4 datasets found
  1. a

    Zip Code Tabulation Areas

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • rigis.org
    Updated Jan 1, 2012
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Environmental Data Center (2012). Zip Code Tabulation Areas [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/edc::zip-code-tabulation-areas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2012
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Environmental Data Center
    Area covered
    Description

    This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83This dataset is a modified version of the source data that are produced and distributed by the U.S. Census Bureau. ZCTA's associated with Rhode Island were selected from the source national-scale dataset and clipped to the Rhode Island coastline for cartographic purposes.

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation.

    ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) are approximate area representations of U.S. Postal Service (USPS) ZIP Code service areas that the Census Bureau creates to present statistical data from Census 2000. The Census Bureau creates ZCTAs for the United States, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for the 2010 Census. Data users should not use ZCTAs to identify the official USPS ZIP Code for mail delivery. The USPS makes periodic changes to ZIP Codes to support more efficient mail delivery. For the 2010 Census, ZCTAs should more accurately represent the actual ZIP Codes at the time of their delineation than they did for Census 2000. This is because that before the tabulation blocks, which the ZCTAs are built from, were delineated for the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau undertook the process of inserting lines that could be used as 2010 Census tabulation block boundaries, and these lines split polygons where the result would be that a significant number of addresses would occur on either one or both sides of the line associated with a single ZIP Code.

    Each 2010 Census tabulation block that contains addresses is assigned to a single ZCTA, usually to the ZCTA that reflects the most frequently occurring ZIP Code for the addresses within that tabulation block. As a result, ZIP Codes associated with address ranges found in the Address Ranges relationship file may not always match the ZCTA. Blocks that do not contain addresses but are completely surrounded by a single ZCTA (enclaves) are assigned to the surrounding ZCTA. A ZCTA may not exist for every USPS ZIP Code. Some ZIP Codes may not have a matching ZCTA because too few addresses were associated with the specific ZIP Code or the ZIP Code was not the most frequently occurring ZIP Code within any of the blocks were it exists. The Census Bureau uses the addresses stored within MTDB to delineate ZCTAs, and at the time of the 2010 Census the MTDB primarily included addresses for residential or at least potentially residential structures, so ZCTAs representing only non-residential structures are infrequent. Also, in each tabulation block, if a choice existed between using a potential city-style mail delivery ZIP Code for an address or a post office box ZIP Code, the city-style mail delivery ZIP Code was preferred for the 2010 Census ZCTA delineation. The Census Bureau identifies 5-digit ZCTAs using a five-character numeric code that represents the most frequently occurring USPS ZIP Code within that ZCTA, and this code may contain leading zeros.

  2. a

    CDC PLACES (2017)

    • data-spokane.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    RI Health Dept. Online Mapping (2024). CDC PLACES (2017) [Dataset]. https://data-spokane.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/rihealth::cdc-places-2017-3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 20, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    RI Health Dept. Online Mapping
    Area covered
    Description

    Mapping Layer Data Released: 06/15/2017, | Last Updated 04/20/2024Data Currency: This data is checked semi-annually from it's enterprise federal source fo 2010 CENSUS Data and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Application Programming Interface (API).Data Update Frequency: Twice, YearlyData Cycle | History (as required below)QA/QC Performed: December, 2024Next Scheduled Data QA/QC: July, 2024CDC PLACES (2010 CENSUS) FEATURE LAYERData Requester: Rhode Island Executive Office of Health and Human Service (OHHS) via Health Equity Institute (HEI).Data Requester: Rhode Island Department of Health, Maternal Child Health via Health Equity Institute (HEI).Data Request: Provide a database deliverable via download that contains both US CENSUS tracts and USPS Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA).HEALTH EQUITY INSTITUTE DATA CONNECT RI Using Modern GIS (Mapping)🡅 Click IT 🡅Facilitate transformative mapping visualizations that engage constituents and measure the impact of real-world solutions.Instructions to Join Your Data Provided Below STEP 1: Video (Pending)STEP 2: Video (Pending)STEP 3: Video (Pending)There are twenty-two U.S. CENSUS fields (download here) that you can join to your datasets. For additional insight, please contact the Center for Health Data and Analysis (CHDA) Rhode Island Department of Health (GIS) Mapping Department for assistance.Database Enhancement: This database contains two (2) additional data fields for consideration to be added to the existing 2020 State of Rhode Island Health Equity Map.Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)ZCTA/Tract Relationship (Singular ZCTAs per Tract, versus Multiple ZCTAs per Tract)Additional Information: While ZCTAs can be useful for certain qualitative purposes, such as broad or general high level analysis, they may not provide the level of granularity and accuracy required for in-depth demographic research which is required for policy mapping. ZCTAs can change frequently as the US Postal Service (USPS) adjusts postal routes and boundaries. These changes can lead to inconsistencies and challenges in tracking demographic trends and making accurate comparisons over time.RIDOH GIS encourages analysts to make the appropriate choice of using census based data, with their consistent boundaries readily available for suitability for spatial analysis when conducting detailed demographic research.Here are a few reasons why you might want to consider using census based data (tracts, block groups, and blocks) instead of ZCTAs:1. Inaccurate Representations: ZCTAs are not designed for statistical analysis or demographic research. They are created by the United States Postal Service (USPS) for efficient mail delivery and can often span multiple cities, counties, or even states. As a result, ZCTAs may not accurately represent the actual geographic boundaries or demographic characteristics of a specific area.2. Lack of Granularity: ZCTAs are typically larger than census tracts, which are smaller, more homogeneous geographic units defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Census tracts are designed to be relatively consistent in terms of population size, allowing for more detailed analysis at a local level. ZCTAs, on the other hand, can vary significantly in terms of population size, making it challenging to draw precise conclusions about specific neighborhoods or communities.3. Data Availability and Compatibility: Census tracts are used by the U.S. Census Bureau to collect and report demographic data. Consequently, a wide range of demographic information, such as population counts, age distribution, income levels, and education levels, is readily available at the census tract level. In contrast, data specifically tailored to ZCTAs may be more limited, making it difficult to obtain comprehensive and consistent data for demographic analysis.4. Changes Over Time: Census tracts are relatively stable over time, allowing for consistent longitudinal analysis. ZCTAs, however, can change frequently as the USPS adjusts postal routes and boundaries. These changes can lead to inconsistencies and challenges in tracking demographic trends and making accurate comparisons over time.5. Spatial Analysis: Census tracts are designed to maintain a level of spatial proximity, adjacency, or connectedness of these data containers while providing consistency and continuity over time - making them useful for spatial analysis. Mapping. ZCTAs, on the other hand, may not exhibit the same level of spatial coherence due to their primary purpose being mail delivery efficiency rather than geographic representation.State Agencies - Contact RIDOH GIS - Learn More About Mapping Data Available at the Census Tract LevelRIDOH GIS releases this database with the caveats noted above and that the researcher can accurately align the ZCTAs with the corresponding census tracts. Careful consideration should be given to the comparability and compatibility of the data collected at different geographic levels to ensure valid and meaningful statistical conclusions. Data Dictionary: 2010 Decennial CensusOBJECT ID - the count of each census tract entity.GEOID (10) STATE,COUNTY,TRACT - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010) HEZ (10) - Health Equity Zone (2020)LOCATION (10) - Plain Language Census Tract Descriptor (2010)COUNTY (10) NAME - County Name (2010)STATE (10) NAME - State Name (2010)ZCTA (23) - Zip Code Tabulation Area - Numeric US CENSUS ZCTA Description (2023)ZCTA/TRACT CONTEXT - Number of ZCTAs (Singular/Multiple) that reside within a US CENSUS TractST (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010) CO (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)ST (10) CO (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)TRACT (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)GEOID (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)TRIBAL TRACT (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)Additional Mapping DataThe user is provided authoritative Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) such as numeric descriptions of state, county and tract identification, in addition to shape and length measurements of each census tract for data joining purposes.STATE (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)COUNTY (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)STATE (10), COUNTY (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)TRACT (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)TRIBAL TRACT (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)ST ABBRV (10) - State AbbreviationShape_Length - Total length of the polygon's (census tract) perimeter, in the units used by the feature class' coordinate system.Shape_Area - Total area of the polygon's (census tract) in the units used by the feature class' coordinate system.Data Source: Series Information for 2020 Census 5-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA5) National TIGER/Line Shapefiles, Current Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Application Programming Interface (API) Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas - OGC Features copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewers. For more information, please visit: ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs)To Report Data Discrepancies Contact the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) GIS (mapping) OfficePlease Be Certain To --Provide a Brief Description of What the Discrepancy IsInclude Your, Name, Organization, Telephone NumberAttach the Complete .xlsx with the Discrepancy Highlighted

  3. a

    myNH 2019 MF08 H4

    • data-spokane.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 7, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    RI Health Dept. Online Mapping (2024). myNH 2019 MF08 H4 [Dataset]. https://data-spokane.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/rihealth::mynh-2019-mf08-h4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    RI Health Dept. Online Mapping
    Area covered
    Description

    Mapping Layer Data Released: 06/15/2023, | Last Updated 01/20/2024Data Currency: This data is checked semi-annually from it's enterprise federal source fo 2010 CENSUS Data and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Application Programming Interface (API).Data Update Frequency: Twice, YearlyData Cycle | History (as required below)QA/QC Performed: December, 2024Next Scheduled Data QA/QC: July, 2024TRACT 10 (2010 CENSUS) CONNECT LAYERData Requester: Rhode Island Executive Office of Health and Human Service (OHHS) via Health Equity Institute (HEI).Data Requester: Rhode Island Department of Health, Maternal Child Health via Health Equity Institute (HEI).Data Request: Provide a database deliverable via download that contains both US CENSUS tracts and USPS Zip Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA).HEALTH EQUITY INSTITUTE DATA CONNECT RI Using Modern GIS (Mapping)🡅 Click IT 🡅Facilitate transformative mapping visualizations that engage constituents and measure the impact of real-world solutions.Instructions to Join Your Data Provided Below STEP 1: Video (Pending)STEP 2: Video (Pending)STEP 3: Video (Pending)There are twenty-two U.S. CENSUS fields (download here) that you can join to your datasets. For additional insight, please contact the Center for Health Data and Analysis (CHDA) Rhode Island Department of Health (GIS) Mapping Department for assistance.Database Enhancement: This database contains two (2) additional data fields for consideration to be added to the existing 2020 State of Rhode Island Health Equity Map.Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)ZCTA/Tract Relationship (Singular ZCTAs per Tract, versus Multiple ZCTAs per Tract)Additional Information: While ZCTAs can be useful for certain qualitative purposes, such as broad or general high level analysis, they may not provide the level of granularity and accuracy required for in-depth demographic research which is required for policy mapping. ZCTAs can change frequently as the US Postal Service (USPS) adjusts postal routes and boundaries. These changes can lead to inconsistencies and challenges in tracking demographic trends and making accurate comparisons over time.RIDOH GIS encourages analysts to make the appropriate choice of using census based data, with their consistent boundaries readily available for suitability for spatial analysis when conducting detailed demographic research.Here are a few reasons why you might want to consider using census based data (tracts, block groups, and blocks) instead of ZCTAs:1. Inaccurate Representations: ZCTAs are not designed for statistical analysis or demographic research. They are created by the United States Postal Service (USPS) for efficient mail delivery and can often span multiple cities, counties, or even states. As a result, ZCTAs may not accurately represent the actual geographic boundaries or demographic characteristics of a specific area.2. Lack of Granularity: ZCTAs are typically larger than census tracts, which are smaller, more homogeneous geographic units defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. Census tracts are designed to be relatively consistent in terms of population size, allowing for more detailed analysis at a local level. ZCTAs, on the other hand, can vary significantly in terms of population size, making it challenging to draw precise conclusions about specific neighborhoods or communities.3. Data Availability and Compatibility: Census tracts are used by the U.S. Census Bureau to collect and report demographic data. Consequently, a wide range of demographic information, such as population counts, age distribution, income levels, and education levels, is readily available at the census tract level. In contrast, data specifically tailored to ZCTAs may be more limited, making it difficult to obtain comprehensive and consistent data for demographic analysis.4. Changes Over Time: Census tracts are relatively stable over time, allowing for consistent longitudinal analysis. ZCTAs, however, can change frequently as the USPS adjusts postal routes and boundaries. These changes can lead to inconsistencies and challenges in tracking demographic trends and making accurate comparisons over time.5. Spatial Analysis: Census tracts are designed to maintain a level of spatial proximity, adjacency, or connectedness of these data containers while providing consistency and continuity over time - making them useful for spatial analysis. Mapping. ZCTAs, on the other hand, may not exhibit the same level of spatial coherence due to their primary purpose being mail delivery efficiency rather than geographic representation.State Agencies - Contact RIDOH GIS - Learn More About Mapping Data Available at the Census Tract LevelRIDOH GIS releases this database with the caveats noted above and that the researcher can accurately align the ZCTAs with the corresponding census tracts. Careful consideration should be given to the comparability and compatibility of the data collected at different geographic levels to ensure valid and meaningful statistical conclusions. Data Dictionary: 2010 Decennial CensusOBJECT ID - the count of each census tract entity.GEOID (10) STATE,COUNTY,TRACT - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010) HEZ (10) - Health Equity Zone (2020)LOCATION (10) - Plain Language Census Tract Descriptor (2010)COUNTY (10) NAME - County Name (2010)STATE (10) NAME - State Name (2010)ZCTA (23) - Zip Code Tabulation Area - Numeric US CENSUS ZCTA Description (2023)ZCTA/TRACT CONTEXT - Number of ZCTAs (Singular/Multiple) that reside within a US CENSUS TractST (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010) CO (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)ST (10) CO (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)TRACT (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)GEOID (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)TRIBAL TRACT (10) - Numeric US CENSUS Tract Description (2010)Additional Mapping DataThe user is provided authoritative Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) such as numeric descriptions of state, county and tract identification, in addition to shape and length measurements of each census tract for data joining purposes.STATE (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)COUNTY (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)STATE (10), COUNTY (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)TRACT (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)TRIBAL TRACT (10) - Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)ST ABBRV (10) - State AbbreviationShape_Length - Total length of the polygon's (census tract) perimeter, in the units used by the feature class' coordinate system.Shape_Area - Total area of the polygon's (census tract) in the units used by the feature class' coordinate system.Data Source: Series Information for 2020 Census 5-Digit ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA5) National TIGER/Line Shapefiles, Current Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Application Programming Interface (API) Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas - OGC Features copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewers. For more information, please visit: ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs)To Report Data Discrepancies Contact the Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) GIS (mapping) OfficePlease Be Certain To --Provide a Brief Description of What the Discrepancy IsInclude Your, Name, Organization, Telephone NumberAttach the Complete .xlsx with the Discrepancy Highlighted

  4. d

    Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US)

    • search.dataone.org
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 26, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    US Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP) (2017). Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/0459986b-9a0e-41d9-9997-cad0fbea9c4e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    US Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP)
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2005 - Jan 1, 2016
    Area covered
    United States,
    Variables measured
    Shape, Access, Des_Nm, Des_Tp, Loc_Ds, Loc_Nm, Agg_Src, GAPCdDt, GAP_Sts, GIS_Src, and 20 more
    Description

    The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public open space and voluntarily provided, private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastral Theme (http://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html). PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database of areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural, recreational or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase maps and describes public open space and other protected areas. Most areas are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, and agreements or administrative designations documented in agency management plans may be included. The PAD-US database strives to be a complete “best available” inventory of protected areas (lands and waters) including data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The dataset is built in collaboration with several partners and data providers (http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/stewards/). See Supplemental Information Section of this metadata record for more information on partnerships and links to major partner organizations. As this dataset is a compilation of many data sets; data completeness, accuracy, and scale may vary. Federal and state data are generally complete, while local government and private protected area coverage is about 50% complete, and depends on data management capacity in the state. For completeness estimates by state: http://www.protectedlands.net/partners. As the federal and state data are reasonably complete; focus is shifting to completing the inventory of local gov and voluntarily provided, private protected areas. The PAD-US geodatabase contains over twenty-five attributes and four feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services and analyses: Marine Protected Areas (MPA), Fee, Easements and Combined. The data contained in the MPA Feature class are provided directly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Marine Protected Areas Center (MPA, http://marineprotectedareas.noaa.gov ) tracking the National Marine Protected Areas System. The Easements feature class contains data provided directly from the National Conservation Easement Database (NCED, http://conservationeasement.us ) The MPA and Easement feature classes contain some attributes unique to the sole source databases tracking them (e.g. Easement Holder Name from NCED, Protection Level from NOAA MPA Inventory). The "Combined" feature class integrates all fee, easement and MPA features as the best available national inventory of protected areas in the standard PAD-US framework. In addition to geographic boundaries, PAD-US describes the protection mechanism category (e.g. fee, easement, designation, other), owner and managing agency, designation type, unit name, area, public access and state name in a suite of standardized fields. An informative set of references (i.e. Aggregator Source, GIS Source, GIS Source Date) and "local" or source data fields provide a transparent link between standardized PAD-US fields and information from authoritative data sources. The areas in PAD-US are also assigned conservation measures that assess management intent to permanently protect biological diversity: the nationally relevant "GAP Status Code" and global "IUCN Category" standard. A wealth of attributes facilitates a wide variety of data analyses and creates a context for data to be used at local, regional, state, national and international scales. More information about specific updates and changes to this PAD-US version can be found in the Data Quality Information section of this metadata record as well as on the PAD-US website, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/history/.) Due to the completeness and complexity of these data, it is highly recommended to review the Supplemental Information Section of the metadata record as well as the Data Use Constraints, to better understand data partnerships as well as see tips and ideas of appropriate uses of the data and how to parse out the data that you are looking for. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/. To find more data resources as well as view example analysis performed using PAD-US data visit, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/resources/. The PAD-US dataset and data standard are compiled and maintained by the USGS Gap Analysis Program, http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/ . For more information about data standards and how the data are aggregated please review the “Standards and Methods Manual for PAD-US,” http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus/data/standards/ .

  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Environmental Data Center (2012). Zip Code Tabulation Areas [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/edc::zip-code-tabulation-areas

Zip Code Tabulation Areas

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jan 1, 2012
Dataset authored and provided by
Environmental Data Center
Area covered
Description

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83This dataset is a modified version of the source data that are produced and distributed by the U.S. Census Bureau. ZCTA's associated with Rhode Island were selected from the source national-scale dataset and clipped to the Rhode Island coastline for cartographic purposes.

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation.

ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) are approximate area representations of U.S. Postal Service (USPS) ZIP Code service areas that the Census Bureau creates to present statistical data from Census 2000. The Census Bureau creates ZCTAs for the United States, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for the 2010 Census. Data users should not use ZCTAs to identify the official USPS ZIP Code for mail delivery. The USPS makes periodic changes to ZIP Codes to support more efficient mail delivery. For the 2010 Census, ZCTAs should more accurately represent the actual ZIP Codes at the time of their delineation than they did for Census 2000. This is because that before the tabulation blocks, which the ZCTAs are built from, were delineated for the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau undertook the process of inserting lines that could be used as 2010 Census tabulation block boundaries, and these lines split polygons where the result would be that a significant number of addresses would occur on either one or both sides of the line associated with a single ZIP Code.

Each 2010 Census tabulation block that contains addresses is assigned to a single ZCTA, usually to the ZCTA that reflects the most frequently occurring ZIP Code for the addresses within that tabulation block. As a result, ZIP Codes associated with address ranges found in the Address Ranges relationship file may not always match the ZCTA. Blocks that do not contain addresses but are completely surrounded by a single ZCTA (enclaves) are assigned to the surrounding ZCTA. A ZCTA may not exist for every USPS ZIP Code. Some ZIP Codes may not have a matching ZCTA because too few addresses were associated with the specific ZIP Code or the ZIP Code was not the most frequently occurring ZIP Code within any of the blocks were it exists. The Census Bureau uses the addresses stored within MTDB to delineate ZCTAs, and at the time of the 2010 Census the MTDB primarily included addresses for residential or at least potentially residential structures, so ZCTAs representing only non-residential structures are infrequent. Also, in each tabulation block, if a choice existed between using a potential city-style mail delivery ZIP Code for an address or a post office box ZIP Code, the city-style mail delivery ZIP Code was preferred for the 2010 Census ZCTA delineation. The Census Bureau identifies 5-digit ZCTAs using a five-character numeric code that represents the most frequently occurring USPS ZIP Code within that ZCTA, and this code may contain leading zeros.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu