9 datasets found
  1. o

    Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ

    • omicsdi.org
    xml
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tim Griffin, Human oral cancer brush biopsy iTRAQ [Dataset]. https://www.omicsdi.org/dataset/pride/PXD000807
    Explore at:
    xmlAvailable download formats
    Authors
    Tim Griffin
    Variables measured
    Proteomics
    Description

    iTRAQ-based comparison of proteins derived from oral cells collected by brush biopsy. Protein abundance levels compared between oral pre-malignant cells, oral cancer cells and healthy normal cells, all collected from human patients. Two separate iTRAQ labeled biological replicate analyses were conducted.

  2. o

    Classification of Oral Precancer and Cancer Using Image-based Artificial...

    • osf.io
    url
    Updated Nov 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zhiyun Xue; Anil K. Chaturvedi; Payal Rajender Kumar; Alicia A. Livinski; Hosam Alraqiq; Kelly J. Yu; Sameer Antani (2023). Classification of Oral Precancer and Cancer Using Image-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms: Protocol for a Scoping Review [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P8SZR
    Explore at:
    urlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Center For Open Science
    Authors
    Zhiyun Xue; Anil K. Chaturvedi; Payal Rajender Kumar; Alicia A. Livinski; Hosam Alraqiq; Kelly J. Yu; Sameer Antani
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Cancers of the oral cavity are one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. With highest incidence in developing countries in Asia, they have shown huge variation in geographical distribution. In Taiwan, oral cancer is the 6th most common cancer overall and the 4th most common cancer among men.

    Oral cavity cancer often results in impaired functions and esthetics like difficulty in breathing, swallowing, mastication, speech along with disfigurement of the face. Advanced stage oral cancer is associated with high mortality rates and poses a serious threat to public health. Around 85% of these malignant lesions are diagnosed as oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and this diagnosis is confirmed through tissue biopsy. Although currently considered as gold standard, histopathological classification and tissue biopsies (surgical biopsy, punch biopsy, lymph node biopsy, brush biopsy, and needle aspiration biopsy) are invasive, time consuming and cannot be repeated frequently. Further, prediction of dysplastic oral lesions and OSCC only through visual inspection is challenging and demands significant training and expertise. It is therefore crucial to explore alternative diagnostic/screening tools like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) tools for image classification.

    Currently, deep learning (DL) is a dominant machine learning (ML) technique establishing new capability standards for image classification in a variety of domains including medicine. DL has shown promising results in several image-based medical screening and diagnostic applications. It is important to learn the progress and development of work in the literature on using ML especially DL techniques for automatic oral cancer image analysis/classification. To help understand what has been done, identify the challenges and opportunities, address its research gap, and improve its status of the art, we propose to conduct a scoping review on this topic.

    Study Objective: This scoping review aims at mapping the studies and synthesizing the evidence on the artificial intelligence and/or machine learning techniques available for the classification of intraoral images to identify oral cancers or precancers. Furthermore, the review will also explore and compare the performance of the models/techniques when used for classification of oral cancer and/or precancer and how they aid in diagnosis made visually. The research gap will be identified and will be used to provide direction for future studies in this area.

  3. f

    Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Oral Brush Biopsies Identifies Secretory...

    • plos.figshare.com
    doc
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ya Yang; Nelson L. Rhodus; Frank G. Ondrey; Beverly R. K. Wuertz; Xiaobing Chen; Yaqin Zhu; Timothy J. Griffin (2023). Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Oral Brush Biopsies Identifies Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor as a Promising, Mechanism-Based Oral Cancer Biomarker [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095389
    Explore at:
    docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Ya Yang; Nelson L. Rhodus; Frank G. Ondrey; Beverly R. K. Wuertz; Xiaobing Chen; Yaqin Zhu; Timothy J. Griffin
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A decrease in the almost fifty percent mortality rate from oral cancer is needed urgently. Improvements in early diagnosis and more effective preventive treatments could affect such a decrease. Towards this end, we undertook for the first time an in-depth mass spectrometry-based quantitative shotgun proteomics study of non-invasively collected oral brush biopsies. Proteins isolated from brush biopsies from healthy normal tissue, oral premalignant lesion tissue (OPMLs), oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and matched control tissue were compared. In replicated proteomic datasets, the secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) protein stood out based on its decrease in abundance in both OPML and OSCC lesion tissues compared to healthy normal tissue. Western blotting in additional brushed biopsy samples confirmed a trend of gradual decreasing SLPI abundance between healthy normal and OPML tissue, with a larger decrease in OSCC lesion tissue. A similar SLPI decrease was observed in-vitro comparing model OPML and OSCC cell lines. In addition, exfoliated oral cells in patients’ whole saliva showed a loss of SLPI correlated with oral cancer progression. These results, combined with proteomics data indicating a decrease in SLPI in matched healthy control tissue from OSCC patients compared to tissue from healthy normal tissue, suggested a systemic decrease of SLPI in oral cells correlated with oral cancer development. Finally, in-vitro experiments showed that treatment with SLPI significantly decreased NF-kB activity in an OPML cell line. The findings indicate anti-inflammatory activity in OPML, supporting a mechanistic role of SLPI in OSCC progression and suggesting its potential for preventative treatment of at-risk oral lesions. Collectively, our results show for the first time the potential for SLPI as a mechanism-based, non-invasive biomarker of oral cancer progression with potential in preventive treatment.

  4. Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 7, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. cytology.

  5. f

    Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of the automated CellScope vs. histology.

  6. f

    Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Clinical and pathological diagnosis of patients.

  7. Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t006
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology vs. histology.

  8. Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher (2023). Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188440.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P. Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D. Reber; Michael V. D’Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D. Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V. Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Determination of kappa value between the two pathologists.

  9. f

    A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening

    • figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sumsum Sunny; Arun Baby; Bonney Lee James; Dev Balaji; Aparna N. V.; Maitreya H. Rana; Praveen Gurpur; Arunan Skandarajah; Michael D’Ambrosio; Ravindra Doddathimmasandra Ramanjinappa; Sunil Paramel Mohan; Nisheena Raghavan; Uma Kandasarma; Sangeetha N.; Subhasini Raghavan; Naveen Hedne; Felix Koch; Daniel A. Fletcher; Sumithra Selvam; Manohar Kollegal; Praveen Birur N.; Lance Ladic; Amritha Suresh; Hardik J. Pandya; Moni Abraham Kuriakose (2023). A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224885
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sumsum Sunny; Arun Baby; Bonney Lee James; Dev Balaji; Aparna N. V.; Maitreya H. Rana; Praveen Gurpur; Arunan Skandarajah; Michael D’Ambrosio; Ravindra Doddathimmasandra Ramanjinappa; Sunil Paramel Mohan; Nisheena Raghavan; Uma Kandasarma; Sangeetha N.; Subhasini Raghavan; Naveen Hedne; Felix Koch; Daniel A. Fletcher; Sumithra Selvam; Manohar Kollegal; Praveen Birur N.; Lance Ladic; Amritha Suresh; Hardik J. Pandya; Moni Abraham Kuriakose
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Early detection of oral cancer necessitates a minimally invasive, tissue-specific diagnostic tool that facilitates screening/surveillance. Brush biopsy, though minimally invasive, demands skilled cyto-pathologist expertise. In this study, we explored the clinical utility/efficacy of a tele-cytology system in combination with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based risk-stratification model for early detection of oral potentially malignant (OPML)/malignant lesion. A portable, automated tablet-based tele-cytology platform capable of digitization of cytology slides was evaluated for its efficacy in the detection of OPML/malignant lesions (n = 82) in comparison with conventional cytology and histology. Then, an image pre-processing algorithm was established to segregate cells, ANN was trained with images (n = 11,981) and a risk-stratification model developed. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of platform/ stratification model were computed, and agreement was examined using Kappa statistics. The tele-cytology platform, Cellscope, showed an overall accuracy of 84–86% with no difference between tele-cytology and conventional cytology in detection of oral lesions (kappa, 0.67–0.72). However, OPML could be detected with low sensitivity (18%) in accordance with the limitations of conventional cytology. The integration of image processing and development of an ANN-based risk stratification model improved the detection sensitivity of malignant lesions (93%) and high grade OPML (73%), thereby increasing the overall accuracy by 30%. Tele-cytology integrated with the risk stratification model, a novel strategy established in this study, can be an invaluable Point-of-Care (PoC) tool for early detection/screening in oral cancer. This study hence establishes the applicability of tele-cytology for accurate, remote diagnosis and use of automated ANN-based analysis in improving its efficacy.

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Ya Yang; Nelson L. Rhodus; Frank G. Ondrey; Beverly R. K. Wuertz; Xiaobing Chen; Yaqin Zhu; Timothy J. Griffin (2023). Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Oral Brush Biopsies Identifies Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor as a Promising, Mechanism-Based Oral Cancer Biomarker [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095389

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Oral Brush Biopsies Identifies Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor as a Promising, Mechanism-Based Oral Cancer Biomarker

Explore at:
11 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
docAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 2, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Ya Yang; Nelson L. Rhodus; Frank G. Ondrey; Beverly R. K. Wuertz; Xiaobing Chen; Yaqin Zhu; Timothy J. Griffin
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

A decrease in the almost fifty percent mortality rate from oral cancer is needed urgently. Improvements in early diagnosis and more effective preventive treatments could affect such a decrease. Towards this end, we undertook for the first time an in-depth mass spectrometry-based quantitative shotgun proteomics study of non-invasively collected oral brush biopsies. Proteins isolated from brush biopsies from healthy normal tissue, oral premalignant lesion tissue (OPMLs), oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and matched control tissue were compared. In replicated proteomic datasets, the secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) protein stood out based on its decrease in abundance in both OPML and OSCC lesion tissues compared to healthy normal tissue. Western blotting in additional brushed biopsy samples confirmed a trend of gradual decreasing SLPI abundance between healthy normal and OPML tissue, with a larger decrease in OSCC lesion tissue. A similar SLPI decrease was observed in-vitro comparing model OPML and OSCC cell lines. In addition, exfoliated oral cells in patients’ whole saliva showed a loss of SLPI correlated with oral cancer progression. These results, combined with proteomics data indicating a decrease in SLPI in matched healthy control tissue from OSCC patients compared to tissue from healthy normal tissue, suggested a systemic decrease of SLPI in oral cells correlated with oral cancer development. Finally, in-vitro experiments showed that treatment with SLPI significantly decreased NF-kB activity in an OPML cell line. The findings indicate anti-inflammatory activity in OPML, supporting a mechanistic role of SLPI in OSCC progression and suggesting its potential for preventative treatment of at-risk oral lesions. Collectively, our results show for the first time the potential for SLPI as a mechanism-based, non-invasive biomarker of oral cancer progression with potential in preventive treatment.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu