a paper. Our search was therefore restricted to GS. All authors discussed and agreed upon representative search terms, which were relatively broad to capture a variety of databases hosting primary occurrence records. The terms included: “species occurrence” database (8,800 results), “natural history collection” database (634 results), herbarium database (16,500 results), “biodiversity database” (3,350 results), “primary biodiversity data” database (483 results), “museum collection” database (4,480 results), “digital accessible information” database (10 results), and “digital accessible knowledge” database (52 results)--note that quotations are used as part of the search terms where specific phrases are needed in whole. We downloaded all records returned by each search (or the first 500 if there were more) into a Zotero reference management database. About one third of the 2500 papers in the final dataset were relevant. Three of the authors with specialized knowledge of the field characterized relevant papers using a standardized tagging protocol based on a series of key topics of interest. We developed a list of potential tags and descriptions for each topic, including: database(s) used, database accessibility, scale of study, region of study, taxa addressed, research use of data, other data types linked to species occurrence data, data quality issues addressed, authors, institutions, and funding sources. Each tagged paper was thoroughly checked by a second tagger.

    The final dataset of tagged papers allow us to quantify general areas of research made possible by the expansion of online species occurrence databases, and trends over time. Analyses of this data will be published in a separate quantitative review.

  20. i

    Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Mexico

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit (2023). Global Financial Inclusion (Global Findex) Database 2021 - Mexico [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/11353
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Unit
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Mexico
    Description

    Abstract

    The fourth edition of the Global Findex offers a lens into how people accessed and used financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mobility restrictions and health policies drove increased demand for digital services of all kinds.

    The Global Findex is the world’s most comprehensive database on financial inclusion. It is also the only global demand-side data source allowing for global and regional cross-country analysis to provide a rigorous and multidimensional picture of how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Global Findex 2021 data were collected from national representative surveys of almost 145,000 people in 139 economies, representing 97 percent of the world’s population. The latest edition follows the 2011, 2014, and 2017 editions, and it includes a number of new series measuring financial health and resilience and contains more granular data on digital payment adoption, including merchant and government payments.

    The Global Findex is an indispensable resource for financial service practitioners, policy makers, researchers, and development professionals.

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Kind of data

    Observation data/ratings [obs]

    Sampling procedure

    In most developing economies, Global Findex data have traditionally been collected through face-to-face interviews. Surveys are conducted face-to-face in economies where telephone coverage represents less than 80 percent of the population or where in-person surveying is the customary methodology. However, because of ongoing COVID-19–related mobility restrictions, face-to-face interviewing was not possible in some of these economies in 2021. Phone-based surveys were therefore conducted in 67 economies that had been surveyed face-to-face in 2017. These 67 economies were selected for inclusion based on population size, phone penetration rate, COVID-19 infection rates, and the feasibility of executing phone-based methods where Gallup would otherwise conduct face-to-face data collection, while complying with all government-issued guidance throughout the interviewing process. Gallup takes both mobile phone and landline ownership into consideration. According to Gallup World Poll 2019 data, when face-to-face surveys were last carried out in these economies, at least 80 percent of adults in almost all of them reported mobile phone ownership. All samples are probability-based and nationally representative of the resident adult population. Additionally, phone surveys were not a viable option in 16 economies in 2021, which were then surveyed in 2022.

    In economies where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of primary sampling units. These units are stratified by population size, geography, or both, and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size; otherwise, simple random sampling is used. Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day and, where possible, on different days. If an interview cannot be obtained at the initial sampled household, a simple substitution method is used. Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Each eligible household member is listed, and the hand-held survey device randomly selects the household member to be interviewed. For paper surveys, the Kish grid method is used to select the respondent. In economies where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected from among all eligible adults of the interviewer's gender.

    In traditionally phone-based economies, respondent selection follows the same procedure as in previous years, using random digit dialing or a nationally representative list of phone numbers. In most economies where mobile phone and landline penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used.

    The same respondent selection procedure is applied to the new phone-based economies. Dual frame (landline and mobile phone) random digital dialing is used where landline presence and use are 20 percent or higher based on historical Gallup estimates. Mobile phone random digital dialing is used in economies with limited to no landline presence (less than 20 percent).

    For landline respondents in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is 80 percent or higher, random selection of respondents is achieved by using either the latest birthday or household enumeration method. For mobile phone respondents in these economies or in economies where mobile phone or landline penetration is less than 80 percent, no further selection is performed. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day.

    Sample size for Mexico is 1000.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    Questionnaires are available on the website.

    Sampling error estimates

    Estimates of standard errors (which account for sampling error) vary by country and indicator. For country-specific margins of error, please refer to the Methodology section and corresponding table in Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/809750/worldwide-popularity-ranking-database-management-systems/
Organization logo

Most popular database management systems worldwide 2024

Explore at:
44 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jun 30, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Jun 2024
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

As of June 2024, the most popular database management system (DBMS) worldwide was Oracle, with a ranking score of *******; MySQL and Microsoft SQL server rounded out the top three. Although the database management industry contains some of the largest companies in the tech industry, such as Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, a number of free and open-source DBMSs such as PostgreSQL and MariaDB remain competitive. Database Management Systems As the name implies, DBMSs provide a platform through which developers can organize, update, and control large databases. Given the business world’s growing focus on big data and data analytics, knowledge of SQL programming languages has become an important asset for software developers around the world, and database management skills are seen as highly desirable. In addition to providing developers with the tools needed to operate databases, DBMS are also integral to the way that consumers access information through applications, which further illustrates the importance of the software.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu