Parcels and Land Ownership dataset current as of unknown. York County, South Carolina Parcel Database.

Road segments within this layer represent centerlines of public and private (not gated) roadways. Road segments define left (_L) and right (_R) side attributes and address ranges along the segment. Additional attribute information may include:The full street name ST_DIR_NAM;the city or zip community [POSTCOMM_L]; The ZIP code POSTCODE_L; The jurisdiction (Incorporated Municipality) the segment is within [INCMUNI_L];The functional classification [F_CLASS] used; (ex: Interstate, Major Collector, Minor Arterial, Local)The route number [RT_NUM] containing a county road or highway number;The road maintenance provider or construction status [ST_OWNER];Fields used in routing [MPH, ONEWAY, _ELEV, _IM] and; the date that the road segment was created [DATE_CREATED] and last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].This information is was originally compiled from orthophotography in 2001 for use in Public Safety e911 response. Today it is used throughout the County and by the public to conduct business and assist in decision making.County and City staff update records daily or as needed (such as through subdivision plan review and approval using georeferenced CAD files provided by land developers). The road centerlines support address geocoding, analysis, routing and mapping.The centerline represents the geographic location on the roadway between both shoulders (physical center), which often, but not always coincides with the center painted line dividing bi-directional travel lanes. Roadway centerline data plays an important role in transportation management and planning, while also being the basis for all other roadway-related data products.This feature service is updated daily from its source ArcGIS Enterprise feature class. Source data within an Enterprise Geodatabase is accessed by County and City of Rock Hill staff through ArcGIS Server and Portal. When edited, business rules are enforced by BCS theAddresser software. York County has an Address Manual used by staff and stakeholders to ensure quality and standards are adhered to during maintenance and use.For additional information about county maintained roadways, review the County Road Inventory data or search for data through One Map. County staff maintain the relationship between streets and the County Road Inventory through the RT_NUM field. The street ownership [ST_OWNER] designation serves as a source to determine the maintenance provider by municipal public works agencies who actively manage the road assets. SCDOT roadways can be confirmed by reviewing data within their lookup application or their source data within our One Map application.Railroads are contained within the streets feature class to enable cross street lookup (geodcoding), a requirement for e911 dispatchers.Street segments outside the county are present for cartographic and Public Safety dispatch of nearest vehicle (routing) purposes. These can be filtered out and removedAddressing data (streets and addresses) are used to update the US Census Bureau Tiger data in support of the decennial census. As of October 2022, the schema of these data are compatible with NG911. Previous schema remains as of January 2023 with intent to remove fields tentatively planned for 2024. Review the schema field mapping document (PDF) to gain a better understanding of field mapping used to transition these data to NG911 standards. Continuing NG911 compliance projects include splitting the centerline as they cross the city limit. To assist York County, South Carolina in the maintenance of the data, please provide any information concerning discovered errors, omissions, or other discrepancies found in the data. Data Owner: County IT/GIS, Addressing Staff and City of Rock Hill.Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system

Meeting minutes from January 9, 2023 where these boundaries were approved can be found here.Town staff has been working with the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs office (SCRFA) to study and plan for the redistricting of the Town Council’s wards based upon the results of the 2020 Decennial Census. SCRFA first developed a Redistricting Benchmark Report, which staff presented to Council on March 14, 2022. The report outlines the current demographics of the existing Council ward geographies and discusses the path forward to developing a new ward map. After receiving input, staff reached back out to SCRFA to begin the process of developing a draft map for public review. The draft map is attached. The map was developed utilizing the following traditional redistricting principles:Wards will be drawn contiguously, so that all parts of the district or ward are connected to each other. Wards will be drawn to minimize the division of voting precincts. Wards will be geographically compact to the extent practicable, such that nearby areas of population are not bypassed for a more distant population. Wards will be drawn to comply with other applicable court decisions and federal and state laws. Wards will be drawn, when feasible, with respect to existing districts and communities of interests, which will require input from Council and the citizens.Wards will be drawn to give careful consideration to minority districts for compliance with Section 2 criteria of the Voting Rights Act Wards will be drawn to a deviation range of 5%The adoption process follows the normal ordinance adoption process, which requires two readings and one public hearing. The public hearing is tentatively set for Council’s first meeting in January.

The 2010 districts will continue to be effective until the next Council takes office in January 2023.The 2020 districts are effective as of February 7, 2022 for use in preparing for the 2022 elections.++++ ACTIONS ● FEBRUARY 7, 2022AMENDED AND GAVE THIRD READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO REDISTRICT AND REDEFINE THE VOTING DISTRICTS WITHIN YORK COUNTY THROUGH REAPPORTIONMENT, AS TO POPULATION, OF THE SEVEN SINGLE-MEMBER ELECTORAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE COUNTY FOR THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF YORK COUNTY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES CENSUS OF 2020 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 4-9-90 OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS, 1976, AS AMENDED; TO AMEND SECTION 11.04 OF THE YORK COUNTY CODE TO CODIFY THE BLOCK INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE NEW DISTRICTING; AND TO ADOPT THE CONFORMING REDISTRICTING MAP; AND TO PROVIDE FOR OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO THE REDISTRICTING AND REAPPORTIONMENT OF COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICTS IN YORK COUNTY.+++++Council Minutes and ActionFeb 7, 2022 Meeting Detail and Action Item 6686Feb 7 Meeting Minutes include reference to the Clover Amendment.(8:42pm) Motion to approve third reading of the Redistricting Ordinance with the amendment beforeCouncil bringing the 5 census blocks to the north of the Calabash Branch back into District 2 andcorrespondingly adjusting and adopting the revised map and census block information to reflect theboundary change, with all other aspects of the Redistricting plan and block information approved atsecond reading remaining the same.

Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system

The primary use is for e911 public safety dispatch, if a call comes in the dispatcher can review this layer as a guide to look up and then call the provider to have electricity turned off. In January 2022, electric companies (York Electric and Rock Hill) provided indication of service by parcel (presence of an electric meter). The Duke Energy parcels were selected from those unassigned by the other providers, but within the service area regions they provided May 2022. This layer was last updated June 8, 2022 using the more accurate data provided by Duke Energy. Fields were reworked in 2022. There is now a secondary provider attribute that can be populated to suggest the alternative provider for a region, when the area is unknown. This was provided based on the region, for example, if near Rock Hill, the providers might be CRH / YEC / DUKE, if elsewhere, YEC/DUKE are the probable providers. The only exception is the lower left corner near the Broad River, which is Lockhart Power.There may be a small number of properties that are served by multiple service providers, however these are unknown. YEC suggests these are large properties and maybe no more than 3.Annexations in the City of Rock Hill with empty lots become Rock Hill customers. If Rock Hill annexes Duke Energy customers, they remain with Duke Energy. Providers don't appear to communicate between each other about their areas of service. Service areas don’t appear to be regulated.Future updates should take place yearly or at every two years based on the amount of growth.Future updates could focus on areas unknown or may use a different methodology.A note about the Duke Energy Service Area:Duke Energy's Service Area in York County was derived by buffering all of the primary and secondary distribution conductors by 300ft. That buffer was then used to select parcels that intersect with the buffer. Lastly, those selected parcels were dissolved into a single polygon layer and a single record. This process was generated on 5/25/2022. The data product was reviewed internally and released. The information product provided by Duke Energy is not presented in this data, instead it was used to select parcels within the areas provided and assign those as being served by the provider.++++Description last updated 6/8/22++++Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system

Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system

This data represents the graphic portrayal of land parcels and their spatial relationships throughout York County, South Carolina. Land parcel boundaries are also the basis for and define coincident boundaries for other layers, such as zoning, subdivisions, public safety response (ORI -Police, Fire, EMS) and Jurisdiction.Boundaries are established from a variety of sources including cadastral plats, subdivision plats, deeds, land contracts, right-of-way plats, and others. Each feature represents a parcel of land that is inventoried by a unique identifier, referred to as a “Tax Map Id” number. This dataset also includes multi-unit structures which have separate tax accounts for each unit, such as condominium units, represented as stacked polygon features. The parent parcel number [ParentTaxID] for the land parcel is distinguished from the child parcel [TaxMapID] for the condo unit. This data does not include mobile home data. Attributes include data stored within the Esri Fabric data model combined with those from the CAMA data. Examples of relevant attributes include:the [TaxMapID], [ParcelID] and [AprAccNum] can be used to uniquely identify each parcel. the [MailAddr1], [MailAddr2], [MailApt], [MailCity], [MailState], [MailZip] can be used as the full tax billing address for the owner.The [Owner1], [Owner2], [Owner3] describe the owner.the [YearBuilt] offers the oldest year a building was built on the property, reference this web map for info on potential lead pipes on premises;the area of the parcel in acres [GISSizeAC] as calculated from the parcel geometry and also the [deededAcres] from recorded documents, and ;the date that the parcel boundary was last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].How were parcels compiled? This layer was initially developed as an ink-on-mylar property maps maintained by the County from the early 1970's through around 2001.In the 1990s, the county procured services to convert parcels from source documents, however the product delivered in 2000 used a methodology which lost fidelity of source documents. Since then, county staff adhered to this same methodology in their daily work. Between 2001 and 2015 staff used an Esri topology to maintain parcel data in ArcMap. In 2015 the county migrated to Parcel Fabric (ArcMap) and then in 2021 to Pro (2.6/10.8.1 Enterprise) Parcel Fabric. In May of 2021 the county began outsourcing maintenance of parcel edits. This has worked well and was initiated in part to ensure a higher standard of editing practice was adhered to, but also to fulfil a shortage of skilled staff in the job market. County parcel mapping staff remain responsible for simple transactions (merge, split), compilation of materials to create vendor edit request task, and QC or review of vendor work. In Q4 2021, County Staff performed a needs assessment to review alignment issues between parcels and other layers and the internal business requirements for data alignment to parcels. They determined boundary layers must remain coincident with parcels, which are used in decision making by citizens and across many areas of government. Also, it was determined that our parcels had many errors from 20 years of edits in a non-Fabric data model and the previous editing practices. The county will be remapping parcels using ARP grant funding in the 2023-2024 timeframe. Upon delivery in 2024, data maintenance practices will ensure ongoing alignment with parcels.Year BuiltTo obtain the year built for structures on a property, use the 'Buildings' table available through our open data portal.Once you have downloaded the 'Buildings' table and this parcels layer, consider processing the building records in some way to join or perform a relate as there could be many buildings on one parcel, using the following fields:Parcel.AprAccNum = BuildingTable.PropertyID(Note: 98,227 parcels have 1 building, 647 parcels have 2 buildings, 272 have 3 or more)Data SchemaReview the Parcel schema document (PDF) to gain a better understand of the data fields. Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system