https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in New York per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Virginia per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
This dataset contains data from California resident tax returns filed with California adjusted gross income and self-assessed tax listed by zip code. This dataset contains data for taxable years 1992 to the most recent tax year available.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionOur study explores how New York City (NYC) communities of various socioeconomic strata were uniquely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsNew York City ZIP codes were stratified into three bins by median income: high-income, middle-income, and low-income. Case, hospitalization, and death rates obtained from NYCHealth were compared for the period between March 2020 and April 2022.ResultsCOVID-19 transmission rates among high-income populations during off-peak waves were higher than transmission rates among low-income populations. Hospitalization rates among low-income populations were higher during off-peak waves despite a lower transmission rate. Death rates during both off-peak and peak waves were higher for low-income ZIP codes.DiscussionThis study presents evidence that while high-income areas had higher transmission rates during off-peak periods, low-income areas suffered greater adverse outcomes in terms of hospitalization and death rates. The importance of this study is that it focuses on the social inequalities that were amplified by the pandemic.
https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in South Carolina per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Table contains median household income for households residing in Santa Clara County. Data are presented at county, city, zip code and census tract level. Notes: Data are presented for zip codes (ZCTAs) fully within the county. Data are capped at $250,001 for geographies with median household income of $250,000 or higher. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, Table B19013; data accessed on May 16, 2022 from https://api.census.gov. The 2020 Decennial geographies are used for data summarization.METADATA:notes (String): Lists table title, notes, sourcesgeolevel (String): Level of geographyGEOID (Numeric): Geography IDNAME (String): Name of geographymedHHinc (Numeric): Median household income
Explore Louisville's wealthiest ZIP Codes using Esri's latest 2016 wealth, demographic, and lifestyle characteristics.Click on this link to see Austin Business Journal's full story and map: http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/subscriber-only/2016/08/19/wealthiest-zip-codes-2016.html
https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Missouri per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38528/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/38528/terms
These datasets contain measures of socioeconomic and demographic characteristics by U.S. census tract for the years 1990-2022 and ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA) for the years 2008-2022. Example measures include population density; population distribution by race, ethnicity, age, and income; income inequality by race and ethnicity; and proportion of population living below the poverty level, receiving public assistance, and female-headed or single parent families with kids. The datasets also contain a set of theoretically derived measures capturing neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and affluence, as well as a neighborhood index of Hispanic, foreign born, and limited English. The disadvantage variable was incorrectly calculated for the following datasets: DS7 Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of Census Tracts (2020 Census), United States, 2018-2022 Data DS8 Socioeconomic Status and Demographic Characteristics of ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (2020 Census), United States, 2018-2022 Data Please refrain from downloading these datasets. The updated datasets are forthcoming and will be made available soon. Users needing these datasets can reach out to nanda-admin@umich.edu.
This map shows demographic and income data in Detroit. What stands out is a pattern of low-income households in the downtown area combined with areas of high child population. This pattern helps answer where in Detroit our charity should focus its resources to help children living in poverty.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
I use income, demographic, and solar PV installation data to test whether wealth inequality has an effect on Solar PV usage within the State of Arizona. I find that there is no statistically significant evidence that a higher proportion of low income households within a given zip code results in a decreased installation rate of solar PV. Rather, as the proportion of individuals earning between $50,000-75,000 dollars a year or $100,000-$200,000 dollars per year rises, the number of solar PV installations increase. Finally, I find there is a positive correlation between the median age of a zip code and solar PV installations.
Small business transactions and revenue data aggregated from several credit card processors, collected by Womply and compiled by Opportunity Insights. Transactions and revenue are reported based on the ZIP code where the business is located. Data provided for CT (FIPS code 9), MA (25), NJ (34), NY (36), and RI (44). Data notes from Opportunity Insights: Seasonally adjusted change since January 2020. Data is indexed in 2019 and 2020 as the change relative to the January index period. We then seasonally adjust by dividing year-over-year, which represents the difference between the change since January observed in 2020 compared to the change since January observed since 2019. We account for differences in the dates of federal holidays between 2019 and 2020 by shifting the 2019 reference data to align the holidays before performing the year-over-year division. Small businesses are defined as those with annual revenue below the Small Business Administration’s thresholds. Thresholds vary by 6 digit NAICS code ranging from a maximum number of employees between 100 to 1500 to be considered a small business depending on the industry. County-level and metro-level data and breakdowns by High/Middle/Low income ZIP codes have been temporarily removed since the August 21st 2020 update due to revisions in the structure of the raw data we receive. We hope to add them back to the OI Economic Tracker soon. More detailed documentation on Opportunity Insights data can be found here: https://github.com/OpportunityInsights/EconomicTracker/blob/main/docs/oi_tracker_data_documentation.pdf
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer shows census tracts that meet the following definitions: Census tracts with median household incomes at or below 80 percent of the statewide median income or with median household incomes at or below the threshold designated as low income by the Department of Housing and Community Development’s list of state income limits adopted under Healthy and Safety Code section 50093 and/or Census tracts receiving the highest 25 percent of overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 or Census tracts lacking overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 due to data gaps, but receiving the highest 5 percent of CalEnviroScreen 4.0 cumulative population burden scores or Census tracts identified in the 2017 DAC designation as disadvantaged, regardless of their scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 or Lands under the control of federally recognized Tribes.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Median Household Income in the United States (MEHOINUSA646N) from 1984 to 2024 about households, median, income, and USA.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comparison of characteristics of ZIP code tabulation areas within and outside of clusters of diabetes-related hospitalizations in Florida, 2016–2019.
This is the subset of parcels that meet the FIRST TWO of the “specified criteria” in the King County Code 26.12.003J definition of “Opportunity Areas.” Areas within King County that: (a) “are located in a census tract in which the median household income is in the lowest one-third for median household income for census tracts in King County;” (b) “are located in a ZIP code in which hospitalization rates for asthma, diabetes, and heart disease are in the highest one-third for ZIP Codes in King County.”
This dataset and map service provides information on the U.S. Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) low to moderate income areas. The term Low to Moderate Income, often referred to as low-mod, has a specific programmatic context within the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Over a 1, 2, or 3-year period, as selected by the grantee, not less than 70 percent of CDBG funds must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. HUD uses special tabulations of Census data to determine areas where at least 51% of households have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income (AMI). This dataset and map service contains the following layer.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Effects of initial lockdown and stimulus payments on zip code spending.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Abstract: Food insecurity occurs when a household lacks consistent access to food and is more prevalent in ethnic and racial minoritized populations. While there has been a proliferation of research linking food insecurity to obesity, these findings are mixed. It may be helpful to consider some additional geographic factors that may be associated with both factors including socioeconomic status and grocery store density. The purpose of the current study aimed to examine spatial relationships between food insecurity and SES/store density and BMI and SES/store density in a diverse sample of adolescents and young adults across two studies in a large, urban city. GIS analysis revealed that participants with the highest food insecurity (larger symbols) tend to live in the zip codes with the lowest median income. There did not appear to be clear a relationship between food insecurity and store density. Participants with the highest BMI tend to live in zip codes with lower median income and participants with higher BMI tended to live further away from downtown, which has the highest concentration of grocery stores in the city. Our findings may help to inform future interventions and policy approaches to addressing both obesity and food insecurity in areas of higher prevalence.
https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in South Dakota per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
https://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in New York per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.