16 datasets found
  1. Wyoming Population density

    • knoema.com
    csv, json, sdmx, xls
    Updated Jun 28, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Knoema (2023). Wyoming Population density [Dataset]. https://knoema.com/atlas/United-States-of-America/Wyoming/Population-density
    Explore at:
    sdmx, xls, json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Knoemahttp://knoema.com/
    Time period covered
    2011 - 2022
    Area covered
    United States, Wyoming
    Variables measured
    Population density
    Description

    Population density of Wyoming improved by 0.43% from 2.30 persons per sq. km in 2021 to 2.31 persons per sq. km in 2022.

  2. Population density in the U.S. 2023, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population density in the U.S. 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/183588/population-density-in-the-federal-states-of-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, Washington, D.C. had the highest population density in the United States, with 11,130.69 people per square mile. As a whole, there were about 94.83 residents per square mile in the U.S., and Alaska was the state with the lowest population density, with 1.29 residents per square mile. The problem of population density Simply put, population density is the population of a country divided by the area of the country. While this can be an interesting measure of how many people live in a country and how large the country is, it does not account for the degree of urbanization, or the share of people who live in urban centers. For example, Russia is the largest country in the world and has a comparatively low population, so its population density is very low. However, much of the country is uninhabited, so cities in Russia are much more densely populated than the rest of the country. Urbanization in the United States While the United States is not very densely populated compared to other countries, its population density has increased significantly over the past few decades. The degree of urbanization has also increased, and well over half of the population lives in urban centers.

  3. d

    Population Density in the Western United States (Individuals / ha)

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Steve Hanser, USGS-FRESC, Snake River Field Station (2016). Population Density in the Western United States (Individuals / ha) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/04f758d8-9caa-40ab-af6e-bb72b1b7a007
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Steve Hanser, USGS-FRESC, Snake River Field Station
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Value, ObjectID
    Description

    This map of human habitation was developed, following a modification of Schumacher et al. (2000), by incorporating 2000 U.S Census Data and land ownership. The 2000 U.S. Census Block data and ownership map of the western United States were used to correct the population density for uninhabited public lands. All census blocks in the western United States were merged into one shapefile which was then clipped to contain only those areas found on private or indian reservation lands because human habitation on federal land is negligible. The area (ha) for each corrected polygon was calculated and the 2000 census block data table was joined to the shapefile. In a new field, population density (individuals/ha) corrected for public land in census blocks was calculated . SHAPEGRID in ARC/INFO was used to convert population density values to grid with 90m resolution.

  4. U.S. per capita personal income in Wyoming 2000-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. per capita personal income in Wyoming 2000-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/205583/per-capita-personal-income-in-wyoming/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 14, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, the per capita personal income in Wyoming was 82,060 U.S. dollars. Per capita personal income is calculated as the personal income of the residents of a given area divided by the resident population of the area.

  5. Wyoming CO2 emissions per capita

    • hi.knoema.com
    csv, json, sdmx, xls
    Updated Mar 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Knoema (2025). Wyoming CO2 emissions per capita [Dataset]. https://hi.knoema.com/atlas/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9/wyoming/co2-emissions-per-capita
    Explore at:
    sdmx, json, csv, xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Knoemahttp://knoema.com/
    Time period covered
    2006 - 2017
    Area covered
    Wyoming, United States of America
    Variables measured
    Annual fossil-fuel CO2 emitted per capita
    Description

    0.105 (metric tones of carbon) in 2017. A ratio of annual fossil-fuel CO2 emitted to population.

  6. Data from: Shortgrass Steppe site, station Laramie County, WY (FIPS 56021),...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project (2015). Shortgrass Steppe site, station Laramie County, WY (FIPS 56021), study of percent urban population in units of percent on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F13332%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Nichole Rosamilia; Christopher Boone; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; Ted Gragson; Michael R. Haines; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1870 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Shortgrass Steppe (SGS) contains percent urban population measurements in percent units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  7. Glacier Lakes Ecosystems Experiments Site site, station Carbon County, WY...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Mar 11, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; EcoTrends Project (2015). Glacier Lakes Ecosystems Experiments Site site, station Carbon County, WY (FIPS 56007), study of human population density in units of numberPerKilometerSquared on a yearly timescale [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fecotrends%2F7451%2F2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Long Term Ecological Research Networkhttp://www.lternet.edu/
    Authors
    U.S. Bureau of the Census; Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research; EcoTrends Project
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1880 - Jan 1, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    YEAR, S_DEV, S_ERR, ID_OBS, N_TRACE, N_INVALID, N_MISSING, N_EXPECTED, N_OBSERVED, N_ESTIMATED, and 3 more
    Description

    The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Glacier Lakes Ecosystems Experiments Site (GLA) contains human population density measurements in numberPerKilometerSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

  8. U.S. real per capita GDP 2023, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. real per capita GDP 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/248063/per-capita-us-real-gross-domestic-product-gdp-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Out of all 50 states, New York had the highest per-capita real gross domestic product (GDP) in 2023, at 90,730 U.S. dollars, followed closely by Massachusetts. Mississippi had the lowest per-capita real GDP, at 39,102 U.S. dollars. While not a state, the District of Columbia had a per capita GDP of more than 214,000 U.S. dollars. What is real GDP? A country’s real GDP is a measure that shows the value of the goods and services produced by an economy and is adjusted for inflation. The real GDP of a country helps economists to see the health of a country’s economy and its standard of living. Downturns in GDP growth can indicate financial difficulties, such as the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009, when the U.S. GDP decreased by 2.5 percent. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on U.S. GDP, shrinking the economy 2.8 percent. The U.S. economy rebounded in 2021, however, growing by nearly six percent. Why real GDP per capita matters Real GDP per capita takes the GDP of a country, state, or metropolitan area and divides it by the number of people in that area. Some argue that per-capita GDP is more important than the GDP of a country, as it is a good indicator of whether or not the country’s population is getting wealthier, thus increasing the standard of living in that area. The best measure of standard of living when comparing across countries is thought to be GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) which uses the prices of specific goods to compare the absolute purchasing power of a countries currency.

  9. Population in the states of the U.S. 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Population in the states of the U.S. 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/183497/population-in-the-federal-states-of-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    California was the state with the highest resident population in the United States in 2024, with 39.43 million people. Wyoming had the lowest population with about 590,000 residents. Living the American Dream Ever since the opening of the West in the United States, California has represented the American Dream for both Americans and immigrants to the U.S. The warm weather, appeal of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, as well as cities that stick in the imagination such as San Francisco and Los Angeles, help to encourage people to move to California. Californian demographics California is an extremely diverse state, as no one ethnicity is in the majority. Additionally, it has the highest percentage of foreign-born residents in the United States. By 2040, the population of California is expected to increase by almost 10 million residents, which goes to show that its appeal, both in reality and the imagination, is going nowhere fast.

  10. d

    Human Population in the Western United States (1900 - 2000)

    • dataone.org
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Steven Hanser, USGS-FRESC, Snake River Field Station (2016). Human Population in the Western United States (1900 - 2000) [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/e4102f83-6264-4903-9105-e7d5e160b98a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Steven Hanser, USGS-FRESC, Snake River Field Station
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    FID, AREA, FIPS, STATE, Shape, COUNTY, STFIPS, PC10-00, PC20-10, PC30-20, and 30 more
    Description

    Map containing historical census data from 1900 - 2000 throughout the western United States at the county level. Data includes total population, population density, and percent population change by decade for each county. Population data was obtained from the US Census Bureau and joined to 1:2,000,000 scale National Atlas counties shapefile.

  11. Predicted total lek count and number of inactive (0 males), small (1–10...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rebecca L. Taylor; Jason D. Tack; David E. Naugle; L. Scott Mills (2023). Predicted total lek count and number of inactive (0 males), small (1–10 males), medium-sized (11–25 males) and large (>25 males) leks for northeast Wyoming as a function of oil and gas well density (#/km2) within 20 km of each lek and WNv outbreak or non-outbreak year status. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071256.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Rebecca L. Taylor; Jason D. Tack; David E. Naugle; L. Scott Mills
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wyoming
    Description

    1Mean well density in 2009 within a 20 km radius of northeast Wyoming leks.2Maximum well density in 2009 within a 20 km radius of northeast Wyoming leks.3Permitting levels for well density on United States federal land.

  12. d

    Data from: Differential influences of local subpopulations on regional...

    • datadryad.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Jul 29, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jeffrey R. Row; Sara J. Oyler-McCance; Bradley C. Fedy (2016). Differential influences of local subpopulations on regional diversity and differentiation for greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.s4k74
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad
    Authors
    Jeffrey R. Row; Sara J. Oyler-McCance; Bradley C. Fedy
    Time period covered
    2016
    Area covered
    Wyoming
    Description

    Microsatellite genotypes for greater sage-grouse.Microsatellite genotypes (number of repeats for 14 loci) for 781 individuals from 10 subpopulations of the greater sage-grouse in Wyoming.rowetal_mol_ecol_2016.csv

  13. Per capita CO₂ emissions in the U.S. 1970-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Per capita CO₂ emissions in the U.S. 1970-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1049662/fossil-us-carbon-dioxide-emissions-per-person/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The average American was responsible for emitting 13.8 metric tons of carbon dioxide (tCO₂) in 2023. U.S. per capita fossil CO₂ emissions have fallen by more than 30 percent since 1990. Global per capita emission comparisons Despite per capita emissions in the U.S. falling notably in recent decades, they remain roughly three times above global average per capita CO₂ emissions. In fact, the average American emits more CO₂ in one day than the average Somalian does throughout the entire year. Additionally, while China is now the world’s biggest emitter, the average Chinese citizen’s annual carbon footprint is roughly half the average American’s. Which U.S. state has the largest carbon footprint? Per capita energy-related CO₂ emissions in the U.S. vary greatly by state. Wyoming was the biggest CO₂ emitter per capita in 2022, with 97 tCO₂ per person. The least-populated state’s high per capita emissions are mainly due to its heavily polluting coal industry. In contrast, New Yorkers had the one of the smallest carbon footprints in 2022, at less than nine tCO₂ per person.

  14. d

    National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated May 20, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Wyoming. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/3288f0525a164d4cbbe6be3296ccc825/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2018
    Description

    description: This shapefile contains landscape factors representing human disturbances summarized to local and network catchments of river reaches for the state of Wyoming. This dataset is the result of clipping the feature class 'NFHAP 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data for the Conterminous United States linked to NHDPLUSV1.gdb' to the state boundary of Wyoming. Landscape factors include land uses, population density, roads, dams, mines, and point-source pollution sites. The source datasets that were compiled and attributed to catchments were identified as being: (1) meaningful for assessing fish habitat; (2) consistent across the entire study area in the way that they were assembled; (3) representative of conditions in the past 10 years, and (4) of sufficient spatial resolution that they could be used to make valid comparisons among local catchment units. In this data set, these variables are linked to the catchments of the National Hydrography Dataset Plus Version 1 (NHDPlusV1) using the COMID identifier. They can also be linked to the reaches of the NHDPlusV1 using the COMID identifier. Catchment attributes are available for both local catchments (defined as the land area draining directly to a reach; attributes begin with "L_" prefix) and network catchments (defined by all upstream contributing catchments to the reach's outlet, including the reach's own local catchment; attributes begin with "N_" prefix). This shapefile also includes habitat condition scores created based on responsiveness of biological metrics to anthropogenic landscape disturbances throughout ecoregions. Separate scores were created by considering disturbances within local catchments, network catchments, and a cumulative score that accounted for the most limiting disturbance operating on a given biological metric in either local or network catchments. This assessment only scored reaches representing streams and rivers (see the process section for more details). Please use the following citation: Esselman, P., D.M. Infante, L. Wang, W. Taylor, W. Daniel, R. Tingley, J. Fenner, A. Cooper, D. Wieferich, D. Thornbrugh and J. Ross. (April 2011) National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Wyoming. National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7VM499V; abstract: This shapefile contains landscape factors representing human disturbances summarized to local and network catchments of river reaches for the state of Wyoming. This dataset is the result of clipping the feature class 'NFHAP 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data for the Conterminous United States linked to NHDPLUSV1.gdb' to the state boundary of Wyoming. Landscape factors include land uses, population density, roads, dams, mines, and point-source pollution sites. The source datasets that were compiled and attributed to catchments were identified as being: (1) meaningful for assessing fish habitat; (2) consistent across the entire study area in the way that they were assembled; (3) representative of conditions in the past 10 years, and (4) of sufficient spatial resolution that they could be used to make valid comparisons among local catchment units. In this data set, these variables are linked to the catchments of the National Hydrography Dataset Plus Version 1 (NHDPlusV1) using the COMID identifier. They can also be linked to the reaches of the NHDPlusV1 using the COMID identifier. Catchment attributes are available for both local catchments (defined as the land area draining directly to a reach; attributes begin with "L_" prefix) and network catchments (defined by all upstream contributing catchments to the reach's outlet, including the reach's own local catchment; attributes begin with "N_" prefix). This shapefile also includes habitat condition scores created based on responsiveness of biological metrics to anthropogenic landscape disturbances throughout ecoregions. Separate scores were created by considering disturbances within local catchments, network catchments, and a cumulative score that accounted for the most limiting disturbance operating on a given biological metric in either local or network catchments. This assessment only scored reaches representing streams and rivers (see the process section for more details). Please use the following citation: Esselman, P., D.M. Infante, L. Wang, W. Taylor, W. Daniel, R. Tingley, J. Fenner, A. Cooper, D. Wieferich, D. Thornbrugh and J. Ross. (April 2011) National Fish Habitat Action Plan (NFHAP) 2010 HCI Scores and Human Disturbance Data (linked to NHDPLUSV1) for Wyoming. National Fish Habitat Partnership Data System. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.5066/F7VM499V

  15. d

    2016 Cartographic Boundary File, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • data.wu.ac.at
    html, zip
    Updated Jun 5, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). 2016 Cartographic Boundary File, 2010 Urban Areas (UA) within 2010 County and Equivalent for Wyoming, 1:500,000. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/d034ff9157e84bbdaa1c66961fd6dd4f/html
    Explore at:
    zip, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2017
    Description

    description: The 2016 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.; abstract: The 2016 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

  16. Daily U.S. public water supply per capita use by key state 2015

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Daily U.S. public water supply per capita use by key state 2015 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/194176/public-water-supply-per-capita-use-by-leading-states-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 6, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2015
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Idaho had one of the largest per capita uses of the public water supply in the United States, totaling 184 gallons per day, followed by Utah with 169 gallons and Wyoming at 156 gallons. The public supply of water refers to water that is withdrawn by both public and private suppliers and is delivered to domestic, commercial, thermoelectric, irrigation, and industrial users. Overall, the most populous states tend to be the largest consumers of water. Sources of public supply water can include desalinated seawater and treated brackish groundwater. California and Texas withdrew 5.15 billion gallons and 2.89 billion gallons per day, respectively, for public supply in 2015. Almost 90 percent of the U.S. population relies on public water supplies.

    U.S. Water Consumption Water withdrawal in the United States has increased over the last decades, reaching 322 billion gallons per day in 2015. The U.S. is one of the largest per capita consumers water in the world, in addition to being one of the largest absolute consumers of water. The average U.S. family uses some 400 gallons of water per day. However, a large share of water is lost or wasted through leaky pipes or just evaporation and over-watering landscapes. Minor changes such as fixing a leaky faucet, using a dishwasher, upgrading to a water-efficient toilet, or taking showers instead of baths can help save conserve water.

  17. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Knoema (2023). Wyoming Population density [Dataset]. https://knoema.com/atlas/United-States-of-America/Wyoming/Population-density
Organization logo

Wyoming Population density

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
sdmx, xls, json, csvAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 28, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
Knoemahttp://knoema.com/
Time period covered
2011 - 2022
Area covered
United States, Wyoming
Variables measured
Population density
Description

Population density of Wyoming improved by 0.43% from 2.30 persons per sq. km in 2021 to 2.31 persons per sq. km in 2022.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu