Saved datasets
Last updated
Download format
Croissant
Croissant is a format for Machine Learning datasets
Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
Usage rights
License from data provider
Please review the applicable license to make sure your contemplated use is permitted.
Topic
Provider
Free
Cost to access
Described as free to access or have a license that allows redistribution.
100+ datasets found
  1. u

    Conservation Practice Effectiveness (CoPE) Database

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    xlsx
    Updated Dec 18, 2023
  2. d

    Special Areas of Conservation (England)

    • data.gov.uk
    • data.europa.eu
    Updated Dec 18, 2023
  3. l

    Data from: Conservation Drones

    • lila.science
    jpg
    Updated Feb 18, 2020
  4. Tiger Conservation Landscape data

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • globil-panda.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 3, 2016
  5. r

    Local Conservation Areas

    • rigis.org
    • arc-gis-hub-home-arcgishub.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 18, 2018
  6. o

    Conservation

    • opencontext.org
    Updated Nov 27, 2021
  7. g

    Conservation Easements Database of the U.S.

    • data.geospatialhub.org
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Aug 14, 2017
  8. K

    Orange County, Florida Committed Conservation

    • koordinates.com
    csv, dwg, geodatabase +6
    Updated Sep 10, 2018
  9. Bird Conservation Areas

    • data.ny.gov
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +6more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Oct 23, 2020
  10. C

    California Conservation Easement Database

    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jun 30, 2023
  11. C

    Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) Approved Projects [ds672]

    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Dec 22, 2023
  12. Conservation Opportunities Modeler

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +2more
    Updated May 18, 2023
  13. h

    Conservation District Subzones

    • geoportal.hawaii.gov
    • opendata.hawaii.gov
    Updated Feb 8, 2014
  14. Tiger Conservation Landscapes

    • data.globalforestwatch.org
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 26, 2015
  15. USA Conservation Easements

    • data.globalforestwatch.org
    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • +1more
    Updated May 5, 2015
  16. a

    Conservation Efforts Database Website Startup Statistics

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 6, 2021
  17. d

    National Conservation Lands Database 2009

    • fed.dcceew.gov.au
    Updated Jan 1, 2009
  18. Environmental and conservation organizations - Number of members

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 20, 2008
  19. d

    Site Specific Conservation Objectives - Dataset - data.gov.ie

    • data.gov.ie
    Updated May 4, 2022
  20. l

    Data from: Conservation Lands

    • geohub.lacity.org
    • visionzero.geohub.lacity.org
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 30, 2020
Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Douglas Smith; Michael White; Eileen McLellan; Rehanon Pampell; Daren Harmel (2023). Conservation Practice Effectiveness (CoPE) Database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1504544

Conservation Practice Effectiveness (CoPE) Database

Explore at:
44 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
xlsxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Dec 18, 2023
Dataset provided by
Ag Data Commons
Authors
Douglas Smith; Michael White; Eileen McLellan; Rehanon Pampell; Daren Harmel
License

CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

The Conservation Practice Effectiveness Database compiles information on the effectiveness of a suite of conservation practices. This database presents a compilation of data on the effectiveness of innovative practices developed to treat contaminants in surface runoff and tile drainage water from agricultural landscapes. Traditional conservation practices such as no-tillage and conservation crop rotation are included in the database, as well as novel practices such as drainage water management, blind inlets, and denitrification bioreactors. This will be particularly useful to conservation planners seeking new approaches to water quality problems associated with dissolved constituents, such as nitrate or soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and for researchers seeking to understand the circumstances in which such practices are most effective. Another novel feature of the database is the presentation of information on how individual conservation practices impact multiple water quality concerns. This information will be critical to enabling conservationists and policy makers to avoid (or at least be aware of) undesirable tradeoffs, whereby great efforts are made to improve water quality related to one resource concern (e.g., sediment) but exacerbate problems related to other concerns (e.g., nitrate or SRP). Finally, we note that the Conservation Practice Effectiveness Database can serve as a source of the soft data needed to calibrate simulation models assessing the potential water quality tradeoffs of conservation practices, including those that are still being developed. This database is updated and refined annually. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: 2019 Conservation Practice Effectiveness (CoPE) Database. File Name: Conservation_Practice_Effectiveness_2019.xlsxResource Description: This version of the database was published in 2019.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu