37 datasets found
  1. U.S. juvenile arrest rate for violent crime 2014, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 31, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2015). U.S. juvenile arrest rate for violent crime 2014, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/306643/us-violent-crime-juvenile-arrest-rate/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 31, 2015
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2014
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic provides information on the juvenile arrest rate for violent crimes in the United States in 2014, sorted by state. The arrest rate is defined as the number of arrests of persons under age 18 for every 100,000 persons aged 10–17. In 2014, the violent crime arrest rate for persons under age 18 in Alabama stood at **. The number of reported violent crimes in the country can be accessed here.

  2. Data from: State-Level Data on Juvenile Delinquency and Violence,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). State-Level Data on Juvenile Delinquency and Violence, Mental-Health and Psychotropic-Medication Related Issues, and School Accountability, United States, 1990-2014 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/state-level-data-on-juvenile-delinquency-and-violence-mental-health-and-psychotropic-1990--9d8ab
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The research project has tested a possible explanation for the Great American Crime Decline of the 1990s and especially 2000s: the increasing rates at which psychotropic drugs are prescribed, especially to children and adolescents. Psychotropic drugs are often prescribed to youth for mental health conditions that involve disruptive and impulsive behaviors and learning difficulties. The effects of these drugs are thus expected to lead to the decrease in the juveniles' involvement in delinquency and violence. The effects of two legislative changes are hypothesized to have contributed to the increased prescribing of psychotropic drugs to children growing up in families in poverty: 1) changes in eligibility for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) that made it possible for poor children to qualify for additional financial assistance due to mental health conditions (1990 and 1996), and 2) changes in school accountability rules following the passage of No Child Left Behind Act (2002) that put pressure on schools in some low-income areas to qualify academically challenged students as having ADHD or other learning disabilities. The objectives of the project are: 1) to assemble a data set, using state-level data from various publicly available sources, containing information about trends in juvenile delinquency and violence, trends in psychotropic drug prescribing to children and adolescents, and various control variables associated with these two sets of trends; 2) to test the proposed hypotheses about the effect of increasing psychotropic medication prescribing to children and adolescents on juvenile delinquency and violence, using the assembled data set; and 3) to disseminate the scientific knowledge gained through this study among criminal justice researchers, psychiatric and public health scientists, as well as among a wider audience of practitioners and the general public. This collection includes one SPSS file (Dataset_NIJ_GRANT_2014-R2-CX-0003_DV-IV_3-29-17.sav; n=1,275, 113 variables) and one Word syntax file (doc36775-0001_syntax.docx).

  3. Youth justice annual statistics: 2013 to 2014

    • gov.uk
    Updated Jan 29, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Justice (2015). Youth justice annual statistics: 2013 to 2014 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/youth-justice-annual-statistics-2013-to-2014
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 29, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    These statistics concentrate on the flow of young people (aged 10-17) through the Youth Justice System in England and Wales. The data described comes from various sources including the Home Office (HO), Ministry of Justice (MOJ), Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) and youth secure estate providers. The report is produced by the Analysis team and the Information team in the Youth Justice Board (YJB) under the direction of the Chief Statistician in MOJ.

    Details of the number of young people arrested are provided along with proven offences, criminal history, characteristics of young people, details of the number of young people sentenced, those on remand, those in custody, reoffending and behaviour management.

    The report and executive summary are published, along with supplementary tables for each chapter and some regional information.

    Pre-release access

    Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons (reflecting the cross-departmental responsibility for juvenile crime and reoffending):

    MOJ:

    Secretary of State, Minister of State, Permanent Secretary, Director of Criminal Policy Group, Head of Joint Youth Justice Unit, Programme Director Youth Justice Analysis, Chief Statistician and the relevant special adviser, policy officer and press officer

    HO:

    Minister of State, and press officer

    YJB:

    Chair of the YJB, Head of YJB, Director of Operations, Director of Partnerships and Performance, Head of YJB Wales, Head of YJB Communications and the relevant policy officer and press officer

  4. d

    Data from: The Dynamic Context of Teen Dating Violence in Adolescent...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). The Dynamic Context of Teen Dating Violence in Adolescent Relationships, Baltimore, Maryland, 2014-2016 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/the-dynamic-context-of-teen-dating-violence-in-adolescent-relationships-baltimore-mar-2014-5664d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Area covered
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Description

    These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. Teenage adolescent females residing in Baltimore, Maryland who were involved in a relationship with a history of violence were sought after to participate in this research study. Respondents were interviewed and then followed through daily diary entries for several months. The aim of the research was to understand the context regarding teen dating violence (TDV). Prior research on relationship context has not focused on minority populations; therefore, the focus of this project was urban, predominantly African American females. The available data in this collection includes three SAS (.sas7bdat) files and a single SAS formats file that contains variable and value label information for all three data files. The three data files are: final_baseline.sas7bdat (157 cases / 252 variables) final_partnergrid.sas7bdat (156 cases / 76 variables) hart_final_sas7bdata (7004 cases / 23 variables)

  5. Colombia: homicide rate 2014-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Colombia: homicide rate 2014-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/984798/homicide-rate-colombia/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Colombia
    Description

    In 2024, there were approximately 25.4 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants in the country, down from a homicide rate of 25.7 a year earlier. The homicide rate in Colombia has been stable since 2014 with the numbers varying between 24 and 26.8 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants. Crime and corruption Approximately 31 percent of the population identifies corruption as the main problem of the country, with fraud emerging as the foremost committed corruption and economic felony in Colombia. Followed by instances where residents were either firsthand or indirectly encountered attempts to purchase electoral votes. These experiences stem from discontent with flawed democratic functioning, culminating with the country positioned among the Latin American nations most plagued by corruption. Moreover, Colombia's corruption index was 39, where 0 represents the worst corruption scenario. Notably, those entrusted with safeguarding public welfare—the police, congressional representatives, and presidential personnel—are implicated in these transgressions, thereby fostering a prevailing sense of insecurity among the population. Not an easy way out of drug trafficking Amidst the economic challenges stemming from an uneven distribution of wealth that predominantly favors merely one percent of the population, the youth demographic and individuals residing in rural areas are more inclined towards seeking a convenient route to monetary gains. This trend has the adverse consequence of resulting in land expropriation and engenders a state of insecurity for landowners, particularly concerning crop cultivation. The proliferation of narcotics has escalated significantly, prompting alarm within the government. These authorities have grappled with a persistent inability to curb the proliferation of this phenomenon. Notably, the cultivation and exportation of marijuana and cocaine stand out as the primary illegal undertaking, facilitated through international transport via land, aircraft, and maritime shipments.

  6. w

    Governor's Children's Cabinet County Crime Rates And Population

    • data.wu.ac.at
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    csv, json, rdf, xml
    Updated Aug 2, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    State of Illinois (2017). Governor's Children's Cabinet County Crime Rates And Population [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov/MDJiNWYyNTEtOTcxNC00ZWU4LTgwYzUtMTM0Yzc0MjljZDYz
    Explore at:
    json, csv, xml, rdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 2, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    State of Illinois
    Description

    This dataset was compiled by the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority (ICJIA) at the request of the Governor’s Children’s Cabinet. This data contains the population of youth ages 13-26 in each county, the total population of each county, and the number and rate of index crimes reported, with domestic violence offenses and rates reported separately for every year between 2006 and 2015.

    For the purpose of this analysis the crime data was gathered from the Illinois State Police Annual report Crime in Illinois. This publication is produced by the Illinois State Police every year using the UCR data that is submitted to them by individual jurisdictions throughout the state. The accuracy of this data presented is dependent on the local jurisdictions reporting their index crime and domestic violence offenses to ISP, so it can be included in the annual report.

    Therefore, if there is large decrease in number of index crimes reported in the dataset it is likely that one or more jurisdictions did not report data for that year to ISP. If there is a large increase from year to year within a county it is likely that a jurisdiction within the county, who previously had not reported crime data, did report crime data for that year. If there is no reported crime in a certain year that means no jurisdictions, or a small jurisdiction with no crime from that county reported data to the Illinois State Police. The annual Crime in Illinois reports can be found on the ISP website www.isp.state.il.us.

    A direct link to that annual reports is: http://www.isp.state.il.us/crime/ucrhome.cfm#anlrpts.

    The Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority did not record the data that is expressed in the dataset. ICJIA simply used the ISP reports to compile that yearly crime data into one chart that could be provided to the Illinois Governor’s Children’s Cabinet. This data set has be critically examined to be accurate according to the annual Crime in Illinois Reports. If there are issues with the data set provided please contact the Illinois State Police or the individual jurisdictions within a specific county.

    **Index offenses do not include every crime event that occurs. Prior to 2014 there were 8 index crimes reported by the Illinois State Police in their annual reports, Criminal Homicide, Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Battery/Aggravated Assault, Burglary, Theft, Motor Vehicle Theft, and Arson. In 2014 there were two new offenses added to the list of index crimes these were Human Trafficking – Commercial Sex Acts and Human Trafficking – Involuntary Servitude. These are the index crimes that are recorded in the chart provided.

