This dataset simulates a set of key economic, social, and environmental indicators for 20 countries over the period from 2010 to 2019. The dataset is designed to reflect typical World Bank metrics, which are used for analysis, policy-making, and forecasting. It includes the following variables:

Country Name: The country for which the data is recorded. Year: The specific year of the observation (from 2010 to 2019). GDP (USD): Gross Domestic Product in billions of US dollars, indicating the economic output of a country. Population: The total population of the country in millions. Life Expectancy (in years): The average life expectancy at birth for the country’s population. Unemployment Rate (%): The percentage of the total labor force that is unemployed but actively seeking employment. CO2 Emissions (metric tons per capita): The per capita carbon dioxide emissions, reflecting environmental impact. Access to Electricity (% of population): The percentage of the population with access to electricity, representing infrastructure development. Country:

Description: Name of the country for which the data is recorded. Data Type: String Example: "United States", "India", "Brazil" Year:

Description: The year in which the data is observed. Data Type: Integer Range: 2010 to 2019 Example: 2012, 2015 GDP (USD):

Description: The Gross Domestic Product of the country in billions of US dollars, indicating the economic output. Data Type: Float (billions of USD) Example: 14200.56 (represents 14,200.56 billion USD) Population:

Description: The total population of the country in millions. Data Type: Float (millions of people) Example: 331.42 (represents 331.42 million people) Life Expectancy (in years):

Description: The average number of years a newborn is expected to live, assuming that current mortality rates remain constant throughout their life. Data Type: Float (years) Range: Typically between 50 and 85 years Example: 78.5 years Unemployment Rate (%):

Description: The percentage of the total labor force that is unemployed but actively seeking employment. Data Type: Float (percentage) Range: Typically between 2% and 25% Example: 6.25% CO2 Emissions (metric tons per capita):

Description: The amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the country, measured in metric tons. Data Type: Float (metric tons) Range: Typically between 0.5 and 20 metric tons per capita Example: 4.32 metric tons per capita Access to Electricity (%):

Description: The percentage of the population with access to electricity. Data Type: Float (percentage) Range: Typically between 50% and 100% Example: 95.7%

Context

The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans to countries of the world for capital projects. The World Bank's stated goal is the reduction of poverty. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank

Content

This dataset combines key education statistics from a variety of sources to provide a look at global literacy, spending, and access.

For more information, see the World Bank website.

Fork this kernel to get started with this dataset.

Acknowledgements

https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/dataset/bigquery-public-data:world_bank_health_population

http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/ed-stats

https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/world-bank-education

Citation: The World Bank: Education Statistics

Dataset Source: World Bank. This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - http://www.data.gov/privacy-policy#data_policy - and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

Banner Photo by @till_indeman from Unplash.

Inspiration

Of total government spending, what percentage is spent on education?

Graph and download economic data for Boone Indicator in Banking Market for World (DISCONTINUED) (DDOI051WA156NWDB) from 1999 to 2015 about boone indicator, banks, and depository institutions.

Graph and download economic data for Number of Bank Branches for United States (DDAI02USA643NWDB) from 2004 to 2019 about banks, depository institutions, and USA.

The number of full-time employees at the World Bank increased from 2016 to 2024, reaching 13,492. The World Bank Group and its subunits provide loans to low- and middle-income countries.

Abstract

The Country Opinion Survey in Zambia assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Zambia perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Zambia on 1) their views regarding the general environment in Zambia; 2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Zambia; 3) overall impressions of the WBG’s effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Zambia; and 4) their perceptions of the WBG’s future role in Zambia.

Geographic coverage

• Central Province
• Copperbelt Province
• Eastern Province
• Luapula Province
• Lusaka Province
• Muchinga Province
• North- Western Province
• Northern Province
• Southern Province
• Western Province

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Opinion leaders from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

From May to June 2021, 1,331 stakeholders of the WBG in Zambia were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG’s work in the country by participating in a Country Opinion Survey. Participants were drawn from the Office of the President, Vice President; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; employees of ministries/ministerial departments/implementation agencies; Project Management Units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of WBG projects; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; local governments; independent government institutions; the judicial system; state-owned enterprises; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; the financial sector/private banks; private foundations; NGOs and community based organizations; trade unions; faith-based groups; youth groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; the media; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The questionnaire used to collect the survey data consisted of the following 8 sections: A. Overall Context B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group C. World Bank Group’s Work and Engagement on the Ground D. World Bank Group’s Support in Development Areas E. World Bank Group’s Knowledge Work and Activities F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Zambia G. Communication and Information Sharing H. Background Information

The questionnaire was prepared in English.

Response rate

Response rate was 43%.

Graph and download economic data for Percentage of Foreign Bank Assets Among Total Bank Assets for Switzerland (DDOI14CHA156NWDB) from 2005 to 2013 about Switzerland, foreign, percent, assets, banks, and depository institutions.

During the 2023 financial year, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), part of the World Bank Group, supported a significant amount of private sector growth in developing countries globally. By industry, a little over half of IFC commitments that year went towards financial markets. Infrastructure followed behind, composing 15 percent of IFC commitments during 2023.

Abstract

The Country Opinion Survey in Viet Nam assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in better understanding how stakeholders in Viet Nam perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Viet Nam on 1) their views regarding the general environment in Viet Nam; 2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Viet Nam; 3) overall impressions of the WBG’s effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Viet Nam; and 4) their perceptions of the WBG’s future role in Viet Nam.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Viet Nam

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

From May to August 2024, a total of 985 stakeholders of the WBG in Viet Nam were invited to provide their opinions about the WBG’s work in the country by participating in a COS. A list of potential participants was compiled by the WBG country team and the field agency. Participants were drawn from the Office of the Prime Minister, Minister, Central Agencies, National Assembly, government institutions, local governments, bilateral/ multilateral agencies, the private sector, civil society organizations, academia, and the media. A total of 389 stakeholders participated in the survey.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The survey was conducted in English and Vietnamese languages. The English version is provided as related material.

Response rate

Response rate was 39%

This year’s survey results were compared to the FY20 Survey, with a response rate of 56% (N=580). Comparing responses across Country Surveys reflects changes in attitudes over time, as well as changes in respondent samples, methodology, and the survey instrument itself. To reduce the influence of the latter factor, only questions with similar response scales/options were analyzed. This year’s survey saw an increased outreach to and/or response from civil society, academia, and media but a decrease from government institutions, local government, and civil society. These differences in stakeholder composition between the two years should be considered when interpreting the results of the past-year comparison analyses.

Graph and download economic data for Bank Z-Score for World (DISCONTINUED) (DDSI011WA645NWDB) from 1996 to 2015 about Z-Score, banks, and depository institutions.

Graph and download economic data for Deposit Money Bank Assets to GDP for China (DDDI02CNA156NWDB) from 1985 to 2021 about China, deposits, assets, banks, depository institutions, and GDP.

As of December 31, 2024, the largest bank in the world in terms of market capitalization was the U.S.-based J*************. The American banking giant's market cap exceeded *** billion U.S. dollars, which was significantly higher than ***************'s, which ranked second with a market cap of approximately ****** billion U.S. dollars. ************** was also the largest bank in the United States in terms of total assets but ranked only fifth globally, behind four Chinese banks. What is market capitalization? Market capitalization, also known as stock market value, is the total value of issued shares of a publicly traded company. It is equal to the share price multiplied by the number of shares outstanding. It applies only to publicly traded companies or companies that have made their stock market debut, also known as an initial public offering, or IPO. Due to the nature of the capitalist system and the practice of buying and selling stocks in public markets, market capitalization can be used as a proxy for the wider public’s opinion of a company’s net worth, making it therefore a determining factor in calculating other theoretical values of companies and their stocks, for example, stock valuation. How were banks affected by the coronavirus outbreak? The outbreak of the coronavirus left no industries unaffected and had a significant impact on the global financial markets. This can be seen in the banking industry, as the market capitalization of the largest banks worldwide dropped markedly between December 2019 and March 2020. For the largest bank, JPMorgan Chase, it was not until February 2021 that the market capitalization saw pre-pandemic figures again.

Graph and download economic data for Bank Concentration for United States (DDOI01USA156NWDB) from 2000 to 2021 about banks, depository institutions, and USA.

The International Development Association (IDA), part of the World Bank system, distributed billions in interest-free loans to low-income countries in 2023. That year, Pakistan was the leading fiscal borrower, borrowing over 2.3 billion U.S. dollars from the IDA. Other major borrowers include Bangladesh, Tanzania, Kenya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Total global commitments from the World Bank Group in 2024 reached ***** billion U.S. dollars. Sub-Saharan Africa was the region that received the highest sum, at nearly ** billion dollars. The World Bank Group provides loans to low- and middle-income countries.

Abstract

In an environment where the Bank must demonstrate its impact and value, it is critical that the institution collects and tracks empirical data on how its work is perceived by clients, partners and other stakeholders in our client countries.

The Country Opinion Survey Program was scaled up in order to: - Annually assess perceptions of the World Bank among key stakeholders in a representative sample of client countries; - Track these opinions over time, representative of: regions, stakeholders, country lending levels, country income/size levels, etc. - Inform strategy and decision making: apply findings to challenges to ensure real time response at several levels: corporate, regional, country - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders regarding: • The general environment in their country; • Value of the World Bank in their country; • World Bank's presence (work, relationships, etc.); • World Bank's future role in their country. - Create a feedback loop that allows data to be shared with stakeholders.

Geographic coverage

The data from the 29 country surveys were combined in this review. Although individual countries are not specified, each country was designated as part of a particular region: Africa (AFR), East Asia (EAP), Europe/Central Asia (ECA), Latin America (LAC), Middle East/North Africa (MNA), and South Asia (SAR).

Analysis unit

Client Country

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In FY 2012 (July 2011 to July 1, 2012), 15,029 stakeholders of the World Bank in 29 different countries were invited to provide their opinions on the Bank's assistance to the country by participating in a country survey. Participants in these surveys were drawn from among senior government officials (from the office of the Prime Minister, President, Minister, Parliamentarian; i.e., elected officials), staff of ministries (employees of ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies, and government officials; i.e., non-elected government officials, and those attached to agencies implementing Bank-supported projects), consultants/contractors working on World Bank-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials or staff, bilateral and multilateral agency staff, private sector organizations, private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; non-government organizations (NGOs, including CBOs), the media, independent government institutions (e.g., regulatory agencies, central banks), trade unions, faith-based groups, members of academia or research institutes, and members of the judiciary.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of the following sections:

A. General Issues facing a country: Respondents were asked to indicate whether the country is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities, and which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in the country.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the World Bank, the Bank's effectiveness in the country, the extent to which the Bank meets the country's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, and the extent to which the Bank should seek or does seek to influence the global development agenda. Respondents were also asked to rate their agreement with various statements regarding the Bank's work and the extent to which the Bank is an effective development partner. Furthermore, respondents were asked to indicate the sectoral areas on which it would be most productive for the Bank to focus its resources, the Bank's greatest values and greatest weaknesses in its work, the most and least effective instruments in helping to reduce poverty in the country, with which groups the Bank should collaborate more, and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts.

C. World Bank Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the Bank's work helps achieve sustainable development results in the country, and the Bank's level of effectiveness across thirty-five development areas, such as economic growth, public sector governance, basic infrastructure, social protection, and others.

D. The World Bank's Knowledge: Respondents were asked to indicate the areas on which the Bank should focus its research efforts, and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the Bank's knowledge/research, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results, its technical quality, and the Bank's effectiveness at providing linkage to non-Bank expertise.

E. Working with the World Bank: Respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the Bank, such as the World Bank's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the Bank imposing reasonable conditions on its lending, disbursing funds promptly, and increasing the country's institutional capacity.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank in the country: Respondents were asked to rate how significant a role the Bank should play in the country's development in the near future, and to indicate what the Bank should do to make itself of greater value in the country.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate where they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the Bank, their access to the Internet, and their usage and evaluation of the Bank's websites. Respondents were asked about their awareness of the Bank's Access to Information policy, past information requests from the Bank, and their level of agreement that they use more data from the World Bank as a result of the Bank's Open Data policy. Respondents were also asked to indicate their level of agreement that they know how to find information from the Bank and that the Bank is responsive to information requests.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the World Bank, their exposure to the Bank in the country, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 7,142 stakeholders (48% response rate) participated and are part of this review.

All the details in https://www.kaggle.com/gemartin/world-bank-data-1960-to-2016/ also apply to this new dataset.

The preprocessed data has been generated using the data preparatory notebook https://www.kaggle.com/neomatrix369/chaieda-world-bank-data-1960-2016-data-prep.

Context

Extending the current dataset to enable better analysis and reasonings

Content

A number of economic, geographic, country and region-specific data and indicators from different datasets have been aggregated.

Acknowledgements

A number of Kaggle users have been helpful in the process of creation of this dataset, they have been mentioned in the data preparatory notebook https://www.kaggle.com/neomatrix369/chaieda-world-bank-data-1960-2016-data-prep.

Inspiration

Other similar aggregated datasets and competition data and notebooks.

Context

This dataset provides country-level GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in current US dollars from 2000 to 2025, mapped to the seven classic continents (Asia, Africa, Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and Antarctica). It is designed to make global economic data easier to explore, compare, and visualize by combining both geographic and temporal dimensions.

GDP is one of the most widely used indicators to measure the size of an economy, its growth trends, and relative economic performance across regions.

Source

Data Provider: World Bank Open Data

Indicator Used: NY.GDP.MKTP.CD → GDP (current US$)

License: World Bank Dataset Terms of Use (aligned with CC BY 4.0)

Note: 2024–2025 values may be incomplete or missing for some countries, depending on World Bank publication updates.

Dataset Structure

Name of country → Country name

Continent → One of the 7 continents

2000–2025 → GDP values in current US$ (float, may contain missing values NaN)

Format: wide panel data (one row per country, one column per year).

Inspiration & Use Cases

This dataset was prepared to make economic analysis, visualization, and forecasting more accessible. It can be used for:

• Time-series forecasting (predicting GDP growth into the future)
• Cross-country comparisons (e.g., comparing GDP trends of India vs. USA vs. Brazil)
• Continent-level aggregation (summing GDP by continent per year)
• Data visualization (heatmaps, line charts, world choropleths)
• Machine Learning applications (e.g., clustering countries by GDP trajectory)

Citation

If you use this dataset, please cite:

Source: World Bank, World Development Indicators (NY.GDP.MKTP.CD). Licensed under the World Bank Terms of Use.

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Costa Rica or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Costa Rica, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Costa Rica. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Costa Rica perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Costa Rica regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Costa Rica; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Costa Rica; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Costa Rica; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Costa Rica. - Use data to help inform Costa Rica country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

Greater Metropolitan Area North South

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In April - June 2014, 310 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; the judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of 8 sections:

A. General Issues Facing Costa Rica: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Costa Rica is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Costa Rica, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in Costa Rica, WBG staff preparedness to help Costa Rica solve its development challenges, WBG's local presence, WBG's capacity building in Costa Rica, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Costa Rica, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Costa Rica, the extent to which the WBG meets Costa Rica's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in twenty nine development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across twenty one of these areas, such as transport, economic growth, public sector governance/reform, poverty reduction, and trade and exports.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the WBG reports, including which of them are the most useful, whether they raised substantive new information, and whether they provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, the WBG's speed in disbursing funds, and whether the WBG is risk-averse.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Costa Rica: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Costa Rica, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in Costa Rica.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Costa Rica, which WBG agencies they work with, whether IFC and the Bank work well together, and their geographic location.

Questionnaires were in English and Spanish.

Response rate

A total of 127 stakeholders participated in the survey (41% response rate).

Abstract

The World Bank Group is interested in gauging the views of clients and partners who are either involved in development in Peru or who observe activities related to social and economic development. The following survey will give the World Bank Group's team that works in Peru, greater insight into how the Bank's work is perceived. This is one tool the World Bank Group uses to assess the views of its stakeholders, and to develop more effective strategies that support development in Peru. A local independent firm was hired to oversee the logistics of this survey.

This survey was designed to achieve the following objectives: - Assist the World Bank Group in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Peru perceive the Bank Group; - Obtain systematic feedback from stakeholders in Peru regarding: · Their views regarding the general environment in Peru; · Their overall attitudes toward the World Bank Group in Peru; · Overall impressions of the World Bank Group's effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Peru; · Perceptions of the World Bank Group's future role in Peru. - Use data to help inform Peru country team's strategy.

Geographic coverage

Metropolitan Lima Area, Outside of Metropolitan Lima Area

Analysis unit

Stakeholders in Peru

Universe

Stakeholders in Peru

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

In February-April 2014, 465 stakeholders of the World Bank Group in Peru were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG's work in the country by participating in a country opinion survey. Participants were drawn from the office of the President; the office of the Prime Minister; office of a minister; office of a parliamentarian; ministries, ministerial departments, or implementation agencies; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; project management units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of a project; local government officials; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; private foundations; the financial sector/private banks; NGOs; community based organizations; the media; independent government institutions; trade unions; faith-based groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; judiciary branch; and other organizations.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The Questionnaire consists of following sections:

A. General Issues Facing Peru: Respondents were asked to indicate whether Peru is headed in the right direction, what they thought were the top three most important development priorities in the country, which areas would contribute most to reducing poverty and generating economic growth in Peru, and how "shared prosperity" would be best achieved.

B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group (WBG): Respondents were asked to rate their familiarity with the WBG and other regional development banks, their effectiveness in Peru, WBG staff preparedness to help Peru solve its development challenges, WBG's local presence, WBG's capacity building in Peru, their agreement with various statements regarding the WBG's work, and the extent to which the WBG is an effective development partner. Respondents were asked to indicate the WBG's greatest values and weaknesses, the most effective instruments in helping reduce poverty in Peru, in which sectoral areas the WBG should focus most of its resources (financial and knowledge services), and to what reasons respondents attributed failed or slow reform efforts. Respondents were also asked to respond to a few questions about capacity building and whether they believe the World Bank Group should have more or less local presence.

C. World Bank Group's Effectiveness and Results: Respondents were asked to rate the extent to which the WBG's work helps achieve development results in Peru, the extent to which the WBG meets Peru's needs for knowledge services and financial instruments, the importance for the WBG to be involved in thirty one development areas, and the WBG's level of effectiveness across these areas, such as education, public sector governance/reform, water and sanitation, and transport.

D. The World Bank Group's Knowledge Work and Activities: Respondents were asked to indicate how frequently they consult WBG's knowledge work and activities and to rate the effectiveness and quality of the WBG's knowledge work and activities, including how significant of a contribution it makes to development results and its technical quality. Respondents were also asked about the WBG reports, including which of them are the most useful, whether they raised substantive new information, and whether they provided them with useful information in terms of work they do.

E. Working with the World Bank Group: Respondents were asked to rate WBG's technical assistance/advisory work's contribution to solving development challenges and their level of agreement with a series of statements regarding working with the WBG, such as the WBG's "Safeguard Policy" requirements being reasonable, and disbursing funds promptly.

F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Peru: Respondents were asked to indicate what the WBG should do to make itself of greater value in Peru, and which services the Bank should offer more of in the country. They were asked whether WBG has moved to the right direction, and the future role international development cooperation should play in Peru.

G. Communication and Information Sharing: Respondents were asked to indicate how they get information about economic and social development issues, how they prefer to receive information from the WBG, and their usage and evaluation of the WBG's websites. Respondents were also asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information policy, were asked to rate WBG's responsiveness to information requests, value of its social media channels, and levels of easiness to find information they needed.

H. Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position, specialization, whether they professionally collaborate with the WBG, their exposure to the WBG in Peru, which WBG agencies they work with, whether IFC and the Bank work well together, and their geographic location.

Response rate

A total of 197 stakeholders participated in the survey (42% response rate).