    **“Domestic offenses are defined as offenses committed between family or household members. Family or household members include spouses; former spouses; parents; children; foster parents; foster children; legal guardians and their wards; stepchildren; other persons related by blood (aunt, uncle, cousin) or by present or previous marriage (in-laws); persons who share, or formerly shared, a common dwelling; persons who have, or allegedly have, a child in common; persons who share, or allegedly share, a blood relationship through a child; persons who have, or have had, a dating or engagement relationship; and persons with disabilities, their personal care assistants, or care givers outside the context of an employee of a public or private care facility. Every offense that occurs, when a domestic relationship exists between the victim and offender, must be reported (Illinois State Police).”

    **“Offenses reported are not limited to domestic battery and violations of orders of protection; offenses most commonly associated with domestic violence (Illinois State Police).”

    The crime rate was compiled using the total population, and the index crime. The Index crime whether all crime or Domestic Violence crime was divided by the total population then multiplied by 10,000, hence crime rate per 10,000.

    The sources of data are the Illinois Uniform Crime Reporting Program and the U.S. Census Bureau.

    The source of the description is the Illinois State Police and their Reporting guidelines and forms.

  7. Data from: Bridge of Faith: Aim4Peace Community-Based Violence Prevention...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2025). Bridge of Faith: Aim4Peace Community-Based Violence Prevention Project, Kansas City, Missouri, 2014-2017 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/bridge-of-faith-aim4peace-community-based-violence-prevention-project-kansas-city-mis-2014-00ace
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preventionhttp://ojjdp.gov/
    Area covered
    Missouri, Kansas City
    Description

    This study followed the outcomes of the Bridge of Faith program. Bridge of Faith is an expansion project based on efforts of the Aim4Peace Violence Prevention Program, serving youth 13-24 years of age living in a prioritized area of Kansas City, Missouri. Bridge of Faith created goals and objectives that strategically address a continuum from response to violence exposure, intervention for violence survivors, and preventing of violence exposure. Activities were designed to target a reduction in risk factors and improvement in resiliency factors associated with the use of violence, as well as improve access to care and quality of services for those who are survivors of violence to reduce the probability of violence and exposure to others in the future. The overall purpose was to improve the health, social, and economic outcomes for youth and families who have been exposed to trauma and/or violence and prevent further violence from occurring. The project will facilitate these outcomes in specific goals and objectives to expand access to evidence-based programs and services for youth survivors through a new platform for collaborating agencies to link survivors of violence to additional wrap around services, and enhance the performance of service agencies through training, strengthening knowledge and skill development to ensure quality, trauma-informed, and culturally competent care. This study on the Bridge of Faith Project was split into two datasets, Participant Survey Data and Police Data. Individuals were the unit of analysis measured in the Participant Survey Data, and criminal acts were the unit of analysis measured in the Police Data. Participant Survey Data contains 22 variables and 12 cases. Police Data contains 26 variables and 9 cases.

  8. Crime severity index and weighted clearance rates, Canada, provinces,...

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2025). Crime severity index and weighted clearance rates, Canada, provinces, territories and Census Metropolitan Areas [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/3510002601-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Crime severity index (violent, non-violent, youth) and weighted clearance rates (violent, non-violent), Canada, provinces, territories and Census Metropolitan Areas, 1998 to 2024.

  9. Incident-based crime statistics, by detailed violations, police services in...

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Incident-based crime statistics, by detailed violations, police services in Ontario [Dataset]. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510018001
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Ontario, Canada
    Description

    Incident-based crime statistics (actual incidents, rate per 100,000 population, percentage change in rate, unfounded incidents, percent unfounded, total cleared, cleared by charge, cleared otherwise, persons charged, adults charged, youth charged / not charged), by detailed violations (violent, property, traffic, drugs, other Federal Statutes), police services in Ontario, 1998 to 2024.

  10. b

    Juvenile Arrest Rate for Violent Offenses per 1,000 Juveniles

    • data.baltimorecity.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 18, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance (2020). Juvenile Arrest Rate for Violent Offenses per 1,000 Juveniles [Dataset]. https://data.baltimorecity.gov/maps/bniajfi::juvenile-arrest-rate-for-violent-offenses-per-1000-juveniles
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance
    Area covered
    Description

    The number of persons aged 10 to 17 arrested for violent offenses per 1,000 juveniles that live in an area. Violent offenses may include homicide, rape, assault (with or without a weapon), and robbery. This indicator is calculated by where the arrested juvenile was arrested and not by where the crime is committed. Arrests are used instead of crimes committed since not all juveniles that are arrested are charged with committing a crime. This indicator also excludes offenders who are later charged as adults for their crime(s). Source: Baltimore Police Department Years Available: 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

  11. Data from: Cross-age Peer Mentoring to Enhance Resilience Among Low-Income...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2025). Cross-age Peer Mentoring to Enhance Resilience Among Low-Income Urban Youth Living in High Violence Chicago Communities, 2014-2019 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/cross-age-peer-mentoring-to-enhance-resilience-among-low-income-urban-youth-living-in-2014-f7bd7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preventionhttp://ojjdp.gov/
    Description

    The goal of this mixed-methods study was to evaluate the effectiveness of community based cross-age mentoring to reduce negative outcomes related to violence exposure/engagement and promote positive development among African-American and Latinx youth from multiple sites serving four low-income, high violence urban neighborhoods, using youth mentors from the same high-risk environment. The program was named by youth mentors, "Saving Lives, Inspiring Youth" (or SLIY henceforth). Cross-age peer mentoring programs promise to solve problems and ineffectiveness of other types of mentoring programs, but few have been systematically studied in high-poverty, high-crime communities. In collaboration with several community organizations, a prospective approach was implemented to follow cross-age mentors and mentees for up to one year of mentoring. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were employed to examine possible changes in a number of relevant constructs, and to understand program impact in greater depth. Mentoring sessions lasting one hour took place each week, with an hour debriefing session for mentors following each mentoring session. Quantitative data were collected pre, post and at a 9-12 month follow-up. Throughout the mentoring intervention, several forms of qualitative data were gathered to make it possible for youth voices to permeate understanding findings, to illuminate program processes that youth perceived as helpful and not helpful, and to provide multiple perspectives on youths' resilience and their understanding of the risks they faced. Both mentors and community collaborators were trained and engaged as community researchers. School-based data were also collected. Demographic variables include participants' age, race, and grade in school.

  12. Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: September 2015

    • gov.uk
    Updated Feb 18, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Justice (2016). Criminal justice system statistics quarterly: September 2015 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-september-2015
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    The reports present key statistics on activity in the criminal justice system for England and Wales. It provides information for the latest 12 months (October 2014 to September 2015) with accompanying commentary, analysis and presentation of longer term trends.

    From 18 February 2016 to 31 March 2016, the Ministry of Justice is running a consultation on changes to the criminal justice statistics quarterly. These changes aim to improve the way in which information is made available to users.

    Pre-release access

    The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff. Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons:

    Ministry of Justice

    Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice; Minister of State for Policing, Fire, Criminal Justice and Victims; Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Minister for the Courts and Legal Aid; Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Rehabilitation; Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and Minister for Human Rights; Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Family Justice; Permanent Secretary; 3 Special Advisors; Senior Policy Advisor; Director General, Finance and Corporate Services, Corporate Performance Group; Director General, Criminal Justice Group; Director, Criminal Justice Policy; Director, Criminal Justice Reform Directorate; Director of Analytical Services and Chief Economist; Deputy Director, Legal Services, Court Users, and Summary Justice Reform Courts & Tribunals Development Directorate; Deputy Director, Sentencing Policy; Chief Statistician; Policy Advisor, Sentencing Policy; Policy Advisor, Youth Sentencing/Courts & Gangs and Violence policy; Head of External Communications; Head of Criminal Justice System Statistics; 3 Press Officer; 4 Private Secretaries; 3 Assistant Private Secretaries.

    Home Office

    Home Secretary; Permanent Secretary; Director of Crime; Head of Crime and Policing Statistics; Private Secretary to the Home Secretary; Deputy Principal Private Secretary to the Home Secretary; Assistant Private Secretary to the Permanent Secretary; 2 press officers.

    The Judiciary

    Lord Chief Justice; Head of Lord Chief Justice’s Criminal Justice Team; Legal Advisor to the Lord Chief Justice; Assistant Private Secretary.

    Other

    1 Policy Officials, Attorney General’s Office; Policy Advisor, Cabinet Office.

  13. Data from: Comprehensive Gang Model Evaluation: Integrating Research Into...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Comprehensive Gang Model Evaluation: Integrating Research Into Practice, Massachusetts, 2014-2018 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/comprehensive-gang-model-evaluation-integrating-research-into-practice-massachusetts-2014--3332d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Description

    The effects of a deliberate strategy to bolster organizational change in order to achieve the goals of the Comprehensive Gang Model (CGM) were tested in this study. The CGM goals of increasing community capacity to address gang and youth violence and reducing gang and youth violence were examined. A quasi-experimental design was used wherein two Massachusetts cities received a relational coordination intervention to boost organizational change and two similar Massachusetts cities were used as comparisons. Surveys, observational notes, and crime data assessed outcomes of interest. The intervention was carried out from March 2016 through August 2017. Survey and observational data were gathered during that time. Crime data from January 2014 through December 2018 was utilized to examine outcomes.

  14. Criminal justice statistics quarterly: June 2014

    • gov.uk
    Updated Nov 20, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Criminal justice statistics quarterly: June 2014 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-quarterly-statistics-june-2014
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 20, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Ministry of Justice
    Description

    We’re running a consultation on proposed changes to the criminal justice statistics quarterly until 22 January 2015. Please feedback comments on your current use of the publication and the proposed changes.

    This quarterly report presents key statistics on activity in the criminal justice system (CJS) for England and Wales. It provides information for the latest 12 months (July 2013 to June 2014) with accompanying commentary, analysis and presentation of longer term trends.

    Key findings

    • Number of individuals formally dealt with by the Criminal Justice System is lowest on record (1970 to date).
    • The use of out of court disposals is now less than half of the peak, in year ending June 2007.
    • Conviction ratio has remained relatively stable since year ending June 2009 (following on from an increase in the 5 years before this).
    • Average custodial sentence length continues to increase since June 2006.
    • Immediate custody rate for indictable offences is highest in the decade and has increased in each of the last 5 years.
    • Number of first time entrants formally dealt with by the CJS continues to decline.
    • 25% increase in adult offenders given suspended sentences despite having 15 or more previous cautions or convictions.
    • Prosecutions for sexual offences are the highest in the decade and increased by 19% in the latest year, in line with recorded crime.

    The bulletin is produced and handled by the ministry’s analytical professionals and production staff. Pre-release access of up to 24 hours is granted to the following persons.

    Ministry of Justice

    Secretary of State for Justice; Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister for Prisons, Probation and Rehabilitation; Minister of State for Policing, Criminal Justice and Victims; Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Minister for the Courts and Legal Aid; Minister of State for Justice and Civil Liberties; Permanent Secretary; 2 special advisers; 2 Director Generals, Crime; Director, Analytical Services; Director, Sentencing and Rehabilitation; senior policy official, Sentencing and Youth Policy; policy official, Sentencing; policy official, Out of court disposals; policy official, Youth justice; Head of News; senior press officer; 3 further press officers; 2 private secretaries; 6 assistant private secretaries.

    Home Office

    Home Secretary; Permanent Secretary; Director of Crime; 1 press officer; Chief Statistician; 1 assistant private secretary

    The Judiciary

    Lord Chief Justice; Head of Lord Chief Justice’s Criminal Justice Team

    Other

    Attorney General; policy official

  15. d

    Data from: Assessing Different Levels and Dosages of the Shifting Boundaries...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Assessing Different Levels and Dosages of the Shifting Boundaries Intervention to Prevent Youth Dating Violence in New York City Middle Schools: A Randomized Control Trial, 2011-2014 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/assessing-different-levels-and-dosages-of-the-shifting-boundaries-intervention-to-pre-2011
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study was a randomized controlled trial of a dating violence and sexual harassment (DV/H) prevention program called the Shifting Boundaries (SB) Program. Thirty-five public middle schools in New York City were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions of the SB program. The project includes a baseline and two follow-up surveys with 6th, 7th and 8th grade students to assess short to medium term impact on rates of DV/H. The classroom curriculum intervention (SBC) covered the consequences for perpetrators of DV/H, state laws and penalties for DV/H, and respectful relationships. The school (building-level) intervention (SBS) included the use of school-based restraining orders, higher levels of faculty and security presence in areas identified through student mapping of safe/unsafe "hot spots," and the use of posters to increase awareness and reporting of DV/H. The project examined (1) the effects of saturating a school environment by providing the SB intervention to all three middle school grades compared to only two grades or one grade and (2) the effects of two dosages of SB across two years compared to one dosage of the SB intervention across one year which was explored in two prior evaluations of the program.

  16. Number, percentage and rate of gang-related homicide victims

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • beta.data.urbandatacentre.ca
    • +5more
    Updated Jul 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2025). Number, percentage and rate of gang-related homicide victims [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/3510007501-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Victims of gang-related homicides (total number of homicide victims; number of homicide victims - unknown gang-relation; number of homicide victims - known gang relation; number of gang-related homicide victims; percentage of gang-related homicide victims; rate (per 100,000 population) of gang-related homicide victims), Canada and regions, 1999 to 2024.

  17. b

    Juvenile Arrest Rate per 1,000 Juveniles

    • data.baltimorecity.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 18, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance (2020). Juvenile Arrest Rate per 1,000 Juveniles [Dataset]. https://data.baltimorecity.gov/maps/bniajfi::juvenile-arrest-rate-per-1000-juveniles
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance
    Area covered
    Description

    The number of persons aged 10 to 17 arrested per 1,000 juveniles that live in an area. This indicator is calculated by where the arrested juvenile was arrested and not by where the crime is committed. Arrests are used instead of crimes committed since not all juveniles that are arrested are charged with committing a crime. This indicator also excludes offenders who are later charged as adults for their crime(s). Source: Baltimore City Police DepartmentYears Available: 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

  18. d

    The Republic of China's 103-Year Crime Situation and Analysis - 2014 Crime...

    • data.gov.tw
    json
    Updated Jun 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Academy for the Judiciary, MOJ (2025). The Republic of China's 103-Year Crime Situation and Analysis - 2014 Crime Trends Key Report [Dataset]. https://data.gov.tw/en/datasets/26263
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Academy for the Judiciary, MOJ
    License

    https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license

    Area covered
    China
    Description

    The first paper analyzes the crime situation and trends in criminality in the Republic of China in 2014 and the past decade, using statistics from the police and the Ministry of Health and Welfare. It expands the depth of criminal research to the investigative stage, and includes comparisons of major crime rates and imprisonment rates with the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. The second paper covers the handling of crimes, including investigation, trial, correction, rehabilitation protection, cross-strait and international criminal justice cooperation. The third paper addresses juvenile incidents, including a general overview of juvenile crime and the analysis of the causes of crime, the handling of juvenile incidents, and institutional handling. The fourth paper covers trends and handling of special offenders, including female offenders, drug offenders, elderly offenders, and repeat offenders. The fifth paper covers crime victim protection, including the crime victim protection system, crime victim compensation system, and crime victim protection services. The sixth paper discusses the analysis of crime issues of social concern, and the seventh paper focuses on judicial reform, aimed at clarifying innovative measures including prosecution, correction, judicial protection, anti-corruption, and cross-strait and international judicial reforms. The eighth paper is the conclusion and policy recommendations for future research, summarizing the overall crime situation in 2014 and the various innovative focal points observed in the research, and making corresponding policy and future research recommendations.

  19. Child abuse victimization in Canada in 2014, by sexual orientation

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Child abuse victimization in Canada in 2014, by sexual orientation [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/676902/child-abuse-victimization-by-sexual-orientation-canada/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2014
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    This statistic shows distribution of self-reported physical and sexual abuse victimization of children in Canada, 2014, by sexual orientation of victims. In 2014, eight percent of heterosexual children reported experiencing sexual abuse at some point in their childhood.

  20. d

    Somali Youth Longitudinal Study (SYLS) Series

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Somali Youth Longitudinal Study (SYLS) Series [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/somali-youth-longitudinal-study-syls-series-a499c
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Description

    The Somali Youth Longitudinal Study collected data on Somali-American youth at four time points between 2013-2019. The study was originally designed to address concerns in the Somali community over youth violence. The study broadened its focus to adopt a life-course perspective to examine Somali immigrant experiences with discrimination and marginalization associated with religion, race, ethnicity, and immigration status, and their relationship to health outcomes. Time 1: May 2013 – January 2014 Time 2: June 2014 – August 2015 Time 3: December 2016 – February 2018, NOTE: Time 3 data are not available from ICPSR. Time 4: April 2018 – February 2019

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2015). U.S. juvenile arrest rate for violent crime 2014, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/306643/us-violent-crime-juvenile-arrest-rate/
Organization logo

U.S. juvenile arrest rate for violent crime 2014, by state

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Dec 31, 2015
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2014
Area covered
United States
Description

This statistic provides information on the juvenile arrest rate for violent crimes in the United States in 2014, sorted by state. The arrest rate is defined as the number of arrests of persons under age 18 for every 100,000 persons aged 10–17. In 2014, the violent crime arrest rate for persons under age 18 in Alabama stood at **. The number of reported violent crimes in the country can be accessed here.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu